切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华脑科疾病与康复杂志(电子版) ›› 2020, Vol. 10 ›› Issue (02) : 86 -89. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-123X.2020.02.005

所属专题: 文献

颅内动脉瘤

LVIS支架辅助弹簧圈栓塞颅内破裂微小动脉瘤的疗效分析
陈靓1, 张天1, 胡晓1, 郭莉丽1, 刘泠1, 程美雄1,()   
  1. 1. 610072 成都,四川省医学科学院·四川省人民医院神经外科
  • 收稿日期:2020-02-26 出版日期:2020-04-15
  • 通信作者: 程美雄

Effect analysis of LVIS stent-assisted coil in intracranial ruptured small aneurysms

Liang Chen1, Tian Zhang1, Xiao Hu1, Lili Guo1, Ling Liu1, Meixiong Chen1,()   

  1. 1. Department of Neurosurgery, Sichuan Academy of Medical Sciences & Sichuan Provincial People’s Hospital, Chengdu 610072, China
  • Received:2020-02-26 Published:2020-04-15
  • Corresponding author: Meixiong Chen
引用本文:

陈靓, 张天, 胡晓, 郭莉丽, 刘泠, 程美雄. LVIS支架辅助弹簧圈栓塞颅内破裂微小动脉瘤的疗效分析[J/OL]. 中华脑科疾病与康复杂志(电子版), 2020, 10(02): 86-89.

Liang Chen, Tian Zhang, Xiao Hu, Lili Guo, Ling Liu, Meixiong Chen. Effect analysis of LVIS stent-assisted coil in intracranial ruptured small aneurysms[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Brain Diseases and Rehabilitation(Electronic Edition), 2020, 10(02): 86-89.

目的

探讨LVIS支架在颅内破裂微小动脉瘤介入治疗中的安全性及有效性。

方法

回顾性分析四川省医学科学院·四川省人民医院神经外科自2014年8月至2019年8月采用LVIS支架辅助弹簧圈栓塞的32例颅内破裂微小动脉瘤患者的临床资料,评价介入治疗的临床效果、手术并发症发生情况及预后情况。

结果

32例患者均成功进行LVIS支架辅助弹簧圈栓塞术。术后即刻栓塞结果:Raymond分级Ⅰ级30例(93.8%),Ⅱ级2例(6.2%);31例患者支架完全展开,1例患者支架展开不良。术后6~12个月,28例患者行DSA随访,其中Raymond分级Ⅰ级27例(96.4%)、Ⅱ级1例(3.6%)。临床随访32例,无再出血、致死、致残病例,改良Rankin量表(mRs)评分0分28例,mRs评分1~2分4例。随访期间32例患者均未出现脑卒中相关事件。

结论

应用LVIS支架辅助弹簧圈栓塞治疗颅内破裂微小动脉瘤方法安全、有效,但需长期、大量样本病例的随访观察。

Objective

To investigate the safety and efficacy of LVIS stent in the treatment of intracranial wide-necked small aneurysms.

Methods

The clinical data of 32 patients with intracranial ruptured small aneurysms treated with LVIS stent-assisted coil embolization from August 2014 to August 2019 in the neurosurgery department of Sichuan Academy of Medical Sciences & Sichuan Provincial People’s Hospital were retrospectively analyzed. The clinical effect, complications and prognosis of interventional therapy were evaluated.

Results

LVIS stent-assisted coil embolization were successfully performed in 32 patients. Raymond classification right after the surgery hinted grade Ⅰ in 30 patients (93.8%), grade Ⅱ in 2 patients (6.2%). There was 1 patient enjoying suboptimal opening of LVIS stent. Raymond classification 6-12 months after surgery hinted grade Ⅰ in 27 patients (96.4%), grade Ⅱ in 1 patient (3.6%). Modified Rankin scale indicated that 28 patients had 0 point and 4 had 1-2 point. No procedure-related complications occurred during follow-up.

Conclusion

The LVIS stent is safe and effective in the treatment of intracranial ruptured small aneurysms. The long-term efficacy remains to be confirmed by larger studies with longer follow-up duration.

图1 典型病例LVIS支架辅助弹簧圈栓塞破裂微小、宽颈右侧颈内动脉末端分叉部动脉瘤手术前后的影像学资料
[1]
Pierot L, Barbe C, Spelle L. Endovascular treatment of very small unruptured aneurysms: rate of procedural complications, clinical outcome, and anatomical results[J]. Stroke, 2010, 41(12): 2855-2859.
[2]
Poncyljusz W, Bilinski P, Safranow K, et al. The LVIS/LVIS Jr. stents in the treatment of wide-neck intracranial aneurysms: multicentre registry[J]. J Neurointerv Surg, 2015, 7(7): 524-529.
[3]
杨鸿春,王大明.血管内治疗颅内微小动脉瘤的研究进展[J].中华神经外科杂志, 2016, 32(1): 100-103.
[4]
Zheng Y, Song Y, Liu D, et al. Stent-assisted coiling embolization of tiny, wide-necked intracranial aneurysms[J]. Acta Neurochir, 2017, 159(1): 93-100.
[5]
van Rooij WJ, Keeren GJ, Peluso JP, et al. Clinical and angiographic results of coiling of 196 very small (< or = 3 mm) intracranial aneurysms[J]. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol, 2009, 30(4): 835-839.
[6]
King B, Vaziri S, Singla A, et al. Clinical and angiographic outcomes after stent-assisted coiling of cerebral aneurysms with enterprise and neuroform stents: a comparative analysis of the literature[J]. J Neurointerv Surg, 2015, 7(12): 905-909.
[7]
Li X, Qin J, Xiao Z, et al. Solitaire AB stent-assisted coiling of wide-neck micro aneurysms[J]. J Korean Neurosurg Soc, 2016, 59(4): 341-345.
[8]
程美雄,张天,谭海斌,等. Pipeline血流导向装置治疗颈内动脉大型和巨大型动脉瘤的疗效分析[J].中华神经外科杂志, 2018, 34(5): 447-450.
[9]
凌国源,莫立根,冯大勤,等. LVIS支架与Enterprise支架辅助栓塞颅内宽颈动脉瘤的比较[J].中国微创外科杂志, 2020, 20(9): 769-774.
[10]
Lee SJ, Cho YD, Kang HS, et al. Coil embolization using the self-expandable closed-cell stent for intracranial saccular aneurysm: a single-center experience of 289 consecutive aneurysms[J]. Clin Radiol, 2013, 68(3): 256-263.
[11]
Fiorella D, Boulos A, Turk AS, et al. The safety and effectiveness of the LVIS stent system for the treatment of wide-necked cerebral aneurysms: final results of the pivotal US LVIS trial[J]. 2019, 11(4): 357-361.
[12]
程美雄,张天,刘泠. LVIS支架辅助弹簧圈栓塞颅内宽颈微小动脉瘤的疗效分析[J].中国脑血管病杂志, 2019, 16(11): 597-600.
[13]
李锦,戴冬伟,黄清海,等. LVIS支架辅助弹簧圈栓塞大脑中动脉M1段累及分支囊状动脉瘤的疗效评价[J].中国脑血管病杂志, 2018, 15(9): 478-482.
[14]
许刚,崔刚,僧志远,等.血管内栓塞治疗前交通破裂微小动脉瘤的技术分析[J].中国脑血管病杂志, 2015, 12(3): 118-124.
[15]
叶海泉. LVIS支架辅助弹簧圈血管内栓塞治疗颅内动脉瘤破裂围术期感染的危险因素分析[J].广西医学, 2020, 42(5): 551-553, 558.
[1] 陆婷, 范晴敏, 王洁, 万晓静, 许春芳, 董凤林. 超声引导下经皮穿刺置管引流对重症急性胰腺炎的疗效及应用时机的选择[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(05): 511-516.
[2] 王友芳, 李兴超, 刘清敏, 刘德彬, 刘松伍, 郭冬冬, 车峰远. 应激性高血糖指数对经皮冠状动脉介入术后急性心肌梗死患者发生主要不良心脑血管事件的预测价值[J/OL]. 中华危重症医学杂志(电子版), 2024, 17(02): 124-129.
[3] 张腾花, 尚培中, 王晓梅, 李晓武, 王金, 苗建军, 刘冰. 外伤性脾破裂三阶梯分层治疗策略[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 510-512.
[4] 吴俊嶺, 孟科, 刘江涛, 孙刚. 基于HVPG分层的门脉高压内镜治疗中远期疗效研究[J/OL]. 中华腔镜外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 17(02): 100-105.
[5] 邢颖, 程石. 巨脾外科治疗现状与介入治疗序贯手术策略[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(03): 253-258.
[6] 唐必英, 李钢. 治疗时机对动脉瘤性蛛网膜下腔出血患者预后的影响[J/OL]. 中华神经创伤外科电子杂志, 2024, 10(04): 213-219.
[7] 杨金朔, 吴桥伟, 王春雷, 史怀璋. 脑血管内支架成形术后再狭窄的研究进展[J/OL]. 中华神经创伤外科电子杂志, 2024, 10(03): 174-179.
[8] 牟超鹏, 宗斌, 刘奕, 史美英, 徐杜娟, 冯春光. 经远端桡动脉与经常规桡动脉行急诊冠脉介入诊疗后穿刺部位血肿的对比[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(03): 275-282.
[9] 陈芳, 王建英, 曹建用, 刘丽, 罗晓琴. 基于分析-设计-开发-实施-评价模式的叙事护理培训在产科预防性介入治疗中的应用[J/OL]. 中华介入放射学电子杂志, 2024, 12(04): 392-396.
[10] 崔斯童, 马骏, 刘亮, 夏加庚, 刘振. 双微导管与支架辅助技术治疗颅内未破裂宽颈分叶状动脉瘤的疗效对比分析[J/OL]. 中华介入放射学电子杂志, 2024, 12(03): 200-205.
[11] 李超迪, 刘娟芳, 闫肃, 秦胜东, 张镐哲, 常琼方, 韩新巍, 张建好. 血管性介入治疗在宫颈癌大出血患者中的临床疗效[J/OL]. 中华介入放射学电子杂志, 2024, 12(03): 217-220.
[12] 周宝林, 刘曦, 谌浩, 王金, 马雪琴. 温敏水凝胶在血管内栓塞治疗中的研究进展[J/OL]. 中华介入放射学电子杂志, 2024, 12(03): 244-249.
[13] 徐啸阳, 张帅, 仲斌演, 沈健, 朱晓黎. 血管腔内介入治疗肾动脉瘤的临床疗效分析[J/OL]. 中华介入放射学电子杂志, 2024, 12(02): 137-143.
[14] 林永俭, 谢雪花, 郝莉茹, 刘丽, 马英东. 优化急诊绿色通道对急性心肌梗死介入治疗患者救治时间的影响[J/OL]. 中华介入放射学电子杂志, 2024, 12(02): 185-189.
[15] 周洪千, 张煜坤, 顾天舒, 胡苏涛, 姜超, 张雪, 张昊, 陶华岳, 刘行, 刘彤, 陈康寅. 既往出血性脑卒中患者行经皮冠脉介入治疗后不良事件的危险因素分析[J/OL]. 中华脑血管病杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(04): 323-329.
阅读次数
全文


摘要


AI


AI小编
你好!我是《中华医学电子期刊资源库》AI小编,有什么可以帮您的吗?