切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华脑科疾病与康复杂志(电子版) ›› 2026, Vol. 16 ›› Issue (03) : 163 -169. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-123X.2026.03.005

短篇论著

破裂小脑上动脉动脉瘤急性期血管内治疗的安全性和有效性分析
潘麒羽, 陈晨, 李珊珊, 史筱涵, 徐善才()   
  1. 150001 哈尔滨,哈尔滨医科大学附属第一医院神经外科
  • 收稿日期:2025-08-07 出版日期:2026-06-15
  • 通信作者: 徐善才

Safety and efficacy analysis of endovascular treatment for ruptured superior cerebellar artery aneurysms in the acute phase

Qiyu Pan, Chen Chen, Shanshan Li, Xiaohan Shi, Shancai Xu()   

  1. Department of Neurosurgery, the First Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University, Harbin 150001, China
  • Received:2025-08-07 Published:2026-06-15
  • Corresponding author: Shancai Xu
  • Supported by:
    Clinical Research Special Fund of the Wu Jieping Medical Foundation(320.6750.2021-04-61)
引用本文:

潘麒羽, 陈晨, 李珊珊, 史筱涵, 徐善才. 破裂小脑上动脉动脉瘤急性期血管内治疗的安全性和有效性分析[J/OL]. 中华脑科疾病与康复杂志(电子版), 2026, 16(03): 163-169.

Qiyu Pan, Chen Chen, Shanshan Li, Xiaohan Shi, Shancai Xu. Safety and efficacy analysis of endovascular treatment for ruptured superior cerebellar artery aneurysms in the acute phase[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Brain Diseases and Rehabilitation(Electronic Edition), 2026, 16(03): 163-169.

目的

探讨血管内治疗急性期破裂小脑上动脉动脉瘤的安全性和临床有效性。

方法

回顾性分析哈尔滨医科大学附属第一医院神经外科自2011年10月至2024年10月行血管内治疗的34例破裂小脑上动脉动脉瘤患者的临床资料。观察患者住院期间并发症发生情况,采用改良兰金量表(MRS)评分评估患者的临床预后,采用Raymond-Roy分级评估动脉瘤闭塞情况。

结果

本组患者中9例使用支架辅助栓塞,25例行单纯弹簧圈栓塞。11例(32.4%)患者出现住院期间并发症,其中出血性并发症4例(11.8%),有1例(2.9%)住院期间死亡;缺血性并发症5例(14.7%);分流依赖性脑积水3例(8.8%),其中1例患者同时出现了分流依赖性脑积水和出血性并发症。34例患者完成临床随访,中位随访时间41.5(26.5,61.8)个月,有3例(8.8%)患者出现并发症,其中2例(5.9%)为随访期间首次出现并发症。随访期间,2例(5.9%)患者出现动脉瘤再次破裂出血,其中1例死亡,1例脑梗死。本组患者总死亡率为8.8%(3/34)。24例患者完成造影随访,中位随访时间9(6,12)个月,其中Raymond-Roy分级Ⅰ级20例(83.3%),Raymond-Roy分级Ⅱ级3例(12.5%),Raymond-Roy分级Ⅲ级1例(4.2%)。

结论

血管内治疗急性期破裂小脑上动脉动脉瘤具有较好的可行性及临床有效性,但相关并发症仍需重点关注。

Objective

To evaluate the safety and clinical efficacy of endovascular treatment for acutely ruptured aneurysms located in the superior cerebellar artery.

Methods

A retrospective analysis was conducted on the clinical data of 34 patients with ruptured superior cerebellar artery aneurysms who underwent endovascular treatment at Neurosurgery Department of the First Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University from October 2011 to October 2024. The incidence of in-hospital complications was evaluated. Clinical outcomes were assessed using the modified Rankin scale (MRS), and aneurysm occlusion status was evaluated according to the Raymond-Roy Occlusion Classification.

Results

Among the 34 patients included in this study, 9 underwent stent-assisted coiling, whereas 25 were treated with simple coil embolization. In-hospital complications occurred in 11 patients (32.4%), including hemorrhagic complications in 4 patients (11.8%), with 1 in-hospital death (2.9%), ischemic complications in 5 patients (14.7%), and shunt-dependent hydrocephalus in 3 patients (8.8%). One patient developed both shunt-dependent hydrocephalus and a hemorrhagic complication. All 34 patients completed clinical follow-up, with a median follow-up duration of 41.5 (26.5-61.8) months. During follow-up, 3 patients (8.8%) experienced complications, including 2 patients (5.9%) who developed their first complication after discharge. Two patients (5.9%) suffered aneurysm rebleeding during follow-up, resulting in death in one patient and cerebral infarction in the other. The overall mortality rate in this cohort was 8.8% (3/34). Angiographic follow-up was available for 24 patients, with a median follow-up duration of 9 (6-12) months. According to the Raymond-Roy occlusion classification, complete occlusion (Grade Ⅰ) was achieved in 20 patients (83.3%), residual neck (Grade Ⅱ) was observed in 3 patients (12.5%), and residual aneurysm (Grade Ⅲ) was identified in 1 patient (4.2%).

Conclusions

Endovascular treatment for acutely ruptured superior cerebellar artery aneurysms is feasible and demonstrates favorable clinical efficacy. However, procedure-related and disease-related complications remain a significant concern and warrant close attention.

图1 行血管内弹簧圈栓塞治疗的破裂左侧小脑上动脉动脉瘤患者的影像学资料A:术前DSA示左侧小脑上动脉远端动脉瘤;B:术前头部CT示蛛网膜下腔出血;C:术中向动脉瘤腔内填入弹簧圈;D:术后即刻DSA示动脉瘤完全栓塞,载瘤动脉通畅;E:术后头部CT复查示左侧小脑幕区栓塞弹簧圈影;F:术后随访头部CT未见动脉瘤再次出血
Fig.1 Imaging data of a patient with a ruptured left superior cerebellar artery aneurysm treated with endovascular coil embolization
[1]
Dharia A, Lacci JV, Mascitelli J, et al. Impact of ruptured aneurysm circulation on mortality: a nationwide inpatient sample analysis[J]. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis, 2020, 29(10): 105124. DOI: 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2020.105124.
[2]
Korja M, Kaprio J. Controversies in epidemiology of intracranial aneurysms and SAH[J]. Nat Rev Neurol, 2016, 12(1): 50-55. DOI: 10.1038/nrneurol.2015.228.
[3]
D'Souza S. Aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage[J]. J Neurosurg Anesthesiol, 2015, 27(3): 222-240. DOI: 10.1097/ana.0000000000000130.
[4]
Gonzalez LF, Amin-Hanjani S, Bambakidis NC, et al. Skull base approaches to the basilar artery[J]. Neurosurg Focus, 2005, 19(2): E3. DOI: 10.3171/foc.2005.19.2.4.
[5]
Wiebers DO, Whisnant JP, Huston J, 3rd, et al. Unruptured intracranial aneurysms: natural history, clinical outcome, and risks of surgical and endovascular treatment[J]. Lancet, 2003, 362(9378): 103-110. DOI: 10.1016/s0140-6736(03)13860-3.
[6]
Greving JP, Wermer MJ, Brown BD Jr, et al. Development of the phases score for prediction of risk of rupture of intracranial aneurysms: a pooled analysis of six prospective cohort studies[J]. Lancet Neurol, 2014, 13(1): 59-66. DOI: 10.1016/s1474-4422(13)70263-1.
[7]
Wu Q, Xu S, Wang C, et al. Endovascular management of vertebrobasilar trunk artery large aneurysms: complications and long-term results[J]. Front Neurol, 2022, 13: 839219. DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2022.839219.
[8]
Molyneux AJ, Kerr RS, Yu LM, et al. International subarachnoid aneurysm trial (ISAT) of neurosurgical clipping versus endovascular coiling in 2143 patients with ruptured intracranial aneurysms: a randomised comparison of effects on survival, dependency, seizures, rebleeding, subgroups, and aneurysm occlusion[J]. Lancet, 2005, 366(9488): 809-817. DOI: 10.1016/s0140-6736(05)67214-5.
[9]
Lindgren A, Vergouwen MD, van der Schaaf I, et al. Endovascular coiling versus neurosurgical clipping for people with aneurysmal subarachnoid haemorrhage[J]. Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 2018, 8(8): CD003085. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD003085.pub3.
[10]
Cao R, Mattar A, Torche E, et al. Clinical and angiographic characteristics of ruptured and unruptured distal cerebral aneurysms: a review of a large series of cases in a high-volume center[J]. J Neurointerv Surg, 2024, Online ahead of print. DOI: 10.1136/jnis-2023-021164.
[11]
Dorhout Mees SM, Molyneux AJ, Kerr RS, et al. Timing of aneurysm treatment after subarachnoid hemorrhage: relationship with delayed cerebral ischemia and poor outcome[J]. Stroke, 2012, 43(8): 2126-2129. DOI: 10.1161/strokeaha.111.639690.
[12]
Yang J, Wu Q, Wang C, et al. Reconstructive endovascular treatment of intracranial ruptured posterior circulation aneurysms located on small arteries: complications and long-term results[J]. World Neurosurg, 2025, 194: 123473. DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2024.11.056.
[13]
Lawson MF, Chi YY, Velat GJ, et al. Timing of aneurysm surgery: the international cooperative study revisited in the era of endovascular coiling[J]. J Neurointerv Surg, 2010, 2(2): 131-134. DOI: 10.1136/jnis.2009.001172.
[14]
Yang J, Wu Q, Ji Z, et al. Endovascular treatment for ruptured intracranial posterior circulation aneurysms: complications and clinical outcomes[J]. World Neurosurg, 2025, 193: 1089-1098. DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2024.09.067.
[15]
Roy D, Milot G, Raymond J. Endovascular treatment of unruptured aneurysms[J]. Stroke, 2001, 32(9): 1998-2004. DOI: 10.1161/hs0901.095600.
[16]
姚金彪,吴桥伟,吴培,等. 伴脑缺血症状的大脑中动脉瘤患者行显微外科夹闭与血管内治疗的对比研究[J]. 中国脑血管病杂志, 2023, 20(9): 577-586. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-5921.2023.09.001.
[17]
Błaszczyk M, Dziedzic M, Stachera B, et al. The anatomy of the superior cerebellar artery: a detailed analysis[J]. Folia Morphol (Warsz), 2026, 85: e01726061. DOI: 10.5603/fm.106635.
[18]
Kühn AL, Hou SY, Puri AS, et al. Stent-assisted coil embolization of aneurysms with small parent vessels: safety and efficacy analysis[J]. J Neurointerv Surg, 2016, 8(6): 581-585. DOI: 10.1136/neurintsurg-2015-011774.
[19]
Peluso JP, van Rooij WJ, Sluzewski M, et al. Superior cerebellar artery aneurysms: incidence, clinical presentation and midterm outcome of endovascular treatment[J]. Neuroradiology, 2007, 49(9): 747-751. DOI: 10.1007/s00234-007-0251-z.
[20]
Carter BS, Sheth S, Chang E, et al. Epidemiology of the size distribution of intracranial bifurcation aneurysms: smaller size of distal aneurysms and increasing size of unruptured aneurysms with age[J]. Neurosurgery, 2006, 58(2): 217-223; discussion 217-223. DOI: 10.1227/01.NEU.0000194639.37803.F8.
[21]
Onishi S, Sakamoto S, Sadatomo T, et al. Endovascular coil embolization with low-profile visualized intraluminal support junior stent for ruptured dissecting aneurysm of proximal superior cerebellar artery-case report and literature review[J]. World Neurosurg, 2019, 122: 102-105. DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2018.10.137.
[22]
Matsukawa H, Sowlat MM, Porto G, et al. Vertebral artery access considerations in coil embolization of small superior cerebellar artery aneurysm[J]. World Neurosurg, 2024, 184: 29-37. DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2024.01.014.
[23]
Li T, Shi S, Chen Q, et al. Use of the neuroform atlas stent or LVIS Jr stent for treatment of unruptured intracranial aneurysms in parent arteries of <2 mm in diameter: a multicenter experience[J]. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol, 2024, 45(7): 899-905. DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A8238.
[24]
王艺,程美雄,徐如祥,等. Neuroform Atlas支架辅助弹簧圈栓塞治疗颅内宽颈动脉瘤的疗效分析[J]. 中华脑科疾病与康复杂志(电子版), 2026, 16(2): 92-99. DOI: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-123X.2026.02.005.
[25]
Hou K, Li G, Wang X, et al. Endovascular treatment for peripheral superior cerebellar artery aneurysms: current state and future considerations[J]. World Neurosurg, 2019, 127: 423-433. DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2019.04.145.
[26]
Yang J, Wu Q, Yuan K, et al. Reconstructive endovascular treatment of patients with ruptured distal intracranial aneurysms in posterior circulation: a retrospective cohort study[J]. Quant Imaging Med Surg, 2024, 14(12): 8878-8888. DOI: 10.21037/qims-24-1147.
[27]
Kim J, Han HJ, Lee W, et al. Safety and efficacy of stent-assisted coiling of unruptured intracranial aneurysms using low-profile stents in small parent arteries[J]. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol, 2021, 42(9): 1621-1626. DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A7196.
[28]
Shen Y, Ni H, Li J, et al. Initial and mid-term results of LEO Baby stent-assisted coiling of intracranial aneurysms located in small arteries: a single-center experience with 131 consecutive patients[J]. Front Neurol, 2022, 13: 990532. DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2022.990532.
[29]
Liang F, Zhang Y, Yan P, et al. Predictors of periprocedural complications and angiographic outcomes of endovascular therapy for large and giant intracranial posterior circulation aneurysms[J]. World Neurosurg, 2019, 125: e378-e384. DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2019.01.080.
[30]
Zhao B, Tan X, Yang H, et al. Stent-assisted coiling versus coiling alone of poor-grade ruptured intracranial aneurysms: a multicenter study[J]. J Neurointerv Surg, 2017, 9(2): 165-168. DOI: 10.1136/neurintsurg-2016-012259.
[31]
Keston P, White PM, Horribine L, et al. The endovascular management of pericallosal artery aneurysms[J]. J Neuroradiol, 2004, 31(5): 384-390. DOI: 10.1016/s0150-9861(04)97021-6.
[32]
伊力亚尔·地力夏提,王凯,姜世豪,等. 颅内外血管搭桥术治疗后循环动脉瘤效果分析[J]. 中华神经创伤外科电子杂志, 2025, 11(6): 365-370. DOI: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-9141.2025.06.005.
[1] 许梓锋, 黄展森, 狄金明. 胡桃夹综合征诊治进展[J/OL]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(06): 784-791.
[2] 伊力亚尔·地力夏提, 王凯, 姜世豪, 乃吉米丁江·热夏提, 尼扎米丁江·热夏提, 阿西木江·阿西尔, 卡合尔曼·卡德尔, 苏日青, 王增亮, 成晓江, 买买提力·艾沙. 颅内外血管搭桥术治疗后循环动脉瘤效果分析[J/OL]. 中华神经创伤外科电子杂志, 2025, 11(06): 365-370.
[3] 马泽坤, 姜世豪, 吴鹏飞, 阿力玛斯·阿布力孜, 杨文博, 尹胜楠, 王增亮. Pipeline血流导向装置治疗颅内大型与巨大型动脉瘤效果分析[J/OL]. 中华神经创伤外科电子杂志, 2025, 11(06): 358-364.
[4] 黄志宏, 郭俊清, 鄢宇芳, 张帆, 曾国勇. 经前交通动脉入路支架取栓及球囊扩张治疗大脑前动脉急性闭塞一例报道[J/OL]. 中华神经创伤外科电子杂志, 2025, 11(05): 333-335.
[5] 陈振华, 戴勇, 陈佳磊, 蔡正华, 朱向阳, 蔡刚. 经桡动脉穿刺置管治疗颅内动脉瘤后桡动脉穿刺点出血的影响因素分析[J/OL]. 中华神经创伤外科电子杂志, 2025, 11(04): 238-242.
[6] 刘亚, 潘晓虎, 杨明刚, 施学松, 董启武, 张宁, 唐燕, 谢春明, 赵国锋. 初级卒中中心与高级卒中中心血管内治疗急性大血管闭塞性脑卒中的对比研究[J/OL]. 中华脑科疾病与康复杂志(电子版), 2025, 15(06): 364-369.
[7] 陈海斌, 赵林波, 刘圣. 基底动脉主干动脉瘤血管内治疗的安全性及有效性:单中心经验[J/OL]. 中华介入放射学电子杂志, 2026, 14(01): 33-39.
[8] 张国赛, 赵林波, 曹月洲, 贾振宇, 施海彬, 刘圣. 低剖面支架治疗未破裂大脑前动脉远端动脉瘤的单中心经验[J/OL]. 中华介入放射学电子杂志, 2025, 13(03): 212-216.
[9] 曹婷婷, 刘嘉博, 都一鸣, 吴桥伟, 马丽娜. 血流导向装置治疗未破裂基底动脉大型动脉瘤的安全性及疗效分析[J/OL]. 中华介入放射学电子杂志, 2025, 13(03): 206-211.
[10] 张莉, 王汉祥. 急性缺血性脑卒中血压管理研究进展[J/OL]. 中华临床实验室管理电子杂志, 2025, 13(03): 178-182.
[11] 辛伽伦, 卑红喆, 何佳, 鞠东升, 孙太欣, 马熙岳, 陈佳佳, 李振波, 王伟, 郭强, 张恒, 王杰, 姚力. 前循环急性大血管闭塞性轻型脑卒中患者行血管内治疗的临床疗效[J/OL]. 中华脑血管病杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(03): 280-286.
[12] 于玲, 秦伟, 徐霁华, 胡秀朝, 杨磊, 胡文立. 急性小脑梗死的临床影像学特征[J/OL]. 中华脑血管病杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(02): 133-138.
[13] 柴昌, 李定安, 姜进, 薛延华, 王衡. 前循环大血管闭塞性轻型卒中患者早期进展的危险因素及其补救性血管内治疗的临床疗效[J/OL]. 中华脑血管病杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(06): 503-510.
[14] 于棋, 李兰君, 韩红星, 王贤军, 王蒙恩. 晚窗血管内治疗不同病因类型急性大血管闭塞性缺血性卒中的临床疗效[J/OL]. 中华脑血管病杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(04): 296-303.
[15] 张笑闻, 钟海龙, 佟鑫, 范梦妍, 万佳鑫, 林日金, 李菁, 管生. 瘤内扰流装置相关临床应用的研究现状[J/OL]. 中华脑血管病杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(03): 250-254.
阅读次数
全文


摘要


AI


AI小编
你好!我是《中华医学电子期刊资源库》AI小编,有什么可以帮您的吗?