切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华脑科疾病与康复杂志(电子版) ›› 2021, Vol. 11 ›› Issue (03) : 171 -174. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-123X.2021.03.009

临床研究

感觉扩增法对改善中青年脑梗死后偏瘫患者神经和肢体运动功能的临床作用
李娜1, 阮炎鹏2, 周磊乐1,()   
  1. 1. 529300 广东江门,广东医科大学附属开平医院神经内科
    2. 529000 广东江门,江门市人民医院神经内科
  • 收稿日期:2021-04-13 出版日期:2021-06-15
  • 通信作者: 周磊乐
  • 基金资助:
    江门市卫生健康局科研立项(20A144)

Clinical effect of sensory amplification on improving nerve and limb motor function in young and middle-aged patients with hemiplegia after cerebral infarction

Na Li1, Yanpeng Ruan2, Leile Zhou1,()   

  1. 1. Department of Neurology, Kaiping Affiliated Hospital of Guangdong Medical University, Jiangmen 529300, China
    2. Department of Neurology, Jiangmen People’s Hospital, Jiangmen 529000, China
  • Received:2021-04-13 Published:2021-06-15
  • Corresponding author: Leile Zhou
引用本文:

李娜, 阮炎鹏, 周磊乐. 感觉扩增法对改善中青年脑梗死后偏瘫患者神经和肢体运动功能的临床作用[J/OL]. 中华脑科疾病与康复杂志(电子版), 2021, 11(03): 171-174.

Na Li, Yanpeng Ruan, Leile Zhou. Clinical effect of sensory amplification on improving nerve and limb motor function in young and middle-aged patients with hemiplegia after cerebral infarction[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Brain Diseases and Rehabilitation(Electronic Edition), 2021, 11(03): 171-174.

目的

研究感觉扩增法对改善中青年脑梗死后偏瘫患者神经功能和肢体运动功能的临床作用。

方法

选择广东医科大学附属开平医院和江门市人民医院神经内科自2018年6月至2020年6月收治的40例中青年脑梗死后偏瘫患者作为研究对象,根据随机数字表法分为试验组和对照组,每组20例。试验组采用感觉扩增法训练,对照组采用随机振动法训练,比较2组患者的干预安全性、神经和肢体运动功能指标[害怕跌倒的变化、功能步态评估评分变化、活动专项平衡信心评分变化、地面自选步态速度变化、Fugl-Meyer运动功能评估量表(FMA)评分、美国国立卫生研究院卒中量表(NIHSS)评分等]以及临床预后指标(Barthel指数)差异。

结果

2组患者训练前发病时间、偏瘫位置、第一次训练时步态评分、活动专项平衡信心评分、FMA评分以及NIHSS评分比较,差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。训练安全性上,2组患者不良事件发生率比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。训练结束后,试验组患者步态评分、活动专项平衡信心评分、FMA评分,以及NIHSS评分均优于对照组,差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。患者远期临床预后,试验组患者Barthel指数优于对照组,差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。

结论

感觉扩增法训练具有较好的安全性,对中青年脑梗死后偏瘫患者神经和运动功能的改善作用较为明显。

Objective

To study the clinical effect of sensory amplification on the improvement of nerve function and limb motor function in young and middle-aged patients with hemiplegia after cerebral infarction.

Methods

Forty young and middle-aged patients with post-cerebral infarction hemiplegia were selected as the research objects and randomly divided into experimental group and control group, with 20 cases in each group. Experimental training by sensory augmentation method, the control group using the random vibration method training, then compared between two groups of intervention security, nerve and body movement function index [afraid of fall, functional gait assessment score changes, activities, special balance confidence score changes, ground free gait speed, Fugl-Meyer assessment (FMA) score, National Institute of Health stroke scale (NIHSS) score, etc.], as well as the clinical prognostic indicators (Barthel index).

Results

There were no significant differences in onset time, hemiplegia position, gait score, active-specific balance confidence score, FMA score and NIHSS score between 2 groups before training (P>0.05). There was no significant difference in the incidence of adverse events between the two groups in terms of training safety (P>0.05). After the training, the gait score, activity specific balance confidence score, FMA score and NIHSS score of the experimental group were better than those of the control group, and the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05). The long-term clinical prognosis of patients in the experimental group was better than that in the control group, and the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05).

Conclusion

Sensory amplification training has good safety and can improve the nerve and motor function of young and middle-aged patients with post-cerebral infarction hemiplegia.

表1 2组患者一般资料及临床资料比较
[1]
Ji Y, Song B, Xu Y, et al. Prognostic significance of homocysteine levels in acute ischemic stroke: a prospective cohort study[J]. Curr Neurovasc Res, 2015, 12(4): 334-340.
[2]
闵水平,张贵锋,温鸿源,等.对脑卒中偏瘫患者应用多学科合作康复治疗的效果研究[J].黑龙江医药, 2016, 29(2): 327-329.
[3]
Go AS, Mozaffarian D, Roger VL, et al. Heart disease and stroke statistics--2014 update: a report from the American Heart Association[J]. Circulation, 2014, 129(3): e28-e292.
[4]
中华医学会神经病学分会脑血管病学组急性缺血性脑卒中.中国急性缺血性脑卒中诊治指南2010[J].中国全科医学, 2011, 14(35): 4013-4017.
[5]
Rathore SS, Hinn AR, Cooper LS, et al. Characterization of incident stroke signs and symptoms: findings from the atherosclerosis risk in communities study[J]. Stroke, 2002, 33(11): 2718-2721.
[6]
Kwakkel G, Kollen BJ, van der Grond J, et al. Probability of regaining dexterity in the flaccid upper limb: impact of severity of paresis and time since onset in acute stroke[J]. Stroke, 2003, 34(9): 2181-2186.
[7]
Kwakkel G, Kollen BJ. Predicting activities after stroke: what is clinically relevant?[J]. Int J Stroke, 2013, 8(1): 25-32.
[8]
Jørgensen HS, Nakayama H, Raaschou HO, et al. Recovery of walking function in stroke patients: the copenhagen stroke study[J]. Arch Phys Med Rehabil, 1995, 76(1): 27-32.
[9]
Nakayama H, Jorgensen HS, Raaschou HO, et al. Recovery of upperextremity function in stroke patients: the copenhagen stroke study[J]. Arch Phys Med Rehabil, 1994, 75(4): 394-398.
[10]
Hier DB, Mondlock J, Caplan LR. Recovery of behavioral abnormalities after right hemisphere stroke[J]. Neurology, 1983, 33(3): 345-350.
[11]
Cassidy TP, Lewis S, Gray CS. Recovery from visuospatial neglect in stroke patients[J]. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry, 1998, 64(4): 555-557.
[12]
Pedersen PM, Jorgensen HS, Nakayama H, et al. Imaired orientation in acute stroke: frequency, determinants, and time-course of recovery. The copenhagen stroke study[J]. Cerebrovasc Dis, 1998, 8(2): 90-96.
[13]
Desmond DW, Moroney JT, Sano M, et al. Recovery of cognitive funtion after stroke[J]. Stroke, 1996, 27(10): 1798-1803.
[14]
Wade DT, Parker V, Langton Hewer R. Memory disturbance after stroke: frequency and associated losses[J]. Int Rehabil Med, 1986, 8(2): 60-64.
[15]
张夏伟.中青年脑梗死患者的临床特征及其影响因素分析[J].临床合理用药杂志, 2018, 11(18): 132-133.
[1] 梁章荣, 梁伟伟, 周妙, 黄尚明, 雷俊娜, 刘亚丽, 李旷怡, 张英俭. 急性脑梗死并发吸入性肺炎的危险因素及预后分析[J/OL]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2024, 17(02): 268-271.
[2] 孙顗淼, 张颖. 糖尿病患者急性脑梗死取栓术后发生对比剂肾病的影响因素及预测模型建立[J/OL]. 中华肾病研究电子杂志, 2024, 13(04): 188-194.
[3] 谢井伟, 王森, 王非, 郭永坤. STA-MCA血管搭桥术治疗烟雾病[J/OL]. 中华神经创伤外科电子杂志, 2024, 10(05): 318-320.
[4] 李刚, 潘晓帆, 田雪, 刘路路. CT灌注成像参数及血栓弹力图对急性前循环脑梗死早期神经功能恶化的预测价值分析[J/OL]. 中华神经创伤外科电子杂志, 2024, 10(04): 226-232.
[5] 董西朝, 王林林, 袁致海, 高文文. 超早期经脑沟裂入路与经脑回皮质入路显微手术治疗基底节区脑出血的疗效分析[J/OL]. 中华脑科疾病与康复杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(02): 100-105.
[6] 赵倩, 刘文超, 李玺琳, 章邱东. 老年急性脑梗死诱发胃肠损伤的风险因素分析及模型构建[J/OL]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(03): 213-217.
[7] 窦丽辉, 李鹏, 窦静敏, 王贵玲. 辨证针灸联合双歧杆菌三联活菌胶囊治疗脑梗死恢复期脾胃虚弱证功能性消化不良的疗效[J/OL]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(03): 218-221.
[8] 潘鑫, 黄晓云, 王超, 顾慧, 唐加波, 王鹏, 崔恒熙, 李政. 院前亚低温结合院内溶栓救治急性脑梗死的效果[J/OL]. 中华卫生应急电子杂志, 2024, 10(03): 145-148.
[9] 克地尔牙·马合木提, 胡波, 杨琼, 闫素, 胡岚卿, 高沛沛, 姚恩生. 依达拉奉右莰醇对急性脑梗死后认知功能障碍的疗效观察[J/OL]. 中华脑血管病杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 459-466.
[10] 唐欣, 翟文海, 王润婷, 周胜宇, 靳航. 补体在缺血性卒中疾病中的研究进展[J/OL]. 中华脑血管病杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(04): 382-392.
[11] 刘焕亮, 崔慧娟, 曹慧, 付源. 颈动脉狭窄处剪切率对高同型半胱氨酸血症患者脑梗死的预测价值[J/OL]. 中华脑血管病杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(04): 317-322.
[12] 于乐林, 尚海龙, 杜红娣, 王莺, 王一超, 徐长贺, 叶娟, 赵世伟, 郑芳慧, 沈慧, 沈海林. 基于CT平扫的影像组学特征预测急性大脑中动脉闭塞机械取栓术后造影剂外渗的价值[J/OL]. 中华脑血管病杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(03): 215-223.
[13] 刘晓梅, 罗永梅, 傅瑜. 基于信息化老年综合评估的多学科管理护理模式在脑梗死患者中的应用效果[J/OL]. 中华脑血管病杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(03): 255-264.
[14] 李洪远, 董书宇, 鹿寒冰. 血清Hcy、sdLDL-C、Lp-PLA2水平对短暂性脑缺血发作进展为急性脑梗死的预测效能[J/OL]. 中华脑血管病杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 40-48.
[15] 陈绚, 欧宁江, 叶洁梅, 邓瑾倩. 纤维蛋白原β链启动因子基因多态性与颈动脉粥样硬化斑块稳定性的关联性研究[J/OL]. 中华脑血管病杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 33-39.
阅读次数
全文


摘要