切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华脑科疾病与康复杂志(电子版) ›› 2020, Vol. 10 ›› Issue (03) : 132 -138. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-123X.2020.03.002

所属专题: 文献

临床研究

无创脑水肿动态监测仪对急性脑损伤诊断价值的Meta分析
林洁1, 何明莲1, 邹永杰1, 黄苏娜1, 胡荣1, 陈渝杰1,(), 冯华1   
  1. 1. 400038 重庆,陆军军医大学第一附属医院神经外科
  • 收稿日期:2020-10-09 出版日期:2020-06-15
  • 通信作者: 陈渝杰
  • 基金资助:
    国家重点研发计划(2017YFC0111901); 军队医药卫生科技成果扩试计划(18WKS01); 重庆市重点产业共性关键技术创新专项(cstc2017zdcy-zdyfX0084)

Meta-analysis for the diagnostic value of non-invasive brain edema dynamic monitor on acute brain injury

Jie Lin1, Minglian He1, Yongjie Zou1, Suna Huang1, Rong Hu1, Yujie Chen1,(), Hua Feng1   

  1. 1. Department of Neurosurgery, First Affiliated Hospital of Military Medical University of the Army, Chongqing 400038, China
  • Received:2020-10-09 Published:2020-06-15
  • Corresponding author: Yujie Chen
引用本文:

林洁, 何明莲, 邹永杰, 黄苏娜, 胡荣, 陈渝杰, 冯华. 无创脑水肿动态监测仪对急性脑损伤诊断价值的Meta分析[J/OL]. 中华脑科疾病与康复杂志(电子版), 2020, 10(03): 132-138.

Jie Lin, Minglian He, Yongjie Zou, Suna Huang, Rong Hu, Yujie Chen, Hua Feng. Meta-analysis for the diagnostic value of non-invasive brain edema dynamic monitor on acute brain injury[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Brain Diseases and Rehabilitation(Electronic Edition), 2020, 10(03): 132-138.

目的

对无创脑水肿动态监测仪诊断急性脑损伤的文献进行荟萃分析,评价无创脑水肿动态监测仪对脑出血、颅脑外伤及脑梗死的诊断价值。

方法

使用中国生物医学文献、万方医药、中国知网、PubMed等数据库检索无创脑水肿动态监测仪相关中英文文献。以急性脑损伤患者健侧扰动系数为对照组,对纳入的文献进行质量评价,并提取相关数据进行研究。数据分析采用Review Manager 5.4版软件。检验纳入文献的异质性,采取单篇文献排除法进行敏感性分析,并绘制森林图计算各亚组扰动系数对比的OR值。

结果

最后纳入文献共计8篇,存在异质性,按发病类型进行亚组分析。亚组分析结果:发病后1 d脑出血及颅脑外伤患者大脑患侧扰动系数均显著低于健侧,OR值分别为-2.57(95%CI:-3.01~-2.13)、-0.83(95%CI:-1.02~-0.63),而发病后3、7 d脑出血及颅脑外伤患者大脑患侧扰动系数均显著高于健侧;发病后1、3、7 d脑梗死患者大脑患侧扰动系数均显著高于健侧,OR值分别为0.75(95%CI:0.39~1.10)、0.61(95%CI:0.32~0.90)、0.50(95%CI:0.01~0.99);发病后脑出血、脑梗死及颅脑外伤患者1~3 d扰动系数变化幅度均显著大于3~7 d,OR值分别为3.30(95%CI:3.11~3.50)、1.03(95%CI:0.08~1.98)、2.23(95%CI:2.09~2.38)。

结论

无创脑水肿动态监测仪对急性脑损伤患者的扰动系数监测符合脑水肿发生的基本病理生理规律,反映了患者脑水肿严重程度变化的动态过程,可作为急性脑损伤患者的临床辅助诊断方法,帮助临床医生动态了解患者的脑水肿情况。

Objective

To perform a meta-analysis of non-invasive brain edema dynamic monitor in diagnosis of acute brain injury and evaluate the diagnostic value of non-invasive brain edema dynamic monitor for intracerebral hemorrhage, brain trauma and cerebral infarction.

Methods

The literatures of the non-invasive brain edema dynamic monitor were retrieved using the Chinese Biomedical Literature Database, Wanfang Medical Database, Chinese Knowledge Network Journal Database, and the PubMed Database. The cerebral electrical impedance of the brain with healthy side in acute brain injury patients was treated as control. The quality of included literatures was assessed. The relevant data for research was extracted. Statistical analysis was performed Review Manager 5.4 software. The heterogeneity of the literature was tested. The sensitivity analysis was carried out by single literature exclusion method, and the OR value of disturbance coefficient of each subgroup was calculated by drawing forest map.

Results

Eight studies with heterogeneity were included for subgroup analysis according to the onset type. The cerebral electrical impedance was significantly lower than that of healthy side after 1 d of intracerebral hemorrhage and brain trauma, the OR values were -2.57(95%CI: -3.01--2.13) and -0.83(95%CI: -1.02--0.63). The cerebral electrical impedance was significantly higher than that of healthy side after 3 and 7 d of intracerebral hemorrhage and brain trauma. The cerebral electrical impedance was significantly higher than that of healthy side after 1, 3 and 7 d of cerebral infarction, the OR values were 0.75(95%CI: 0.39-1.10), 0.61(95%CI: 0.32-0.90), 0.50(95%CI: 0.31-0.99). The variation amplitude of cerebral electrical impedance during 1-3 d in patients with intracerebral hemorrhage, cerebral infarction and brain trauma was significantly greater than that during 3-7 d after onset, the OR values were 3.30 (95%CI: 3.11-3.50), 1.03 (95%CI: 0.08-1.98), 2.23 (95%CI: 2.09-2.38).

Conclusion

The cerebral electrical impedance of non-invasive brain edema dynamic monitor in patients with acute brain injury accorded with the basic pathophysiological law of brain edema and reflected the dynamic process of changes in the severity of cerebral edema. It can be used as an auxiliary diagnostic method for patients with acute brain injury to help clinicians understand the situation of brain edema in patients at any time during treatment.

图1 纳入文献流程图
表1 纳入文献的基本情况
图2 发病后1 d患者大脑患侧与健侧扰动系数亚组分析
图3 发病后3 d患者大脑患侧与健侧扰动系数对比
图4 发病后7 d患者大脑患侧与健侧扰动系数对比
图5 发病后1~3 d与3~7 d患者大脑患侧扰动系数对比
图6 扰动系数在各种急性脑损伤患者中的变化规律纳入文献发表偏倚漏斗图分析
[1]
Harukuni I, Bhardwaj A. Mechanisms of brain injury after global cerebral ischemia[J]. Neurol Clin, 2006, 24(1): 1-21.
[2]
刘永亮,王鹏,李建民.颅脑损伤后脑水肿的发病机制研究进展[J].中国医药指南, 2013, 11(8): 76-78.
[3]
丁兴,林海峰.脑出血后脑水肿发病机制研究进展[J].世界最新医学信息文摘, 2015, 15(86): 59-60.
[4]
刘小艳.无创动态监测脑卒中患者脑水肿的临床研究[D].广州,暨南大学, 2007.
[5]
Dimitriou J, Levivier M, Gugliotta M. Comparison of complications in patients receiving different types of intracranial pressure monitoring: a retrospective study in a single center in Switzerland[J]. World Neurosurg, 2016, 89: 641-646.
[6]
Shen L, Wang Z, Su Z, et al. Effects of intracranial pressure monitoring on mortality in patients with severe traumatic brain injury: a meta-analysis[J]. PLoS One, 2016, 11(12): e0168901.
[7]
秦兴虎,陈义天,徐宏,等.无创脑水肿动态监测在创伤性脑损伤术后的临床应用价值[J].中华创伤杂志, 2017, 33(8): 719-723.
[8]
郭栋泽,樊星,乔慧.闪光视觉诱发电位术中监测的研究现状[J].中华神经外科杂志, 2020, 36(5): 529-532.
[9]
Brown BH. Electrical impedance tomography (EIT): a review[J]. J Med Eng Technol, 2003, 27(3): 97-108.
[10]
Itkis ML, Roberts JK, Ghajar JB, et al. A square signal wave method for measurement of brain extra- and intracellular water content[J]. Acta Neurochir Suppl (Wien), 1994, 60: 574-576.
[11]
何为,姚德贵,田海燕.电流场扰动方法和它在颅内异物成像中的应用[J].中国医学物理学杂志, 2001, 18(1): 20-22.
[12]
雷清梅.无创脑水肿监护仪在脑外伤患者的应用观察及预后预测作用[D].广州:南方医科大学, 2018.
[13]
邱昕,陈国华,单萍,等.无创脑水肿动态监测在自发性脑出血患者中的应用[J].神经损伤与功能重建, 2008, 3(5): 317-318.
[14]
张英杰.神经重症患者无创脑水肿动态监测的临床研究[D].唐山:华北理工大学, 2017.
[15]
Lichtenstein MJ, Mulrow CD, Elwood PC. Guidelines for reading case-control studies[J]. J Chronic Dis, 1987, 40(9): 893-903.
[16]
刘树俊,王婷婷,曹世钰,等.中国儿童哮喘危险因素的Meta分析[J].中国当代儿科杂志, 2018, 20(3): 218-223.
[17]
黄振林,甄云,陈麒声,等.无创脑水肿动态监护在脑出血性疾病治疗上的应用[J].现代诊断与治疗, 2011, 22(5): 271-272.
[18]
熊震,黄宇星,李成勋,等.应用无创脑水肿动态监护仪观察血府逐瘀汤治疗急性脑出血后脑水肿的临床研究[J].中国中医急症, 2017, 26(7): 1292-1295.
[19]
李国泰,陈盛强.无创脑水肿动态监护仪对脑出血患者治疗的指导作用[J].医学临床研究, 2006, 23(7): 1106-1107.
[20]
覃家敏,吴雪松.无创脑水肿监测仪监测重型脑损伤脑水肿变化的临床研究[J].广西医学, 2015, 37(12): 1846-1847.
[21]
杨媛.无创脑电阻抗检测在神经科的应用研究[D].大连:大连医科大学, 2012.
[22]
钟高贤,王伟,唐洲平,等.脑出血微创血肿清除术中的无创脑水肿动态监护[J].卒中与神经疾病, 2005, 12(6): 343-345, 349.
[23]
刘丽旭,董为伟,贾建平,等.无创性脑电阻抗测定在脑出血患者脑水肿监测中的应用[J].中华神经科杂志, 2007, 40(6): 383-386.
[24]
胡栓贵,黄新,黄勤,等.无创脑水肿仪对重型颅脑损伤的动态监测[J].中国医药导报, 2009, 6(20): 111-112.
[25]
郝石磊,郭廷旺,王伯初.脑出血后血肿占位效应及脑损伤机制研究[C]//第十二届全国生物力学学术会议暨第十四届全国生物流变学学术会议会议论文摘要汇编,西安, 2018.北京:中国力学学会, 2018.
[26]
Bhasin RR, Xi G, Hua Y, et al. Experimental intracerebral hemorrhage: effect of lysed erythrocytes on brain edema and blood-brain barrier permeability[J]. Acta Neurochir Suppl, 2002, 81: 249-251.
[27]
Shahrokhi N, Khaksari M, AsadiKaram G, et al. Role of melatonin receptors in the effect of estrogen on brain edema, intracranial pressure and expression of aquaporin 4 after traumatic brain injury[J]. Iran J Basic Med Sci, 2018, 21(3): 301-308.
[28]
Castellazzi M, Tamborino C, De Santis G, et al. Timing of serum active MMP-9 and MMP-2 levels in acute and subacute phases after spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage[J]. Acta Neurochir Suppl, 2010, 106: 137-140.
[1] 孙顗淼, 张颖. 糖尿病患者急性脑梗死取栓术后发生对比剂肾病的影响因素及预测模型建立[J/OL]. 中华肾病研究电子杂志, 2024, 13(04): 188-194.
[2] 王永楠, 汤畅通, 殷杰, 谭溢涛. 微创钻孔引流术与神经内镜血肿清除术治疗临界量基底节脑出血的效果对比分析[J/OL]. 中华神经创伤外科电子杂志, 2024, 10(05): 286-292.
[3] 张志超, 李陈, 韩惠, 周夏, 洪家康. 经额平行白质纤维束立体定向血肿穿刺引流术与神经内镜下血肿清除术治疗基底节脑出血的临床对比分析[J/OL]. 中华神经创伤外科电子杂志, 2024, 10(05): 299-303.
[4] 谢井伟, 王森, 王非, 郭永坤. STA-MCA血管搭桥术治疗烟雾病[J/OL]. 中华神经创伤外科电子杂志, 2024, 10(05): 318-320.
[5] 李刚, 潘晓帆, 田雪, 刘路路. CT灌注成像参数及血栓弹力图对急性前循环脑梗死早期神经功能恶化的预测价值分析[J/OL]. 中华神经创伤外科电子杂志, 2024, 10(04): 226-232.
[6] 汤畅通, 王永楠, 王诗筌. 颅脑外伤后阵发性交感神经兴奋患者的药物治疗效果分析[J/OL]. 中华神经创伤外科电子杂志, 2024, 10(04): 233-237.
[7] 周良辅. 爆炸性颅脑创伤的诊治[J/OL]. 中华神经创伤外科电子杂志, 2024, 10(03): 129-131.
[8] 刘国龙, 王鹏, 谭超, 杨辉, 彭菊红. 神经外科机器人辅助双通道颅内血肿清除术治疗高血压性脑出血[J/OL]. 中华脑科疾病与康复杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(04): 254-256.
[9] 赵倩, 刘文超, 李玺琳, 章邱东. 老年急性脑梗死诱发胃肠损伤的风险因素分析及模型构建[J/OL]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(03): 213-217.
[10] 潘鑫, 黄晓云, 王超, 顾慧, 唐加波, 王鹏, 崔恒熙, 李政. 院前亚低温结合院内溶栓救治急性脑梗死的效果[J/OL]. 中华卫生应急电子杂志, 2024, 10(03): 145-148.
[11] 穆巴拉克·伊力哈, 徐霁华, 鲁明. 急性轻型卒中微量脑出血误诊病例的临床特点及影像学表现分析[J/OL]. 中华脑血管病杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 441-445.
[12] 克地尔牙·马合木提, 胡波, 杨琼, 闫素, 胡岚卿, 高沛沛, 姚恩生. 依达拉奉右莰醇对急性脑梗死后认知功能障碍的疗效观察[J/OL]. 中华脑血管病杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 459-466.
[13] 刘焕亮, 崔慧娟, 曹慧, 付源. 颈动脉狭窄处剪切率对高同型半胱氨酸血症患者脑梗死的预测价值[J/OL]. 中华脑血管病杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(04): 317-322.
[14] 于乐林, 尚海龙, 杜红娣, 王莺, 王一超, 徐长贺, 叶娟, 赵世伟, 郑芳慧, 沈慧, 沈海林. 基于CT平扫的影像组学特征预测急性大脑中动脉闭塞机械取栓术后造影剂外渗的价值[J/OL]. 中华脑血管病杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(03): 215-223.
[15] 刘晓梅, 罗永梅, 傅瑜. 基于信息化老年综合评估的多学科管理护理模式在脑梗死患者中的应用效果[J/OL]. 中华脑血管病杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(03): 255-264.
阅读次数
全文


摘要