切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华脑科疾病与康复杂志(电子版) ›› 2017, Vol. 07 ›› Issue (01) : 16 -19. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-123X.2017.01.005

所属专题: 文献

临床研究

超早期显微手术治疗老年动脉瘤破裂患者临床预后分析
邱少博1, 姚维成2,()   
  1. 1. 266071 山东青岛,青岛大学附属医院神经外科;261021 山东潍坊,潍坊市脑科医院神经外科
    2. 266071 山东青岛,青岛大学附属医院神经外科
  • 收稿日期:2016-07-04 出版日期:2017-02-01
  • 通信作者: 姚维成

Prognostic effect of ultra-early microscopic clip operation in treating elderly patients with ruptured intracranial aneurysms

Shaobo Qiu1, Weicheng Yao2,()   

  1. 1. Department of Neurosurgery, the Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Qingdao 266071, China; Department of Neurosurgery, Weifang Brain Hospital, Weifang 261021, China
    2. Department of Neurosurgery, the Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Qingdao 266071, China
  • Received:2016-07-04 Published:2017-02-01
  • Corresponding author: Weicheng Yao
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Yao Weicheng, Email:
引用本文:

邱少博, 姚维成. 超早期显微手术治疗老年动脉瘤破裂患者临床预后分析[J]. 中华脑科疾病与康复杂志(电子版), 2017, 07(01): 16-19.

Shaobo Qiu, Weicheng Yao. Prognostic effect of ultra-early microscopic clip operation in treating elderly patients with ruptured intracranial aneurysms[J]. Chinese Journal of Brain Diseases and Rehabilitation(Electronic Edition), 2017, 07(01): 16-19.

目的

分析超早期显微夹闭手术治疗老年动脉瘤破裂患者的临床预后情况。

方法

选取潍坊市脑科医院神经外科2011年9月至2016年9月收治的老年动脉瘤破裂患者130例,按照手术时机分为超早期组64例、早期组42例与中晚期组24例。患者均接受显微夹闭手术治疗,超早期组患者于发病后1 d内手术,早期组患者于发病后1~3 d手术,中晚期组患者则于发病3 d后手术。术后随访3个月,比较3组患者临床预后效果、并发症发生情况。

结果

超早期组患者临床预后效果优于早期组和中晚期组(χ2值分别为4.137、4.043,P<0.05),早期组患者组与晚期组临床预后效果比较,差异无统计学意义(χ2=0.031,P>0.05)。超早期组患者术后脑积水发生率明显低于早期组及中晚期组,差异有统计学意义(χ2值分别为4.705、8.282,P<0.05),早期组患者脑积水发生率与晚期组比较,差异无统计学意义(χ2=0.530,P>0.05),3组患者再出血发生率、术后脑梗死发生率比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。

结论

超早期显微夹闭手术治疗老年动脉瘤患者的临床预后效果良好,并可降低脑积水的发生率。

Objective

To analyze the prognostic effect of ultra-early microscopic clip operation in treating the elderly patients with ruptured intracranial aneurysms.

Methods

A total of 130 elderly patients with ruptured intracranial aneurysms were selected in the Department of Neurosurgery, Weifang Brain Hospital from September 2011 to September 2016, and they were divided into ultra-early group (received microscopic clip operation within 1 day after onset, n=64), early group (received microscopic clip operation within 1 day to 3 days after onset, n= 42) and middle-late group groups (received microscopic clip operation after 3 days of onset, n=24) according to operation opportunity. All of the patients were followed up for 3 months, prognostic effect and incidence of complications were compared among the three groups.

Results

The prognostic effect of ultra-early group was statistically significantly better than that of early group (χ2=4.137) and middle-late group (χ2=4.043) , respectively (P<0. 05). There was no significant differences in the prognostic impact between early group (χ2=0.031) and middle-late group(P>0. 05). In the three groups, the rate of hydrocephalus in ultra-early group was significantly lower than that of early group (χ2=4.705) and middle-late group (χ2=8.282), the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05), but there was no significant difference between early group (χ2=0.530) and middle-late group (P>0.05). There were no statistically significant in the three groups in the incidence of rehaemorrhagia and postoperative cerebral infarction (P>0.05).

Conclusion

Ultra-early microscopic clip operation has good prognostic effect and can reduce the incidence of hydrocephalus in treating the elderly patients.

表1 3组患者一般资料比较
表2 3组患者GOS得分[例(%)]
表3 3组患者术后脑积水、脑梗死及再出血发生率[例(%)]
[1]
Lawson MF,Chi YY,Velat GJ, et al. Timing of aneurysm surgery: the International Cooperative Study revisited in the era of endovascular coiling[J]. J Neurointerv Surg, 2010, 2(2): 131-134.
[2]
Zhou GS,Song LJ. Influence of different surgical timing on outcome of patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage and the surgical techniques during early surgery for ruptured intracranial aneurysms[J]. Turk Neurosurg, 2014, 24(2):202-207.
[3]
Liu J Xiang J,Zhang Y, et al. Morphologic and hemodynamic analysis of paraclinoid aneurysms: ruptured versus unruptured[J]. J Neurointerv Surg, 2014, 6(9):658-663.
[4]
Hishikawa, T,Date I,Tokunaga K, et al. Risk of rupture of unruptured cerebral aneurysms in elderly patients[J]. Neurology, 2015, 85(21):1879-1885.
[5]
Lan Q,Ikeda H,Jimbo H, et al. Considerations on surgical treatment for elderly patients with intracranial aneurysms[J]. Surg Neurol, 2000, 53(3):231-238.
[6]
Awe OO,Gonzalez LF,Hasan D, et al.Treatment outcome of aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage in patients aged 70 years and older[J]. Neurosurgery, 2011, 68(3):753-758; discussion 758.
[7]
van den Berg R,Rinkel GJ,Vandertop WP. Treatment of ruptured intracranial aneurysms: implications of the ISAT on clipping versus coiling[J]. Eur J Radiol, 2003, 46(3):172-177.
[8]
Jartti P,Isokangas JM,Karttunen A, et al. Early rebleeding after coiling of ruptured intracranial aneurysms[J]. Acta Radiol, 2010, 51(9):1043-1049.
[9]
Wong GK,Boet R,Ng SC, et al. Ultra-early (within 24 hours) aneurysm treatment after subarachnoid hemorrhage[J]. World Neurosurg, 2012, 77(2):311-315.
[10]
Weir RU,Marcellus ML,Do HM, et al. Aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage in patients with Hunt and Hess grade 4 or 5: treatment using the Guglielmi detachable coil system[J]. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol, 2003, 24(4): 585-590.
[11]
Zhao B,Zhao Y,Tan X, et al. Factors and outcomes associated with ultra-early surgery for poor-grade aneurysmal subarachnoid haemorrhage: a multicentre retrospective analysis[J]. BMJ Open, 2015, 5(4):e007410.
[12]
Otani N,Takasato Y,Masaoka H, et al. Surgical outcome following decompressive craniectomy for poor-grade aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage in patients with associated massive intracerebral or Sylvian hematomas[J]. Cerebrovasc Dis, 2008, 26(6):612-617.
[13]
Pan JW,Zhan RY,Wen L,et al. Ultra-early surgery for poor-grade intracranial aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage: a preliminary study[J]. Yonsei Med J, 2009, 50(4):521-524.
[1] 衣晓丽, 胡沙沙, 张彦. HER-2低表达对乳腺癌新辅助治疗疗效及预后的影响[J]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 340-346.
[2] 施杰, 李云涛, 高海燕. 腋窝淋巴结阳性Luminal A型乳腺癌患者新辅助与辅助化疗的预后及影响因素分析[J]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 353-361.
[3] 张思平, 刘伟, 马鹏程. 全膝关节置换术后下肢轻度内翻对线对疗效的影响[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 808-817.
[4] 李越洲, 张孔玺, 李小红, 商中华. 基于生物信息学分析胃癌中PUM的预后意义[J]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 426-432.
[5] 张俊, 罗再, 段茗玉, 裘正军, 黄陈. 胃癌预后预测模型的研究进展[J]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 456-461.
[6] 杨倩, 李翠芳, 张婉秋. 原发性肝癌自发性破裂出血急诊TACE术后的近远期预后及影响因素分析[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 33-36.
[7] 栗艳松, 冯会敏, 刘明超, 刘泽鹏, 姜秋霞. STIP1在三阴性乳腺癌组织中的表达及临床意义研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 52-56.
[8] 马伟强, 马斌林, 吴中语, 张莹. microRNA在三阴性乳腺癌进展中发挥的作用[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 111-114.
[9] 姜明, 罗锐, 龙成超. 闭孔疝的诊断与治疗:10年73例患者诊疗经验总结[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 706-710.
[10] 钟广俊, 刘春华, 朱万森, 徐晓雷, 王兆军. MRI联合不同扫描序列在胃癌术前分期诊断及化疗效果和预后的评估[J]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(06): 378-382.
[11] 胡宝茹, 尚乃舰, 高迪. 中晚期肝细胞癌的DCE-MRI及DWI表现与免疫治疗预后的相关性分析[J]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(06): 399-403.
[12] 陆萍, 邹健. 凝血和纤维蛋白溶解标志物的动态变化对急性胰腺炎患者预后的评估价值[J]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(06): 427-432.
[13] 李永胜, 孙家和, 郭书伟, 卢义康, 刘洪洲. 高龄结直肠癌患者根治术后短期并发症及其影响因素[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(9): 962-967.
[14] 王军, 刘鲲鹏, 姚兰, 张华, 魏越, 索利斌, 陈骏, 苗成利, 罗成华. 腹膜后肿瘤切除术中大量输血患者的麻醉管理特点与分析[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(08): 844-849.
[15] 索利斌, 刘鲲鹏, 姚兰, 张华, 魏越, 王军, 陈骏, 苗成利, 罗成华. 原发性腹膜后副神经节瘤切除术麻醉管理的特点和分析[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(07): 771-776.
阅读次数
全文


摘要