切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华脑科疾病与康复杂志(电子版) ›› 2019, Vol. 09 ›› Issue (02) : 91 -95. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-123X.2019.02.007

所属专题: 文献

临床研究

引导式教育系统在脑瘫儿童康复中的应用效果分析
刘彩红1,()   
  1. 1. 250001 济南市按摩医院康复科
  • 收稿日期:2019-03-09 出版日期:2019-04-15
  • 通信作者: 刘彩红

Application of guided education system in the rehabilitation of children with cerebral palsy

Caihong Liu1,()   

  1. 1. Department of Rehabilitation, Ji’nan Massage Hospital, Ji’nan 250001, China
  • Received:2019-03-09 Published:2019-04-15
  • Corresponding author: Caihong Liu
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Liu Caihong, Email:
引用本文:

刘彩红. 引导式教育系统在脑瘫儿童康复中的应用效果分析[J/OL]. 中华脑科疾病与康复杂志(电子版), 2019, 09(02): 91-95.

Caihong Liu. Application of guided education system in the rehabilitation of children with cerebral palsy[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Brain Diseases and Rehabilitation(Electronic Edition), 2019, 09(02): 91-95.

目的

分析引导式教育系统在脑瘫儿童康复中的应用效果。

方法

随机选取济南市按摩医院康复科自2018年1月至2019年3月收治的脑瘫儿童60例,随机分为引导式教育系统组(30例)和常规性康复训练组(30例),统计分析2组患儿的粗大运动功能测量(GMFM)评分、临床疗效、各功能区DQ评分、Gesell发育评分、生活自理能力评分、社会适应能力评分。

结果

康复训练前,2组患儿的GMFM评分、DQ评分、Gesell发育评分、生活自理能力评分、社会适应能力评分之间的差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。康复训练后,2组患儿的GMFM评分、DQ评分、Gesell发育评分、生活自理能力评分、社会适应能力评分均显著高于康复训练前,引导式教育系统组患儿的GMFM评分、DQ评分、Gesell发育评分、生活自理能力评分、社会适应能力评分均显著高于常规性康复训练组,差异均具有统计学(P<0.05)。引导式教育系统组患儿的总有效率(86.7%)显著高于常规性康复训练组(66.7%),差异均具有统计学(P<0.05)。

结论

引导式教育系统在脑瘫儿童康复中的应用效果较常规性康复训练好。

Objective

To analyze the effect of guided education system in the rehabilitation of children with cerebral palsy.

Methods

From January 2018 to March 2019, 60 children with cerebral palsy in our hospital were randomly divided into two groups: a guided education system group (n=30) and a routine rehabilitation nursing group (n=30). The gross motor function measure (GMFM) scores of the two groups were statistically analyzed. Clinical efficacy, DQ score, Gesell development score, self-care ability score, social adaptability score.

Results

Before rehabilitation training, there were no significant differences in GMFM score, DQ score, Gesell development score, self-care ability score and social adaptability score between the two groups (P>0.05). After rehabilitation training, the GMFM score, DQ score, Gesell development score, self-care ability score and social adaptability score of the two groups were significantly higher than those before rehabilitation training. The GMFM score, DQ score, Gesell development score, self-care ability score and social adaptability score of the children in the guidance education system group were significantly higher than those before rehabilitation training. Compared with the routine rehabilitation training group, the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05). The total effective rate of guided education system group (86.7%) was significantly higher than that of routine rehabilitation training group (66.7%), the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05).

Conclusion

The application effect of guided education system in the rehabilitation of children with cerebral palsy is better than that of routine rehabilitation nursing.

表1 2组患儿的一般资料对比
表2 2组患儿康复训练前后的GMFM评分变化情况比较(分,Mean±SD)
表3 2组患儿的临床疗效比较[例(%)]
表4 2组患儿康复训练前后的各功能区DQ评分变化情况比较(分,Mean±SD)
表5 2组患儿康复训练前后的Gesell发育评分、生活自理能力评分、社会适应能力评分变化情况比较(分,Mean±SD)
[1]
龙霏,李昕,马彩云.引导式教育理念对脑瘫儿童康复康复训练效果的影响[J].首都食品与医药, 2018, 25(12): 85-86.
[2]
罗莎,欧阳柳青,肖婷.作业治疗对不同等级手功能脑瘫儿童精细运动的影响[J].湖南师范大学学报(医学版), 2018, 15(4): 66-69.
[3]
肖爱平.小儿脑性瘫痪的早期康复干预对患儿预后的影响[J].江西医药, 2012, 47(12): 1085-1087.
[4]
曹丽敏,余爱如.脑瘫儿童引导式教育教与学[M].北京:华夏出版社, 2012: 7-14.
[5]
卜会亭,章志梁.引导式教育训练辅助治疗脑瘫儿童言语障碍的康复效果评价[J].心理医生, 2019, 25(3): 343-344.
[6]
牛姝静,石记凯,鲁雅妮.沟通技巧联合引导式教育对脑瘫患儿智力水平及行为问题的影响[J].齐鲁康复训练杂志, 2019, 25(5): 95-97.
[7]
徐杨.引导式教育在小儿脑瘫康复护理训练干预中的效果分析[J].中国医药指南, 2018, 16(28): 287-288.
[8]
杨锦媚,粟愿学,汪湘军,等.引导式教育半日制流程课对脑瘫儿童智力发育的影响[J].护士进修杂志, 2018, 33(18): 1642-1645.
[9]
Carlson HL, MacMaster FP, Harris AD, et al. Spectroscopic biomarkers of motor cortex developmental plasticity in hemiparetic children after perinatal stroke[J]. Hum Brain Mapp, 2017, 38(3): 1574-1587.
[10]
Carlson HL, Ciechanski P, Harris AD, et al. Changes in spectroscopic biomarkers after transcranial direct current stimulation in children with perinatal stroke[J]. Brain Stimul, 2018, 11(1): 94-103.
[11]
Nemanich ST, Chen CY, Chen M, et al. Safety and feasibility of transcranial magnetic stimulation as an exploratory assessment of corticospinal connectivity in infants after perinatal brain injury: an observational study[J]. Phys Ther, 2019, 99(6): 689-700.
[12]
Armstrong EL, Boyd RN, Kentish MJ, et al. Effects of a training programme of functional electrical stimulation (FES) powered cycling, recreational cycling and goal-directed exercise training on children with cerebral palsy: a randomised controlled trial protocol[J]. BMJ Open, 2019, 9(6): e024881.
[13]
Velnar T, Spazzapan P, Rodi Z, et al. Selective dorsal rhizotomy in cerebral palsy spasticity - a newly established operative technique in Slovenia: a case report and review of literature[J]. World J Clin Cases, 2019, 7(10): 1133-1141.
[14]
Wotherspoon J, Whittingham K, Boyd RN, et al. Randomised controlled trial of a novel online cognitive rehabilitation programme for children with cerebral palsy: a study protocol[J]. BMJ Open, 2019, 9(6): e028505.
[15]
Blair E, Langdon K, McIntyre S, et al. Survival and mortality in cerebral palsy: observations to the sixth decade from a data linkage study of a total population register and National Death Index[J]. BMC Neurol, 2019, 19(1): 111.
[1] 杨占宇, 黄艳华, 马小迪, 冯安莹, 王旼娴, 龙青燕. 本体感觉训练对踝关节周围骨折患者步行能力的改善[J/OL]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(04): 477-483.
[2] 杨滢甄, 黄子荣, 梁家敏, 黄晓芳, 胡艳, 朱伟民. 膝关节前交叉韧带重建术前康复治疗的研究进展[J/OL]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(04): 538-544.
[3] 孙俊锋, 涂家金, 付丹, 蒋满香, 刘金晶, 崔乃硕. 手部烧伤瘢痕挛缩畸形整形术后综合康复联合点阵二氧化碳激光治疗的临床效果[J/OL]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2024, 19(05): 411-415.
[4] 钟锴, 蒋铁民, 张瑞青, 吐尔干艾力·阿吉, 邵英梅, 郭强. 加速康复外科在肝囊型棘球蚴病肝切除术中的应用分析[J/OL]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 425-429.
[5] 李月平, 李科, 乔禹铭, 钟美浓. 前列腺热蒸汽消融术医护康一体化快速康复模式初探[J/OL]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 464-472.
[6] 杨轲, 丁增巴姆, 马静, 李盼盼, 陈婷. 全程无缝隙肺康复训练在单孔胸腔镜肺叶切除术中的临床应用[J/OL]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2024, 17(05): 801-804.
[7] 曹健, 冯高华, 周卫军, 陈诚, 沈王丰, 吴英姿. 补脾益肺膏联合肺康复训练治疗慢性阻塞性肺疾病的临床分析[J/OL]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2024, 17(05): 781-784.
[8] 冯嘉楠, 蔡磊, 何国林, 付顺军, 张成, 冯周彬, 温耀鸿, 谭洪坤, 潘明新. 腹腔镜胆总管切开探查取石一期缝合的安全性与疗效:附128例分析[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(04): 543-550.
[9] 丁镇涛, 邢博涵, 曲洋, 王泊江, 张培训. 老年肱骨近端骨折的围手术期治疗策略[J/OL]. 中华肩肘外科电子杂志, 2024, 12(04): 292-294.
[10] 王洪, 王骏华, 范建楠. 人工智能技术在肩袖损伤中的研究进展[J/OL]. 中华肩肘外科电子杂志, 2024, 12(04): 356-361.
[11] 陈冬冬, 余程冬, 曹晓光. 上肢外骨骼机器人在脑卒中康复中的应用与研究进展[J/OL]. 中华脑科疾病与康复杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(05): 312-317.
[12] 谢浩文, 丁建英, 刘小霞, 冯毅, 姚婧. 椎旁神经阻滞对微创胃切除肥胖患者术中血流、术后应激及康复质量的影响[J/OL]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(06): 569-573.
[13] 贾玲玲, 滕飞, 常键, 黄福, 刘剑萍. 心肺康复在各种疾病中应用的研究进展[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(09): 859-862.
[14] 刘芳明, 石秀秀, 唐冲, 张克石, 徐影, 王桂杉, 关振鹏, 李晓. 骨科康复患者对数字疗法应用的知晓度和需求度:一项基于928 份问卷调查结果分析[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(07): 654-661.
[15] 蔡雨玲, 王刚, 江志伟. 针刺应用于术后肠麻痹的研究进展[J/OL]. 中华针灸电子杂志, 2024, 13(04): 164-168.
阅读次数
全文


摘要