切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华脑科疾病与康复杂志(电子版) ›› 2026, Vol. 16 ›› Issue (04) : 213 -219. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-123X.2026.04.003

临床研究

弥散张量成像评估高频重复经颅磁刺激治疗脑卒中后运动功能障碍的疗效
她娜, 翁雅伦, 张军†()   
  1. 014040 包头市中心医院神经内科
  • 收稿日期:2025-09-11 出版日期:2026-08-15
  • 通信作者: 张军

Diffusion tensor imaging evaluates the efficacy of high-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation in treating post-stroke motor impairment

Tana, Yalun Weng, Jun Zhang†()   

  1. Department of Neurology, Baotou Central Hospital, Baotou 014040, China
  • Received:2025-09-11 Published:2026-08-15
  • Corresponding author: Jun Zhang
  • Supported by:
    Inner Mongolia Medical University Joint Project(YKD2021LH086)
引用本文:

她娜, 翁雅伦, 张军. 弥散张量成像评估高频重复经颅磁刺激治疗脑卒中后运动功能障碍的疗效[J/OL]. 中华脑科疾病与康复杂志(电子版), 2026, 16(04): 213-219.

Tana, Yalun Weng, Jun Zhang. Diffusion tensor imaging evaluates the efficacy of high-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation in treating post-stroke motor impairment[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Brain Diseases and Rehabilitation(Electronic Edition), 2026, 16(04): 213-219.

目的

应用高频重复经颅磁刺激(rTMS)治疗缺血性脑卒中患者运动功能障碍,运用弥散张量成像(DTI)评估rTMS治疗效果,探讨高频rTMS治疗运动功能障碍的神经机制。

方法

纳入包头市中心医院神经内科、脑科中心及神经康复中心自2023年10月至2024年12月收治的40例缺血性脑卒中患者为研究对象,按照随机数字表法分为治疗组和对照组,每组20例。2组患者均给予基础药物治疗和常规康复治疗。治疗组在此基础上进行高频(10 Hz)rTMS治疗,连续治疗4周,每周5次,每次15 min;对照组给予10 Hz伪刺激治疗。所有患者在首次和末次治疗当天进行DTI检查并评定康复量表[包括美国国立卫生研究院卒中量表(NIHSS)、Fugl-Meyer运动功能评定量表(FMA)、改良Barthel指数(MBI)],评估患者神经功能损伤严重程度、肢体运动功能障碍程度及日常生活活动能力。DTI感兴趣区(ROI)选择为放射冠区及内囊后肢,记录各个ROI的各向异性分数(FA),计算相对FA(rFA)。比较2组患者治疗前后的康复量表评分及DTI变化。

结果

治疗4周后,2组患者的NIHSS评分均较治疗前下降,且治疗组下降更明显,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);FMA和MBI评分均较治疗前升高,且治疗组升高更明显,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。治疗组患者的放射冠区及内囊后肢的FA和rFA值较治疗前升高,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);而对照组患者治疗前后的FA和rFA值相比,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。

结论

高频rTMS联合常规康复治疗可显著改善缺血性脑卒中患者的运动功能障碍,提高患侧皮质脊髓束完整性,这可能是高频rTMS治疗运动功能障碍的神经机制。

Objective

To assess the therapeutic effect of high-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) on motor dysfunction in patients with ischemic stroke using diffusion tensor imaging (DTI), and to explore the underlying neural mechanism of high-frequency rTMS for motor dysfunction.

Methods

Forty patients with ischemic stroke admitted to Neurology Department, Brain Center and Neurorehabilitation Center of Baotou Central Hospital from October 2023 to December 2024 were collected, and divided into treatment group and control group by the random number table method, with 20 cases in each group. Both groups received basic pharmacotherapy and conventional rehabilitation. On this basis, the treatment group underwent high-frequency (10 Hz) rTMS for 4 weeks, 5 times a week, 15 min each time. The control group received 10 Hz sham stimulation. DTI examinations and functional assessments using the National Institutes of Health stroke scale (NIHSS), Fugl-Meyer assessment (FMA), and modified Barthel index (MBI) were performed on the day of the first and last treatment sessions to evaluate neurological deficit severity, limb motor impairment, and activities of daily living. Regions of interest (ROIs) for DTI were placed in the corona radiata and posterior limb of the internal capsule. Fractional anisotropy (FA) values in each ROI were recorded, and relative FA (rFA) was calculated. Rehabilitation scale scores and DTI metrics before and after treatment were compared between the two groups.

Results

After 4 weeks of treatment, the NIHSS scores of both groups decreased compared to those before treatment, with a more significant decrease in the treatment group, and the differences were statistically significant (P<0.05). Both FMA and MBI scores increased compared to those before treatment, with a more significant increase in the treatment group, and the differences were statistically significant (P<0.05). The FA and rFA values of the radiating coronary region and posterior limb of the internal capsule in the treatment group increased compared to those before treatment, and the differences were statistically significant (P<0.05). However, there was no statistically significant difference in the FA and rFA values between the control group before and after treatment (P>0.05).

Conclusions

High-frequency rTMS combined with conventional rehabilitation therapy can significantly improve motor dysfunction in patients with ischemic stroke and improve the integrity of the corticospinal tract on the affected side, which may represent the neural mechanism underlying the therapeutic effect of high-frequency rTMS on post-stroke motor dysfunction.

表1 2组缺血性脑卒中患者的一般资料比较
Tab.1 Comparison of general data between the two groups of ischemic stroke patients
表2 2组缺血性脑卒中患者治疗前后NIHSS、FMA、MBI评分比较(分,mean±SD)
Tab.2 Comparison of NIHSS, FMA and MBI scores before and after treatment of 2 groups of patients with ischemic stroke (point, mean±SD)
图1 缺血性脑卒中患者经高频rTMS治疗前后神经纤维走形图A:治疗前;B:治疗后;圆圈所示患侧放射冠区;rTMS:重复经颅磁刺激
Fig.1 Neurofiber diagram of patients with ischemic stroke before and after high-frequency rTMS treatment
图2 治疗组缺血性脑卒中患者治疗前后双侧放射冠区FA图A:治疗前,患侧放射冠区(红色圆圈所示)FA值为0.33,健侧放射冠区(绿色圆圈所示)FA值为0.41;B:治疗后,患侧放射冠区(红色圆圈所示)FA值为0.47,健侧放射冠区(绿色圆圈所示)FA值为0.51;FA:各向异性分数
Fig.2 FA map of bilateral radiation coronal area before and after treatment of patients in the treatment group of ischemic stroke patients
表3 2组缺血性脑卒中患者治疗前后双侧放射冠区FA、rFA值比较(mean±SD)
Tab.3 Comparison of FA and rFA values in bilateral radiative coronal areas before and after treatment in 2 groups of ischemic stroke patients (mean±SD)
图3 治疗组缺血性脑卒中患者治疗前后双侧内囊后肢FA图A:治疗前,患侧内囊后肢(红色圆圈所示)FA值为0.50,健侧内囊后肢(绿色圆圈所示)FA值为0.58;B:治疗后,患侧内囊后肢(红色圆圈所示)FA值为0.72,健侧内囊后肢(绿色圆圈所示)FA值为0.75;FA:各向异性分数
Fig.3 FA diagram of bilateral inner capsule hind limbs before and after treatment of patients in the treatment group of ischemic stroke patients
表4 2组缺血性脑卒中患者治疗前后双侧内囊后肢FA、rFA值比较(mean±SD)
Tab.4 Comparison of FA and rFA values of bilateral inner capsule hind limbs before and after treatment of 2 groups of ischemic stroke patients (mean±SD)
[1]
Zhang JJY, Ang J, Saffari SE, et al. Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation for motor recovery after stroke: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials with low risk of bias[J]. Neuromodulation, 2025, 28(1): 16-42. DOI: 10.1016/j.neurom.2024.07.010.
[2]
Meoded A, Huisman TAGM. Diffusion tensor imaging of brain malformations: exploring the internal architecture[J]. Neuroimaging Clin N Am, 2019, 29(3): 423-434. DOI: 10.1016/j.nic.2019.03.004.
[3]
Zolkefley MKI, Firwana YMS, Hatta HZM, et al. An overview of fractional anisotropy as a reliable quantitative measurement for the corticospinal tract (CST) integrity in correlation with a Fugl-Meyer assessment in stroke rehabilitation[J]. J Phys Ther Sci, 2021, 33(1): 75-83. DOI: 10.1589/jpts.33.75.
[4]
史淑楠,徐珊瑚,万曙.美国国立卫生研究院卒中量表在急性缺血性脑卒中诊疗中的研究进展[J].心脑血管病防治, 2025, 25(3): 34-38. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-816x.2025.03.008.
[5]
王赛华,施加加,孙莹,等.简体版改良Barthel指数在脑卒中恢复期中的信度与效度研究[J].中国康复, 2020, 35(4): 179-182. DOI: 10.3870/zgkf.2020.04.003.
[6]
薛凯文,吕星,王玉龙.康复分级诊疗评定量表在脑卒中患者中的信效度检验及应用价值研究[J].中华全科医学, 2023, 21(7): 1215-1219. DOI: 10.16766/j.cnki.issn.1674-4152.003087.
[7]
马良飞,尹翎,方婷,等.重复经颅磁刺激联合虚拟现实技术对脑卒中后认知障碍的影响[J].中华脑科疾病与康复杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(6): 346-351. DOI: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-123X.2023.06.005.
[8]
Sánchez-Cuesta FJ, González-Zamorano Y, Arroyo-Ferrer A, et al. Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation of primary motor cortex for stroke upper limb motor sequelae rehabilitation: a systematic review[J]. NeuroRehabilitation, 2023, 52(3): 329-348. DOI: 10.3233/nre-220306.
[9]
Kleindorfer DO, Towfighi A, Chaturvedi S, et al. 2021 guideline for the prevention of stroke in patients with stroke and transient ischemic attack: a guideline from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association[J]. Stroke, 2021, 52(7): e364-e467. DOI: 10.1161/str.0000000000000375.
[10]
Lefaucheur JP, Aleman A, Baeken C, et al. Evidence-based guidelines on the therapeutic use of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS): an update (2014-2018)[J]. Clin Neurophysiol, 2020, 131(2): 474-528. DOI: 10.1016/j.clinph.2019.11.002.
[11]
Wang Q, Zhang D, Zhao YY, et al. Effects of high-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation over the contralesional motor cortex on motor recovery in severe hemiplegic stroke: a randomized clinical trial[J]. Brain Stimul, 2020, 13(4): 979-986. DOI: 10.1016/j.brs.2020.03.020.
[12]
Paul T, Cieslak M, Hensel L, et al. The role of corticospinal and extrapyramidal pathways in motor impairment after stroke[J]. Brain Commun, 2023, 5(1): fcac301. DOI: 10.1093/braincomms/fcac301.
[13]
DiBella EVR, Sharma A, Richards L, et al. Beyond diffusion tensor MRI methods for improved characterization of the brain after ischemic stroke: a review[J]. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol, 2022, 43(5): 661-669. DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A7414.
[14]
王珍玉,夏渊,卢悦,等.高频重复经颅磁刺激对脑卒中患者上肢运动功能及日常活动能力的影响:网状Meta分析[J].中国康复, 2022, 37(9): 549-557. DOI: 10.3870/zgkf.2022.09.009.
[15]
Fan S, Yan L, Zhang J, et al. Effects of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation on lower extremity motor function and optimal parameters in stroke patients with different stages of stroke: a systematic evaluation and meta-analysis[J]. Front Neurol, 2024, 15: 1372159. DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2024.1372159.
[16]
纪栋起,武亮,李欢欢,等.不同频率的重复经颅磁刺激对脑卒中上肢运动功能恢复的影响[J].中国医药导报, 2024, 21(13): 177-180. DOI: 10.20047/j.issn1673-7210.2024.13.47.
[17]
Du J, Yang F, Hu J, et al. Effects of high- and low-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation on motor recovery in early stroke patients: evidence from a randomized controlled trial with clinical, neurophysiological and functional imaging assessments [J]. Neuroimage Clin, 2019, 21: 101620. DOI: 10.1016/j.nicl.2018.101620.
[18]
刘建华,魏清川,胡秀茹,等.弥散张量成像各向异性分数与缺血性脑卒中患者上肢运动功能的相关性[J].中国康复理论与实践, 2020, 26(7): 749-752. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-9771.2020.07.002.
[19]
Guo Z, Jin Y, Peng H, et al. Ipsilesional high frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation add-on therapy improved diffusion parameters of stroke patients with motor dysfunction: a preliminary DTI study[J]. Neural Plast, 2016, 2016: 6238575. DOI: 10.1155/2016/6238575.
[1] 张爽, 谢琦, 杨清武. 急性缺血性脑卒中无效再通的研究进展及脑保护新策略[J/OL]. 中华脑血管病杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(04): 351-358.
[2] 戴荣源, 裴月红, 孙庆利, 黄骁, 张淦, 樊东升, 傅瑜. 美国心脏协会/美国卒中协会《2026年急性缺血性脑卒中患者早期管理指南》更新概述[J/OL]. 中华脑血管病杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(04): 359-364.
[3] 曾陈颖, 陈云清, 徐祖兵, 余求龙, 林晶, 洪道俊, 涂琪. 炎症标志物在大梗死核心与非大梗死核心急性缺血性脑卒中行血管内治疗的预后价值[J/OL]. 中华脑血管病杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(04): 372-379.
[4] 魏宸铭, 牟婧宇, 赵心怡, 陈乐, 武剑. 不同评分量表对前循环大血管闭塞性脑卒中诊断预测性能的差异[J/OL]. 中华脑血管病杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(04): 380-388.
[5] 康志霞, 班玉霞, 白如玉, 郝美美, 李正正, 苏琴琴. 血浆致动脉硬化指数和程序性细胞死亡因子4预测急性缺血性脑卒中神经功能缺损及预后的价值[J/OL]. 中华脑血管病杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(04): 389-395.
[6] 胡琼丹, 侯善兵, 陈霞, 王教媛, 戴晓熹. 应激性血糖升高比值预测急性缺血性脑卒中静脉溶栓预后的价值[J/OL]. 中华脑血管病杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(04): 396-402.
[7] 穆巴拉克·伊力哈木, 纪蒙, 秦伟, 胡文立, 王朝东, 鲁明. 基于两样本孟德尔随机化分析甲状腺功能与缺血性脑卒中的因果关系[J/OL]. 中华脑血管病杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(04): 432-439.
[8] 周英, 李文雯, 周钰, 李炜, 贺思怡, 夏海艳, 王海玲. 基于临床医护人员视角的急性缺血性脑卒中患者就医延迟成因与对策的质性研究[J/OL]. 中华脑血管病杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(04): 446-454.
[9] 黄开来, 李威, 赵振强. 依达拉奉右莰醇在急性缺血性脑卒中的临床应用进展[J/OL]. 中华脑血管病杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(04): 455-461.
[10] 李若曼, 王帆, 张涛. ASPECTS联合表观弥散系数对急性缺血性脑卒中静脉溶栓预后的预测价值[J/OL]. 中华脑血管病杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(04): 403-410.
[11] 朱恩俊儒, 程畅, 贺玉琴, 姚笛, 郝嘉欢, 汪明欢. 缺血性脑卒中患者的肌肉健康与类淋巴系统相关性[J/OL]. 中华脑血管病杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(03): 258-265.
[12] 万孟夏, 杨毅, 申珅, 甘景环, 张拥波. 空气污染与脑卒中亚型的因果关联:孟德尔随机化分析[J/OL]. 中华脑血管病杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(03): 266-273.
[13] 柳云鹏, 贾建文, 黄菊梅, 汪阳. 早期血压变异性对大血管闭塞性急性缺血性脑卒中术后神经功能恢复的影响[J/OL]. 中华脑血管病杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(03): 274-279.
[14] 吴嶛, 蔡诗昆, 左鹏, 倪贵华, 倪小宇. 急性缺血性脑卒中机械取栓前血栓迁移与临床资料的相关性[J/OL]. 中华脑血管病杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(03): 287-293.
[15] 梁怡凡, 牟婧宇, 吴雅婷, 邳靖陶, 陈乐, 武剑. 不同人工智能模型预测脑卒中不良预后诊断效能的荟萃分析[J/OL]. 中华脑血管病杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(03): 308-319.
阅读次数
全文


摘要


AI
小
编
AI小编
你好!我是《中华医学电子期刊资源库》AI小编,有什么可以帮您的吗?