切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华脑科疾病与康复杂志(电子版) ›› 2021, Vol. 11 ›› Issue (01) : 14 -18. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-123X.2021.01.004

所属专题: 文献

周围神经疾患

Hoffmann法内镜尺神经松解术治疗特发性肘管综合征
鲁润春1, 伊骏飞1, 伊志强1, 李春伟1, 段鸿洲1, 张家湧1, 李良1,()   
  1. 1. 100034 北京,北京大学第一医院神经外科
  • 收稿日期:2021-01-05 出版日期:2021-02-15
  • 通信作者: 李良

Endoscopic ulnar nerve decompression for idiopathic cubital tunnel syndrome

Runchun Lu1, Junfei Yi1, Zhiqiang Yi1, Chunwei Li1, Hongzhou Duan1, Jiayong Zhang1, Liang Li1,()   

  1. 1. Department of Neurosurgery, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing 100034, China
  • Received:2021-01-05 Published:2021-02-15
  • Corresponding author: Liang Li
引用本文:

鲁润春, 伊骏飞, 伊志强, 李春伟, 段鸿洲, 张家湧, 李良. Hoffmann法内镜尺神经松解术治疗特发性肘管综合征[J]. 中华脑科疾病与康复杂志(电子版), 2021, 11(01): 14-18.

Runchun Lu, Junfei Yi, Zhiqiang Yi, Chunwei Li, Hongzhou Duan, Jiayong Zhang, Liang Li. Endoscopic ulnar nerve decompression for idiopathic cubital tunnel syndrome[J]. Chinese Journal of Brain Diseases and Rehabilitation(Electronic Edition), 2021, 11(01): 14-18.

目的

初步探讨Hoffmann法内镜尺神经松解术治疗特发性肘管综合征的安全性和有效性。

方法

回顾性分析北京大学第一医院神经外科自2016年6月至2020年9月行内镜手术治疗的13例肘管综合征患者的临床资料。手术器械采用肘管手术套件,采用Hoffmann法进行手术。术前应用McGowan分级对患者进行分类。术后对患者进行电话和门诊随访,采用改良Bishop评分对患者术后恢复程度进行评价。

结果

13例患者中11例行单纯尺神经减压,2例合并小囊肿压迫者同时行囊肿切除,术后病理报告1例为肘关节滑膜囊肿、1例为腱鞘囊肿。术后2~5 d出院,1例患者出现切口裂开,予以重新缝合后愈合良好,余患者无并发症发生。术后第2天所有患者均有麻木症状的缓解。随访5~56个月,改良Bishop评分优5例、良5例、中3例、差0例。其中术前McGowan分级1级组术后改良Bishop评分优良率100%(6/6),McGowan分级2级组改良Bishop评分优良率57%(4/7)。术后14~21 d恢复正常生活工作。

结论

内镜肘管减压术是微创手术,神经减压效果与开放手术相当,术后短期并发症少、恢复工作快,尤其适用于原发性肘管综合征。

Objective

To investigate the efficacy and safety of Hoffmann’s endoscopic ulnar neurolysis in the treatment of cubital tunnel syndrome.

Methods

The clinical data of 13 patients with cubital tunnel syndrome who underwent endoscopic ulnar neurolysis from June 2016 to September 2020 in the First Hospital of Peking University were analyzed retrospectively. The surgical instrument was the cubital release kit, and Professor Hoffmann’s method was used in the operation. McGowan classification was used to classify the patients before operation. The patients were followed up by telephone and outpatient department after operation and evaluated by modified Bishop score.

Results

Among the 13 cases, 11 cases underwent ulnar nerve decompression alone, 2 cases with small cyst compression underwent cyst resection at the same time. Postoperative pathology showed that 1 case was synovial cyst of elbow joint and 1 case was ganglion cyst. All patients were discharged from the hospital 2-5 d postoperatively. One patient had incision dehiscence and healed well after suturing again. The other patients had no complications. Numbness was relieved in all patients on the second day after operation. After 5-56 months of follow-up, the modified Bishop score was excellent in 5 cases, good in 5 cases, fair in 3 cases and poor in 0 case. The excellent and good rate of modified Bishop score was 100% (6/6) in McGowan grade 1 group and 57% (4/7) in McGowan grade 2 group. All the patients returned to work in 14-21 d after surgery.

Conclusion

Endoscopic cubital tunnel decompression is a minimally invasive surgery, the effect of nerve decompression is equivalent to that of open surgery, with less postoperative short-term complications and quick recovery, especially suitable for patients with primary cubital tunnel syndrome.

表1 McGowan分级
图1 内镜下肘管松解术术中资料
表2 改良Bishop评分
表3 术前McGowan分级与术后改良Bishop评分关系
[1]
Zajonc H, Momeni A. Endoscopic release of the cubital tunnel[J]. Hand Clin, 2014, 30(1): 55-62.
[2]
Hoffmann R, Siemionow M. The endoscopic management of cubital tunnel syndrome[J]. J Hand Surg Br, 2006, 31(1): 23-29.
[3]
Dützmann S, Martin KD, Sobottka S, et al. Open vs retractor-endoscopic in situ decompression of the ulnar nerve in cubital tunnel syndrome: a retrospective cohort study[J]. Neurosurgery, 2013, 72(4): 605-616; discussion 614-616.
[4]
Aldekhayel S, Govshievich A, Lee J, et al. Endoscopic versus open cubital tunnel release: a systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. Hand (NY), 2016, 11(1): 36-44.
[5]
Buchanan PJ, Chieng LO, Hubbard ZS, et al. Endoscopic versus open in situ cubital tunnel release: a systematic review of the literature and meta-analysis of 655 patients[J]. Plast Reconstr Surg, 2018, 141(3): 679-684.
[6]
Nakashian MN, Ireland D, Kane PM. Cubital tunnel syndrome: current concepts[J]. Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med, 2020, 13(4): 520-524.
[7]
Wade RG, Griffiths TT, Flather R, et al. Safety and outcomes of different surgical techniques for cubital tunnel decompression: a systematic review and network meta-analysis[J]. JAMA Netw Open, 2020, 3(11): e2024352.
[8]
Assmus H, Antoniadis G, Bischoff C, et al. Cubital tunnel syndrome-a review and management guidelines[J]. Cent Eur Neurosurg, 2011, 72(2): 90-98.
[9]
Byvaltsev VA, Stepanov IA, Kerimbayev TT. A systematic review and meta-analysis comparing open versus endoscopic in situ decompression for the treatment of cubital tunnel syndrome[J]. Acta Neurol Belg, 2020, 120(1): 1-8.
[10]
Toirac A, Giugale JM, Fowler JR. Open versus endoscopic cubital tunnel in situ decompression: a systematic review of outcomes and complications[J]. Hand (NY), 2017, 12(3): 229-235.
[11]
Khalid SI, Carlton A, Kelly R, et al. Novel minimally invasive technique in the treatment of cubital tunnel syndrome[J]. J Spine Surg, 2019, 5(1): 88-96.
[12]
Cobb TK. Endoscopic cubital tunnel release[J]. J Hand Surg Am, 2010, 35(10): 1690-1697.
[1] 袁成雪, 张宗霞, 许婷, 斯郎拉姆. 三种内镜手术治疗结肠息肉的效果及安全性观察[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 78-81.
[2] 张海涛, 康婵娟, 翟静洁. 胰管支架置入治疗急性胆源性胰腺炎效果观察[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 654-657.
[3] 张天献, 吕云福, 郑进方. 胆总管结石微创治疗进展[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2023, 12(05): 585-588.
[4] 侯文运, 刘恒昌, 窦利州, 陈海鹏, 郑朝旭, 王贵齐, 王锡山. 腹部无辅助切口内镜引导下取标本的腹腔镜辅助右半结肠癌根治术(保留回盲部)(附视频)[J]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2023, 12(05): 436-440.
[5] 刘政委, 仪立志, 尹夕龙, 孔文龙, 纠智松, 张文源. 锥颅血肿外引流与神经内镜手术治疗老年基底节区高血压性脑出血的疗效分析[J]. 中华脑科疾病与康复杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(05): 299-303.
[6] 侯超, 潘美辰, 吴文明, 黄兴广, 李翔, 程凌雪, 朱玉轩, 李文波. 早期食管癌及上皮内瘤变内镜黏膜下剥离术后食管狭窄的危险因素[J]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(06): 383-387.
[7] 孙欣欣, 刘军, 陈超伍, 孙超. 超声内镜引导细针穿刺抽吸术在胰腺占位性病变中的应用[J]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(06): 418-421.
[8] 高显奎, 赵太云, 陆兴俊, 张洪领, 房修罗, 闫碧春, 王胤, 王永翠, 刘苗苗, 冉若男. 内镜电凝止血与组织胶注射治疗上消化道溃疡伴出血的疗效观察[J]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(06): 452-455.
[9] 张政赢, 鞠阳, 刘晓宁. 二甲双胍对2型糖尿病患者大肠腺瘤术后复发的影响[J]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(06): 485-488.
[10] 丁亚梅, 田野, 钱进, 陈梅, 季鸿颖. 良性胃溃疡出血患者内镜治疗术后再出血的危险因素分析[J]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(05): 322-325.
[11] 许灿, 周鹏哲, 朱宁, 穆维娜. 超声内镜与磁共振胰胆管成像对胆总管泥沙样结石的诊断价值[J]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(05): 359-362.
[12] 邱春华, 张志宏. 1108例小肠疾病的临床诊断及检查策略分析[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(9): 948-954.
[13] 王亚丹, 吴静, 黄博洋, 王苗苗, 郭春梅, 宿慧, 王沧海, 王静, 丁鹏鹏, 刘红. 白光内镜下结直肠肿瘤性质预测模型的构建与验证[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 655-661.
[14] 孟科, 李燕, 闫婧爽, 闫斌. 胶囊内镜胃通过时间的影响因素分析[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 671-675.
[15] 陈柯豫, 黄艳齐, 张玲利. 同时性多发早期食管癌及高级别上皮内瘤变的危险因素分析[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 524-528.
阅读次数
全文


摘要