切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华脑科疾病与康复杂志(电子版) ›› 2020, Vol. 10 ›› Issue (02) : 75 -81. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-123X.2020.02.003

所属专题: 文献

颅内动脉瘤

前循环血泡样动脉瘤显微手术和血管内介入治疗的对比分析
谭海斌1,(), 张天1, 黄光富1, 李志立1, 王振宇1, 程美雄1, 刘泠1, 刘灵童1, 胡晓1, 胡俊亭1   
  1. 1. 610072 成都,四川省医学科学院·四川省人民医院神经外科
  • 收稿日期:2020-07-13 出版日期:2020-04-15
  • 通信作者: 谭海斌

Microsurgery and endovascular interventional therapy for anterior circulatory blood blister-like aneurysms

Haibin Tan1,(), Tian Zhang1, Guangfu Huang1, Zhili Li1, Zhenyu Wang1, Meixiong Cheng1, Ling Liu1, Lingtong Liu1, Xiao Hu1, Junting Hu1   

  1. 1. Department of Neurosurgery, Sichuan Academy of Medical Sciences & Sichuan Provincial People’s Hospital, Chengdu 610072, China
  • Received:2020-07-13 Published:2020-04-15
  • Corresponding author: Haibin Tan
引用本文:

谭海斌, 张天, 黄光富, 李志立, 王振宇, 程美雄, 刘泠, 刘灵童, 胡晓, 胡俊亭. 前循环血泡样动脉瘤显微手术和血管内介入治疗的对比分析[J]. 中华脑科疾病与康复杂志(电子版), 2020, 10(02): 75-81.

Haibin Tan, Tian Zhang, Guangfu Huang, Zhili Li, Zhenyu Wang, Meixiong Cheng, Ling Liu, Lingtong Liu, Xiao Hu, Junting Hu. Microsurgery and endovascular interventional therapy for anterior circulatory blood blister-like aneurysms[J]. Chinese Journal of Brain Diseases and Rehabilitation(Electronic Edition), 2020, 10(02): 75-81.

目的

总结血泡样动脉瘤(BBA)的临床特点及探讨其治疗策略,比较开颅手术治疗与血管内治疗的有效性和安全性。

方法

回顾性分析四川省医学科学院·四川省人民医院神经外科自2009年9月至2019年8月收治的68例BBA患者的临床资料,按照治疗方法分为开颅手术治疗组和血管内治疗组。开颅手术治疗组:27例患者行开颅手术治疗,分别采用夹闭、包裹及孤立等方式。血管内治疗组:41例患者行血管内治疗,分别采用单或多支架、密网支架辅助弹簧圈栓塞等方法。比较2组患者的围手术期并发症发生情况与临床预后,出院时预后评估采用改良Rankin量表(mRs)评分。

结果

开颅手术治疗组:直接夹闭22例,包裹夹闭4例,孤立+搭桥1例;术中破裂出血18例,术后脑梗死21例,术后再次出血补救治疗7例,术后血液高凝状态19例;出院时mRs评分0~2分8例,3~5分10例,6分(死亡)9例。血管内治疗组:单或多支架辅助弹簧圈栓塞术32例,血流导向装置9例;术中破裂出血17例,术后脑梗死22例,术后再次出血补救治疗5例,去骨瓣减压11例,术后血液高凝状态26例;出院时mRs评分0~2分30例,3~5分6例,6分(死亡)5例。随访6~84个月,开颅手术治疗组存活18例,失访2例,复发3例;血管内治疗组存活36例,失访3例,复发3例。

结论

重建和加固载瘤动脉壁是治疗BBA的关键。围手术期监测凝血功能对及时处理高凝状态、防治脑血管痉挛、降低严重脑梗死发生率极为重要。相对于外科手术方法,血管内治疗似乎能带来更低的复发率、死亡率和更好的预后结果。

Objective

To summarize the clinical characteristics and explore the treatment strategies of blood blister-like aneurysms (BBAs), and compare the efficacy and safety of craniotomy for BBAs and endovascular treatment.

Methods

The clinical data of 68 patients with BBA admitted to the Department of Neurosurgery of Sichuan Academy of Medical Sciences & Sichuan Provincial People’s Hospital from September 2009 to August 2019 were retrospectively analyzed. Craniotomy group: 27 patients were treated with craniotomy, including clipping, wrapping and isolation. Endovascular treatment group: 41 patients were treated with endovascular treatment, using single or multiple stents, dense mesh stent assisted coil embolization and other methods. The perioperative complications and clinical prognosis of the two groups were compared. The modified Rankin scale (mRs) score was used to evaluate the prognosis at discharge.

Results

In the craniotomy group, 22 patients were directly clipped, 4 patients were wrapped, 1 patient was isolated + bypass. There were 18 patients of intraoperative rupture hemorrhage, 21 patients of postoperative cerebral infarction, 7 patients of postoperative rebleeding, and 19 patients of postoperative hypercoagulability. At the time of discharge, the mRs score was 0-2 in 8 patients, 3-5 in 10 patients and 6 in 9 patients (death). In the endovascular treatment group, 32 patients were treated with single or multiple stent-assisted coil embolization, and 9 patients were treated with flow guiding device. There were 17 patients of intraoperative hemorrhage, 22 cases of postoperative cerebral infarction, 5 patients of postoperative rebleeding, 11 patients of decompressivecraniectomy and 26 patients of postoperative hypercoagulability. At the time of discharge, the mRs score was 0-2 in 30 patients, 3-5 in 6 patients and 6 in 5 patients (death). The follow-up time was 6-84 months. In the craniotomy group, 18 patients survived, 2 patients were lost to follow-up, and 3 patients were recurrent. In the intravascular treatment group, 34 patients survived, 3 patients were lost to follow-up, and 3 patients were recurrent.

Conclusion

Reconstruction and reinforcement of parent artery wall is the key to treat BBA. It is very important to monitor the coagulation function in perioperative period to deal with the high coagulation state in time, prevent cerebral vasospasm and reduce the incidence of severe cerebral infarction. Endovascular treatment appears to result in lower rates of recurrence, mortality, and better outcomes than surgical methods.

表1 2组前循环血泡样动脉瘤患者的基本资料比较[例(%)]
表2 2组前循环血泡样动脉瘤患者术后情况对比[例(%)]
表3 68例前循环血泡样动脉瘤患者改良Rankin量表评分多因素Logistic回归分析结果
图1 典型病例1开颅手术治疗的影像学资料
图2 典型病例2开颅手术治疗的影像学资料
图3 典型病例3血管内治疗的影像学资料
[1]
Nakagawa F, Kobayashi S, Takemae T, et al. Aneurysms protruding from the dorsal wall of the internal carotid artery[J]. J Neurosurg, 1986, 65(3): 303-308.
[2]
Takahashi A, Suzuki J, Fujiwara S, et al. Surgical treatment of chimame (blood blister-like) aneurysm at C2 portion of internal carotid artery[J]. Surg Cereb Stroke, 1988, 16(1): 72-77.
[3]
Abe M, Tabuchi K, Yokoyama H, et al. Blood blisterlike aneurysms of the internal carotid artery[J]. J Neurosurg, 1998, 89(3): 419-424.
[4]
Raymond J, Roy D. Safety and efficacy of endovascular treatment of acutely ruptured aneurysms[J]. Neurosurgery, 1997, 41(6): 1235-1245; discussion: 1245-1246.
[5]
Shah SS, Gersey ZC, Nuh M, et al. Microsurgical versus endovascular interventions for blood-blister aneurysms of the internal carotid artery: systematic review of literature and meta-analysis on safety and efficacy[J]. J Neurosurg, 2017, 127(6): 1361-1373.
[6]
Ogawa A, Suzuki M, Ogasawara K. Aneurysms at nonbranching sites in the surpaclinoid portion of the internal carotid artery: internal carotid artery trunk aneurysms[J]. Neurosurgery, 2000, 47(3): 578-583; discussion: 583-586.
[7]
Ishikawa T, Nakamura N, Houkin K, et al. Pathological consideration of a "blister-like" aneurysm at the superior wall of the internal carotid artery: case report[J]. Neurosurgery, 1997, 40:403-405; discussion: 405-406.
[8]
熊叶,谭显西,李则群,等. LVIS支架治疗颈内动脉血泡样动脉瘤(附二例报告)[J].中华神经外科杂志, 2016, 32(10): 1040-1042.
[9]
Konczalla J, Gessler F, Bruder M, et al. Outcome after subarachnoid hemorrhage from blood blister-like aneurysm rupture depends on age and aneurysm morphology[J]. World Neurosurg, 2017, 105: 944-951.
[10]
Peschillo S, Cannizzaro D, Caporlingua A, et al. A systematic review and meta-analysis of treatment and outcome of blister-like aneurysms[J]. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol, 2016, 37(5): 856-861.
[11]
Satoh A, Sugiyama T, Hongo K, et al. Nationwide surveillance of IC anterior (or dorsal) wall aneurysm: with special reference to its dissecting nature[J]. Acta Neurochir Suppl, 2008, 103: 51-55.
[12]
Meling TR, Sorteberg A, Bakke SJ, et al. Blood blister-like aneurysms of the internal carotid artery trunk causing subarachnoid hemorrhage: treatment and outcome[J]. J Neurosurg, 2008, 108(4): 662-671.
[13]
Song J, Oh S, Kim MJ, et al. Endovascular treatment of ruptured blood blister-like aneurysms with multiple (≥3) overlapping enterprise stents and coiling[J]. Acta Neurochir (Wien), 2016, 158(4): 803-809.
[14]
Fiorella D, Arthur A, Boulos A, et al. Final results of the US humanitarian device exemption study of the low-profile visualized intraluminal support (LVIS) device[J]. J Neurointerv Surg, 2016, 8(9): 894-897.
[15]
Cerejo R, Bain M, John S, et al. Flow diverter treatment of cerebral blister aneurysms[J]. Neuroradiology, 2017, 59(12): 1285-1290.
[16]
Hellstern V, Aguilar-Pérez M, AlMatter M, et al. Microsurgical clipping and endovascular flow diversion of ruptured anterior circulation blood blister-like aneurysms[J]. Interv Neuroradiol, 2018, 24(6): 615-623.
[1] 徐建军, 王宏磊, 乔萌, 冯颖利, 徐宁. 血管内介入治疗合并单侧烟雾病的前交通动脉瘤[J]. 中华神经创伤外科电子杂志, 2022, 08(01): 39-43.
[2] 张家瑞, 郑全乐, 李春虎, 周顺义, 张同乐. 经翼点入路与经眶上外侧入路颅内前循环动脉瘤夹闭术的疗效比较[J]. 中华神经创伤外科电子杂志, 2019, 05(02): 97-100.
[3] 凌海平, 那世杰, 刘涛, 庄宗, 张玉华, 张庆荣, 杭春华. 支架辅助弹簧圈栓塞治疗血泡样动脉瘤的临床疗效分析[J]. 中华脑科疾病与康复杂志(电子版), 2021, 11(05): 263-267.
[4] 杭春华. 颈内动脉血泡样动脉瘤的思考与治疗对策[J]. 中华脑科疾病与康复杂志(电子版), 2021, 11(05): 257-262.
[5] 李广峰, 郭仕峰, 庄肃敬, 许跃龙, 丁秀明, 刘真, 刘克欣, 姚文清. 加压滴注报警器在颅内动脉瘤血管内介入治疗术中的应用[J]. 中华介入放射学电子杂志, 2017, 05(04): 254-258.
[6] 徐剑峰, 曾令勇, 吴贵强, 刘阳, 张海, 高阳, 邓李, 张波, 曹辉, 刘藻滨. 血管内介入治疗硬脑膜动静脉瘘的新进展[J]. 中华介入放射学电子杂志, 2016, 04(03): 172-177.
[7] 张志成, 唐颖馨, 潘超, 张萍, 骆翔, 徐沙丽, 唐洲平. 慢性颅内大血管闭塞再通研究现状[J]. 中华脑血管病杂志(电子版), 2021, 15(03): 181-184.
[8] 赵黎明, 梁浩, 张韶, 高涛, 刘阳, 孙玉学, 郭高超, 李天晓, 栗超跃. 不稳定型烟雾病患者的临床特征及其发生的危险因素分析[J]. 中华脑血管病杂志(电子版), 2021, 15(02): 83-87.
阅读次数
全文


摘要