切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华脑科疾病与康复杂志(电子版) ›› 2022, Vol. 12 ›› Issue (01) : 38 -42. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-123X.2022.01.006

临床研究

不同岩斜区脑膜瘤手术入路的疗效分析
谢宝树1, 何科君1, 李西西1, 杨李轩1, 黄正松1, 张弩1,()   
  1. 1. 510080 广州,中山大学附属第一医院神经外科
  • 收稿日期:2021-12-20 出版日期:2022-02-15
  • 通信作者: 张弩
  • 基金资助:
    广东省基础与应用基础研究基金(2019A1515110460)

Effect analysis of different surgical approaches for petroclival meningiomas

Baoshu Xie1, Kejun He1, Xixi Li1, Lixuan Yang1, Zhengsong Huang1, Nu Zhang1,()   

  1. 1. Department of Neurosurgery, First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou 510080, China
  • Received:2021-12-20 Published:2022-02-15
  • Corresponding author: Nu Zhang
引用本文:

谢宝树, 何科君, 李西西, 杨李轩, 黄正松, 张弩. 不同岩斜区脑膜瘤手术入路的疗效分析[J/OL]. 中华脑科疾病与康复杂志(电子版), 2022, 12(01): 38-42.

Baoshu Xie, Kejun He, Xixi Li, Lixuan Yang, Zhengsong Huang, Nu Zhang. Effect analysis of different surgical approaches for petroclival meningiomas[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Brain Diseases and Rehabilitation(Electronic Edition), 2022, 12(01): 38-42.

目的

探讨岩斜区脑膜瘤采用不同手术入路的治疗效果。

方法

回顾性分析中山大学附属第一医院神经外科自2013年6月至2020年6月收治的76例岩斜区脑膜瘤患者的临床资料,分析其临床表现、手术效果,同时对不同手术入路的手术效果和并发症进行比较。

结果

76例岩斜区脑膜瘤,肿瘤全切除42例(55.3%),次全切除28例(36.8%),部分切除6例(7.9%)。术后病理提示世界卫生组织(WHO)Ⅰ级脑膜瘤71例(93.4%),WHOⅡ级脑膜瘤5例(6.6%)。术后颅神经受损26例,脑干受损2例,脑脊液漏4例,颅内感染5例。术前平均卡氏功能状态(KPS)评分为(73.6±8.7)分,术后6个月平均KPS评分为(79.7±8.8)分,术后6个月平均KPS评分高于术前(P<0.05)。对不同入路而言,颞下组全切率高于乙状窦后组(P<0.05),但术中出血量多于乙状窦后组(P<0.05)。

结论

岩斜区脑膜瘤大多为良性肿瘤,且多数岩斜脑膜瘤可以获得全切除或次全切除。颞下入路全切率高,但术中出血多于乙状窦后入路。

Objective

To investigate the efficacy of microsurgery on petroclival meningiomas.

Methods

The clinical data of 76 patients with petroclival meningioma admitted to the Department of Neurosurgery, the First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University from June 2013 to June 2020 were retrospectively analyzed. The effects and complications of different surgical approaches were compared.

Results

Among 76 cases of petroclival meningiomas, 42 cases (55.3%) were totally resected, 28 cases (36.8%) were subtotally resected, and 6 cases (7.9%) were partially resected. Postoperative pathology showed 71 (93.4%) WHO grade Ⅰ meningiomas and 5 (6.6%) WHO grade Ⅱ meningiomas. The sugical complication included 26 cases of cranial nerve injury, 2 cases of brain stem injury, 4 cases of cerebrospinal fluid leakage and 5 cases of intracranial infection. The average preoperative Karnofsky performance status (KPS) score was 73.6±8.7. The average KPS score at 6 months after operation was 79.7±8.8. The average KPS score at 6 months after operation was better than that pre-operation (P<0.05). For different approaches, the intraoperative blood loss in the infratemporal group was more than that in the retrosigmoid group (P<0.05), and the total resection rate was higher than that in the retrosigmoid group (P<0.05).

Conclusion

Most of petroclival meningiomas are benign tumors. Most of petroclival meningiomas can be totally or subtotally removed by careful microsurgery. Although the intraoperative blood loss of infratemporal approach was more than that of retrosigmoid approach, the total resection rate was higher.

图1 岩斜区脑膜瘤经颞下Kawase入路切除患者术前、术后MRI影像A~C:术前MRI示岩斜区脑膜瘤(A:轴位;B:冠状位;C:矢状位);D~F:术后复查MRI示肿瘤全切(D:轴位;E:冠状位;F:矢状位)
表1 颞下组与乙状窦后组患者基本资料及手术效果对比
[1]
Kim JW, Jung HW, Kim YH, et al. Petroclival meningiomas: long-term outcomes of multimodal treatments and management strategies based on 30 years of experience at a single institution[J]. J Neurosurg, 2019, 132(6): 1675-1682.
[2]
Bernard F, Troude L, Isnard S, et al. Long term surgical results of 154 petroclival meningiomas: a retrospective multicenter study[J]. Neurochirurgie, 2019, 65(2-3): 55-62.
[3]
Zhao Z, Yuan X, Yuan J, et al. Treatment strategy for petroclival meningiomas based on a proposed classification in a study of 168 cases[J]. Sci Rep, 2020, 10(1): 4655.
[4]
Guinto G, Hernández E, Estrada E, et al. Petroclival meningiomas: a simple system that could help in selecting the approach[J]. Oper Neurosurg (Hagerstown), 2021, 21(4): 225-234.
[5]
Wayhs SY, Lepski GA, Frighetto L, et al. Petroclival meningiomas: remaining controversies in light of minimally invasive approaches[J]. Clin Neurol Neurosurg, 2017, 152: 68-75.
[6]
Natarajan SK, Sekhar LN, Schessel D, et al. Petroclival meningiomas: multimodality treatment and outcomes at long-term follow-up[J]. Neurosurgery, 2007, 60(6): 965-979; discussion 979-981.
[7]
Roberti F, Sekhar LN, Kalavakonda C, et al. Posterior fossa meningiomas: surgical experience in 161 cases[J]. Surg Neurol, 2001, 56(1): 8-20; discussion 20-21.
[8]
Roux A, Troude L, Baucher G, et al. Does general comorbidity impact the postoperative outcomes after surgery for large and giant petroclival meningiomas?[J]. Neurosurg Rev, 2022, 45(1): 617-626.
[9]
Diluna ML, Bulsara KR. Surgery for petroclival meningiomas: a comprehensive review of outcomes in the skull base surgery era[J]. Skull Base, 2010, 20(5): 337-342.
[10]
Van Havenbergh T, Carvalho G, Tatagiba M, et al. Natural history of petroclival meningiomas[J]. Neurosurgery, 2003, 52(1): 55-62; discussion 62-64.
[11]
Hunter JB, Yawn RJ, Wang R, et al. The natural history of petroclival meningiomas: a volumetric study[J]. Otol Neurotol, 2017, 38(1): 123-128.
[12]
Maurer AJ, Safavi-Abbasi S, Cheema AA, et al. Management of petroclival meningiomas: a review of the development of current therapy[J]. J Neurol Surg B Skull Base, 2014, 75(5): 358-367.
[13]
Li D, Hao SY, Wang L, et al. Surgical management and outcomes of petroclival meningiomas: a single-center case series of 259 patients[J]. Acta Neurochir (Wien), 2013, 155(8): 1367-1383.
[14]
Almefty R, Dunn IF, Pravdenkova S, et al. True petroclival meningiomas: results of surgical management[J]. J Neurosurg, 2014, 120(1): 40-51.
[1] 王杰, 袁泉, 王玥琦, 乔佳君, 谭春丽, 夏仲元, 刘守尧. 溃疡油在糖尿病足溃疡治疗中的应用效果及安全性观察[J/OL]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2024, 19(06): 480-484.
[2] 聂生军, 王钰, 王毅, 鲜小庆, 马生成. 复方倍他米松局部注射联合光动力疗法治疗小型瘢痕疙瘩的临床疗效观察[J/OL]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2024, 19(05): 404-410.
[3] 李义亮, 苏拉依曼·牙库甫, 麦麦提艾力·麦麦提明, 克力木·阿不都热依木. 机器人与腹腔镜食管裂孔疝修补术联合Nissen 胃底折叠术短期疗效分析[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 512-517.
[4] 唐虹, 周奇, 欧阳晓玲, 王永峰, 华宇, 郝小白, 李林霞. 腹膜外无张力吊带子宫悬吊术治疗盆腔脏器脱垂的疗效[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(03): 315-319.
[5] 杨万荣, 任治坤, 时新颍. 沙丁胺醇雾化吸入脾多肽治疗AECOPD的疗效分析[J/OL]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2024, 17(04): 609-612.
[6] 邱小原, 林国乐, 牛备战, 陆君阳, 张冠南, 邱辉忠. TEM技术在中低位直肠癌个性化治疗中的应用[J/OL]. 中华腔镜外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 17(04): 210-217.
[7] 危用洋, 黄俊甫, 辛万鹏, 易思清, 涂书举, 方康, 李勇, 肖卫东. 三种术式治疗胰腺颈体部良性或低度恶性肿瘤的临床疗效分析[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(04): 515-519.
[8] 李晓东, 李昂, 马龙, 刘亮, 魏云, 王汉宇. 基底动脉顶端动脉瘤显微手术治疗[J/OL]. 中华神经创伤外科电子杂志, 2024, 10(04): 254-256.
[9] 戴伟川, 郭协力, 方仲宁, 蔡文华, 洪天生, 田夏阳. 显微镜下周围神经松解术治疗腰椎间盘突出症术后残余神经症状的疗效分析[J/OL]. 中华神经创伤外科电子杂志, 2024, 10(02): 84-90.
[10] 周铜, 詹剑, 肖爵贤, 龚绍慧, 程祖珏. 超声乳化吸引刀在脊髓脂肪瘤手术中的应用[J/OL]. 中华神经创伤外科电子杂志, 2024, 10(02): 102-106.
[11] 韩俊岭, 王刚, 马厉英, 连颖, 徐慧. 维生素D 联合匹维溴铵治疗腹泻型肠易激综合征患者疗效及对肠道屏障功能指标的影响研究[J/OL]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(06): 560-564.
[12] 黄福秀, 张宁宁, 李晨阳, 李淑玲, 陈超. 单纯电切、单纯电凝与电凝电切术对扁平肠息肉疗效及不良事件发生率的影响[J/OL]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(04): 310-314.
[13] 徐清华, 张振林, 李浩. 清胰汤联合乌司他丁对急性胰腺炎患者肠道功能恢复及炎性因子水平的影响[J/OL]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(03): 253-257.
[14] 王楠钧, 马燕, 李隆松, 牛晓彤, 刘圣圳, 毕雅维, 苏松, 柴宁莉, 令狐恩强. 不同年龄段胃低级别上皮内瘤变患者内镜下射频消融术的疗效对比分析[J/OL]. 中华胃肠内镜电子杂志, 2024, 11(04): 238-242.
[15] 徐森胤, 黄斌, 郭绍锋, 王涵. 超声造影引导下关节囊内注射治疗老年粘连性关节囊炎的疗效分析[J/OL]. 中华老年病研究电子杂志, 2024, 11(03): 24-27.
阅读次数
全文


摘要


AI


AI小编
你好!我是《中华医学电子期刊资源库》AI小编,有什么可以帮您的吗?