切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华脑科疾病与康复杂志(电子版) ›› 2020, Vol. 10 ›› Issue (04) : 209 -217. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-123X.2020.04.004

所属专题: 文献

颅内肿瘤

多学科协作、多技术融合手术治疗颈静脉孔区肿瘤
董康1, 钟东1,(), 尹浩扬1, 蒋宏1, 杨瑞1, 吴越1, 黄志坚1, 程崇杰1, 夏海坚1, 孙晓川1   
  1. 1. 400016 重庆,重庆医科大学附属第一医院神经外科
  • 收稿日期:2020-11-12 出版日期:2020-08-15
  • 通信作者: 钟东
  • 基金资助:
    重庆市科卫联合医学科研项目(2019ZDXM044)

Multidisciplinary teams and multiple techniques in surgical management of jugular foramen tumors

Kang Dong1, Dong Zhong1,(), Haoyang Yin1, Hong Jiang1, Rui Yang1, Yue Wu1, Zhijian Huang1, Chongjie Cheng1, Haijian Xia1, Xiaochuan Sun1   

  1. 1. Department of Neurosurgery, the First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing 400016, China
  • Received:2020-11-12 Published:2020-08-15
  • Corresponding author: Dong Zhong
引用本文:

董康, 钟东, 尹浩扬, 蒋宏, 杨瑞, 吴越, 黄志坚, 程崇杰, 夏海坚, 孙晓川. 多学科协作、多技术融合手术治疗颈静脉孔区肿瘤[J]. 中华脑科疾病与康复杂志(电子版), 2020, 10(04): 209-217.

Kang Dong, Dong Zhong, Haoyang Yin, Hong Jiang, Rui Yang, Yue Wu, Zhijian Huang, Chongjie Cheng, Haijian Xia, Xiaochuan Sun. Multidisciplinary teams and multiple techniques in surgical management of jugular foramen tumors[J]. Chinese Journal of Brain Diseases and Rehabilitation(Electronic Edition), 2020, 10(04): 209-217.

目的

回顾颈静脉孔区肿瘤的手术治疗效果,探讨多学科协作、多技术融合手术在颈静脉孔区肿瘤治疗中的价值。

方法

纳入重庆医科大学附属第一医院神经外科自2011年1月至2020年7月行颈静脉孔区肿瘤切除术患者19例,根据Samii分型,其中A型7例,B型5例,C型0例,D型7例;显微神经外科手术治疗14例,显微镜+神经内镜双镜联合手术治疗2例,多学科协作手术治疗3例;手术入路采用枕下乙状窦后入路5例,基础远外侧入路7例,远外侧经髁-髁上入路4例,颞下窝A型入路1例,远外侧-迷路后入路2例。所有患者术后根据肿瘤性质、残留与否及残留程度选择性行辅助放射治疗。分析所有患者肿瘤切除程度、肿瘤复发情况、手术相关并发症、神经功能预后等情况。

结果

手术次全切率及以上达84.2%;1例患者失访,18例随访患者中1例术后1年肿瘤复发,于外院再次行手术治疗,其余患者末次随访期内无肿瘤复发,复发率为5.6%;所有患者末次随访期内无手术相关死亡,术后2例患者出现枕部皮下积液(10.5%)。手术相关神经功能障碍以Ⅸ~Ⅹ颅神经最常见为52.6%(10/19),其次为Ⅶ颅神经47.4%(9/19)、Ⅷ颅神经36.8%(7/19)、Ⅻ颅神经10.5%(2/19)。手术相关暂时性神经功能障碍:Ⅶ颅神经77.8%(7/9)、Ⅷ颅神经50.0%(3/6)、Ⅸ~Ⅹ颅神经33.3%(3/9)、Ⅻ颅神经0(0/2)。末次随访期内术后Ⅶ、Ⅷ、Ⅸ~Ⅹ、Ⅺ、Ⅻ颅神经功能保留及改善率分别为88.2%(15/17)、82.4%(14/17)、64.7%(11/17)、100%(17/17)、88.2%(15/17)。

结论

神经功能的保留及改善应作为颈静脉孔区肿瘤手术治疗的首要目标,手术后颅神经功能障碍者应尽早行康复治疗;多学科协作、多技术融合于颈静脉孔区肿瘤个体化治疗中具有重要价值;辅助放射治疗可用于颈静脉孔区肿瘤切除术后残余肿瘤复发的控制。

Objective

To analyze the curative effect of Jugular foramen tumors explore the value of multidisciplinary teams and multiple techniques in surgical management of jugular foramen tumors.

Methods

Nineteen patients with jugular foramen tumors accepted surgery from January 2011 to July 2020 in neurosurgery department of the First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University. According to the classifications of Samii, they were divided into A type 4 cases, B type 5 cases, C type 0 and D type 7 cases. Fourteen patients underwent micro neurosurgery, another 2 and 3 patients accepted microscopic combined with endoscopic surgery respectively. The surgical approaches included infraoccipital retrosigmoid approach in 5 cases, basic far lateral approach in 7 cases, far lateral transcondylar supracondylar approach in 4 cases, fisch A infratemporal fossa approach in 1 case, and far lateral retrolabyrinthine approach in 2 cases. All patients were treated with adjuvant radiotherapy according to the pathological result and extent of residual tumor. The degree of tumor resection, tumor recurrence, surgical associated complications and preservation of cranial nerve function were analyzed.

Results

The tumor resection rate of subtotal resection and above was 84.2%. One patient was lost to follow-up, and one of the 18 follow-up patients had tumor recurrence one year after operation, and they were operated again in other hospitals. In the remaining follow-up patients, there was no tumor recurrence in the last follow-up period, and the recurrence rate was 5.6%; there was no operation-related death in all patients during the last follow-up period, and 2 patients had occipital subcutaneous effusion (10.5%). Surgical related neurological dysfunction was the most common in Ⅸ-Ⅹ cranial nerve (52.6%, 10/19), followed by Ⅶ cranial nerve (47.4%, 9/19), Ⅷ cranial nerve (36.8%, 7/19) and Ⅻ cranial nerve (10.5%, 2/19). Surgical related temporary neurological dysfunction: 77.8% (7/9) of Ⅶ cranial nerve, 50.0% (3/6) of Ⅷ cranial nerve, 33.3% (3/9) of Ⅸ-Ⅹ cranial nerve and 0 (0/2) of Ⅻ cranial nerve. During the last follow-up period, the rates of preservation and improvement of cranial nerve function in Ⅶ, Ⅷ, Ⅸ-Ⅹ, Ⅺ and Ⅻ were 88.2% (15/17), 82.4% (14/17), 64.7% (11/17), 100% (17/17) and 88.2% (15/17), respectively.

Conclusion

The preservation and improvement of cranial nerves function should be prior goal of surgery. Multidisciplinary teams and multiple techniques have great value on individual surgical treatment of jugular foramen tumors. Adjuvant radiotherapy could be applied to control the recurrence of residual tumor after surgery.

表1 19例患者术前、术后、末次随访的神经功能情况
图1 典型病例1术前术后影像学资料
图3 典型病例3术前术后影像学资料
图4 典型病例4术前术后影像学资料
[1]
Samii M, Alimohamadi M, Gerganov V. Endoscope-assisted retrosigmoid infralabyrinthine approach to jugular foramen tumors[J]. J Neurosurg, 2016, 124(4): 1061-1067.
[2]
Fayad JN, Keles B, Brackmann DE. Jugular foramen tumors: clinical characteristics and treatment outcomes[J]. Otol Neurotol, 2010, 31(2): 299-305.
[3]
Ramina R, Maniglia JJ, Fernandes YB, et al. Tumors of the jugular foramen: diagnosis and management[J]. Neurosurgery, 2005, 57(1 Suppl): 59-68; discussion 59-68.
[4]
Wang X, Long W, Liu D, et al. Optimal surgical approaches and treatment outcomes in patients with jugular foramen schwannomas: a single institution series of 31 cases and a literature review[J]. Neurosurg Rev, 2020, 43(5): 1339-1350.
[5]
Samii M, Babu RP, Tatagiba M, et al. Surgical treatment of jugular foramen schwannomas[J]. J Neurosurg, 1995, 82(6): 924-932.
[6]
陈启懂,张济源,廖振南,等.术中电生理监测下手术切除颈静脉孔区肿瘤[J].医学信息(上旬刊), 2010, 23(9): 3346-3348.
[7]
Puataweepong P, Dhanachai M, Hansasuta A, et al. Clinical outcomes of intracranial nonvestibular schwannomas treated with linacbased stereotactic radiosurgery and radiotherapy[J]. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev, 2016, 17(7): 3271-3276.
[8]
周良学,游潮,罗林丽,等.颈静脉孔区肿瘤的显微外科治疗[J].中华神经外科杂志, 2007, 23(10): 754-757.
[9]
Gilbert ME, Shelton C, McDonald A, et al. Meningioma of the jugular foramen: glomus jugulare mimic and surgical challenge[J]. Laryngoscope, 2004, 114(1): 25-32.
[10]
Tomasello F, Conti A. Judicious management of jugular foramen tumors[J]. World Neurosurg, 2015, 83(5): 756-757.
[11]
Samii M, Alimohamadi M, Gerganov V. Surgical treatment of jugular foramen schwannoma: surgical treatment based on a new classification[J]. Neurosurgery, 2015, 77(3): 424-432; discussion 432.
[12]
Dobberpuhl MR, Maxwell S, Feddock J, et al. Treatment outcomes for single modality management of glomus jugulare tumors with stereotactic radiosurgery[J]. Otol Neurotol, 2016, 37(9): 1406-1410.
[13]
张力伟,于春江,王忠诚.颈静脉孔区肿瘤的手术入路[J].国外医学(神经病学神经外科学分册), 2001, 28(3): 143-146.
[14]
Colasanti R, Tailor AR, Gorjian M, et al. Microsurgical and endoscopic anatomy of the extended retrosigmoid inframeatal infratemporal approach[J]. Neurosurgery, 2015, 11 Suppl 2: 181-189; discussion 189.
[15]
Zhang QH, Wang ZL, Guo HC, et al. Endoscopic approach to remove intra-extracranial tumors in various skull base regions: 10-year experience of a single center[J]. Chin Med J (Engl), 2017, 130(24): 2933-2940.
[16]
Wanna GB, Sweeney AD, Haynes DS, et al. Contemporary management of jugular paragangliomas[J]. Otolaryngol Clin North Am, 2015, 48(2): 331-341.
[17]
Zeng XJ, Li D, Hao SY, et al. Long-term functional and recurrence outcomes of surgically treated jugular foramen schwannomas: a 20-year experience[J]. World Neurosurg, 2016, 86: 134-146.
[18]
de Brito R, Cisneros Lesser JC, Lopes PT, et al. Preservation of the facial and lower cranial nerves in glomus jugulare tumor surgery: modifying our surgical technique for improved outcomes[J]. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol, 2018, 275(8): 1963-1969.
[19]
Ivan ME, Sughrue ME, Clark AJ, et al. A meta-analysis of tumor control rates and treatment-related morbidity for patients with glomus jugulare tumors[J]. J Neurosurg, 2011, 114(5): 1299-1305.
[20]
Guinto G, Kageyama M, Trujillo-Luarca VH, et al. Nonglomic tumors of the jugular foramen: differential diagnosis and prognostic implications[J]. World Neurosurg, 2014, 82(6): 1283-1290.
[1] 张英姿, 王秀琼, 柳颐龄, 杨艳峰, 王世平, 金梅, 蔡江晖, 王献民. COVID-19疫情期基于在线防控管理模式的多学科协作诊疗团队对川崎病并发冠状动脉损害患儿门诊随访应用[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2020, 16(02): 144-149.
[2] 孙静静, 郭霞, 饶艳琼, 代依灵, 田钰, 高举. 儿童肝母细胞瘤疗效及预后分析[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2019, 15(04): 373-381.
[3] 潘艳, 刘义娟, 魏亚利. 多学科协作诊治模式管理烧伤创面换药疼痛的效果观察[J]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2021, 16(04): 362-364.
[4] 宋渊, 赵继荣, 李树君, 杜自忠, 蒋振兴, 李岩, 张海清, 赵宁, 慕向前, 程如意, 赵生鑫. 多学科协作治疗濒临截肢伤的临床应用研究[J]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2018, 13(02): 107-111.
[5] 许东梅, 马小扬, 黄宇明. 神经梅毒诊疗现状及进展[J]. 中华实验和临床感染病杂志(电子版), 2022, 16(05): 300-306.
[6] 李莎莎, 陈桂丽, 刘莹. 一例出血性放射性膀胱炎术后并发尿源性多重耐药菌及真菌感染患者护理报告[J]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2021, 15(01): 78-79.
[7] 唐丽丽, 刘晓青, 高林春, 郑鸿, 何月霞. MDT在肺癌术后癌因性疲乏的临床应用[J]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2020, 13(06): 810-812.
[8] 刘云玥, 范文生, 顾成磊, 马鑫, 刘洪一, 孟元光. 达芬奇机器人MDT模式全盆腔廓清术治疗晚期宫颈癌一例[J]. 中华腔镜外科杂志(电子版), 2022, 15(04): 249-251.
[9] 王峰, 汪刘华, 周家杰, 王道荣. 结直肠癌肝转移外科治疗进展[J]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2020, 09(04): 408-411.
[10] 施赟杰, 王颢. 外科医生参与新型冠状病毒肺炎援鄂救援队抗疫工作体会[J]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2020, 09(03): 315-317.
[11] 周建凤, 周炜洵, 高鑫, 杜顺达, 吴斌. 多学科诊治可切除性结直肠癌肝转移一例报道[J]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2019, 08(03): 295-297.
[12] 杜晓辉, 胡时栋. 结直肠癌MDT模式的建立与实践探讨[J]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2018, 07(02): 190-192.
[13] 李宁, 杨明辉, 朱仕文, 张萍, 吴新宝, 蒋协远. 多学科协作构建老年髋部骨折"绿色通道"[J]. 中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志, 2022, 08(05): 290-295.
[14] 彭晨健, 张伟, 陈烁, 赵建宁, 王军. 多学科协作诊治模式在老年髋部骨折合并肾功能衰竭透析患者髋关节置换治疗中的应用[J]. 中华老年病研究电子杂志, 2023, 10(02): 19-23.
[15] 索源, 杨书聪, 钱见楚, 周立, 骆华德, 郁慧杰. 区域协同多院协作(MHT)模式救治血流动力学不稳定骨盆骨折的价值[J]. 中华卫生应急电子杂志, 2022, 08(02): 81-85.
阅读次数
全文


摘要