切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华脑科疾病与康复杂志(电子版) ›› 2020, Vol. 10 ›› Issue (03) : 132 -138. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-123X.2020.03.002

所属专题: 文献

临床研究

无创脑水肿动态监测仪对急性脑损伤诊断价值的Meta分析
林洁1, 何明莲1, 邹永杰1, 黄苏娜1, 胡荣1, 陈渝杰1,(), 冯华1   
  1. 1. 400038 重庆,陆军军医大学第一附属医院神经外科
  • 收稿日期:2020-10-09 出版日期:2020-06-15
  • 通信作者: 陈渝杰
  • 基金资助:
    国家重点研发计划(2017YFC0111901); 军队医药卫生科技成果扩试计划(18WKS01); 重庆市重点产业共性关键技术创新专项(cstc2017zdcy-zdyfX0084)

Meta-analysis for the diagnostic value of non-invasive brain edema dynamic monitor on acute brain injury

Jie Lin1, Minglian He1, Yongjie Zou1, Suna Huang1, Rong Hu1, Yujie Chen1,(), Hua Feng1   

  1. 1. Department of Neurosurgery, First Affiliated Hospital of Military Medical University of the Army, Chongqing 400038, China
  • Received:2020-10-09 Published:2020-06-15
  • Corresponding author: Yujie Chen
引用本文:

林洁, 何明莲, 邹永杰, 黄苏娜, 胡荣, 陈渝杰, 冯华. 无创脑水肿动态监测仪对急性脑损伤诊断价值的Meta分析[J]. 中华脑科疾病与康复杂志(电子版), 2020, 10(03): 132-138.

Jie Lin, Minglian He, Yongjie Zou, Suna Huang, Rong Hu, Yujie Chen, Hua Feng. Meta-analysis for the diagnostic value of non-invasive brain edema dynamic monitor on acute brain injury[J]. Chinese Journal of Brain Diseases and Rehabilitation(Electronic Edition), 2020, 10(03): 132-138.

目的

对无创脑水肿动态监测仪诊断急性脑损伤的文献进行荟萃分析,评价无创脑水肿动态监测仪对脑出血、颅脑外伤及脑梗死的诊断价值。

方法

使用中国生物医学文献、万方医药、中国知网、PubMed等数据库检索无创脑水肿动态监测仪相关中英文文献。以急性脑损伤患者健侧扰动系数为对照组,对纳入的文献进行质量评价,并提取相关数据进行研究。数据分析采用Review Manager 5.4版软件。检验纳入文献的异质性,采取单篇文献排除法进行敏感性分析,并绘制森林图计算各亚组扰动系数对比的OR值。

结果

最后纳入文献共计8篇,存在异质性,按发病类型进行亚组分析。亚组分析结果:发病后1 d脑出血及颅脑外伤患者大脑患侧扰动系数均显著低于健侧,OR值分别为-2.57(95%CI:-3.01~-2.13)、-0.83(95%CI:-1.02~-0.63),而发病后3、7 d脑出血及颅脑外伤患者大脑患侧扰动系数均显著高于健侧;发病后1、3、7 d脑梗死患者大脑患侧扰动系数均显著高于健侧,OR值分别为0.75(95%CI:0.39~1.10)、0.61(95%CI:0.32~0.90)、0.50(95%CI:0.01~0.99);发病后脑出血、脑梗死及颅脑外伤患者1~3 d扰动系数变化幅度均显著大于3~7 d,OR值分别为3.30(95%CI:3.11~3.50)、1.03(95%CI:0.08~1.98)、2.23(95%CI:2.09~2.38)。

结论

无创脑水肿动态监测仪对急性脑损伤患者的扰动系数监测符合脑水肿发生的基本病理生理规律,反映了患者脑水肿严重程度变化的动态过程,可作为急性脑损伤患者的临床辅助诊断方法,帮助临床医生动态了解患者的脑水肿情况。

Objective

To perform a meta-analysis of non-invasive brain edema dynamic monitor in diagnosis of acute brain injury and evaluate the diagnostic value of non-invasive brain edema dynamic monitor for intracerebral hemorrhage, brain trauma and cerebral infarction.

Methods

The literatures of the non-invasive brain edema dynamic monitor were retrieved using the Chinese Biomedical Literature Database, Wanfang Medical Database, Chinese Knowledge Network Journal Database, and the PubMed Database. The cerebral electrical impedance of the brain with healthy side in acute brain injury patients was treated as control. The quality of included literatures was assessed. The relevant data for research was extracted. Statistical analysis was performed Review Manager 5.4 software. The heterogeneity of the literature was tested. The sensitivity analysis was carried out by single literature exclusion method, and the OR value of disturbance coefficient of each subgroup was calculated by drawing forest map.

Results

Eight studies with heterogeneity were included for subgroup analysis according to the onset type. The cerebral electrical impedance was significantly lower than that of healthy side after 1 d of intracerebral hemorrhage and brain trauma, the OR values were -2.57(95%CI: -3.01--2.13) and -0.83(95%CI: -1.02--0.63). The cerebral electrical impedance was significantly higher than that of healthy side after 3 and 7 d of intracerebral hemorrhage and brain trauma. The cerebral electrical impedance was significantly higher than that of healthy side after 1, 3 and 7 d of cerebral infarction, the OR values were 0.75(95%CI: 0.39-1.10), 0.61(95%CI: 0.32-0.90), 0.50(95%CI: 0.31-0.99). The variation amplitude of cerebral electrical impedance during 1-3 d in patients with intracerebral hemorrhage, cerebral infarction and brain trauma was significantly greater than that during 3-7 d after onset, the OR values were 3.30 (95%CI: 3.11-3.50), 1.03 (95%CI: 0.08-1.98), 2.23 (95%CI: 2.09-2.38).

Conclusion

The cerebral electrical impedance of non-invasive brain edema dynamic monitor in patients with acute brain injury accorded with the basic pathophysiological law of brain edema and reflected the dynamic process of changes in the severity of cerebral edema. It can be used as an auxiliary diagnostic method for patients with acute brain injury to help clinicians understand the situation of brain edema in patients at any time during treatment.

图1 纳入文献流程图
表1 纳入文献的基本情况
图2 发病后1 d患者大脑患侧与健侧扰动系数亚组分析
图3 发病后3 d患者大脑患侧与健侧扰动系数对比
图4 发病后7 d患者大脑患侧与健侧扰动系数对比
图5 发病后1~3 d与3~7 d患者大脑患侧扰动系数对比
图6 扰动系数在各种急性脑损伤患者中的变化规律纳入文献发表偏倚漏斗图分析
[1]
Harukuni I, Bhardwaj A. Mechanisms of brain injury after global cerebral ischemia[J]. Neurol Clin, 2006, 24(1): 1-21.
[2]
刘永亮,王鹏,李建民.颅脑损伤后脑水肿的发病机制研究进展[J].中国医药指南, 2013, 11(8): 76-78.
[3]
丁兴,林海峰.脑出血后脑水肿发病机制研究进展[J].世界最新医学信息文摘, 2015, 15(86): 59-60.
[4]
刘小艳.无创动态监测脑卒中患者脑水肿的临床研究[D].广州,暨南大学, 2007.
[5]
Dimitriou J, Levivier M, Gugliotta M. Comparison of complications in patients receiving different types of intracranial pressure monitoring: a retrospective study in a single center in Switzerland[J]. World Neurosurg, 2016, 89: 641-646.
[6]
Shen L, Wang Z, Su Z, et al. Effects of intracranial pressure monitoring on mortality in patients with severe traumatic brain injury: a meta-analysis[J]. PLoS One, 2016, 11(12): e0168901.
[7]
秦兴虎,陈义天,徐宏,等.无创脑水肿动态监测在创伤性脑损伤术后的临床应用价值[J].中华创伤杂志, 2017, 33(8): 719-723.
[8]
郭栋泽,樊星,乔慧.闪光视觉诱发电位术中监测的研究现状[J].中华神经外科杂志, 2020, 36(5): 529-532.
[9]
Brown BH. Electrical impedance tomography (EIT): a review[J]. J Med Eng Technol, 2003, 27(3): 97-108.
[10]
Itkis ML, Roberts JK, Ghajar JB, et al. A square signal wave method for measurement of brain extra- and intracellular water content[J]. Acta Neurochir Suppl (Wien), 1994, 60: 574-576.
[11]
何为,姚德贵,田海燕.电流场扰动方法和它在颅内异物成像中的应用[J].中国医学物理学杂志, 2001, 18(1): 20-22.
[12]
雷清梅.无创脑水肿监护仪在脑外伤患者的应用观察及预后预测作用[D].广州:南方医科大学, 2018.
[13]
邱昕,陈国华,单萍,等.无创脑水肿动态监测在自发性脑出血患者中的应用[J].神经损伤与功能重建, 2008, 3(5): 317-318.
[14]
张英杰.神经重症患者无创脑水肿动态监测的临床研究[D].唐山:华北理工大学, 2017.
[15]
Lichtenstein MJ, Mulrow CD, Elwood PC. Guidelines for reading case-control studies[J]. J Chronic Dis, 1987, 40(9): 893-903.
[16]
刘树俊,王婷婷,曹世钰,等.中国儿童哮喘危险因素的Meta分析[J].中国当代儿科杂志, 2018, 20(3): 218-223.
[17]
黄振林,甄云,陈麒声,等.无创脑水肿动态监护在脑出血性疾病治疗上的应用[J].现代诊断与治疗, 2011, 22(5): 271-272.
[18]
熊震,黄宇星,李成勋,等.应用无创脑水肿动态监护仪观察血府逐瘀汤治疗急性脑出血后脑水肿的临床研究[J].中国中医急症, 2017, 26(7): 1292-1295.
[19]
李国泰,陈盛强.无创脑水肿动态监护仪对脑出血患者治疗的指导作用[J].医学临床研究, 2006, 23(7): 1106-1107.
[20]
覃家敏,吴雪松.无创脑水肿监测仪监测重型脑损伤脑水肿变化的临床研究[J].广西医学, 2015, 37(12): 1846-1847.
[21]
杨媛.无创脑电阻抗检测在神经科的应用研究[D].大连:大连医科大学, 2012.
[22]
钟高贤,王伟,唐洲平,等.脑出血微创血肿清除术中的无创脑水肿动态监护[J].卒中与神经疾病, 2005, 12(6): 343-345, 349.
[23]
刘丽旭,董为伟,贾建平,等.无创性脑电阻抗测定在脑出血患者脑水肿监测中的应用[J].中华神经科杂志, 2007, 40(6): 383-386.
[24]
胡栓贵,黄新,黄勤,等.无创脑水肿仪对重型颅脑损伤的动态监测[J].中国医药导报, 2009, 6(20): 111-112.
[25]
郝石磊,郭廷旺,王伯初.脑出血后血肿占位效应及脑损伤机制研究[C]//第十二届全国生物力学学术会议暨第十四届全国生物流变学学术会议会议论文摘要汇编,西安, 2018.北京:中国力学学会, 2018.
[26]
Bhasin RR, Xi G, Hua Y, et al. Experimental intracerebral hemorrhage: effect of lysed erythrocytes on brain edema and blood-brain barrier permeability[J]. Acta Neurochir Suppl, 2002, 81: 249-251.
[27]
Shahrokhi N, Khaksari M, AsadiKaram G, et al. Role of melatonin receptors in the effect of estrogen on brain edema, intracranial pressure and expression of aquaporin 4 after traumatic brain injury[J]. Iran J Basic Med Sci, 2018, 21(3): 301-308.
[28]
Castellazzi M, Tamborino C, De Santis G, et al. Timing of serum active MMP-9 and MMP-2 levels in acute and subacute phases after spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage[J]. Acta Neurochir Suppl, 2010, 106: 137-140.
[1] 刘欢颜, 华扬, 贾凌云, 赵新宇, 刘蓓蓓. 颈内动脉闭塞病变管腔结构和血流动力学特征分析[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(08): 809-815.
[2] 邹勇, 顾应江, 丁昊, 杨呈浩, 陈岷辉, 蔡昱. 基于Nrf2/HO-1及NF-κB信号通路探讨葛根素对大鼠脑出血后早期炎症反应及氧化应激反应的影响[J]. 中华脑科疾病与康复杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(05): 271-277.
[3] 运陌, 李茂芳, 王浩, 刘东远. 微创穿刺引流联合吡拉西坦、乌拉地尔治疗基底节区高血压性脑出血的临床研究[J]. 中华脑科疾病与康复杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(05): 278-285.
[4] 刘政委, 仪立志, 尹夕龙, 孔文龙, 纠智松, 张文源. 锥颅血肿外引流与神经内镜手术治疗老年基底节区高血压性脑出血的疗效分析[J]. 中华脑科疾病与康复杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(05): 299-303.
[5] 陈显金, 吴芹芹, 何长春, 张庆华. 利用多模态医学数据和机器学习构建脑出血预后预测模型的研究[J]. 中华脑科疾病与康复杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(04): 193-198.
[6] 许秀兰, 朱建建. 血压变异性与伴H型高血压的急性脑梗死患者预后不良的临床关系分析[J]. 中华脑科疾病与康复杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(04): 199-204.
[7] 谭可, 李锦平, 彭玉涛, 吴文汧, 杨子文, 汪阳, 陶立波, 刘畅. 机器人辅助立体定向血肿引流术治疗自发性脑出血疗效及卫生经济学评价[J]. 中华脑科疾病与康复杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(04): 205-214.
[8] 马丽. CT灌注联合血管成像预测急性脑梗死患者近期神经功能预后的价值分析[J]. 中华脑科疾病与康复杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(04): 229-234.
[9] 韦维, 李忠华, 黄礼德. 机器人辅助第四脑室血肿穿刺抽吸外引流术[J]. 中华脑科疾病与康复杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(04): 255-256.
[10] 宁丽娜, 熊杰. 醒脑开窍针刺法结合舌部针刺治疗脑梗死后构音障碍的疗效观察[J]. 中华针灸电子杂志, 2023, 12(04): 146-150.
[11] 朱敏, 李法强. 血清GFAP、UCH-L1联合VILIP-1水平对急性脑梗死神经功能预后不良的预测研究[J]. 中华脑血管病杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 452-457.
[12] 李秦鹏, 王其涛, 朱媛媛, 周琦, 刘笑言, 许勇. 颈动脉彩色多普勒超声、颈部CT血管成像及脑部CT灌注成像在脑梗死并发颈动脉狭窄患者中的应用研究[J]. 中华脑血管病杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 482-488.
[13] 邱甜, 杨苗娟, 胡波, 郭毅, 何奕涛. 亚低温治疗脑梗死机制的研究进展[J]. 中华脑血管病杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 518-521.
[14] 赵暾, 徐霁华, 何有娣, 鲁明. 误诊为脑梗死且险些溶栓的急性自发微量脑出血一例[J]. 中华脑血管病杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(04): 369-372.
[15] 李安, 张秀萍, 白波, 赵阳, 薛国芳, 李东芳. 主动脉夹层术后并发神经系统并发症二例及文献复习[J]. 中华脑血管病杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(04): 373-378.
阅读次数
全文


摘要