切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华脑科疾病与康复杂志(电子版) ›› 2021, Vol. 11 ›› Issue (01) : 14 -18. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-123X.2021.01.004

所属专题: 文献

周围神经疾患

Hoffmann法内镜尺神经松解术治疗特发性肘管综合征
鲁润春1, 伊骏飞1, 伊志强1, 李春伟1, 段鸿洲1, 张家湧1, 李良1,()   
  1. 1. 100034 北京,北京大学第一医院神经外科
  • 收稿日期:2021-01-05 出版日期:2021-02-15
  • 通信作者: 李良

Endoscopic ulnar nerve decompression for idiopathic cubital tunnel syndrome

Runchun Lu1, Junfei Yi1, Zhiqiang Yi1, Chunwei Li1, Hongzhou Duan1, Jiayong Zhang1, Liang Li1,()   

  1. 1. Department of Neurosurgery, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing 100034, China
  • Received:2021-01-05 Published:2021-02-15
  • Corresponding author: Liang Li
引用本文:

鲁润春, 伊骏飞, 伊志强, 李春伟, 段鸿洲, 张家湧, 李良. Hoffmann法内镜尺神经松解术治疗特发性肘管综合征[J/OL]. 中华脑科疾病与康复杂志(电子版), 2021, 11(01): 14-18.

Runchun Lu, Junfei Yi, Zhiqiang Yi, Chunwei Li, Hongzhou Duan, Jiayong Zhang, Liang Li. Endoscopic ulnar nerve decompression for idiopathic cubital tunnel syndrome[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Brain Diseases and Rehabilitation(Electronic Edition), 2021, 11(01): 14-18.

目的

初步探讨Hoffmann法内镜尺神经松解术治疗特发性肘管综合征的安全性和有效性。

方法

回顾性分析北京大学第一医院神经外科自2016年6月至2020年9月行内镜手术治疗的13例肘管综合征患者的临床资料。手术器械采用肘管手术套件,采用Hoffmann法进行手术。术前应用McGowan分级对患者进行分类。术后对患者进行电话和门诊随访,采用改良Bishop评分对患者术后恢复程度进行评价。

结果

13例患者中11例行单纯尺神经减压,2例合并小囊肿压迫者同时行囊肿切除,术后病理报告1例为肘关节滑膜囊肿、1例为腱鞘囊肿。术后2~5 d出院,1例患者出现切口裂开,予以重新缝合后愈合良好,余患者无并发症发生。术后第2天所有患者均有麻木症状的缓解。随访5~56个月,改良Bishop评分优5例、良5例、中3例、差0例。其中术前McGowan分级1级组术后改良Bishop评分优良率100%(6/6),McGowan分级2级组改良Bishop评分优良率57%(4/7)。术后14~21 d恢复正常生活工作。

结论

内镜肘管减压术是微创手术,神经减压效果与开放手术相当,术后短期并发症少、恢复工作快,尤其适用于原发性肘管综合征。

Objective

To investigate the efficacy and safety of Hoffmann’s endoscopic ulnar neurolysis in the treatment of cubital tunnel syndrome.

Methods

The clinical data of 13 patients with cubital tunnel syndrome who underwent endoscopic ulnar neurolysis from June 2016 to September 2020 in the First Hospital of Peking University were analyzed retrospectively. The surgical instrument was the cubital release kit, and Professor Hoffmann’s method was used in the operation. McGowan classification was used to classify the patients before operation. The patients were followed up by telephone and outpatient department after operation and evaluated by modified Bishop score.

Results

Among the 13 cases, 11 cases underwent ulnar nerve decompression alone, 2 cases with small cyst compression underwent cyst resection at the same time. Postoperative pathology showed that 1 case was synovial cyst of elbow joint and 1 case was ganglion cyst. All patients were discharged from the hospital 2-5 d postoperatively. One patient had incision dehiscence and healed well after suturing again. The other patients had no complications. Numbness was relieved in all patients on the second day after operation. After 5-56 months of follow-up, the modified Bishop score was excellent in 5 cases, good in 5 cases, fair in 3 cases and poor in 0 case. The excellent and good rate of modified Bishop score was 100% (6/6) in McGowan grade 1 group and 57% (4/7) in McGowan grade 2 group. All the patients returned to work in 14-21 d after surgery.

Conclusion

Endoscopic cubital tunnel decompression is a minimally invasive surgery, the effect of nerve decompression is equivalent to that of open surgery, with less postoperative short-term complications and quick recovery, especially suitable for patients with primary cubital tunnel syndrome.

表1 McGowan分级
图1 内镜下肘管松解术术中资料
表2 改良Bishop评分
表3 术前McGowan分级与术后改良Bishop评分关系
[1]
Zajonc H, Momeni A. Endoscopic release of the cubital tunnel[J]. Hand Clin, 2014, 30(1): 55-62.
[2]
Hoffmann R, Siemionow M. The endoscopic management of cubital tunnel syndrome[J]. J Hand Surg Br, 2006, 31(1): 23-29.
[3]
Dützmann S, Martin KD, Sobottka S, et al. Open vs retractor-endoscopic in situ decompression of the ulnar nerve in cubital tunnel syndrome: a retrospective cohort study[J]. Neurosurgery, 2013, 72(4): 605-616; discussion 614-616.
[4]
Aldekhayel S, Govshievich A, Lee J, et al. Endoscopic versus open cubital tunnel release: a systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. Hand (NY), 2016, 11(1): 36-44.
[5]
Buchanan PJ, Chieng LO, Hubbard ZS, et al. Endoscopic versus open in situ cubital tunnel release: a systematic review of the literature and meta-analysis of 655 patients[J]. Plast Reconstr Surg, 2018, 141(3): 679-684.
[6]
Nakashian MN, Ireland D, Kane PM. Cubital tunnel syndrome: current concepts[J]. Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med, 2020, 13(4): 520-524.
[7]
Wade RG, Griffiths TT, Flather R, et al. Safety and outcomes of different surgical techniques for cubital tunnel decompression: a systematic review and network meta-analysis[J]. JAMA Netw Open, 2020, 3(11): e2024352.
[8]
Assmus H, Antoniadis G, Bischoff C, et al. Cubital tunnel syndrome-a review and management guidelines[J]. Cent Eur Neurosurg, 2011, 72(2): 90-98.
[9]
Byvaltsev VA, Stepanov IA, Kerimbayev TT. A systematic review and meta-analysis comparing open versus endoscopic in situ decompression for the treatment of cubital tunnel syndrome[J]. Acta Neurol Belg, 2020, 120(1): 1-8.
[10]
Toirac A, Giugale JM, Fowler JR. Open versus endoscopic cubital tunnel in situ decompression: a systematic review of outcomes and complications[J]. Hand (NY), 2017, 12(3): 229-235.
[11]
Khalid SI, Carlton A, Kelly R, et al. Novel minimally invasive technique in the treatment of cubital tunnel syndrome[J]. J Spine Surg, 2019, 5(1): 88-96.
[12]
Cobb TK. Endoscopic cubital tunnel release[J]. J Hand Surg Am, 2010, 35(10): 1690-1697.
[1] 齐伟亚, 方杰, 左志诚, 刘桂谦, 裴广楠, 刘波. 内窥镜辅助下改良Okutsu 法治疗腕管综合征的临床疗效[J/OL]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2024, 19(06): 503-506.
[2] 王振宁, 杨康, 王得晨, 邹敏, 归明彬, 王雅楠, 徐明. 机器人与腹腔镜手术联合经自然腔道取标本对中低位直肠癌患者远期疗效比较[J/OL]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 437-442.
[3] 杨建波, 马欢, 黄小梅, 刘华柱. 结肠镜辅助下EMR、CSP和RFA术治疗直径<1cm结直肠息肉的疗效和安全性比较[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 76-79.
[4] 方开萱, 翟亚奇, 张贯军, 陈升鑫, 陈德鑫, 刘文静, 梁雅文, 李明阳. 内镜逆行胰胆管造影术治疗胰腺分裂症的安全性与远期疗效[J/OL]. 中华腔镜外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 17(05): 284-289.
[5] 张露平, 黄春玉, 张生澎, 李晶华, 冯力民. 阴道内镜在妊娠期宫颈息肉治疗中的临床应用[J/OL]. 中华腔镜外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 17(05): 301-305.
[6] 梁艳娉, 列诗韵, 王艺穗, 吴晓瑛, 林颖. 基于内镜操作细节记录系统构建胃底静脉曲张内镜下组织胶注射术的标准化管理方案[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(05): 705-709.
[7] 王冬澳, 林超, 鄂长勇. 胰腺术后出血原因及诊治策略[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(04): 472-480.
[8] 王永楠, 汤畅通, 殷杰, 谭溢涛. 微创钻孔引流术与神经内镜血肿清除术治疗临界量基底节脑出血的效果对比分析[J/OL]. 中华神经创伤外科电子杂志, 2024, 10(05): 286-292.
[9] 张志超, 李陈, 韩惠, 周夏, 洪家康. 经额平行白质纤维束立体定向血肿穿刺引流术与神经内镜下血肿清除术治疗基底节脑出血的临床对比分析[J/OL]. 中华神经创伤外科电子杂志, 2024, 10(05): 299-303.
[10] 邵佳申, 张志武, 孟海, 杨雍, 费琦. 单侧双通道脊柱内镜技术治疗腰椎管狭窄症的临床疗效和学习曲线研究[J/OL]. 中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志, 2024, 10(04): 202-208.
[11] 吴广迎, 张延娟, 秦鹏, 卢艳丽. 经颈静脉肝内门体静脉分流术预防上消化道出血的临床研究[J/OL]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(06): 545-548.
[12] 梁艳娉, 陈燕柔, 梁运啸, 白飞虎, 吴斌, 王省. 华南地区门静脉高压食管胃静脉曲张出血内镜治疗现状调研分析[J/OL]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(05): 390-395.
[13] 商倩, 罗静, 卓振山, 苗园园, 吴静, 廖振林. 通腑泻浊法联合生长抑素对内镜逆行胰胆管造影治疗的急性胆源性胰腺炎患者预后的影响[J/OL]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(05): 437-441.
[14] 代剑华, 覃语思, 陈磊, 彭志红, 陈瑶, 刘俐, 吴宏博, 许森林, 李川, 钱锋, 彭贵勇. 术前评估超内镜治疗适应证胃癌的超级微创新选择:内镜、腔镜序贯治疗[J/OL]. 中华胃肠内镜电子杂志, 2024, 11(04): 217-224.
[15] 马梓粼, 张帅, 何占娣, 王娟, 孙国辉, 黄昂, 杨竞, 钟立森, 张晓彬, 刘迎娣, 令狐恩强. 改良的内镜下静脉曲张套扎术治疗肝硬化食管静脉曲张的疗效研究[J/OL]. 中华胃肠内镜电子杂志, 2024, 11(04): 225-232.
阅读次数
全文


摘要


AI


AI小编
你好!我是《中华医学电子期刊资源库》AI小编,有什么可以帮您的吗?