切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华脑科疾病与康复杂志(电子版) ›› 2020, Vol. 10 ›› Issue (02) : 82 -85. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-123X.2020.02.004

所属专题: 文献

颅内动脉瘤

眶上外入路联合腰大池引流与翼点入路治疗急性期前循环动脉瘤破裂伴发脑积水的临床对比分析
胡俊亭1, 李志立1,()   
  1. 1. 610072 成都,四川省医学科学院·四川省人民医院神经外科
  • 收稿日期:2020-03-11 出版日期:2020-04-15
  • 通信作者: 李志立

Clinical comparative analysis of supraorbital external approach combined with lumbar cisterna drainage and pterional approach in the treatment of acute intracranial anterior circulation ruptured aneurysm with hydrocephalus

Junting Hu1, Zhili Li1,()   

  1. 1. Department of Neurosurgery, Sichuan Academy of Medical Sciences & Sichuan Provincial People’s Hospital, Chengdu 610072, China
  • Received:2020-03-11 Published:2020-04-15
  • Corresponding author: Zhili Li
引用本文:

胡俊亭, 李志立. 眶上外入路联合腰大池引流与翼点入路治疗急性期前循环动脉瘤破裂伴发脑积水的临床对比分析[J]. 中华脑科疾病与康复杂志(电子版), 2020, 10(02): 82-85.

Junting Hu, Zhili Li. Clinical comparative analysis of supraorbital external approach combined with lumbar cisterna drainage and pterional approach in the treatment of acute intracranial anterior circulation ruptured aneurysm with hydrocephalus[J]. Chinese Journal of Brain Diseases and Rehabilitation(Electronic Edition), 2020, 10(02): 82-85.

目的

对比眶上外入路联合腰大池引流与翼点入路治疗急性期颅内前循环动脉瘤破裂伴发脑积水的手术治疗效果。

方法

选择自2017年1月至2019年6月四川省医学科学院·四川省人民医院神经外科收治的48例急性期颅内前循环动脉瘤破裂伴发脑积水患者作为研究对象,依据手术方式分为2组,每组24例。观察组采用眶上外入路联合腰大池引流术式,对照组采用翼点入路组。评估2组患者的临床指标变化与手术效果,根据简易精神评价量表评价患者术后记忆力、定向力、回忆能力、语言能力。

结果

观察组的手术时间和住院时间较对照组短,差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。观察组的术中出血量与对照组比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。观察组术中颞浅动脉损伤和脑组织牵拉损伤较对照组少,颞肌萎缩和术后脑积水的发生率较对照组低,差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。观察组患者术后记忆力、定向力、回忆能力、语言能力与对照组比较,差异均具有统计学意义(P<0.1);注意力和计算力与对照组比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.1)。

结论

眶上外入路联合腰大池引流治疗急性期颅内前循环动脉瘤破裂伴发脑积水,能有效减少术中脑挫伤、术后并发症,有利于患者快速康复,提高患者生存质量。

Objective

To investigate the effect of supraorbital approach combined with lumbar cistern drainage and pterional approach in the treatment of acute intracranial anterior circulation ruptured aneurysm with hydrocephalus.

Methods

Forty-eight patients with ruptured anterior circulation complicated by hydrocephalus were admitted to Department of Neurosurgery of Sichuan Academy of Medical Sciences & Sichuan Provincial People’s Hospital from January 2017 to June 2019 were selected as the research objects. The patients were randomly divided into observation group (supraorbital approach surgery combined with lumbar cistern drainage) and control group (pterional approach surgery) with 24 cases in each group. The change time and surgery effect of clinical indicators in the two groups were evaluated. The memory, orientation, recall and language ability were evaluated according to the mini mental status examination (MMSE).

Results

The operation time and hospitalization time of the observation group were shorter than those of the control group, and the differences were statistically significant (P<0.05). There was no significant difference in intraoperative blood loss between the observation group and the control group (P>0.05). Intraoperative superficial temporal artery injury and brain tissue pulling injury in the observation group were less than those in the control group, and the differences were statistically significant (P<0.05). The incidence of temporalis atrophy and postoperative hydrocephalus in the observation group were lower than that in the control group, and the differences were statistically significant (P<0.05). According to MMSE score, postoperative memory, orientation, recall ability and language ability of the patients in the observation group were all different from those in the control group (P<0.1); there was no significant difference in attention and computation ability between the observation group and the control group (P>0.1).

Conclusion

Supraorbital approach combined with lumbar cisterna drainage in the treatment of acute intracranial anterior circulation ruptured aneurysm with hydrocephalus can effectively reduce intraoperative cerebral contusion and postoperative complications, which is conducive to the rapid recovery of patients and improve the quality of life of patients.

表1 观察组和对照组手术指标对比(Mean±SD)
表2 2组患者手术并发症情况及总体的发生率比较[例(%)]
表3 2组患者各认知指标的差异检验(Mean±SD)
[1]
Connolly ES Jr, Rabinstein AA, Carhuapoma JR, et al. Guidelines for the management of aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage: a guideline for healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association[J]. Stroke, 2012, 43(6): 1711-1737.
[2]
张建忠,龙连圣,韩瑞璋,等.蛛网膜下腔出血诱导脑血管病理改变的研究进展[J].中华神经医学杂志, 2010, 9(12): 1291-1293.
[3]
季楠,王硕,赵继宗.术中终板造瘘治疗动脉瘤性蛛网膜下腔出血后脑积水[J].中华神经外科疾病研究杂志, 2004, 3(5): 414-416.
[4]
Yasargil MG, Antic J, Laciga R, et al. Microsurgical pterional approach to aneurysms of the basilar bifurcation[J]. Surg Neurol, 1976, 6(2): 83-91.
[5]
Lan Q, Zhang H, Zhu Q, et al. Keyhole approach for clipping intracranial aneurysm: comparison of supraorbital and pterional keyhole approach[J]. World Neurosurg, 2017, 102: 350-359.
[6]
Park S, Yang N, Seo E. The effectiveness of lumbar cerebrospinal fluid drainage to reduce the cerebral vasospasm after surgical clipping for aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage[J]. J Korean Neurosurg Soc, 2015, 57(3): 167-173.
[7]
黄志敏,王敏,罗安志,等.终板造瘘联合腰池引流对破裂动脉瘤术后脑积水的疗效分析[J].实用医院临床杂志, 2020, 17(4): 63-65.
[8]
郑全乐,赵浩,张家瑞,等.眶上外侧入路与翼点入路手术治疗急性期颅内前循环破裂动脉瘤的临床对比分析[J].中华脑科疾病与康复杂志(电子版), 2019, 9(4): 218-221.
[9]
刘晓杨,王晋,洪勇志,等.眶上外侧入路或翼点入路手术治疗前循环动脉瘤的临床疗效[J].江苏医药, 2017, 43(7): 457-459.
[10]
Hasan D, Vermeulen M, Wijdicks EF, et al. Management problems in acute hydrocephalus after subarachnoid hemorrhage[J]. Stroke, 1989, 20(6): 747-753.
[11]
唐宽.动脉瘤性蛛网膜下腔出血后慢性脑积水研究进展[J].国际神经病学神经外科学杂志, 2019, 46(6): 692-694.
[12]
黄正松,石忠松,齐铁伟,等.显微手术和介入治疗急性期颅内动脉瘤破裂的对比性研究[J].中华显微外科杂志, 2003, 26(4): 247-249.
[13]
张永军,薛润梅.尼莫地平联合奥拉西坦用于高血压脑出血患者认知恢复临床观察[J].中国医学前沿杂志(电子版), 2014, 7(7): 109-111.
[14]
Murai Y, Nakagawa S, Matano F, et al. The feasibility of detecting cerebral blood flow direction using the indocyanine green video angiography[J]. Neurosurg Rev, 2016, 39(4): 685-690.
[15]
陈祥瑞.腰池引流在颅內动脉瘤夹闭术中及术后的应用[J].检验医学与临床, 2014, 11(15): 2192-2193.
[1] 熊微, 李胜利, 林清秀, 张梅芳. 胎儿侧脑室扩张程度与妊娠结局[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2021, 18(03): 290-295.
[2] 张雯, 张彦春, 刘凯波, 徐宏燕. 北京市胎儿先天性脑积水的产前MRI诊断及围产期转归[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2023, 19(03): 345-349.
[3] 张雯, 徐宏燕, 张彦春, 李东阳, 刘凯波. 北京市胎儿及婴儿先天性脑积水发生情况及婴儿期转归[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2021, 17(06): 657-662.
[4] 王柠, 王佳伟, 刘旭阳. 重视眼颅压力差在多学科领域的应用[J]. 中华眼科医学杂志(电子版), 2022, 12(06): 321-325.
[5] 王奎重, 王天助, 袁冶, 胡金娜, 杜嘉庚, 袁绍纪. 三维重建术前计划在经侧脑室后角穿刺脑室-腹腔分流术中的应用[J]. 中华神经创伤外科电子杂志, 2022, 08(06): 361-364.
[6] 吴晓凡, 罗书引, 冯二艳. 交通性脑积水脑室-腹腔分流术后迟发性颅内出血发生风险的列线图预测模型构建与评估[J]. 中华神经创伤外科电子杂志, 2022, 08(05): 276-281.
[7] 李晓东. 翼点锁孔入路夹闭前循环动脉瘤[J]. 中华神经创伤外科电子杂志, 2022, 08(04): 255-256.
[8] 卢盛华, 刘佰运. 创伤性脑积水患者功能评价的研究进展[J]. 中华神经创伤外科电子杂志, 2022, 08(03): 178-182.
[9] 韦强, 秦赢, 王光明, 周立祥, 付双林, 栾永昕. 腰大池-腹腔分流术治疗交通性脑积水的临床疗效分析[J]. 中华神经创伤外科电子杂志, 2022, 08(03): 173-177.
[10] 柏瑞, 赵丽娜, 陈毅, 马宁. 脑室-腹腔分流术后感染的影响因素分析及手术操作改良[J]. 中华神经创伤外科电子杂志, 2021, 07(06): 345-349.
[11] 顾生才, 茆翔, 田学丰, 程宏伟. 持续腰大池引流联合鞘内注射庆大霉素对脑室出血术后颅内感染的临床效果分析[J]. 中华神经创伤外科电子杂志, 2021, 07(02): 100-102.
[12] 解东成, 陈红伟, 王圣杰, 郭小川. 创伤性脑损伤后不同程度脑积水患者脑室-腹腔分流术临床疗效分析[J]. 中华神经创伤外科电子杂志, 2021, 07(02): 92-95.
[13] 张新, 周剑云, 曹泽, 孙炜. 微创技术方案下脑室腹腔分流术效果分析[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2021, 15(12): 917-921.
[14] 黄贞亮, 赵铎. 针刀治疗胶质瘤术后头痛案[J]. 中华针灸电子杂志, 2022, 11(04): 144-145.
[15] 刘忠, 田新华, 杨为祝, 张峰林. 神经内镜在治疗丘脑出血破入脑室中的入路选择及研究进展[J]. 中华脑血管病杂志(电子版), 2021, 15(05): 328-330.
阅读次数
全文


摘要