切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华脑科疾病与康复杂志(电子版) ›› 2021, Vol. 11 ›› Issue (02) : 74 -78. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-123X.2021.02.003

颅神经疾患

显微血管减压术治疗舌咽神经痛疗效分析
阿布地热合曼·吐尔孙尼牙孜1, 石鑫1,(), 郝玉军1, 姜磊1, 买买提江·卡斯木1, 冯兆海1, 裴祎楠1   
  1. 1. 830054 乌鲁木齐,新疆医科大学第一附属医院神经外科中心
  • 收稿日期:2021-03-11 出版日期:2021-04-15
  • 通信作者: 石鑫

Therapeutic effects of glossopharyngeal nerve microvascular decompression on glossopharyngeal neuralgia

Abudireheman Tuersunniyazi1, Xin Shi1,(), Yujun Hao1, Lei Jiang1, Maimaitijiang Kasimu1, Zhaohai Feng1, Yinan Pei1   

  1. 1. Neurosurgery Center, the First Affiliated Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University, Urumqi 830054, China
  • Received:2021-03-11 Published:2021-04-15
  • Corresponding author: Xin Shi
引用本文:

阿布地热合曼·吐尔孙尼牙孜, 石鑫, 郝玉军, 姜磊, 买买提江·卡斯木, 冯兆海, 裴祎楠. 显微血管减压术治疗舌咽神经痛疗效分析[J]. 中华脑科疾病与康复杂志(电子版), 2021, 11(02): 74-78.

Abudireheman Tuersunniyazi, Xin Shi, Yujun Hao, Lei Jiang, Maimaitijiang Kasimu, Zhaohai Feng, Yinan Pei. Therapeutic effects of glossopharyngeal nerve microvascular decompression on glossopharyngeal neuralgia[J]. Chinese Journal of Brain Diseases and Rehabilitation(Electronic Edition), 2021, 11(02): 74-78.

目的

探讨显微血管减压术(MVD)治疗原发性舌咽神经痛(GN)的疗效。

方法

纳入新疆医科大学第一附属医院神经外科中心自2007年10月至2020年12月行MVD治疗的41例GN患者,其中仅行MVD治疗38例,MVD同时行舌咽神经根及迷走神经根上部第1根丝切断术3例,观察术后疗效和并发症,随访平均年限为6.3年。选择本院自2018年2月至2020年12月行MVD治疗的221例面肌痉挛(HFS)患者,术中观察舌咽神经与血管、舌咽神经根与迷走神经根丝的显微解剖关系。

结果

29例GN患者术后即刻疼痛全部消失;12例术后疼痛明显减轻,2~3 d后疼痛消失。随访末期,2例患者疼痛复发,治愈率为95.1%。结合221例HFS患者显微手术中探查观察,发现舌咽神经根与迷走神经根丝的解剖关系有4种类型,分别是舌咽神经根与迷走神经根上部第1根丝之间间隙较大,彼此之间无交通支;二者之间间隙较小、无交通支;二者之间间隙较小、有交通支;二者之间无间隙。

结论

MVD可作为GN首选外科治疗方法,结合舌咽神经根及迷走神经根上部根丝切断术可为GN提供有效的治疗方法,手术方式应根据术中有无责任血管压迫及责任血管压迫的方式而定。

Objective

To investigate the efficacy of microvascular decompression (MVD) in the treatment of primary glossopharyngeal neuralgia (GN).

Methods

Forty-one patients with GN who underwent MVD from October 2007 to December 2020 in the Neurosurgery Center of the First Affiliated Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University were included. Among them, only 38 cases were treated with MVD, and 3 cases of them were treated with MVD combined with rhizotomy of glossopharyngeal nerve root and upper 1st root filament of vagus nerve, the therapeutic effects and postoperative complications were observed. The average follow-up period was 6.3 years. From February 2018 to December 2020, 221 patients with hemifacial spasm (HFS) were treated by MVD in our hospital. The microanatomic relationship between glossopharyngeal nerve and blood vessel, glossopharyngeal nerve root and vagus nerve root filament were observed.

Results

All the pain disappeared immediately after operation in 29 GN patients; the pain of 12 patients was obviously reduced, and the pain disappeared after 2-3 d. At the end of follow-up, 2 patients had pain recurrence, and the cure rate was 95.1%. Combined with exploration observation of 221 HFS patients with MVD, there were 4 types of anatomical relationship between glossopharyngeal nerve root and vagus nerve root filament. The gap between the glossopharyngeal nerve root and the first upper vagus nerve root was large and there was no traffic branch between them. The gap between the two was small and there was no traffic branch. The gap between the two was small and there was a traffic branch; There was no gap between the two.

Conclusion

MVD can be used as the preferred surgical treatment for GN, combined with glossopharyngeal nerve root and upper root filamentectomy of the vagus nerve root can provide effective treatment for GN. The surgical method should be determined according to whether or not the responsible vessel is compressed and the condition of compression.

表1 41例舌咽神经痛患者的一般资料
表2 显微血管减压术术前与术后BNI对比
[1]
Pommier B, Touzet G, Lucas C, et al. Glossopharyngeal neuralgia treated by gamma knife radiosurgery: safety and efficacy through long-term follow-up[J]. J Neurosurg, 2018, 128(5): 1372-1379.
[2]
Headache classification committee of the International Headache Society (IHS) the international classification of headache disorders, 3rd edition[J]. Cephalalgia, 2018, 38(1): 1-211.
[3]
Chen J, Sindou M. Vago-glossopharyngeal neuralgia: a literature review of neurosurgical experience[J]. Acta Neurochir, 2015, 157(2): 311-321.
[4]
Jani RH, Hughes MA, Ligus ZE, et al. MRI findings and outcomes in patients undergoing microvascular decompression for glossopharyngeal neuralgia[J]. J Neuroimaging, 2018, 28(5): 477-482.
[5]
Rogers CL, Shetter AG, Fiedler JA, et al. Gamma knife radiosurgery for trigeminal neuralgia: the initial experience of the barrow neurological institute[J]. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys, 2000, 47(4): 1013-1019.
[6]
Jannetta PJ. Observations on the etiology of trigeminal neuralgia, hemifacial spasm, acoustic nerve dysfunction and glossopharyngeal neuralgia. Definitive microsurgical treatment and results in 117 patients[J]. Neurochirurgia, 1977, 20(5): 145-154.
[7]
李宗豪, 张洁, 陈永汉, 等. 显微血管减压术治疗舌咽神经痛有效性和安全性的Meta分析[J]. 中华神经外科杂志, 2019, 35(2): 197-203.
[8]
Rui Y, Ji W, Chuncheng Q, et al. Efficacy comparison of microvascular decompression and rhizotomy in the treatment of glossopharyngeal neuralgia: a retrospective analysis of 37 cases[J]. Turk Neurosurg, 2019, 29(4): 493-496.
[9]
Taha J, Tew J. Long-term results of surgical treatment of idiopathic neuralgias of the glossopharyngeal and vagal nerves[J]. Neurosurgery, 1995, 36(5): 926-931.
[10]
张黎, 于炎冰, 徐晓利, 等. 选择性舌咽、迷走神经根丝切断术治疗舌咽神经痛[J]. 中华神经外科疾病研究杂志, 2006, 5(2): 159-162.
[11]
Banerjee C, Viers A, Vender J. Glossopharyngeal neuralgia/neuropathy with hemodynamic instability and associated syncope treated with stereotactic radiosurgery[J]. World Neurosurg, 2020, 139: 314-317.
[12]
刘江, 于炎冰, 张黎, 等. 面肌痉挛合并舌咽神经痛的外科治疗(附五例报告)[J]. 中华神经外科杂志, 2017, 33(9): 911-915.
[13]
Jannetta PJ, Gendell HM. Clinical observations on etiology of essential hypertension[J]. Surg Forum, 1979, 30: 431-432.
[14]
Song HD, Yang FJ, Liu RE. Efficacy of microvascular decompression on the vascular compression type of neurogenic hypertension: a meta-analysis[J]. Rev Neurol (Paris), 2020, 176(10): 763-769.
[15]
彭里磊, 明扬, 陈义天, 等. 显微血管减压术对脑神经疾患合并高血压的降压疗效分析[J]. 中华神经外科杂志, 2018, 34(9): 931-936.
[1] 郭永坤, 单峤, 付旭东, 李培栋, 谢井伟, 周少龙, 刘婉清, 刘春颖. 显微血管减压术治疗原发性舌咽神经痛[J]. 中华神经创伤外科电子杂志, 2022, 08(05): 318-319.
[2] 任鸿翔, 张黎, 张瑜廉, 刘学来, 于炎冰. 脑干听觉诱发电位在面肌痉挛显微血管减压术中的应用价值[J]. 中华神经创伤外科电子杂志, 2022, 08(02): 87-91.
[3] 张永明, 许少年, 赵鹏程, 姜国伟, 张圣帮, 丁俊, 钱峰. 神经电生理监测下显微血管减压术治疗左侧面肌痉挛[J]. 中华神经创伤外科电子杂志, 2021, 07(03): 191-192.
[4] 任鸿翔, 张黎, 申宇晓, 任贵玲, 于炎冰. 桥小脑角区肿瘤继发颅神经疾患的临床特点及疗效研究[J]. 中华神经创伤外科电子杂志, 2021, 07(03): 177-181.
[5] 贾戈, 任鸿翔, 张黎, 张瑜廉, 于炎冰. 面肌痉挛显微血管减压术中不同听力保护策略的疗效:一项随机对照研究[J]. 中华神经创伤外科电子杂志, 2021, 07(03): 170-176.
[6] 王晶, 种玉龙, 姜成荣, 陆天宇, 戴宇翔, 梁维邦. 悬吊责任动脉技术治疗面肌痉挛的临床分析[J]. 中华脑科疾病与康复杂志(电子版), 2021, 11(05): 277-281.
[7] 王柏嵊, 张黎, 于炎冰. 面肌痉挛病因学的研究进展[J]. 中华脑科疾病与康复杂志(电子版), 2021, 11(04): 246-248.
[8] 姜成荣, 徐武, 种玉龙, 王晶, 周璐, 梁维邦. 三叉神经痛显微血管减压术中岩静脉的分型及处理策略[J]. 中华脑科疾病与康复杂志(电子版), 2021, 11(04): 200-203.
[9] 任鸿翔. 乙状窦后入路锁孔显微血管减压术治疗面肌痉挛[J]. 中华脑科疾病与康复杂志(电子版), 2021, 11(03): 188-192.
[10] 陈聪, 王昊, 杜垣锋, 王家栋, 江力, 王鼎, 沈永锋, 俞文华. 基于人工神经网络的多数据分析预测三叉神经痛患者MVD术后长期疗效[J]. 中华脑科疾病与康复杂志(电子版), 2021, 11(02): 68-73.
[11] 乔育, 李加龙, 孙帅, 于蓬勃, 马胜利, 张陇平, 王晓峰. 显微血管减压神经移位技术治疗三叉神经痛术中静脉压迫4例报道[J]. 中华脑科疾病与康复杂志(电子版), 2021, 11(01): 61-62.
[12] 李红星, 彭肖肖, 张凯, 刘贻哲, 王瀚, 宗强. 地塞米松鞘内注射与静脉注射在显微血管减压术后无菌性脑膜炎中的疗效比较[J]. 中华脑科疾病与康复杂志(电子版), 2020, 10(05): 276-279.
[13] 薛俊刚, 魏文渊, 赵东升, 邓国华, 党莹, 任碧峰, 别小华. 不同压迫类型的责任血管在面神经显微血管减压术中的临床疗效观察[J]. 中华脑科疾病与康复杂志(电子版), 2020, 10(05): 262-266.
[14] 于炎冰. 积极扩展显微血管减压术治疗颅神经疾患的范畴[J]. 中华脑科疾病与康复杂志(电子版), 2020, 10(05): 257-261.
[15] 苏明明, 王景, 汪鑫, 李嘉明, 郑朝辉, 王学廉, 屈延, 高国栋. 静脉压迫导致三叉神经痛的影像学评估及显微血管减压术治疗[J]. 中华脑科疾病与康复杂志(电子版), 2020, 10(05): 280-283.
阅读次数
全文


摘要