切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华脑科疾病与康复杂志(电子版) ›› 2025, Vol. 15 ›› Issue (06) : 321 -325. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-123X.2025.06.001

述评

脑卒中康复的现状与展望:挑战与机遇
黄丽1, 郭淮莲2,()   
  1. 1100144 北京,首都医科大学附属北京康复医院神经康复中心
    2100044 北京,北京大学人民医院神经内科
  • 收稿日期:2025-12-01 出版日期:2025-12-15
  • 通信作者: 郭淮莲

Current status and future outlook of stroke rehabilitation: challenges and opportunities

Li Huang1, Huailian Guo2,()   

  1. 1Neurological Rehabilitation Center, Beijing Rehabilitation Hospital Affiliated to Capital Medical University, Beijing 100144, China
    2Department of Neurology, Peking University People's Hospital, Beijing 100044, China
  • Received:2025-12-01 Published:2025-12-15
  • Corresponding author: Huailian Guo
引用本文:

黄丽, 郭淮莲. 脑卒中康复的现状与展望:挑战与机遇[J/OL]. 中华脑科疾病与康复杂志(电子版), 2025, 15(06): 321-325.

Li Huang, Huailian Guo. Current status and future outlook of stroke rehabilitation: challenges and opportunities[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Brain Diseases and Rehabilitation(Electronic Edition), 2025, 15(06): 321-325.

脑卒中是全球范围内导致残疾和死亡的重要原因,康复治疗对患者的生活质量和功能恢复至关重要。近年来,随着医学技术的进步和对脑卒中机制的深入研究,脑卒中后康复领域取得了显著的进展。目前的康复治疗方法多样,包括物理治疗、作业治疗、言语治疗等,但在临床实践中如何应对资源不足、实现患者个体化康复,仍是亟待解决的问题。此外,最新的康复技术,如机器人辅助治疗和虚拟现实技术的应用为康复训练提供了新的可能性,能够提高患者的参与度和训练效果。同时,多学科协作在康复过程中也非常重要,可以整合不同专业的力量,为患者提供全面的康复支持。本文围绕脑卒中康复的治疗方法、新技术应用及个体化康复展开述评,并探讨未来的研究方向和潜在机遇,旨在为脑卒中康复领域的专业人士提供全面的视角及参考,以优化脑卒中患者的康复治疗效果。

Stroke is a major cause of disability and death worldwide, and rehabilitation therapy is crucial to improving patients' quality of life and promoting functional recovery. In recent years, with advances in medical technology and in-depth research on the mechanisms of stroke, significant progress has been made in the field of post-stroke rehabilitation. Currently, a variety of rehabilitation treatment methods are available, including physical therapy, occupational therapy, and speech therapy, among others. However, how to address resource shortages and achieve personalized rehabilitation for patients in clinical practice remains a pressing issue to be resolved. Furthermore, the application of cutting-edge rehabilitation technologies, such as robot-assisted therapy and virtual reality technology, has opened up new possibilities for rehabilitation training, as these tools can enhance patient engagement and improve training outcomes. Meanwhile, multidisciplinary collaboration is also particularly important during the rehabilitation process: integrating expertise from different disciplines enables the provision of comprehensive rehabilitation support for patients. This article focuses on therapeutic approaches, the application of new technologies, and personalized rehabilitation in post-stroke rehabilitation. It also explores future research directions and potential opportunities, aiming to offer a comprehensive perspective and reference for professionals in the field of post-stroke rehabilitation, thereby optimizing the rehabilitation outcomes of stroke patients.

[1]
《中国卒中中心报告2022》编写组.《中国卒中中心报告2022》概要[J].中国脑血管病杂志, 2024, 21(8): 565-576. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-5921.2024.08.009.
[2]
Studnicki R, Studzińska K, Adamczewski T, et al. Analyzing the impact of rehabilitation utilizing neurofunctional exercises on the functional status of stroke patients[J]. J Clin Med, 2024, 13(20): 6271. DOI: 10.3390/jcm13206271.
[3]
Gomes E, Alder G, Bright FAS, et al. Understanding task "challenge" in stroke rehabilitation: an interdisciplinary concept analysis[J]. Disabil Rehabil, 2025, 47(3): 560-570. DOI: 10.1080/09638288.2024.2356010.
[4]
Fisher RJ, Russell L, Riley-Bennett F, et al. Barriers and facilitators in providing home-based rehabilitation for stroke survivors with severe disability in the UK: an online focus group study with multidisciplinary rehabilitation teams[J]. BMJ Open, 2023, 13(8): e071217. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-071217.
[5]
Neil HP. Stroke rehabilitation[J]. Crit Care Nurs Clin North Am, 2023, 35(1): 95-99. DOI: 10.1016/j.cnc.2022.11.002.
[6]
Kiani L. Pharmacological rehabilitation for stroke[J]. Nat Rev Neurol, 2025, 21(5): 233. DOI: 10.1038/s41582-025-01087-6.
[7]
Ting WK, Fadul FA, Fecteau S, et al. Neurostimulation for stroke rehabilitation[J]. Front Neurosci, 2021, 15: 649459. DOI: 10.3389/fnins.2021.649459.
[8]
Kakuda W. Future directions of stroke rehabilitation[J]. Rinsho Shinkeigaku, 2020, 60(3): 181-186. DOI: 10.5692/clinicalneurol.cn-001399.
[9]
Jeffares I, Merriman NA, Doyle F, et al. Designing stroke services for the delivery of cognitive rehabilitation: a qualitative study with stroke rehabilitation professionals[J]. Neuropsychol Rehabil, 2023, 33(1): 24-47. DOI: 10.1080/09602011.2021.1977155.
[10]
O'Dell MW. Stroke rehabilitation and motor recovery[J]. Continuum (Minneap Minn), 2023, 29(2): 605-627. DOI: 10.1212/con.0000000000001218.
[11]
李奎成.作业治疗的重新定位与思考[J].中国康复医学杂志, 2021, 36(1): 86-89. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-1242.2021.01.016.
[12]
Dénes Z, Borosnyay K, Masát O. Stroke rehabilitation outcome in an inpatient neurological rehabilitation unit[J]. Ideggyogy Sz, 2023, 76(3-4): 109-114. DOI: 10.18071/isz.76.0109.
[13]
Terranova TT, Simis M, Santos ACA, et al. Robot-assisted therapy and constraint-induced movement therapy for motor recovery in stroke: results from a randomized clinical trial[J]. Front Neurorobot, 2021, 15: 684019. DOI: 10.3389/fnbot.2021.684019.
[14]
Iwamoto Y, Imura T, Suzukawa T, et al. Combination of exoskeletal upper limb robot and occupational therapy improve activities of daily living function in acute stroke patients[J]. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis, 2019, 28(7): 2018-2025. DOI: 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2019.03.006.
[15]
Calabrò RS, Sorrentino G, Cassio A, et al. Robotic-assisted gait rehabilitation following stroke: a systematic review of current guidelines and practical clinical recommendations[J]. Eur J Phys Rehabil Med, 2021, 57(3): 460-471. DOI: 10.23736/s1973-9087.21.06887-8.
[16]
Hu Y, Tian J, Wen X, et al. Clinical effects of MOTOmed intelligent exercise training combined with intensive walking training on the rehabilitation of walking, nerve and lower limb functions among patients with hemiplegia after stroke[J]. Pak J Med Sci, 2022, 38(5): 1222-1227. DOI: 10.12669/pjms.38.5.5259.
[17]
Ahmed N, Mauad VAQ, Gomez-Rojas O, et al. The impact of rehabilitation-oriented virtual reality device in patients with ischemic stroke in the early subacute recovery phase: study protocol for a phase III, single-blinded, randomized, controlled clinical trial[J]. J Cent Nerv Syst Dis, 2020, 12: 1179573519899471. DOI: 10.1177/1179573519899471.
[18]
Shahmoradi L, Almasi S, Ahmadi H, et al. Virtual reality games for rehabilitation of upper extremities in stroke patients[J]. J Bodyw Mov Ther, 2021, 26: 113-122. DOI: 10.1016/j.jbmt.2020.10.006.
[19]
Toh SFM, Fong KNK, Gonzalez PC, et al. Application of home-based wearable technologies in physical rehabilitation for stroke: a scoping review[J]. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng, 2023, 31: 1614-1623. DOI: 10.1109/tnsre.2023.3252880.
[20]
Proulx CE, Louis Jean MT, Higgins J, et al. Somesthetic, visual, and auditory feedback and their interactions applied to upper limb neurorehabilitation technology: a narrative review to facilitate contextualization of knowledge[J]. Front Rehabil Sci, 2022, 3: 789479. DOI: 10.3389/fresc.2022.789479.
[21]
Veldema J, Gharabaghi A. Non-invasive brain stimulation for improving gait, balance, and lower limbs motor function in stroke[J]. J Neuroeng Rehabil, 2022, 19(1): 84. DOI: 10.1186/s12984-022-01062-y.
[22]
Kim JH, Cust S, Lammers B, et al. Cerebellar tDCS enhances functional communication skills in chronic aphasia[J]. Aphasiology, 2024, 38(12): 1895-1915. DOI: 10.1080/02687038.2024.2328874.
[23]
Dawson J, Liu CY, Francisco GE, et al. Vagus nerve stimulation paired with rehabilitation for upper limb motor function after ischaemic stroke (VNS-REHAB): a randomised, blinded, pivotal, device trial[J]. Lancet, 2021, 397(10284): 1545-1553. DOI: 10.1016/s0140-6736(21)00475-x.
[24]
Glickman LB, Chimatiro G. Clients with stroke and non-stroke and their guardians' views on community reintegration status after in-patient rehabilitation[J]. Malawi Med J, 2018, 30(3): 174-179. DOI: 10.4314/mmj.v30i3.8.
[25]
Hong I, Hreha KP. Swallowing status comparison between primary dysphagia and post-stroke dysphagia in inpatient rehabilitation facilities[J]. Swallowing Rehabil, 2020, 3(1): 23-31. DOI: 10.31115/sr.2020.3.1.23.
[26]
Ciancarelli I, Morone G, Iosa M, et al. Influence of oxidative stress and inflammation on nutritional status and neural plasticity: new perspectives on post-stroke neurorehabilitative outcome[J]. Nutrients, 2022, 15(1): 108. DOI: 10.3390/nu15010108.
[27]
Chiu CC, Wang JJ, Hung CM, et al. Impact of multidisciplinary stroke post-acute care on cost and functional status: a prospective study based on propensity score matching[J]. Brain Sci, 2021, 11(2): 161. DOI: 10.3390/brainsci11020161.
[1] 葛建岭, 杨勇, 王坤, 徐成, 李晓明, 王伟. 超声引导下星状神经节阻滞联合右美托咪定对老年腹腔镜胆囊切除术患者炎性因子及快速康复的影响[J/OL]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2025, 19(06): 390-395.
[2] 泌尿功能障碍预防和康复联盟. 中国老年脑卒中患者相关泌尿功能障碍管理指南(2025版)[J/OL]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(06): 681-692.
[3] 汪黎, 王喻, 丁杰, 李文薇, 欧阳婧, 张旭. 凶险性前置胎盘输尿管损伤治疗策略分析[J/OL]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(06): 753-758.
[4] 谷冰冰, 宋韦, 范博士, 王萍, 马静, 张静文, 周娜, 李盼盼. 肺康复训练管理在微创食管癌切除术后并发肺部感染患者中的临床应用观察[J/OL]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2025, 18(06): 949-954.
[5] 许志翱, 顾丽萍, 曹敏, 宣梦馨, 李艳婷, 赵丽亭. 基于加速康复外科和预康复模式对老年肺癌围术期多维度管理干预及预后的影响[J/OL]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2025, 18(06): 979-984.
[6] 钟晓盈, 曹杨, 于昕, 史宏辉, 樊庆泊, 刘海元. 单孔与多孔腹腔镜在巨大子宫肌瘤剔除术中的疗效与安全性对比[J/OL]. 中华腔镜外科杂志(电子版), 2025, 18(06): 348-353.
[7] 袁文康, 张冲, 张超. 肝脏外科治疗理念的变迁与技术进步[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(05): 673-679.
[8] 韩媛媛, 张泽, 薛庆云, 闫蕾, 常琳, 石磊. 智能训练系统在全膝关节置换术患者围术期康复训练中的应用:一项前瞻性随机对照研究[J/OL]. 中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志, 2025, 11(05): 295-302.
[9] 徐颢庭, 葛新, 尹雯, 毛雷音. 严重上肢骨折伴神经损伤患者的ICU早期康复方案的构建与应用[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(10): 741-746.
[10] 张建锋, 马洪庆, 武雪亮, 郭甘霖, 孟泽松, 冯鋆, 赵泽铭, 王贵英. 恶性肿瘤相关皮肌炎的病理机制与临床管理研究进展[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(08): 601-605.
[11] 皇立媛, 浦洁, 王苏贵, 陈婷婷, 朱德慧, 胡雪. 中青年脑卒中患者应激障碍风险预测模型的构建与验证[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(07): 504-512.
[12] 侯志博, 张苗, 卢洁. 多延迟动脉自旋标记成像在急性缺血性脑卒中灌注评估中的研究进展与临床应用[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(06): 454-460.
[13] 陈芸, 杨海燕, 陈薇, 董贯忠, 张伟媛, 许钰. 社会支持和心理弹性在急性期脑卒中患者感知压力与睡眠质量间的链式中介作用[J/OL]. 中华卫生应急电子杂志, 2025, 11(06): 329-335.
[14] 单小洁, 胡欢欢, 张磊, 杨佳康, 刘建民, 甘丽芬, 徐立, 李红月, 李冬梅. 链式流程管理在急性脑卒中绿色通道CT检查中改善碘对比剂外渗的效果[J/OL]. 中华脑血管病杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(06): 477-482.
[15] 王琳, 霍鸿波, 李可静, 边毓尧, 徐正虎, 王恒, 刘翠翠. 老年急性大血管闭塞性卒中患者支架取栓中长期预后及其影响因素[J/OL]. 中华脑血管病杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(06): 511-518.
阅读次数
全文


摘要


AI


AI小编
你好!我是《中华医学电子期刊资源库》AI小编,有什么可以帮您的吗?