切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华脑科疾病与康复杂志(电子版) ›› 2023, Vol. 13 ›› Issue (02) : 102 -107. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-123X.2023.02.006

临床研究

间歇经口至食管管饲联合吞咽训练对脑卒中吞咽障碍患者营养状态和预后的影响
郭晋朝, 张新杰, 杨璐, 王贵玲()   
  1. 054000 河北邢台,邢台市第三医院康复科
  • 收稿日期:2022-05-13 出版日期:2023-04-15
  • 通信作者: 王贵玲

Effect of intermittent oral to esophageal tube feeding combined with swallowing training on nutritional status and prognosis in stroke patients with dysphagia

Jinchao Guo, Xinjie Zhang, Lu Yang, Guiling Wang()   

  1. Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, the Third Hospital of Xingtai City, Xingtai 054000, China
  • Received:2022-05-13 Published:2023-04-15
  • Corresponding author: Guiling Wang
引用本文:

郭晋朝, 张新杰, 杨璐, 王贵玲. 间歇经口至食管管饲联合吞咽训练对脑卒中吞咽障碍患者营养状态和预后的影响[J/OL]. 中华脑科疾病与康复杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(02): 102-107.

Jinchao Guo, Xinjie Zhang, Lu Yang, Guiling Wang. Effect of intermittent oral to esophageal tube feeding combined with swallowing training on nutritional status and prognosis in stroke patients with dysphagia[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Brain Diseases and Rehabilitation(Electronic Edition), 2023, 13(02): 102-107.

目的

分析间歇经口至食管管饲联合吞咽训练对吞咽障碍患者营养状态和预后的影响。

方法

前瞻性选取邢台市第三医院康复科自2019年1月至2020年5月收治的106例吞咽障碍患者,采用随机数字表法分为对照组和研究组,每组53例。对照组给予持续留置鼻饲+吞咽训练,研究组采用间歇经口至食管管饲+吞咽训练,均治疗4周。对比2组患者治疗前后的吞咽功能、营养状态[包括体质量指数(BMI)、肱三头肌皮褶厚度(TSF)、上臂围(AC)、血清总蛋白(TP)、血清前白蛋白(PA)、血清白蛋白(ALB)]和临床疗效,以及治疗期间并发症、不良事件发生率和预后。

结果

2组患者治疗前后吞咽功能等级比较差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05),且治疗后组间比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。研究组治疗后BMI、TSF、AC和血清TP、PA、ALB水平均高于治疗前,且均高于对照组,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。研究组临床疗效分布与对照组比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);研究组治疗总有效率高于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。研究组误吸、吸入性肺炎、电解质紊乱发生率及并发症发生率均低于对照组,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。2组患者不良事件发生率比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。研究组NIHSS评分低于对照组,BI评分高于对照组,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。

结论

间歇经口至食管管饲联合吞咽训练可显著改善吞咽障碍患者的吞咽功能、营养状态,增强疗效,还可减少并发症,改善预后。

Objective

To analyze the effect of intermittent oral to esophageal tube feeding combined with swallowing training on nutritional status and prognosis of patients with dysphagia.

Methods

One hundred and six patients with dysphagia in the Third Hospital of Xingtai City from January 2019 to May 2020 were divided into control group (53 cases, continuous indwelling nasal feeding + swallowing training) and study group (53 cases, intermittent oral to esophageal tube feeding + swallowing training) by a random digital table, and all patients were treated for 4 weeks. The swallowing function, nutritional status [including body mass index (BMI), triceps skinfold thickness (TSF), arm circumference (AC), total protein (TP), prealbumin (PA), albumin (ALB)] before treatment and after treatment were compared between the two groups. The clinical effect, the incidences of complications and adverse events during treatment and prognosis were compared.

Results

There were statistically significant differences in swallowing function grades between the two groups before and after treatment (P<0.05), and there was a statistically significant difference between the two groups after treatment (P<0.05). After treatment, BMI, TSF, AC, serum TP, PA, ALB levels in the study group were higher than those before treatment, which were higher than those in the control group, with statistically significant differences (P<0.05). There was a statistically significant difference in the grading of clinical effect between the two groups after treatment (P<0.05), and the total effective rate in the study group was higher than the control group (P<0.05). The incidences of aspiration pneumonia, electrolyte disturbance and complications were lower than those of the control group, with statistically significant differences (P<0.05). There was no statistically significant difference in the incidences of adverse events between the two groups (P>0.05). NIHSS score of the study group was lower than that of the control group, and BI score was higher than that of the control group, with a statistically significant difference (P<0.05).

Conclusion

Intermittent oral to esophageal tube feeding combined with swallowing training can significantly improve the swallowing function and nutritional status of patients with dysphagia, enhance clinical effect, reduce complications and improve the prognosis.

表1 2组患者的一般资料比较
Tab.1 Comparison of general data between the 2 groups
表2 2组患者治疗前后吞咽功能比较[例(%)]
Tab.2 Comparison of swallowing function between two groups before and after treatment [n(%)]
表3 2组患者治疗前后营养状态比较(Mean±SD)
Tab.3 Comparison of nutritional status before and after treatment (Mean±SD)
表4 2组患者临床疗效比较[例(%)]
Tab.4 Comparison of clinical efficacy between the two groups [n(%)]
表5 2组治疗期间并发症发生率比较[例(%)]
Tab.5 Comparison of complication rates between two groups during treatment [n(%)]
表6 2组患者预后比较(分,Mean±SD)
Tab.6 Comparison of prognosis between the two groups (score, Mean±SD)
[1]
McIntyre M, Doeltgen S, Dalton N, et al. Post-extubation dysphagia incidence in critically ill patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. Aust Crit Care, 2021, 34(1): 67-75. DOI: 10.1016/j.aucc.2020.05.008.
[2]
田莉,罗清平,杨柳,等.湖南养老机构老年人吞咽障碍的调查研究[J].长沙民政职业技术学院学报, 2022, 29(3): 36-39. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-5136.2022.03.008.
[3]
王玫,陈雨朦,陈曦,等.基于老年综合评估的80岁及以上住院患者吞咽障碍筛查的多维度分析[J].中国护理管理, 2020, 20(11): 1606-1610. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-1756.2020.11.002.
[4]
Canning A, Fairhurst R, Chauhan M, et al. Oral feeding for infants and children receiving nasal continuous positive airway pressure and high-flow nasal cannula respiratory supports: a survey of practice[J]. Dysphagia, 2020, 35(3): 443-454. DOI: 10.1007/s00455-019-10047-4.
[5]
McGrattan KE, Graham RJ, DiDonato CJ, et al. Dysphagia phenotypes in spinal muscular atrophy: the past, present, and promise for the future[J]. Am J Speech Lang Pathol, 2021, 30(3): 1008-1022. DOI: 10.1044/2021_AJSLP-20-00217.
[6]
Argov Z, de Visser M. Dysphagia in adult myopathies[J]. Neuromuscul Disord, 2021, 31(1): 5-20. DOI: 10.1016/j.nmd.2020.11.001.
[7]
陈立早,王丽菊,邓长辉,等.康复医学工作管理手册[M].北京:科学技术文献出版社, 2016: 144-148.
[8]
张磊,刘建民.美国国立卫生研究院卒中量表[J].中华神经外科杂志, 2014, 30(1): 79.
[9]
窦祖林.吞咽障碍评估与治疗[M].北京:人民卫生出版社, 2009: 78-81.
[10]
李奎成,唐丹,刘晓艳,等.国内Barthel指数和改良Barthel指数应用的回顾性研究[J].中国康复医学杂志, 2009, 24(8): 737-740. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-1242.2009.08.019.
[11]
Fujita M, Nakano Y, Sakae H, et al. Dysphagia induced by acromegalic arthropathy[J]. Intern Med, 2021, 60(7): 1127-1128. DOI: 10.2169/internalmedicine.5856-20.
[12]
王旭霞,盛超,孙洁,等.探究化痰通络汤加减联合康复训练对急性脑梗死后吞咽障碍(痰瘀互结证)的治疗效果[J].中华脑科疾病与康复杂志(电子版), 2021, 11(5): 294-299. DOI: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-123X.2021.05.008.
[13]
Leibel SL, Castro M, McBride T, et al. Comparison of Continuous positive airway pressure versus High flow nasal cannula for Oral feeding Preterm infants (CHOmP): randomized pilot study[J]. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med, 2022, 35(5): 951-957. DOI: 10.1080/14767058.2020.1735339.
[14]
Zheng YR, Liu JF, Lei YQ, et al. Synchronized nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation versus nasal continuous positive airway pressure for prevention of extubation failure in infants after congenital heart surgery[J]. Heart Surg Forum, 2021, 24(2): E249-E255. DOI: 10.1532/hsf.3515.
[15]
Haapala V, Vähänikkilä N, Kulkas L, et al. Mycoplasma bovis infection in dairy herds-Risk factors and effect of control measures[J]. J Dairy Sci, 2021, 104(2): 2254-2265. DOI: 10.3168/jds.2020-18814.
[16]
Ajanwaenyi J, Bamidele O, Osim C, et al. The minimal invasive surfactant therapy: experience from a low resource setting[J]. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med, 2022, 35(25): 5177-5183. DOI: 10.1080/14767058.2021.1875438.
[17]
Pandey N, Hopker A, Prajapati G, et al. Observations on presumptive lumpy skin disease in native cattle and Asian water buffaloes around the tiger reserves of the central Indian highlands[J]. N Z Vet J, 2022, 70(2): 101-108. DOI: 10.1080/00480169.2021.1984335.
[1] 张晓宇, 殷雨来, 张银旭. 阿帕替尼联合新辅助化疗对三阴性乳腺癌的疗效及预后分析[J/OL]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 346-352.
[2] 许杰, 李亚俊, 韩军伟. 两种入路下腹腔镜根治性全胃切除术治疗超重胃癌的效果比较[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 19-22.
[3] 高杰红, 黎平平, 齐婧, 代引海. ETFA和CD34在乳腺癌中的表达及与临床病理参数和预后的关系研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 64-67.
[4] 李代勤, 刘佩杰. 动态增强磁共振评估中晚期低位直肠癌同步放化疗后疗效及预后的价值[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 100-103.
[5] 梁孟杰, 朱欢欢, 王行舟, 江航, 艾世超, 孙锋, 宋鹏, 王萌, 刘颂, 夏雪峰, 杜峻峰, 傅双, 陆晓峰, 沈晓菲, 管文贤. 联合免疫治疗的胃癌转化治疗患者预后及术后并发症分析[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 619-623.
[6] 关小玲, 周文营, 陈洪平. PTAAR在乙肝相关慢加急性肝衰竭患者短期预后中的预测价值[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(06): 841-845.
[7] 张润锦, 阳盼, 林燕斯, 刘尊龙, 刘建平, 金小岩. EB病毒相关胆管癌伴多发转移一例及国内文献复习[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(06): 865-869.
[8] 陈晓鹏, 王佳妮, 练庆海, 杨九妹. 肝细胞癌VOPP1表达及其与预后的关系[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(06): 876-882.
[9] 韩加刚, 王振军. 梗阻性左半结肠癌的治疗策略[J/OL]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2024, 13(06): 450-458.
[10] 刘郁, 段绍斌, 丁志翔, 史志涛. miR-34a-5p 在结肠癌患者的表达及其与临床特征及预后的相关性研究[J/OL]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(06): 485-490.
[11] 陈倩倩, 袁晨, 刘基, 尹婷婷. 多层螺旋CT 参数、癌胚抗原、错配修复基因及病理指标对结直肠癌预后的影响[J/OL]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(06): 507-511.
[12] 曾明芬, 王艳. 急性胰腺炎合并脂肪肝患者CT 与彩色多普勒超声诊断参数与其病情和预后的关联性研究[J/OL]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(06): 531-535.
[13] 沈炎, 张俊峰, 唐春芳. 预后营养指数结合血清降钙素原、胱抑素C及视黄醇结合蛋白对急性胰腺炎并发急性肾损伤的预测价值[J/OL]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(06): 536-540.
[14] 王景明, 王磊, 许小多, 邢文强, 张兆岩, 黄伟敏. 腰椎椎旁肌的研究进展[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(09): 846-852.
[15] 郭曌蓉, 王歆光, 刘毅强, 何英剑, 王立泽, 杨飏, 汪星, 曹威, 谷重山, 范铁, 李金锋, 范照青. 不同亚型乳腺叶状肿瘤的临床病理特征及预后危险因素分析[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 524-532.
阅读次数
全文


摘要