切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华脑科疾病与康复杂志(电子版) ›› 2019, Vol. 09 ›› Issue (06) : 360 -363. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-123X.2019.06.009

所属专题: 文献

临床研究

补充抗癫痫治疗对心肺复苏后有脑电癫痫持续状态患者的临床疗效
关彦钧1, 张旺龙2, 黄光锐1,()   
  1. 1. 529300 广东开平,开平市中心医院急诊科
    2. 529300 广东开平,开平市中心医院重症医学科
  • 收稿日期:2019-11-19 出版日期:2019-12-15
  • 通信作者: 黄光锐
  • 基金资助:
    江门市卫生计生局科学技术研究项目(19A091)

Clinical effect of supplementary antiepileptic therapy on patients with electroencephalogram epileptic status after cardiopulmonary resuscitation

Yanjun Guan1, Wanglong Zhang2, Guangrui Huang1,()   

  1. 1. Department of Emergency, Kaiping Central Hospital, Kaiping 529300, China
    2. Department of Critical Care Medicine, Kaiping Central Hospital, Kaiping 529300, China
  • Received:2019-11-19 Published:2019-12-15
  • Corresponding author: Guangrui Huang
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Huang Guangrui, Email:
引用本文:

关彦钧, 张旺龙, 黄光锐. 补充抗癫痫治疗对心肺复苏后有脑电癫痫持续状态患者的临床疗效[J]. 中华脑科疾病与康复杂志(电子版), 2019, 09(06): 360-363.

Yanjun Guan, Wanglong Zhang, Guangrui Huang. Clinical effect of supplementary antiepileptic therapy on patients with electroencephalogram epileptic status after cardiopulmonary resuscitation[J]. Chinese Journal of Brain Diseases and Rehabilitation(Electronic Edition), 2019, 09(06): 360-363.

目的

探讨补充抗癫痫治疗对心脏骤停复苏成功后有脑电癫痫状态患者的临床疗效。

方法

选择开平市中心医院自2016年1月至2018年12月收治的31例心脏骤停复苏成功后有脑电癫痫持续状态的患者作为研究对象,进行随机对照研究。根据随机数字表法分为观察组(17例)和对照组(14例),在心肺复苏(CPR)规范化治疗的基础上,观察组给予抗癫痫药物治疗,达到癫痫状态的完全控制,对照组则给予常规镇静治疗。比较2组患者在临床治疗指标(CPR时间、电除颤使用情况、ICU住院时间、机械通气时间、癫痫复发率),以及神经-精神功能预后[脑功能评分(CPC)、生活质量评价量表SF-36评分(SF-36)、蒙特利尔认知功能评估量表(MoCA)评分、蒙哥马利和阿斯伯格抑郁量表(MADRS)评分]方面的差异。

结果

2组患者CPR用时、电除颤使用、机械通气时间、出院时GOS评分差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);观察组患者的ICU治疗时间短于对照组,癫痫复发率、CPC评分平均秩、MADRS评分小于对照组,SF-36评分、MoCA评分高于对照组,差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。

结论

对于心脏骤停复苏成功后有脑电癫痫持续状态患者,补充抗癫痫治疗可以缩短ICU治疗时间,降低癫痫复发率,并有效改善患者的神经-精神预后状况。

Objective

To investigate the clinical effect of supplementary antiepileptic therapy on electroencephalogram epileptic status in patients with successful resuscitation after cardiac arrest.

Methods

Thirty-one patients with status epilepticus after cardiac arrest and obtained successful cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) admitted to Kaiping Central Hospital from January 2016 to December 2018 were selected as the study subjects for a randomized controlled study. According to the random number table method, the patients were divided into the observation group (17 cases) and the control group (14 cases). On the basis of standardized treatment of CPR, the observation group was given supplementary antiepileptic drug therapy to achieve control of epileptic state, while the control group was given conventional sedation treatment. The differences of clinical therapeutic indexes (CPR available time, use of electrical shock, mechanical ventilation, ICU length of hospital stay, recurrence time, epilepsy) and prognosis of neuro-psychiatric outcomes [cerebral performance category (CPC), quality of life assessment scale SF-36 score (SF-36), Montreal cognitive assessment (MoCA), Montgomery and Asberg depression rating scale (MADRS) score] between the two groups were compared.

Results

There were no statistically significant differences in CPR duration, electric defibrillation use, mechanical ventilation duration, and GOS score at discharge time between the two groups (P>0.05). ICU treatment time and epilepsy recurrence rate of patients in the observation group were lower than those in the control group, with statistically significant differences (P<0.05). The average rank of CPC score and MADRS score in the observation group were smaller than those in the control group, with statistically significant differences (P<0.05), while the SF-36 score and MoCA score were higher than those in the control group, with statistically significant differences (P<0.05).

Conclusion

Supplementing antiepileptic therapy can shorten the treatment time in ICU, reduce the rate of epileptic recurrence and effectively improve the neuro-psychiatric prognosis of patients with electroencephalogram epileptic status after resuscitation of cardiac arrest.

表1 2组患者的病史资料及住院信息比较
表2 2组患者神经-精神功能预后的比较
[1]
Ryvlin P, Nashef L, Lhatoo SD, et al. Incidence and mechanisms of cardiorespiratory arrests in epilepsy monitoring units (mortemus): a retrospective study[J]. Lancet Neurol, 2013, 12(10): 966-977.
[2]
Lamberts RJ, Blom MT, Wassenaar M, et al. Sudden cardiac arrest in people with epilepsy in the community: circumstances and risk factors[J]. Neurology, 2015, 85(3): 212-218.
[3]
陈志刚,陆素琴.癫痫与心脏骤停、癫痫猝死关系研究进展[J].中国急救复苏与灾害医学杂志, 2015, 10(1): 87-89.
[4]
Brooks GA, Park JT. Clinical and electroencephalographic correlates in pediatric cardiac arrest: experience at a tertiary care center[J]. Neuropediatrics, 2018, 49(5): 324-329.
[5]
Verrier RL, Pang TD, Nearing BD, et al. The epileptic heart: concept and clinical evidence[J]. Epilepsy Behav, 2020, 105: 106946.
[6]
齐志江,李春盛. 2015CPR指南更新后心肺复苏研究新进展[J].中华急诊医学杂志, 2017, 26(1): 7-10.
[7]
杨晓梅,周保纯,朱建军,等.脑氧代谢率评估心肺复苏后脑功能预后[J].中华急诊医学杂志, 2018, 27(12): 1341-1346.
[8]
赵龙超,刘志军,何燕,等.简明健康状况调查问卷第二版评价成都市城镇居民生命质量适用性研究[J].中华预防医学杂志, 2014, 48(5): 370-374.
[9]
张伟国.左乙拉西坦结合常规疗法治疗青年难治性部分性癫痫的效果及对患者认知功能、生活质量的影响[J].中国医药科学, 2018, 8(20): 44-47.
[10]
Eskelinen M, Ollonen P. Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) in healthy study subjects, in patients with breast disease and breast cancer: a prospective case-control study[J]. Anticancer Res, 2011, 31(3): 1065-1069.
[11]
Chan PH. Mitochondrial dysfunction and oxidative stress as determinants of cell death/survival in stroke[J]. Ann N Y Acad Sci, 2005, 1042: 203-209.
[12]
陆剑平.成人心肺复苏后缺氧缺血性脑病继发癫痫的临床分析及脑电图特点[J].中国实用医药, 2015, 10(36): 39-40.
[13]
唐洪兴,王小峰,车宁伟,等.癫痫相关死亡原因分析与防治[J].中华神经科杂志, 2017, 50(9): 704-707.
[14]
李振洲,张耀芬,刘燕,等.探讨心肺复苏后非癫痫肌阵挛临床治疗[J].中国急救复苏与灾害医学杂志, 2012, 7(7): 628-630.
[15]
李强.床旁连续脑电诊断心肺复苏后非痉挛性癫痫持续状态一例[J].中华急诊医学杂志, 2012, 21(12): 1307.
[16]
江甲子,刘志.亚低温治疗对心跳骤停复苏成功后并发癫痫患者预后的影响[J].临床急诊杂志, 2016, 17(8): 614-617.
[17]
Lee JW. Eeg reactivity in coma after cardiac arrest: is it enough to wake up the dead?[J]. Epilepsy Curr, 2019, 19(6): 369-371.
[18]
Rantanen K, Eriksson K, Nieminen P. Cognitive impairment in preschool children with epilepsy[J]. Epilepsia, 2011, 52(8): 1499-1505.
[19]
邹琴,陈永敏,刘惠,等.不同抗癫痫药物对部分性癫痫患者认知功能和生活质量的影响[J].华西药学杂志, 2018, 33(4): 460-462.
[1] 孔莹莹, 谢璐涛, 卢晓驰, 徐杰丰, 周光居, 张茂. 丁酸钠对猪心脏骤停复苏后心脑损伤的保护作用及机制研究[J]. 中华危重症医学杂志(电子版), 2023, 16(05): 355-362.
[2] 王淦楠, 张忠满, 许晓泉, 孙娜娜, 陈旭锋, 张劲松. 成人体外心肺复苏患者神经功能预后相关指标的预测价值研究[J]. 中华危重症医学杂志(电子版), 2022, 15(01): 9-13.
[3] 祝雅, 赵晖, 董莲莲, 金燕. 亚低温治疗对心肺复苏后兔脑组织中基质金属蛋白酶9和神经元特异性烯醇化酶水平及脑复苏的影响[J]. 中华危重症医学杂志(电子版), 2021, 14(05): 374-379.
[4] 廖祥鹏, 安锐. 《2020新生儿复苏指南》和《新生儿复苏项目(8版)》的最新建议解读[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2021, 17(05): 527-535.
[5] 顾世杰, 马麟, 陈秋源, 崔瑞文, 赖柏聪, 石小红, 孟凡航, 易述红, 曹荣华. 徒手-机器联合复苏在脑死亡供者心脏骤停后器官维护中的作用[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2022, 11(03): 283-287.
[6] 于洋, 刘孝洁, 王丽娟, 高宇晨, 丁瑶, 敖虎山. 新冠肺炎常态化条件下心肺复苏培训模式初探[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(04): 483-486.
[7] 倪争, 朱英华. 视频辅助调度员指导院外心肺复苏的研究进展[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2022, 16(09): 842-846.
[8] 王毅欣, 郑平靖, 黄显雄, 柏杨, 杜果果, 张华. 旁观者实施心肺复苏行为意向的研究现状及启示[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2022, 16(09): 828-832.
[9] 梅冬兰, 凌受毅, 梅冰, 邵光亮, 孙志辉. 院外自动心肺复苏机序贯骨髓腔输液在抢救呼吸心跳骤停患者中的应用价值[J]. 中华卫生应急电子杂志, 2023, 09(03): 159-162.
[10] 章楠, 盛雪立, 邵俊, 方诗园, 王芳, 朱娴, 周斌捷. 院前恢复自主循环的院外心脏骤停患者流行病学研究[J]. 中华卫生应急电子杂志, 2022, 08(06): 326-330.
[11] 谷向民, 刘庆阳, 何忠杰, 杨刚三, 王永刚, 姚世斌, 黄立锋. 院前围心搏骤停心肺复苏后自主循环恢复率15年变化趋势[J]. 中华卫生应急电子杂志, 2022, 08(02): 95-101.
[12] 金庸, 陈刚, 沈芝红, 李晓卿. 急救时间对院前心脏骤停患者心肺复苏成功率预测研究[J]. 中华卫生应急电子杂志, 2021, 07(06): 338-341.
[13] 吴仔弦, 杨思敏, 周保纯. 心搏骤停后综合征患者神经功能预后评估研究进展[J]. 中华脑血管病杂志(电子版), 2022, 16(03): 202-205.
[14] 李震中, 冯立群, 马青变, 王涛, 李永秋, 赵斌, 覃秀川, 李清熙, 吴世政, 孙红斌, 袁军, 楚兰, 武剑, 顾宇翔, 彭继茂, 陈志, 樊东升. 《2020中国心脏骤停后脑保护专家共识》解读三:药物治疗[J]. 中华脑血管病杂志(电子版), 2021, 15(06): 356-360.
[15] 杜兰芳, 马青变. 《2020年中国心脏骤停后脑保护专家共识》解读二:目标温度管理[J]. 中华脑血管病杂志(电子版), 2021, 15(05): 293-296.
阅读次数
全文


摘要