切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"
高级检索
中华脑科疾病与康复杂志(电子版)

中华脑科疾病与康复杂志(电子版) ›› 2024, Vol. 14 ›› Issue (02) : 86 -92. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-123X.2024.02.004

临床研究

神经内镜下脑室血肿清除术与脑室外引流术治疗脑室内出血的疗效分析
周军1, 赵志明1, 刘运锋1, 唐兆伟1, 宋常华1, 刘杰1, 李浩然1, 吴绍光1,†()   
  1. 1. 261500　山东高密，高密市人民医院神经外科
  • 收稿日期:2023-11-14 出版日期:2024-04-15
  • 通信作者: 吴绍光

Efficacy analysis of neuroendoscopic hematoma evacuation and external ventricular drainage in the treatment of intraventricular hemorrhage

Jun Zhou1, Zhiming Zhao1, Yunfeng Liu1, Zhaowei Tang1, Changhua Song1, Jie Liu1, Haoran Li1, Shaoguang Wu1,†()   

  1. 1. Department of Neurosurgery, the People's Hospital of Gaomi, Gaomi 261500, China
  • Received:2023-11-14 Published:2024-04-15
  • Corresponding author: Shaoguang Wu
  • Supported by:
    Weifang Science and Technology Development Program Project(2020YX137); Qingdao University Medical Group Research Project(QU-00015)
全文 ( ) 下载PDF ( ) 导出引用
引用本文：

周军, 赵志明, 刘运锋, 唐兆伟, 宋常华, 刘杰, 李浩然, 吴绍光. 神经内镜下脑室血肿清除术与脑室外引流术治疗脑室内出血的疗效分析[J]. 中华脑科疾病与康复杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(02): 86-92.

Jun Zhou, Zhiming Zhao, Yunfeng Liu, Zhaowei Tang, Changhua Song, Jie Liu, Haoran Li, Shaoguang Wu. Efficacy analysis of neuroendoscopic hematoma evacuation and external ventricular drainage in the treatment of intraventricular hemorrhage[J]. Chinese Journal of Brain Diseases and Rehabilitation(Electronic Edition), 2024, 14(02): 86-92.

目的

对比神经内镜辅助下血肿清除术与脑室外引流术治疗脑室内出血（IVH）的临床疗效。

方法

选择高密市人民医院神经外科自2019年1月至2022年2月收治的42例IVH患者，按照随机数字表法分为内镜组与穿刺组，每组21例。内镜组予以神经内镜下脑室血肿清除术治疗，穿刺组行侧脑室外引流术治疗，比较2组患者术后8 h颅脑CT的Graeb评分、尿激酶注射次数、置管时间、术后并发症（颅内感染、再出血、脑积水）发生率、术后3个月患者的神经功能恢复情况（GOS评分）。

结果

内镜组患者术后8 h的血肿清除情况优于穿刺组，Graeb评分低于穿刺组，差异有统计学意义（P<0.05）。内镜组患者尿激酶注射次数、置管时间均少于穿刺组，差异有统计学意义（P<0.05）。内镜组术后并发症的发生率（14.29%）低于穿刺组（38.10%），但差异无统计学意义（P>0.05）。内镜组术后3个月的预后良好率高于穿刺组，差异有统计学意义（P<0.05）。

结论

神经内镜治疗IVH安全可行，是一种潜在的有效手术方式，需要更多临床试验数据的验证。

关键词: 脑室内出血, 神经内镜, 脑室外引流术, 临床疗效
Objective

To compare the clinical efficacy of neuroendoscopic hematoma evacuation and external ventricular drainage in the treatment of intraventricular hemorrhage (IVH).

Methods

A total of 42 patients with IVH admitted to Neurosurgery Department of the People's Hospital of Gaomi from January 2019 to February 2022 were selected and divided into an endoscopy group and a puncture group according to the random number table method, with 21 cases in each group. The endoscopic group was treated with endoscopic evacuation of ventricular hematoma, while the puncture group was treated with lateral external drainage. The Graeb score at the 8 h postoperative time point, the number of urokinase injection, the time of extubation, and the incidence of postoperative complications (intracranial infection, rebleeding, hydrocephalus), and the neurological function recovery of patients 3 months after surgery (GOS score) were compared between the two groups.

Results

The clearance of hematoma in the endoscopic group was better than that in the puncture group at 8 h after surgery, and the Graeb score was lower than that in the puncture group, with a statistically significant difference (P<0.05). The number of urokinase injections and extubation time in the endoscopic group were less than those in the puncture group, and the differences were statistically significant (P<0.05). The incidence of postoperative complications in the endoscopic group (14.29%) was lower than that in the puncture group (38.10%), but the difference was not statistically significant (P>0.05). The good prognosis rate of the endoscopic group at 3 months after surgery was higher than that of the puncture group, and the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05).

Conclusion

Neuroendoscopic treatment of IVH is safe and feasible, and it is a potentially effective surgical method, which needs to be verified by more clinical trial data.

Key words: Intraventricular hemorrhage, Neuroendoscopy, External ventricular drainage, Clinical efficacy
表1 2组患者一般资料的比较（Mean±SD）
Tab.1 Comparison of general information between two groups (Mean±SD)
组别 例数 年龄（岁，Mean±SD） 性别（男/女） 脑出血 出血量（mL，Mean±SD） 术前Graeb评分（分，Mean±SD） 术前GCS评分（分，Mean±SD）
丘脑出血破入脑室 原发性脑室出血
内镜组 21 54.43±11.91 12/9 15 6 25.12±6.43 9.38±1.77 7.91±2.64
穿刺组 21 53.28±12.13 11/10 16 5 23.83±4.45 10.03±1.53 8.21±2.37
χ2/t值   0.232 0.476 0.123 1.078 0.708 1.013
P值   0.817 0.490 0.726 0.103 0.340 0.153
图1 神经内镜下脑室内血肿清除术前术后比较A：术前CT示少量IVH，行脑室穿刺后血肿扩大导致脑室铸型；B：术前3D-Slicer评估血肿体积约51.53 mL；C：术前模拟手术体位，并计算手术路径长度及角度；D：围绕Kocher点做弧形切口后，取骨瓣大小约2.5 cm；E：术后8 h复查头颅CT显示血肿清除良好；F：术后3D-Slicer评估血肿体积约5.80 mL；IVH：脑室内出血
Fig.1 Comparison of imaging before and after endoscopic removal of intraventricular hematoma
表2 2组患者手术指标比较[M（P25，P75）]
Tab.2 Comparison of surgical indicators between two groups [M(P25，P75)]
组别 例数 血肿清除率（%） 尿激酶注射次数（次） 置管时间（d） 术后Graeb评分（分）
内镜组 21 76（69.5，83.0） 2（1，2） 5（4，5） 4（3，5）
穿刺组 21 42（37.5，45.5） 5（5，6） 9（8，10） 9（8，10）
Z值   -5.550 -5.633 -5.639 -5.544
P值   <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001
表3 2组患者术后并发症情况比较[例（%）]
Tab.3 Comparison of postoperative complications between two groups [n(%)]
组别 例数 颅内感染 再出血 脑积水 合计
内镜组 21 1（4.8） 0（0.0） 2（9.5） 3（14.3）
穿刺组 21 2（9.5） 2（9.5） 4（19.0） 8（38.1）
χ2值         3.079
P值         0.079
表4 2组患者术后3个月的GOS评分比较[例（%）]
Tab.4 Comparison of GOS scores between two groups at 3 months after surgery [n(%)]
组别 例数 5分 4分 3分 2分 1分 预后良好（4~5分）
内镜组 21 4（19.0） 9（42.9） 4（19.5） 3（14.3） 1（4.8） 13（61.9）
穿刺组 21 1（4.8） 5（23.8） 8（38.1） 5（23.8） 2（9.5） 6（28.6）
χ2值           0.000 4.709
P值           1.000 0.030
[1]
Hanley DF. Intraventricular hemorrhage: severity factor and treatment target in spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage[J]. Stroke, 2009, 40(4): 1533-1538. DOI: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.108.535419.
[2]
Hanley DF, Naff NJ, Harris DM. Intraventricular hemorrhage: presentation and management options[J]. Semin Cerebrovasc Dis Stroke, 2005, 5(3): 209-216. DOI: 10.1053/j.scds.2006.01.011.
[3]
Stein M, Luecke M, Preuss M, et al. Spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage with ventricular extension and the grading of obstructive hydrocephalus: the prediction of outcome of a special life-threatening entity[J]. Neurosurgery, 2010, 67(5): 1243-1251; discussion 1252. DOI: 10.1227/NEU.0b013e3181ef25de.
[4]
Tuhrim S, Horowitz DR, Sacher M, et al. Volume of ventricular blood is an important determinant of outcome in supratentorial intracerebral hemorrhage[J]. Crit Care Med, 1999, 27(3): 617-621. DOI: 10.1097/00003246-199903000-00045.
[5]
Adams RE, Diringer MN. Response to external ventricular drainage in spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage with hydrocephalus[J]. Neurology, 1998, 50(2): 519-523. DOI: 10.1212/wnl.50.2.519.
[6]
周军,赵月明,宋常华,等.神经内镜手术治疗自发性幕上中等程度脑出血的临床效果[J].中华神经创伤外科电子杂志, 2021, 7(1): 51-55. DOI: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-9141.2021.01.012.
[7]
Jennett B, Snoek J, Bond MR, et al. Disability after severe head injury: observations on the use of the Glasgow outcome scale[J]. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry, 1981, 44(4): 285-293. DOI: 10.1136/jnnp.44.4.285.
[8]
Bhattathiri PS, Gregson B, Prasad KS, et al. Intraventricular hemorrhage and hydrocephalus after spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage: results from the STICH trial[J]. Acta Neurochir Suppl, 2006, 96: 65-68. DOI: 10.1007/3-211-30714-1_16.
[9]
Gluski J, Garling RJ, Kappel A, et al. Factors impacting hydrocephalus incidence in intracerebral hemorrhage: a retrospective analysis[J]. World Neurosurg, 2021, 148: e381-e389. DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2020.12.164.
[10]
Trifan G, Arshi B, Testai FD. Intraventricular hemorrhage severity as a predictor of outcome in intracerebral hemorrhage[J]. Front Neurol, 2019, 10: 10217. DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2019.00217.
[11]
Ziai WC, Tuhrim S, Lane K, et al. A multicenter, randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled phase III study of clot lysis evaluation of accelerated resolution of intraventricular hemorrhage (CLEAR III)[J]. Int J Stroke, 2014, 9(4): 536-542. DOI: 10.1111/ijs.12097.
[12]
Steiner T, Diringer MN, Schneider D, et al. Dynamics of intraventricular hemorrhage in patients with spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage: risk factors, clinical impact, and effect of hemostatic therapy with recombinant activated factor VII[J]. Neurosurgery, 2006, 59(4): 767-773; discussion 773-764. DOI: 10.1227/01.Neu.0000232837.34992.32.
[13]
Wahjoepramono POP, Sasongko AB, Halim D, et al. Hydrocephalus is an independent factor affecting morbidity and mortality of ICH patients: systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. World Neurosurg X, 2023, 19: 100194. DOI: 10.1016/j.wnsx.2023.100194.
[14]
Staykov D, Bardutzky J, Huttner HB, et al. Intraventricular fibrinolysis for intracerebral hemorrhage with severe ventricular involvement[J]. Neurocrit Care, 2011, 15(1): 194-209. DOI: 10.1007/s12028-010-9390-x.
[15]
Naff NJ, Carhuapoma JR, Williams MA, et al. Treatment of intraventricular hemorrhage with urokinase: effects on 30-day survival[J]. Stroke, 2000, 31(4): 841-847. DOI: 10.1161/01.str.31.4.841.
[16]
Hinson HE, Hanley DF, Ziai WC. Management of intraventricular hemorrhage[J]. Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep, 2010, 10(2): 73-82. DOI: 10.1007/s11910-010-0086-6.
[17]
Hanley DF, Lane K, McBee N, et al. Thrombolytic removal of intraventricular haemorrhage in treatment of severe stroke: results of the randomised, multicentre, multiregion, placebo-controlled CLEAR III trial[J]. Lancet, 2017, 389(10069): 603-611. DOI: 10.1016/s0140-6736(16)32410-2.
[18]
Hemphill JC, 3rd, Greenberg SM, Anderson CS, et al. Guidelines for the management of spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage: a guideline for healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association[J]. Stroke, 2015, 46(7): 2032-2060. DOI: 10.1161/str.0000000000000069.
[19]
Auer LM. Endoscopic evacuation of intracerebral haemorrhage. High-tec-surgical treatment--a new approach to the problem?[J]. Acta Neurochir (Wien), 1985, 74(3-4): 124-128. DOI: 10.1007/bf01418801.
[20]
Chen CC, Liu CL, Tung YN, et al. Endoscopic surgery for intraventricular hemorrhage (IVH) caused by thalamic hemorrhage: comparisons of endoscopic surgery and external ventricular drainage (EVD) surgery[J]. World Neurosurg, 2011, 75(2): 264-268. DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2010.07.041.
[21]
Zhang Z, Li X, Liu Y, et al. Application of neuroendoscopy in the treatment of intraventricular hemorrhage[J]. Cerebrovasc Dis, 2007, 24(1): 91-96. DOI: 10.1159/000103122.
[22]
Li Y, Zhang H, Wang X, et al. Neuroendoscopic surgery versus external ventricular drainage alone or with intraventricular fibrinolysis for intraventricular hemorrhage secondary to spontaneous supratentorial hemorrhage: a systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. PLoS One, 2013, 8(11): e80599. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0080599.
[23]
Proulx ST. Cerebrospinal fluid outflow: a review of the historical and contemporary evidence for arachnoid villi, perineural routes, and dural lymphatics[J]. Cell Mol Life Sci, 2021, 78(6): 2429-2457. DOI: 10.1007/s00018-020-03706-5.
[24]
Hamada H, Hayashi N, Kurimoto M, et al. Neuroendoscopic removal of intraventricular hemorrhage combined with hydrocephalus[J]. Minim Invasive Neurosurg, 2008, 51(6): 345-349. DOI: 10.1055/s-0028-1085449.
[25]
Longatti P, Fiorindi A, Martinuzzi A. Neuroendoscopic aspiration of hematocephalus totalis: technical note[J]. Neurosurgery, 2005, 57(4 Suppl): E409. DOI: 10.1227/01.neu.0000176702.26810.b7.
[26]
Longatti PL, Martinuzzi A, Fiorindi A, et al. Neuroendoscopic management of intraventricular hemorrhage[J]. Stroke, 2004, 35(2): e35-e38. DOI: 10.1161/01.Str.0000113736.73632.F6.
[27]
Yadav YR, Mukerji G, Shenoy R, et al. Endoscopic management of hypertensive intraventricular haemorrhage with obstructive hydrocephalus[J]. BMC Neurol, 2007, 7: 1. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2377-7-1.
[28]
Huttner HB, Nagel S, Tognoni E, et al. Intracerebral hemorrhage with severe ventricular involvement: lumbar drainage for communicating hydrocephalus[J]. Stroke, 2007, 38(1): 183-187. DOI: 10.1161/01.Str.0000251795.02560.62.
[29]
Liliang PC, Liang CL, Lu CH, et al. Hypertensive caudate hemorrhage prognostic predictor, outcome, and role of external ventricular drainage[J]. Stroke, 2001, 32(5): 1195-1200. DOI: 10.1161/01.str.32.5.1195.
[30]
Naff NJ, Hanley DF, Keyl PM, et al. Intraventricular thrombolysis speeds blood clot resolution: results of a pilot, prospective, randomized, double-blind, controlled trial[J]. Neurosurgery, 2004, 54(3): 577-583; discussion 583-574. DOI: 10.1227/01.neu.0000108422.10842.60.
[1] 张华, 孙宇, 乡世健, 李樱媚, 王小群. 循环肿瘤细胞预测晚期胃肠癌患者化疗药物敏感性的研究[J]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 422-425.
[2] 钟文涛, 吕远, 孙亮, 袁强, 聂玉辉, 东星, 陈光, 陈纲, 杜峻峰. 腹腔镜-胃镜联合手术与开腹手术处理胃间质瘤的临床疗效对比研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(02): 164-166.
[3] 王乔, 郑莹. 机器人手术在妇科领域的应用及展望[J]. 中华腔镜外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 16(05): 304-307.
[4] 袁宝玉, 管义祥, 王东流, 陆正. 不同时机颅骨修补术治疗颅脑外伤的临床疗效[J]. 中华神经创伤外科电子杂志, 2024, 10(01): 35-41.
[5] 张佳元, 王浩, 戴黎萌, 胡继良. 双侧岩下窦采血指导下神经内镜手术治疗库欣病一例报道[J]. 中华神经创伤外科电子杂志, 2024, 10(01): 58-61.
[6] 葛雪梅. SOX与mFOLFOX6化疗方案对晚期胃癌的疗效与安全性[J]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(01): 67-71.
[7] 刘萍, 刘占举, 张萃. 英夫利西单抗治疗克罗恩病的临床疗效及影响因素[J]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(01): 28-34.
[8] 姜里蛟, 张峰, 周玉萍. 多学科诊疗模式救治老年急性非静脉曲张性上消化道大出血患者的临床观察[J]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(06): 520-524.
[9] 梁文龙, 曹杰, 黄庆, 林泳, 黄红丽, 杨平, 李冠炜, 胡鹤. 信迪利单抗联合瑞戈非尼治疗晚期结直肠癌的疗效与安全性分析[J]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(06): 409-413.
[10] 盛静, 梅勇, 夏佩, 王晓林. 乌苯美司联合伊立替康二线治疗晚期胃癌的临床研究[J]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(05): 317-321.
[11] 张景旭, 李德舫, 由上可, 张玉田. 贝伐珠单抗与安罗替尼联合奥沙利铂治疗晚期直肠癌的临床疗效[J]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(05): 289-293.
[12] 于晓东, 李德华, 高山, 徐鑫. 理中汤加味联合美沙拉嗪治疗轻度活动期克罗恩病的临床观察[J]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(04): 199-202.
[13] 赵军, 李超杰, 李佳. 雷贝拉唑联合康复新液对治疗幽门螺杆菌阳性的十二指肠溃疡的疗效[J]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(04): 254-258.
[14] 王栋梁, 宋海栋, 焦风, 伍刚, 仁增, 吴文博, 吴科学, 曹旭东, 翁宇. 西藏地区神经内镜辅助手术治疗基底节区脑出血的临床初步研究[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(10): 1075-1079.
[15] 李莹倩, 李华山. 基于真实世界的完全性直肠脱垂治疗方式评价[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 700-705.
阅读次数
全文


摘要

版权所有 中华医学会 中华医学电子音像出版社有限责任公司  京ICP备14006079号-1  网络出版服务许可证：(署)网出证(京)字第075号