切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华脑科疾病与康复杂志(电子版) ›› 2021, Vol. 11 ›› Issue (02) : 97 -100. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-123X.2021.02.007

临床研究

蛛网膜下腔出血患者脑脊液神经元特异性烯醇化酶水平变化及临床意义
黄富1, 刘康峰1, 常婉贞1, 赵振林1, 唐瑜晨1, 王国兴1, 肖华1,()   
  1. 1. 510800 广州市花都区人民医院(南方医科大学附属花都医院)神经外科
  • 收稿日期:2021-04-10 出版日期:2021-04-15
  • 通信作者: 肖华
  • 基金资助:
    广州市花都区科技计划项目(19-HDWS-054、20-HDWS-30)

Changes and clinical significance of neuron-specific enolase levels in cerebrospinal fluid in patients with subarachnoid hemorrhage

Fu Huang1, Kangfeng Liu1, Wanzhen Chang1, Zhenlin Zhao1, Yuchen Tang1, Guoxing Wang1, Hua Xiao1,()   

  1. 1. Department of Neurosurgery, People’s Hospital of Huadu District (Huadu Hospital Affiliated of Southern Medical University), Guangzhou 510800, China
  • Received:2021-04-10 Published:2021-04-15
  • Corresponding author: Hua Xiao
引用本文:

黄富, 刘康峰, 常婉贞, 赵振林, 唐瑜晨, 王国兴, 肖华. 蛛网膜下腔出血患者脑脊液神经元特异性烯醇化酶水平变化及临床意义[J/OL]. 中华脑科疾病与康复杂志(电子版), 2021, 11(02): 97-100.

Fu Huang, Kangfeng Liu, Wanzhen Chang, Zhenlin Zhao, Yuchen Tang, Guoxing Wang, Hua Xiao. Changes and clinical significance of neuron-specific enolase levels in cerebrospinal fluid in patients with subarachnoid hemorrhage[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Brain Diseases and Rehabilitation(Electronic Edition), 2021, 11(02): 97-100.

目的

探讨蛛网膜下腔出血(SAH)患者发病后脑脊液中神经元特异性烯醇化酶(NES)的表达水平变化规律及其临床意义。

方法

选取自2018年1月至2020年6月于广州市花都区人民医院神经外科住院的64例SAH患者为研究组,选择同期因非神经系统病在我院行腰麻的手术患者64例为对照组。研究组患者发病后第1、3、5、7、10、14天行腰椎穿刺留取脑脊液标本,而对照组患者在行腰麻时留取脑脊液标本,检测NSE表达水平,对比其表达水平的变化规律。研究组患者根据病因、NIHSS评分及GOS评分进行分组,分别比较各亚组患者的脑脊液中NSE表达水平。

结果

研究组患者脑脊液中NES表达水平在发病后第1天开始升高,于第3~5天达到高峰,此后逐渐下降,第14天基本恢复至正常值水平。研究组中不同病因亚组患者脑脊液NSE的表达水平比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);不同NIHSS、GOS评分亚组患者脑脊液NSE表达水平比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。

结论

SAH患者发病后脑脊液中NSE的表达水平在发病后即出现升高,第3~5天达高峰,其与神经损害程度及预后相关,可作为患者神经功能损害及预后评估的指标。

Objective

To explore the changes in the expression level of neuron-specific enolase (NES) in the cerebrospinal fluid of patients with subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH) and its clinical significance.

Methods

Sixty-four SAH patients who were hospitalized in Neurosurgery Department of People’s Hospital of Huadu District from January 2018 to June 2020 were selected as the study group. Sixty-four patients who had undergone lumbar anesthesia in our hospital for non-neurological diseases were selected as the control group. The cerebrospinal fluid samples were taken by lumbar puncture on the 1st, 3rd, 5th, 7th, 10th and 14th days after the onset of the study group, while the control group left cerebrospinal fluid samples when they were under spinal anesthesia, and the NSE expression level was detected and the expression of NSE was compared with the change of the expression. The patients in the study group were divided into groups according to etiology, NIHSS score and GOS score, and compared the NSE expression level in cerebrospinal fluid of each subgroup.

Results

The expression level of NES in cerebrospinal fluid of the study group began to increase on the 1st day after onset, reached the peak on the 3rd to 5th day, and then gradually decreased, and the normal level was basically recovered on the 14th day. There was no significant difference in the expression of NSE in cerebrospinal fluid between different etiological subgroups in the study group (P>0.05); There was significant difference in NSE expression in CSF between different NIHSS and GOS score subgroups (P<0.05).

Conclusion

NSE expression level in cerebrospinal fluid of SAH patients increased after onset, and reached the peak on the 3rd to 5th day. The expression level of NES was related to the degree of nerve damage and prognosis, which could be used as the index of neurological function damage and prognosis assessment.

表1 2组患者的基本情况对比
表2 2组患者脑脊液中NSE表达水平比较(ng/L,Mean±SD)
表3 研究组不同病因亚组脑脊液中NSE表达水平比较(ng/L,Mean±SD)
表4 研究组不同NIHSS评分亚组脑脊液中NSE表达水平比较(ng/L,Mean±SD)
表5 不同预后患者的脑脊液中NSE表达水平比较(ng/L,Mean±SD)
[1]
刘晓刚, 王二玲, 冯娟, 等. 重型颅脑损伤术后颅内感染脑脊液中不同指标和炎症因子水平分析[J]. 创伤外科杂志, 2020, 22(6): 419-423.
[2]
中华医学会神经病学分会, 中华医学会神经病学分会脑血管病学组, 中华医学会神经病学分会神经血管介入协作组. 中国蛛网膜下腔出血诊治指南2019[J]. 中华神经科杂志, 2019, 52(12): 1006-1021.
[3]
秦浩, 尹航, 张亚波, 等. 血浆IGF-1联合GOS评分对动脉瘤性蛛网膜下腔出血患者预后的预测价值[J]. 山东医药, 2020, 60(31): 60-63.
[4]
张玉清, 陶立玉, 张子轩. 颅内动脉瘤破裂出血术后血清HIF-1α、miR-210表达与脑血管痉挛的关系[J]. 中华神经创伤外科电子杂志, 2020, 6(1): 4-8.
[5]
欧春影, 李传玲, 安晓雷, 等. 急性脑梗死患者血清BDNF、IL-6和TNF-α含量与血管性认知障碍关系的临床分析[J]. 中华脑科疾病与康复杂志(电子版), 2019, 9(3): 163-167.
[6]
Catli G, Anik A, Acar S, et al. Brain injury markers: S100 calcium-binding protein B, neuron-specific enolase and glial fibrillary acidic protein in children with diabetic ketoacidosis[J]. Pediatr Diabetes, 2018, 19(5): 1000-1006.
[7]
Okonkwo DO, Puffer RC, Puccio AM, et al. Point-of-Care Platform Blood Biomarker Testing of Glial Fibrillary Acidic Protein versus S100 Calcium-Binding Protein B for Prediction of Traumatic Brain Injuries: A Transforming Research and Clinical Knowledge in Traumatic Brain Injury Study[J]. J Neurotrauma, 2020, 37(23): 2460-2467.
[8]
吕国伟. 动脉瘤性蛛网膜下腔出血后血清NSE水平变化的临床意义[J]. 重庆医学, 2012, 41(32): 3442-3445.
[9]
张晓阳, 范振增. 吡非尼酮对大鼠血液及脑脊液中神经元特异性烯醇化酶的影响[C]//中国中西医结合学会.中国中西医结合学会神经外科专业委员会第一次学术大会论文集,北京, 2014: 275-286.北京:中国中西医结合学会神经外科专业委员会第一次学术大会, 2014.
[10]
冯磊, 谢利平, 王鹏. 动脉瘤性蛛网膜下腔出血患者脑脊液HMGB1、NSE水平变化及与脑积水的关系[J]. 河北医药, 2019, 41(18): 2798-2801.
[11]
徐伟华, 赵冬, 戴晶, 等. 神经元特异性烯醇化酶在神经元氧糖剥夺损伤模型复氧后的表达变化[J]. 中国全科医学, 2015, 18(20): 2444-2447.
[12]
Casmiro M, Maitan S, De Pasquale F, et al. Cerebrospinal fluid and serum neuron-specific enolase concentrations in a normal population[J]. Eur J Neurol, 2005, 12(5): 369-374.
[13]
谢基华. NSE在高热惊厥患儿血清及脑脊液中的表达水平及临床意义[J]. 江西医药, 2016, 51(7): 692-693.
[14]
Park SH, Hwang SK. Prognostic value of serum levels of S100 calcium-binding protein B, neuron-specific enolase, and interleukin-6 in pediatric patients with traumatic brain injury[J]. World Neurosurg, 2018, 118: e534-e542.
[15]
Echeverría-Palacio CM, Agut T, Arnaez J, et al. Neuron-specific enolase in cerebrospinal fluid predicts brain injury after sudden unexpected postnatal collapse[J]. Pediatr Neurol, 2019, 101: 71-77.
[16]
谢锋, 叶敏, 赖湘, 等. 动脉瘤性蛛网膜下腔出血患者血清S100B蛋白和NSE水平与Hunt-Hess分级及预后的关系[J]. 海南医学, 2020, 31(5): 563-565.
[1] 洪俊, 张春来, 鲍黄胜. 肿瘤标志物在肺癌鉴别诊断中的预测价值[J/OL]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2023, 16(06): 877-879.
[2] 赵文思, 曾艳峰. 血清神经元特异性烯醇化酶联合CT检查对肺尘病诊断意义[J/OL]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2023, 16(01): 67-69.
[3] 王永楠, 汤畅通, 殷杰, 谭溢涛. 微创钻孔引流术与神经内镜血肿清除术治疗临界量基底节脑出血的效果对比分析[J/OL]. 中华神经创伤外科电子杂志, 2024, 10(05): 286-292.
[4] 唐必英, 李钢. 治疗时机对动脉瘤性蛛网膜下腔出血患者预后的影响[J/OL]. 中华神经创伤外科电子杂志, 2024, 10(04): 213-219.
[5] 李晓东, 李昂, 马龙, 刘亮, 魏云, 王汉宇. 基底动脉顶端动脉瘤显微手术治疗[J/OL]. 中华神经创伤外科电子杂志, 2024, 10(04): 254-256.
[6] 冯铭, 孙洪涛. 动脉瘤性蛛网膜下腔出血的颅内压监测与管理[J/OL]. 中华神经创伤外科电子杂志, 2024, 10(04): 248-253.
[7] 汤畅通, 王永楠, 王诗筌. 颅脑外伤后阵发性交感神经兴奋患者的药物治疗效果分析[J/OL]. 中华神经创伤外科电子杂志, 2024, 10(04): 233-237.
[8] 朱泽超, 杨新宇, 李侑埕, 潘鹏宇, 梁国标. 染料木黄酮通过SIRT1/p53信号通路对蛛网膜下腔出血后早期脑损伤的作用[J/OL]. 中华神经创伤外科电子杂志, 2023, 09(05): 261-269.
[9] 李晓东, 王汉宇. 脑动脉瘤破裂并发额叶脑出血的手术治疗[J/OL]. 中华神经创伤外科电子杂志, 2023, 09(02): 126-127.
[10] 李晓东, 王汉宇, 马龙, 刘亮, 魏云, 李昂. 小脑后下动脉瘤的显微手术治疗[J/OL]. 中华脑科疾病与康复杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(05): 318-320.
[11] 李秋琼, 薛静, 王敏, 陈芬, 肖美芳. NSE、SIL-2R、TNF-α检测对小儿病毒性脑膜炎与细菌性脑膜炎的诊断价值[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(03): 303-307.
[12] 奚玲如, 罗利婷, 李丹丹, 刘碧梅, 赖可元, 刘志红. 一例狒狒巴拉姆希阿米巴脑炎报告及文献复习[J/OL]. 中华临床实验室管理电子杂志, 2024, 12(04): 238-243.
[13] 张钰, 张湘斌, 黄晓松, 潘晓彦. 亚低温联合脑室穿刺引流对老年性高分级动脉瘤性蛛网膜下腔出血患者脑血管状态的影响[J/OL]. 中华脑血管病杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(03): 214-220.
[14] 庄宗, 祝琦, 那世杰, 刘涛, 凌海平, 张玉华, 曹博强, 杭春华, 张庆荣. 破裂性小脑后下动脉远端动脉瘤的个体化治疗策略[J/OL]. 中华脑血管病杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(03): 200-206.
[15] 付永鹏, 拉巴索朗, 马强, 陈群超, 郑裕峰, 吴蕻, 郑圆杰, 胡婧, 于洮, 张东. 人工智能辅助CT血管成像脑血管重建在基层医院颅内动脉瘤诊断中的应用[J/OL]. 中华脑血管病杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(01): 26-30.
阅读次数
全文


摘要


AI


AI小编
你好!我是《中华医学电子期刊资源库》AI小编,有什么可以帮您的吗?