切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华脑科疾病与康复杂志(电子版) ›› 2021, Vol. 11 ›› Issue (04) : 196 -199. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-123X.2021.04.002

脑科疾病与康复

卵圆孔形态和外口面积对半月神经节球囊压迫术的影响
徐武1, 姜成荣1, 梁维邦1,()   
  1. 1. 210008 南京,南京大学医学院附属鼓楼医院麻神经外科
  • 收稿日期:2021-07-23 出版日期:2021-08-15
  • 通信作者: 梁维邦
  • 基金资助:
    江苏省第十五批"六大人才高峰"高层次人才选拔培养资助项目(WSN-135)

Effect of foramen ovale shape and the size of external orifice on the balloon compression of semilunar ganglion in trigeminal neuralgia

Wu Xu1, Chengrong Jiang1, Weibang Liang1,()   

  1. 1. Department of Neurosurgery, Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital, the Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing University Medical School, Nanjing 210008, China
  • Received:2021-07-23 Published:2021-08-15
  • Corresponding author: Weibang Liang
引用本文:

徐武, 姜成荣, 梁维邦. 卵圆孔形态和外口面积对半月神经节球囊压迫术的影响[J]. 中华脑科疾病与康复杂志(电子版), 2021, 11(04): 196-199.

Wu Xu, Chengrong Jiang, Weibang Liang. Effect of foramen ovale shape and the size of external orifice on the balloon compression of semilunar ganglion in trigeminal neuralgia[J]. Chinese Journal of Brain Diseases and Rehabilitation(Electronic Edition), 2021, 11(04): 196-199.

目的

探讨卵圆孔的形态、外口的大小对半月神经节球囊压迫术(PMC)操作的影响。

方法

纳入南京大学医学院附属鼓楼医院神经外科自2017年1月至2018年6月收治的382例原发性三叉神经痛(TN)患者,术前均行颅底CT薄层扫描,3D重建后,从穿刺方向观察卵圆孔形态,并测量卵圆孔外口面积,结合术中穿刺结果评价卵圆孔形态、外口大小对手术的影响。

结果

卵圆孔穿刺后,球囊置入Meckel’s腔内并呈现典型"梨形"显影即为成功,纳入成功组;卵圆孔穿刺失败或卵圆孔穿刺成功,但球囊未能成功置入Meckel’s腔、未能典型"梨形"显影即为失败,纳入失败组。成功组356例(93.19%),卵圆孔呈椭圆形324例(91.01%),外口面积范围23.42~34.23 mm2,中位面积为30.27 mm2;卵圆孔呈圆形32例(8.99%),外口面积范围24.15~33.00 mm2,中位面积为30.15 mm2。失败组26例(6.81%),其中卵圆孔穿刺失败1例,Meckel’s腔穿刺失败25例;卵圆孔外口呈椭圆形20例(76.92%),外口面积范围11.67~48.84 mm2,中位面积为24.15 mm2;卵圆孔外口呈圆形6例(23.08%),外口面积范围14.38~43.51 mm2,中位面积为25.40 mm2,失败组中虽有1例外口面积为48.84 mm2,大于所有成功组病例,但失败组中位面积数显著小于成功组(P<0.05);失败组中卵圆孔外口呈现圆形的比例大于成功组(P<0.05)。1例卵圆孔穿刺失败患者的卵圆孔呈椭圆形,外口面积20.00 mm2,但卵圆孔内、外口成角,穿刺针不能通过。

结论

半月神经节PMC的成功率较高,与卵圆孔相关的穿刺失败多与卵圆孔外口圆形、外口过小有关,少数与卵圆孔外口过大有关,特殊情况下,卵圆孔内、外口的折曲、成角也会导致手术失败。

Objective

To explore the effect of the shape of foramen ovale and the size of the external orifice on percutaneous microballoon compression (PMC) of the semilunar ganglion.

Methods

Three hundred and eighty-two patients with primary trigeminal neuralgia (TN) who admitted to the Neurosurgery Department of Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital, the Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing University Medical School, from January 2017 to June 2018 were underwent thin-layer CT scanning of skull base before operations, then the images were reconstructed in three dimensions, the shape of foramen ovale was observed and the area of foramen ovale was measured from the direction of surgical puncture subsequently. Finally evaluate the effect of the shape of foramen ovale and the size of external orifice on the operations according to the results of intraoperative puncture.

Results

According to the balloon was placed into Meckel’s cavity and showed a typical "pear shaped" imaging, which was regarded as successful and included in the successful group. The failure of foramen ovale puncture or the success of foramen ovale puncture, but the balloon failed to be placed into Meckel’s cavity and failed to show a typical "pear shaped" , which was regarded as failure and included in the failure group. There were 356 patients in the successful group, the success rate was 93.19%, the oval foramens look like oval in 324 cases (91.01%), and the areas of external orifice were 23.42-34.23 mm2, the median area was 30.27 mm2, oval foramens with round shape in 32 cases (8.99%), the areas of the external orifice were 24.15-33.00 mm2, median area was 30.15 mm2. There were 26 patients in the successful group, the failure rate was 6.81%. Among them, 1 failed case due to unsuccessful puncture of foramen ovale, the remaining 25 cases failed to Meckel’s capsule. Twenty cases (76.92%) with oval outer opening, and the areas were 11.67-48.84 mm2, the median area was 24.15 mm2 in this group, otherwise 6 cases(23.08%) with round outer opening, their areas were 14.38-43.51 mm2, the median area was 25.40 mm2. Although there was one patient in the failure group with an orifice area of 48.84 mm2, which was larger than all cases in the successful group, but the number of median areas in the failure group was significantly smaller than the successful puncture group (P<0.05). The proportion of circular external orifice of foramen ovale in the failure group was larger than successful group (P<0.05). One special case with oval-likely foramen ovale was failed to puncture the foramen ovale, the area of external orifice was 20.00 mm2, but the inner and outer part of the foramen ovale were angled, and the puncture needle couldn’t pass through.

Conclusion

The success rate of puncture in the treatment of TN by PMC is very high, the reasons of failure related to foramen ovale were mostly due to the small external area and round shape of foramen ovale, and a few related to the large external diameter of foramen ovale. In special cases, the folding and angulation of the internal and external part of foramen ovale would also lead to the failure of operation.

图3 卵圆孔穿刺失败患者冠状位CT资料
[1]
蒋光元,罗超,彭形, 等. 经皮穿刺微球囊压迫三叉神经节治疗不同类型三叉神经痛疗效观察[J]. 中国微侵袭神经外科杂志, 2019, 24(8): 370-371.
[2]
Missios S, Mohammadi AM, Barnett GH. Percutaneous treatments for trigeminal neuralgia[J]. Neurosurg Clin N Am, 2014, 25(4): 751-762.
[3]
程森,王冰冰,寿记新, 等. 经皮穿刺微球囊压迫术治疗药物难治性三叉神经痛的临床疗效[J]. 中国实用神经疾病杂志, 2019, 22(7): 725-731.
[4]
Noorani I, Lodge A, Vajramani G, et al. Comparing percutaneous treatments of trigeminal neuralgia: 19 years of experience in a single centre[J]. Stereotact Funct Neurosurg, 2016, 94(2): 75-85.
[5]
杜垣锋,杨定博,俞文华, 等. 经皮穿刺球囊压迫半月节治疗微血管减压术后复发性三叉神经痛[J]. 医学研究杂志, 2014, 43(8): 118-120.
[6]
Mullan S, Lichtor T. Percutaneous microcompression of the trigeminal ganglion for trigeminal neuralgia[J]. J Neurosurg, 1983, 59(6): 1007-1012.
[7]
Bergenheim AT, Asplund P, Linderoth B. Percutaneous retrogasserian balloon compression for trigeminal neuralgia: review of critical technical details and outcomes[J]. World Neurosurg, 2013, 79(2): 359-368.
[8]
郄光峰,杨允东,郭兴涛, 等. C-臂引导经皮穿刺微球囊压迫治疗三叉神经痛[J]. 中国微侵袭神经外科杂志, 2018, 23(11): 510-511.
[9]
Montano N, Papacci F, Cioni B, et al. The role of percutaneous balloon compression in the treatment of trigeminal neuralgia recurring after other surgical procedures[J]. Acta Neurol Belg, 2014, 114(1): 59-64.
[10]
Liu P, Zhong W, Liao C, et al. Narrow foramen ovale and rotundum: a role in the etiology of trigeminal neuralgia[J]. J Craniofac Surg, 2016, 27(8): 2168-2170.
[11]
俞文华. 影响经皮穿刺球囊压迫术治疗三叉神经痛疗效的因素[J]. 实用医学杂志, 2014, 30(21): 3379-3380.
[12]
阳昊,刘卫平,费舟, 等. Meckel腔的临床解剖学研究[J]. 中华神经外科疾病研究杂志, 2013, 12(2): 146-149.
[13]
王可心,乔婧,张杰, 等. DSA引导下微球囊压迫技术精准治疗三叉神经痛[J]. 口腔医学, 2020, 40(8): 711-714.
[14]
顾斌,张庆海,金星星, 等. CT及MRI三维重建辅助经皮穿刺半月节球囊压迫术治疗原发性三叉神经痛[J]. 南京医科大学学报(自然科学版), 2019, 39(11): 1643-1645.
[1] 张红梅, 李春梅, 王胰, 张清凤, 丁戈琦, 邓燕, 林薿, 李文华, 尹立雪. 经胸右心声学造影不同右心房增压方式评估卵圆孔未闭隐匿性右向左分流的价值[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2022, 19(06): 508-513.
[2] 陈丽炯, 赵博文, 陈冉, 潘美, 彭晓慧, 楼海亚, 王蓓. 单纯性卵圆孔瓣开放过度与开放受限胎儿的超声心动图评估[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2022, 19(04): 350-356.
[3] 吴雅峰, 赵春艳, 刘娟. 胎儿心脏卵圆孔瓣正常开放与宫内早闭的超声心动图定量分析[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2021, 18(10): 960-966.
[4] 张雯, 徐宏燕, 张彦春, 刘凯波. 2017—2021年北京市先天性心脏病流行病学资料分析[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2023, 19(01): 61-68.
[5] 樊晓彤, 闫峰, 王亚明. 立体定向机器人辅助经皮穿刺半月神经节球囊扩张压迫术[J]. 中华脑科疾病与康复杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(03): 191-192.
[6] 中国医师协会功能神经外科专家委员会, 世界华人神经外科协会功能神经外科专家委员会, 中国研究型医院学会神经外科学专业委员会, 中华医学会神经外科分会功能神经外科学组. 经皮球囊压迫术治疗三叉神经痛中国专家共识[J]. 中华脑科疾病与康复杂志(电子版), 2022, 12(05): 260-268.
[7] 李岩峰, 马逸. 经皮穿刺球囊压迫术治疗三叉神经痛在中国的现状与展望[J]. 中华脑科疾病与康复杂志(电子版), 2022, 12(04): 193-195.
[8] 蒋亦林, 伍刚, 刘波, 沈洁, 刘如恩. 继发性三叉神经痛诊疗策略[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2022, 16(07): 643-646.
[9] 田佳丽, 陈晓波. 卵圆孔未闭隧道特点对介入封堵术的影响因素分析[J]. 中华介入放射学电子杂志, 2023, 11(04): 346-351.
[10] 李燕伟, 黄大军, 伍洲, 张嬿, 康彧, 孔令秋. 曲折的右心声学造影一例[J]. 中华心脏与心律电子杂志, 2023, 11(03): 179-181.
[11] 娄宇轩, 孙伟, 孔祥清. 经导管卵圆孔未闭介入封堵术预防卒中的研究进展[J]. 中华心脏与心律电子杂志, 2022, 10(01): 23-26.
[12] 姜新鹏, 李晓明, 杨航, 宫一宸, 傅元豪, 傅瑜, 张喆. 单纯经胸超声心动图引导卵圆孔未闭封堵术早期安全性及有效性分析[J]. 中华脑血管病杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(04): 320-324.
[13] 尹琛俊, 张喆, 李晓明. 卵圆孔未闭相关血栓形成机制的研究进展[J]. 中华脑血管病杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(04): 307-311.
[14] 霍俊艳, 傅瑜. 卵圆孔未闭检测方法临床应用研究进展[J]. 中华脑血管病杂志(电子版), 2022, 16(05): 310-313.
[15] 史鹏飞, 王常伟, 郭亚洲, 刘霄, 李锴, 刘禹, 何兵, 赵余涛, 刘德中. 经皮穿刺球囊压迫与显微血管减压术治疗老年人三叉神经痛的疗效及安全性[J]. 中华脑血管病杂志(电子版), 2022, 16(04): 258-262.
阅读次数
全文


摘要