切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华脑科疾病与康复杂志(电子版) ›› 2020, Vol. 10 ›› Issue (03) : 148 -152. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-123X.2020.03.005

所属专题: 文献

临床研究

颞浅动脉-大脑中动脉双支血管搭桥短期安全性分析
胡晓1, 陈靓1, 王振宇1,()   
  1. 1. 610072 成都,四川省医学科学院·四川省人民医院神经外科
  • 收稿日期:2020-09-11 出版日期:2020-06-15
  • 通信作者: 王振宇

Short-term safety of double barrel superficial temporal artery to middle cerebral artery bypass

Xiao Hu1, Liang Chen1, Zhenyu Wang1,()   

  1. 1. Department of Neurosurgery, Sichuan Academy of Medical Sciences & Sichuan Provincial People’s Hospital, Chengdu 610072, China
  • Received:2020-09-11 Published:2020-06-15
  • Corresponding author: Zhenyu Wang
引用本文:

胡晓, 陈靓, 王振宇. 颞浅动脉-大脑中动脉双支血管搭桥短期安全性分析[J]. 中华脑科疾病与康复杂志(电子版), 2020, 10(03): 148-152.

Xiao Hu, Liang Chen, Zhenyu Wang. Short-term safety of double barrel superficial temporal artery to middle cerebral artery bypass[J]. Chinese Journal of Brain Diseases and Rehabilitation(Electronic Edition), 2020, 10(03): 148-152.

目的

探索颞浅动脉-大脑中动脉(STA-MCA)搭桥术在慢性颅内缺血性疾病中的应用,分析单支/双支STA-MCA端侧吻合术后短期的安全性差异。

方法

回顾性分析了四川省医学科学院·四川省人民医院神经外科自2020年1月至8月收治并行STA-MCA端侧吻合手术治疗慢性颈内动脉系统闭塞的患者的临床资料,按照治疗方法将患者分为单支搭桥组和双支搭桥组。对比2组患者术后短期内出现脑血流过度灌注综合征、桥血管闭塞、颅内感染、头皮切口愈合不良等相关并发症的统计学差异。

结果

本文共纳入患者35例,共行手术41次,其中单支搭桥25次,双支搭桥16次。2组患者术前临床资料比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。单支搭桥组患者术后出现脑血流过度灌注综合征的几率(20%)低于双支搭桥组(44%),但差异无统计学意义(P=0.103)。单支搭桥组和双支搭桥组中术后7 d的CT脑血管成像未见桥血管显影的患者分别为2例和1例,2组比较差异无统计学意义(P=0.834)。2组患者术后均未出现颅内感染、切口愈合不良。

结论

本研究目前暂时没有发现双支搭桥可能增加的手术风险,但是双支搭桥术后可能增加脑血流灌注较单支更为明显,后续研究将做进一步的量化研究,以评估该术式的临床意义。

Objective

To explore the application of superficial temporal artery-middle cerebral artery (STA-MCA) bypass operation in chronic intracranial ischemic diseases and analyze the short-term safety after single/double STA-MCA end-to-side anastomosis.

Methods

The clinical data of patients with chronic internal carotid artery occlusion treated by end-to-side anastomosis involving STA-MCA in the Department of Neurosurgery of Sichuan Academy of Medical Sciences & Sichuan Provincial People’s Hospital from January to August 2020 were retrospectively analyzed. According to the treatment methods, the patients were divided into single bypass group and double bypass group. The statistical differences of complications such as cerebral hyperperfusion syndrome, bridge occlusion, intracranial infection and scalp necrosis in the short term after operation between the two groups were analyzed.

Results

A total of 35 patients underwent 41 operations, including 25 single bypass and 16 double bypass. There was no significant difference in clinical data between the two groups before operation (P>0.05). And there was no statistically significant difference neither in the rate of high perfusion response postoperative (20% in the single-branch group and 44% in the double-branch group, P=0.103) nor the rate of Bridge-vessel occlusion (8% vs 6%, P=0.834) in the CTA for 7 d after the operation. No patients in the two groups showed infection or scalp necrosis after operation.

Conclusion

Through this study, there is no evidence that double bypass may increase the risk of surgery. However, the cerebral blood flow after double-bypass is more obvious increase than that after single-bypass, which will be further quantified in future studies to evaluate the clinical significance of this operation.

图2 双支桥血管CT脑血管成像(箭头所示)
表1 单支/双支搭桥患者临床资料
表2 单支/双支搭桥患者预后情况[例(%)]
[1]
Aboukais R, Verbraeken B, Leclerc X, et al. Superficial temporal artery-middle cerebral artery anastomosis patency correlates with cerebrovascular reserve in adult moyamoya syndrome patients[J]. Neurochirurgie, 2019, 65(4): 146-151.
[2]
Gu Y, Ni W, Jiang H, et al. Efficacy of extracranial-intracranial revascularization for non-moyamoya steno-occlusive cerebrovascular disease in a series of 66 patients[J]. J Clin Neurosci, 2012, 19(10): 1408-1415.
[3]
Kuroda S, Kawabori M, Hirata K, et al. Clinical significance of STA-MCA double anastomosis for hemodynamic compromise in post-JET/COSS era[J]. Acta Neurochir (Wien), 2014, 156(1): 77-83.
[4]
Hayashi K, Horie N, Suyama K, et al. Incidence and clinical features of symptomatic cerebral hyperperfusion syndrome after vascular reconstruction[J]. World Neurosurg, 2012 78(5): 447-454.
[5]
中华医学会神经外科学分会,中国神经外科重症管理协作组.中国神经外科重症患者感染诊治专家共识(2017)[J].中华医学杂志, 2017, 97(21): 1607-1614.
[6]
Powers WJ, Clarke WR, Grubb RL Jr, et al. Extracranial-intracranial bypass surgery for stroke prevention in hemodynamic cerebral ischemia: the carotid occlusion surgery study randomized trial[J]. JAMA, 2011, 306(18): 1983-1992.
[7]
Ishikawa T, Yamaguchi K, Kawashima A, et al. Predicting the occurrence of hemorrhagic cerebral hyperperfusion syndrome using regional cerebral blood flow after direct bypass surgery in patients with moyamoya disease[J]. World Neurosurg, 2018, 119: e750-e756.
[8]
Cherian J, Srinivasan V, Kan P, et al. Double-barrel superficial temporal artery-middle cerebral artery bypass: can it be considered "high-flow?" [J]. Oper Neurosurg (Hagerstown), 2018, 14(3): 288-294.
[9]
Burkhardt JK, Winkler EA, Gandhi S, et al. Single-barrel versus double-barrel superficial temporal artery to middle cerebral artery bypass: a comparative analysis[J]. World Neurosurg, 2019, 125: e408-e415.
[10]
刘海玉,王宏磊.烟雾病血管重建术后脑血流过度灌注综合征的研究进展[J].中华神经外科杂志, 2014, 30(9): 956-958.
[11]
Fujimura M, Niizuma K, Inoue T, et al. Minocycline prevents focal neurological deterioration due to cerebral hyperperfusion after extracranial-intracranial bypass for moyamoya disease[J]. Neurosurgery, 2014, 74(2): 163-170.
[12]
Ishiguro T, Okada Y, Ishikawa T, et al. Efficacy of superficial temporal artery-middle cerebral artery double bypass in patients with hemorrhagic moyamoya disease: surgical effects for operated hemispheric sides[J]. Neurosurg Rev, 2019, 42(2): 559-568.
[13]
Chen Y, Ma L, Lu J, et al. Postoperative hemorrhage during the acute phase after direct or combined revascularization for moyamoya disease: risk factors, prognosis, and literature review[J]. J Neurosurg, 2019, Online ahead of print.
[14]
Hwang JW, Yang HM, Lee H, et al. Predictive factors of symptomatic cerebral hyperperfusion after superficial temporal artery-middle cerebral artery anastomosis in adult patients with moyamoya disease[J]. Br J Anaesth, 2013, 110(5): 773-779.
[15]
Takanari K, Araki Y, Okamoto S, et al. Operative wound-related complications after cranial revascularization surgeries[J]. J Neurosurg, 2015, 123: 1145-1150.
[1] 魏淑婕, 惠品晶, 丁亚芳, 张白, 颜燕红, 周鹏, 黄亚波. 单侧颈内动脉闭塞患者行颞浅动脉-大脑中动脉搭桥术的脑血流动力学评估[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(10): 1046-1055.
[2] 徐建军, 王宏磊, 乔萌, 冯颖利, 徐宁. 血管内介入治疗合并单侧烟雾病的前交通动脉瘤[J]. 中华神经创伤外科电子杂志, 2022, 08(01): 39-43.
[3] 邱俊, 卢文朋, 冯雷. 表现为岛盖综合征的烟雾病一例报道[J]. 中华脑科疾病与康复杂志(电子版), 2021, 11(02): 125-126.
[4] 杨海华, 袁景林, 周晓梅, 牛军伟. RNF213基因突变所致烟雾病一家系病例临床分析并文献复习[J]. 中华脑血管病杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 495-498.
[5] 丁江波, 汤志伟. 烟雾病患者脑血流动力学的研究进展[J]. 中华脑血管病杂志(电子版), 2022, 16(06): 432-438.
[6] 石志勇, 王嵘, 张东. 基于烟雾血管分级的成人烟雾病患者脑认知功能障碍初步研究[J]. 中华脑血管病杂志(电子版), 2022, 16(03): 158-164.
[7] 谭存鑫, 叶迅, 牛弘川, 王嵘. 烟雾病颈内动脉颅外段狭窄的临床特点分析[J]. 中华脑血管病杂志(电子版), 2022, 16(03): 149-153.
[8] 赵鹏, 张平, 邓林, 吴伟, 李新钢, 王东海. 直接搭桥对比联合搭桥治疗成人缺血型烟雾病的疗效[J]. 中华脑血管病杂志(电子版), 2022, 16(01): 38-43.
[9] 孙浩耕, 任宇涛, 肖安琪, 田蕊, 郭睿, 刘翼. 烟雾病患者脑微出血的临床特点分析[J]. 中华脑血管病杂志(电子版), 2021, 15(04): 247-252.
[10] 孙宁, 赵岩, 杨新宇. 颞浅动脉-大脑中动脉的直接搭桥术治疗低龄(5~11岁)儿童烟雾病11例[J]. 中华脑血管病杂志(电子版), 2021, 15(04): 242-246.
[11] 刘阳, 郭高超, 赵黎明, 梁浩, 张韶, 高涛, 孙玉学, 栗超跃. 儿童烟雾病的临床特征、手术治疗及疗效分析[J]. 中华脑血管病杂志(电子版), 2021, 15(04): 237-241.
[12] 佟志勇, 孙怀宇, 刘源, 王刚, 张劲松, 初金刚, 温志锋, 潘起晨, 梁传声. 序贯双吻合技术治疗烟雾病的短期疗效分析[J]. 中华脑血管病杂志(电子版), 2021, 15(02): 88-94.
[13] 赵黎明, 梁浩, 张韶, 高涛, 刘阳, 孙玉学, 郭高超, 李天晓, 栗超跃. 不稳定型烟雾病患者的临床特征及其发生的危险因素分析[J]. 中华脑血管病杂志(电子版), 2021, 15(02): 83-87.
[14] 陆夏, 马妍. 烟雾病的血管壁解剖病理——从基础到影像[J]. 中华脑血管病杂志(电子版), 2021, 15(01): 41-43.
[15] 黄亚波, 周鹏, 韩庆东, 陆晓诚, 惠品晶, 颜艳红, 张世明, 王中. 荧光造影在烟雾病颅内外血管搭桥术中的应用[J]. 中华脑血管病杂志(电子版), 2021, 15(01): 34-40.
阅读次数
全文


摘要