切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华脑科疾病与康复杂志(电子版) ›› 2021, Vol. 11 ›› Issue (06) : 331 -335. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-123X.2021.06.003

临床研究

扩散张量成像对脊髓型颈椎病预测价值的Meta分析
冯妍1, 范雁东1, 吴金泽1, 芒苏尔·努尔麦麦提1, 排日哈提·居麦1, 罗坤1,()   
  1. 1. 830011 乌鲁木齐,新疆医科大学第一附属医院神经外科中心
  • 收稿日期:2021-10-16 出版日期:2021-12-15
  • 通信作者: 罗坤
  • 基金资助:
    新疆维吾尔自治区自然科学基金(2019D01C323)

Meta-analysis of the predictive value of diffusion tensor imaging in cervical spondylotic myelopathy

Yan Feng1, Yandong Fan1, Jinze Wu1, Nuermaimaiti Mangsuer·1, Jumai Pairihati·1, Kun Luo1,()   

  1. 1. Department of Neurosurgery Center, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University, Urumqi 830011, China
  • Received:2021-10-16 Published:2021-12-15
  • Corresponding author: Kun Luo
引用本文:

冯妍, 范雁东, 吴金泽, 芒苏尔·努尔麦麦提, 排日哈提·居麦, 罗坤. 扩散张量成像对脊髓型颈椎病预测价值的Meta分析[J/OL]. 中华脑科疾病与康复杂志(电子版), 2021, 11(06): 331-335.

Yan Feng, Yandong Fan, Jinze Wu, Nuermaimaiti Mangsuer·, Jumai Pairihati·, Kun Luo. Meta-analysis of the predictive value of diffusion tensor imaging in cervical spondylotic myelopathy[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Brain Diseases and Rehabilitation(Electronic Edition), 2021, 11(06): 331-335.

目的

系统评价扩散张量成像(DTI)常用变量各向异性参数(FA)和表观扩散系数(ADC)对脊髓型颈椎病(CSM)的预测价值。

方法

在PubMed、Cochrane Library、EMBASE、Web of Science和万方数据库中检索2000~2021年CSM患者与健康对照者的DTI队列研究,采用改良纽卡斯尔-渥太华量表(NOS)对纳入文献进行质量评估,采用STATA14.0软件进行连续性变量资料的Meta分析。

结果

最终纳入10篇文献,共有327例CSM患者和208名健康对照者,在FA值的比较中,CSM患者组282例,健康对照组199例,CSM患者中最大受压水平(LMC)比健康对照组的FA低,差异具有统计学意义(SMD=-2.32,95%CI:-2.56~-2.06,P<0.001);在ADC值的比较中,CSM患者组177例,健康对照组132例,CSM患者组中LMC比健康对照组的ADC高,差异具有统计学意义(SMD=1.95,95%CI:1.67~2.23,P<0.001)。

结论

作为DTI参数的FA值和ADC值具有成为预测CSM的潜在能力,DTI有很大的可能成为诊断CSM的一个重要组成部分。

Objective

To systematically evaluate the predictive value of the anisotropy parameter (FA) and the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) of the common variables of diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) for cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM).

Methods

DTI cohort studies of CSM patients and healthy controls were retrieved from PubMed, Cochrane Library, Embase, Web of Science and Wanfang database from 2000 to 2021. The modified Newcastle-Ottawa scale (NOS) was used to evaluate the quality of the included literature. The Meta-analysis of continuous variable data was performed using Stata 14.0 software.

Results

A total of 10 studies were included, including 327 patients with CSM and 208 healthy controls. In the comparison of FA values, there were 282 patients in the CSM group and 199 healthy controls. The Level of maximal cord compression LMC in CSM patients was lower than that in healthy controls, and the results were statistically significant (SMD=-2.32, 95%CI: -2.56--2.06, P<0.001). In the comparison of ADC values, there were 177 patients in the CSM group and 132 in the healthy control group. The LMC in the CSM group was higher than that in the healthy control group, and the results were statistically significant (SMD=1.95, 95%CI: 1.67-2.23, P<0.001).

Conclusion

As DTI parameters, FA value and ADC value have potential ability to predict CSM, and DTI may be an important part in the diagnosis of CSM.

图1 文献检索流程图
表1 纳入研究的基本特征
表2 所纳入研究质量评估
图2 脊髓型颈椎病患者与健康对照组各向异性参数值比较的森林图
图3 脊髓型颈椎病患者与健康对照组表观扩散系数值比较的森林图
图4 脊髓型颈椎病患者与健康对照组各向异性参数值漏斗图
图5 脊髓型颈椎病患者与健康对照组表观扩散系数值漏斗图
[1]
Smith ZA, Khayatzadeh S, Bakhsheshian J, et al. Dimensions of the cervical neural foramen in conditions of spinal deformity: an ex vivo biomechanical investigation using specimen-specific CT imaging[J]. Eur Spine J, 2016, 25(7): 2155-2165.
[2]
Kara B, Celik A, Karadereler S, et al. The role of DTI in early detection of cervical spondylotic myelopathy: a preliminary study with 3-T MRI[J]. Neuroradiology, 2011, 53(8): 609-616.
[3]
Demir A, Ries M, Moonen CT, et al. Diffusion-weighted MR imaging with apparent diffusion coefficient and apparent diffusion tensor maps in cervical spondylotic myelopathy[J]. Radiology, 2003, 229(1): 37-43.
[4]
Vedantam A, Jonathan A, Rajshekhar V. Association of magnetic resonance imaging signal changes and outcome prediction after surgery for cervical spondylotic myelopathy[J]. J Neurosurg Spine, 2011, 15(6): 660-666.
[5]
Ellingson BM, Salamon N, Holly LT. Advances in MR imaging for cervical spondylotic myelopathy[J]. Eur Spine J, 2015, 24 Suppl 2(Suppl 2): 197-208.
[6]
Banaszek A, Bladowska J, Podgórski P, et al. Role of diffusion tensor MR imaging in degenerative cervical spine disease: a review of the literature[J]. Clin Neuroradiol, 2016, 26(3): 265-276.
[7]
Wang K, Chen Z, Zhang F, et al. Evaluation of DTI parameter ratios and diffusion tensor tractography grading in the diagnosis and prognosis prediction of cervical spondylotic myelopathy[J]. Spine (Phila Pa 1976), 2017, 42(4): E202-E210.
[8]
Jiang W, Han X, Guo H, et al. Usefulness of conventional magnetic resonance imaging, diffusion tensor imaging and neurite orientation dispersion and density imaging in evaluating postoperative function in patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy[J]. J Orthop Translat, 2018, 15: 59-69.
[9]
Cui JL, Li X, Chan TY, et al. Quantitative assessment of column-specific degeneration in cervical spondylotic myelopathy based on diffusion tensor tractography[J]. Eur Spine J, 2015, 24(1): 41-47.
[10]
Chen X, Kong C, Feng S, et al. Magnetic resonance diffusion tensor imaging of cervical spinal cord and lumbosacral enlargement in patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy[J]. J Magn Reson Imaging, 2016, 43(6): 1484-1491.
[11]
Toktas ZO, Tanrıkulu B, Koban O, et al. Diffusion tensor imaging of cervical spinal cord: a quantitative diagnostic tool in cervical spondylotic myelopathy[J]. J Craniovertebr Junction Spine, 2016, 7(1): 26-30.
[12]
Ying J, Zhou X, Zhu M, et al. The contribution of diffusion tensor imaging to quantitative assessment on multilevel cervical spondylotic myelopathy[J]. Eur Neurol, 2016, 75(1-2): 67-74.
[13]
Liu Y, Kong C, Cui L, et al. Correlation between diffusion tensor imaging parameters and clinical assessments in patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy with and without high signal intensity[J]. Spinal Cord, 2017, 55(12): 1079-1083.
[14]
Rao A, Soliman H, Kaushal M, et al. Diffusion tensor imaging in a large longitudinal series of patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy correlated with long-term functional outcome[J]. Neurosurgery, 2018, 83(4): 753-760.
[15]
Iwasaki M, Yokohama T, Oura D, et al. Decreased value of highly accurate fractional anisotropy using 3-Tesla ZOOM diffusion tensor imaging after decompressive surgery in patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy: aligned fibers effect[J]. World Neurosurg X, 2019, 4: 100056.
[16]
Han X, Ma X, Li D, et al. The evaluation and prediction of laminoplasty surgery outcome in patients with degenerative cervical myelopathy using diffusion tensor MRI[J]. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol, 2020, 41(9): 1745-1753.
[17]
Wu W, Yang Z, Zhang T, et al. Microstructural changes in compressed cervical spinal cord are consistent with clinical symptoms and symptom duration[J]. Spine (Phila Pa 1976), 2020, 45(16): E999-E1005.
[18]
Ulubaba HE, Saglik S, Yildirim IO, et al. Effectiveness of diffusion tensor imaging in determining cervical spondylotic myelopathy[J]. Turk Neurosurg, 2021, 31(1): 67-72.
[19]
Vedantam A, Rao A, Kurpad SN, et al. Diffusion tensor imaging correlates with short-term myelopathy outcome in patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy[J]. World Neurosurg, 2017, 97: 489-494.
[20]
Facon D, Ozanne A, Fillard P, et al. MR diffusion tensor imaging and fiber tracking in spinal cord compression[J]. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol, 2005, 26(6): 1587-1594.
[21]
Rajasekaran S, Yerramshetty JS, Chittode VS, et al. The assessment of neuronal status in normal and cervical spondylotic myelopathy using diffusion tensor imaging[J]. Spine (Phila Pa 1976), 2014, 39(15): 1183-1189.
[22]
Rajasekaran S, Prasad V, Shetty J, et al. Diffusion tensor imaging as a prognostic investigation in cervical myelopathy-comparison of pre- and postsurgical decompression DTI indices and tractography in 56 subjects[J]. Global Spine J, 2012, 2(1-suppl): 137-157.
[23]
Mamata H, Jolesz FA, Maier SE. Apparent diffusion coefficient and fractional anisotropy in spinal cord: age and cervical spondylosis-related changes[J]. J Magn Reson Imaging, 2005, 22(1): 38-43.
[24]
Wang SQ, Li X, Cui JL, et al. Prediction of myelopathic level in cervical spondylotic myelopathy using diffusion tensor imaging[J]. J Magn Reson Imaging, 2015, 41(6): 1682-1688.
[1] 蚁淳, 袁冬生, 熊学军. 系统免疫炎症指数与骨密度降低和骨质疏松的关联[J/OL]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 609-617.
[2] 李志文, 李远志, 李华, 方志远. 糖皮质激素治疗膝骨关节炎疗效的网状Meta分析[J/OL]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(04): 484-496.
[3] 吴姗姗, 潘裕民, 刘晋, 张劲松, 乔莉. 睡眠呼吸暂停综合征患者静脉血栓栓塞症发生率的Meta分析[J/OL]. 中华危重症医学杂志(电子版), 2024, 17(04): 312-317.
[4] 程鹏, 杨道鸿, 邓文君, 钟宇琼, 胡晓雪, 黄小银, 周道扬. 纤维蛋白原治疗创伤性凝血病有效性和安全性的Meta分析[J/OL]. 中华危重症医学杂志(电子版), 2024, 17(03): 225-231.
[5] 沈皓, 张驰, 韩旻轩, 陆晓庆, 周愉, 周莉丽. 骨皮质切开术对正畸治疗牙根吸收影响的Meta分析[J/OL]. 中华口腔医学研究杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(03): 175-184.
[6] 郭仁凯, 武慧铭, 李辉宇. 机器人辅助全系膜切除术治疗右半结肠癌有效性和安全性的Meta分析及试验序贯分析[J/OL]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2024, 18(03): 234-240.
[7] 朱俊佳, 孙琦, 徐文龙, 陆天宇, 冯强, 储涛, 邢春根, 高春冬, 俞一峰, 赵振国. 永久性结肠造口预防性补片置入对预防造口旁疝价值的Meta分析[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(03): 336-342.
[8] 王招荐, 曹桢, 郭小双, 靳小雷, 刘子文. 加速康复外科理念应用于腹壁重建手术的系统评价及Meta分析[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(03): 343-350.
[9] 高瑞, 康迪斯, 秦蘅, 胡月明, 初同伟, 代丽. 加速康复管理改善膝关节置换术后肺部感染并发症和疗效的Meta分析[J/OL]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2024, 17(02): 234-237.
[10] 马振威, 宋润夫, 王兵. ERCP胆道内支架与骑跨十二指肠乳头支架置入治疗不可切除肝门部胆管癌疗效的Meta分析[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(06): 807-812.
[11] 龚财芳, 赵俊宇, 游川. 围手术期肠内营养在肝癌肝切除患者中有效性及安全性的Meta分析[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(04): 551-556.
[12] 郁凯, 曾保起, 杨剑, 杨杰, 张殿英, 孙凤. 全关节镜与切开手术治疗肩袖撕裂疗效比较的系统综述与Meta分析[J/OL]. 中华肩肘外科电子杂志, 2024, 12(03): 238-245.
[13] 王芳, 刘达, 左智炜, 盛金平, 陈庭进, 蒋锐. 定量CT与双能X线骨密度仪对骨质疏松诊断效能比较的Meta分析[J/OL]. 中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志, 2024, 10(06): 363-371.
[14] 周倩妹, 王宪娥, 徐筱, 老慧琳, 赵欣悦, 胡菁颖. 多元化系统护理对老年人群牙周健康指标影响的系统评价[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 500-506.
[15] 姜超, 夏旭东, 王功夏, 何向宇, 王海彬, 李媛. 磁共振DWI及其ADC对乳腺导管原位癌伴微浸润腋窝淋巴结转移的诊断价值[J/OL]. 中华介入放射学电子杂志, 2024, 12(03): 234-243.
阅读次数
全文


摘要