切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华脑科疾病与康复杂志(电子版) ›› 2018, Vol. 08 ›› Issue (01) : 33 -36. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-123X.2018.01.008

所属专题: 文献

临床研究

高级别颅内动脉瘤保守治疗后行血管内栓塞治疗的预后观察
周根1, 李彦钊1, 邓东风1, 董斌2, 张绪新1,(), 刘群2, 徐国伟1   
  1. 1. 116001 大连,大连大学附属中山医院神经外一科
    2. 116011 大连,大连医科大学附属第一医院神经外二科
  • 收稿日期:2018-10-16 出版日期:2018-12-15
  • 通信作者: 张绪新

Prognostic observation of endovascular embolization for high grade intracranial aneurysms after conservation treatment

Gen Zhou1, Yanzhao Li1, Dongfeng Deng1, Bin Dong2, Xuxin Zhang1,(), Qun Liu2, Guowei Xu1   

  1. 1. Fist Department of Neurosurgery, Affiliated Zhongshan Hospital of Dalian University, Dalian 116001, China
    2. Second Department of Neurosurgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Dalian Medical University, Dalian 116011, China
  • Received:2018-10-16 Published:2018-12-15
  • Corresponding author: Xuxin Zhang
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Zhang Xuxin, Email:
引用本文:

周根, 李彦钊, 邓东风, 董斌, 张绪新, 刘群, 徐国伟. 高级别颅内动脉瘤保守治疗后行血管内栓塞治疗的预后观察[J]. 中华脑科疾病与康复杂志(电子版), 2018, 08(01): 33-36.

Gen Zhou, Yanzhao Li, Dongfeng Deng, Bin Dong, Xuxin Zhang, Qun Liu, Guowei Xu. Prognostic observation of endovascular embolization for high grade intracranial aneurysms after conservation treatment[J]. Chinese Journal of Brain Diseases and Rehabilitation(Electronic Edition), 2018, 08(01): 33-36.

目的

探讨颅内囊状动脉瘤Hunt-Hess Ⅳ~Ⅴ分级患者给予保守治疗后行血管内栓塞治疗的预后效果。

方法

回顾性分析大连大学附属中山医院神经外一科自2012年1月至2017年12月收治的64例颅内囊状动脉瘤Hunt-Hess Ⅳ~Ⅴ分级(Ⅳ级48例,Ⅴ级16例)患者的临床资料,其中32例患者入院后采取保守治疗,待意识状态较前有所改善或者散大瞳孔的直径较前有所减小,行血管内栓塞联合持续腰大池引流治疗,为暂缓手术组;另外32例急诊行血管内栓塞联合持续腰大池引流治疗,为即刻手术组。对2组患者治疗后第1、3、6月的预后进行评价。

结果

暂缓手术组与即刻手术组比较,治疗后1个月GCS评分差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05);治疗后3个月Rankin量表评分差异无统计学意义(P>0.05),治疗后6个月差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。

结论

高级别颅内动脉瘤患者保守治疗后行血管内栓塞术术后6个月的预后优于入院即刻行颅内动脉瘤栓塞术的患者。

Objective

To observe the prognosis of patients with Hunt-hess lV-V grade of intracranial saccular aneurysms who were treated with conservative therapy.

Methods

The clinical date of 64 patients with Hunt-Hess grade Ⅳ-Ⅴ intracranial saccular aneurysm (grade Ⅳ, n=48 and grade Ⅴ, n=16) admitted to Fist Department of Neurosurgery of Affiliated Zhongshan Hospital of Dalian University from January 2012 to December 2017 were analyzed retrospectively. Thirty two cases of them were treated with conservative therapy in which the state of consciousness was better than before or the pupil was smaller than before,and then they were treated with embolization and continuous lumbar drainage(postpone surgery group) and 32 underwent emergency embolization and continuous lumbar drainage(immediate surgery group). The neurological prognosis of the patients was evaluated at 1, 3 and 6 months.

Results

There was no significant difference in Glasgow outcome scores between the postpone surgery group and immediata surgery group at one month after treatment (P>0.05); there was no significant difference in Rankin prognostic scores at three months after treatment (P>0.05); But there was significant difference in Rankin prognostic scores at six months after treatment between the two groups (P<0.05).

Conclusion

Patients with high grade cystic aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage can be treated with conservation treatment. When patients were treated with conservative therapy in which the state of consciousness was better than before or the pupil was smaller than before,endovascular embolization and continuous lumbar drainagemay be performed. The prognosis at six months is better than emergency embolization and continuous lumbar drainage.

表1 2组高级别颅内动脉瘤患者一般资料比较(Mean±SD)
表2 高级别颅内动脉瘤位置分布(例)
表3 2组颅内动脉瘤Hunt-Hess Ⅳ~Ⅴ级患者术前、术后1、3、6个月评分比较(Mean±SD,分)
[1]
Zacharia BE, Hickman ZL, Grobelny BT, et al. Epidemiology of aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage[J]. Neurosurg Clin N Am, 2010, 21(2):221-233.
[2]
Huang AP, Arora S, Wintermark M, et al. Perfusion computed tomographic imaging and surgical selection with patients after poor-grade aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage[J]. Neurosurgery, 2010, 67(4):964-974.
[3]
Ceviz A, Arslan A, Ak HE, et al. The effect of urokinase in preventing the formation of epidural fibrosis and/or leptomeninggeal arachnoiditis[J]. Surg Neurol, 1997, 47(2):124-127.
[4]
Cupta V, Chinchure SD, Goe C, et al. Coil embolization of intracranial aneurysm in polyarteritis nodosa. A case report and review of the literature[J]. Interv Neuroradiol, 2013, 19(2):203-208.
[5]
Macdonald RL, Amidei C, Lin G, et al. Safety of perioperative subcutaneous heparin for prophylaxis of venous thromboembolism in patients undergoing craniotomy[J]. Neurosurgery, 1999, 45(2):245-251.
[6]
Ray WZ, Strom RG, Blackburn SL, et al. Incidence of deep venous thrombosis after subarachnoid hemorrhage[J]. J Neurosurg, 2009, 110(5):1010-1014.
[7]
Witiw CD, Ibrahim GM, Fllah A, et al. Early predictors of prolonged stay in a critical care unit following aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage[J]. Neurocrit Care, 2013, 18(3):291-297.
[8]
Hwang US, Shin HS, Lee SH, et al. Decompressive surgery in patient with poor-grade aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage:clipping with simultaneous decompression[J]. J Cerebrovasc Endovasc Neurosurg, 2014, 16(3):254-261.
[9]
Sodhi HB, Savardekar AR, Mohindra S, et al. The clinical profile, management, and overall outcome of aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage at the neurosurgical unit of a tertiary care center in India[J]. J Neurosci Rural Pract, 2014, 5(2):118-126.
[10]
Zhao B, Tan H, Yang H, et al. A multicenter prospective study of poor-grade aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (AMPAS): observational registry study[J]. BMC Neurol, 2014, 14:86.
[11]
Egashira Y, Yoshimura S, Funatsu N, et al. Continuous growth of remote intracerebral haematoma following angiographically successful endovascular embolisation of ruptured cerebral aneurysms[J]. J Clin Neurosci, 2012, 19(1):170-173.
[12]
Karamanakos PN, Koivisto T, Vanninen R, et al. The impact of endovascular management on the outcome of aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage in the elderly in eastern Finland[J]. Acta Neurochir (Wien), 2010, 152(9):1493-502.
[13]
Ransom ER, Mocco J, Komotar RJ, et al. External ventricular drainage response in poor grade aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage: effect on preoperative grading and prognosis[J]. Neurocrit care, 2007, 6(3):174-180.
[14]
Mocco J, Ransom ER, Komotar RJ, et al. Long-term domain-specific improvement following poor grade aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage[J]. J Neurol, 2006, 253(10):1278-1284.
[1] 黎鹏程, 黄谦亦, 张逵, 范润金, 尚彬. 手术切除颅内巨大假性动脉瘤一例报道并文献复习[J]. 中华神经创伤外科电子杂志, 2023, 09(02): 123-125.
[2] 许明伟, 许民辉. 组合塑形夹闭联合低流量搭桥治疗复杂大脑中动脉多发动脉瘤[J]. 中华神经创伤外科电子杂志, 2023, 09(01): 62-64.
[3] 潘鹏宇, 孔睿, 李侑埕, 李佳朔, 杨新宇, 张文旭, 朱泽超, 田学实, 闻亮, 朱廷准, 梁国标. 无创脑电磁扰动在蛛网膜下腔出血术后脱水治疗中的应用研究[J]. 中华神经创伤外科电子杂志, 2022, 08(06): 351-355.
[4] 李晓东. 翼点锁孔入路夹闭前循环动脉瘤[J]. 中华神经创伤外科电子杂志, 2022, 08(04): 255-256.
[5] 张东, 梁宗星, 陈来照. 颅内动脉瘤术中侧脑室穿刺损伤的危险因素分析[J]. 中华神经创伤外科电子杂志, 2021, 07(06): 355-358.
[6] 阿卜莱提·麦麦提敏, 何子骏. 颅内动脉瘤栓塞中的通路选择[J]. 中华神经创伤外科电子杂志, 2021, 07(01): 63-64.
[7] 林之琪, 陈圣攀, 洪韬, 宁波, 钱爱翠, 张鹏. 3D打印硅胶脑血管模型的应用评价[J]. 中华神经创伤外科电子杂志, 2021, 07(01): 56-58.
[8] 魏云, 李晓东. 脑动静脉畸形合并颅内动脉瘤的手术治疗[J]. 中华脑科疾病与康复杂志(电子版), 2022, 12(06): 382-383.
[9] 李文虎, 付帅, 武玉亮, 王磊, 孔凡强, 陈卫光, 边玉松, 陈永安, 丛大伟. 动脉瘤性蛛网膜下腔出血后认知功能障碍的研究进展[J]. 中华脑科疾病与康复杂志(电子版), 2022, 12(02): 115-119.
[10] 李田利, 张照龙, 孙成建, 刘国平, 谢宜兴, 赵晓龙, 邵黎明, 郑璇, 王长鑫, 徐锐. 基于血流动力学、血脂及外周血炎症标志物的眼段动脉瘤破裂风险相关研究[J]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(02): 78-83.
[11] 陈中国, 万宇婷, 陈卓萍, 陈晓君, 袁亚君. CPR技术在颅内血流导向装置植入术中的应用[J]. 中华介入放射学电子杂志, 2023, 11(03): 247-250.
[12] 李敬峰, 赵林波, 倪恒, 贾振宇, 曹月洲, 施海彬, 刘圣. 颅内动脉瘤破裂合并脑室出血的危险因素分析[J]. 中华介入放射学电子杂志, 2022, 10(04): 404-407.
[13] 连万成, 姚京, 吴泽涛, 何毅, 伍健明, 张猛. 血流导向装置治疗颅内未破裂动脉瘤的疗效与影响因素分析[J]. 中华脑血管病杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(01): 31-36.
[14] 付永鹏, 拉巴索朗, 马强, 陈群超, 郑裕峰, 吴蕻, 郑圆杰, 胡婧, 于洮, 张东. 人工智能辅助CT血管成像脑血管重建在基层医院颅内动脉瘤诊断中的应用[J]. 中华脑血管病杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(01): 26-30.
[15] 杨日淼, 刘鹏, 郝方斌, 张茜, 韩聪, 暴向阳, 张正善, 汪汇, 赵博, 赵申超, 吕明, 段炼. 烟雾病合并颅内动脉瘤的血管内栓塞治疗[J]. 中华脑血管病杂志(电子版), 2021, 15(01): 28-33.
阅读次数
全文


摘要