切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华脑科疾病与康复杂志(电子版) ›› 2021, Vol. 11 ›› Issue (05) : 277 -281. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-123X.2021.05.005

脑科疾病与康复

悬吊责任动脉技术治疗面肌痉挛的临床分析
王晶1, 种玉龙1, 姜成荣1, 陆天宇1, 戴宇翔1, 梁维邦1,()   
  1. 1. 210008 南京,南京大学医学院附属鼓楼医院神经外科
  • 收稿日期:2021-09-15 出版日期:2021-10-15
  • 通信作者: 梁维邦

Clinical analysis of the offending vessel suspension technique in microvascular decompression for hemifacial spasm

Jing Wang1, Yulong Chong1, Chengrong Jiang1, Tianyu Lu1, Yuxiang Dai1, Weibang Liang1,()   

  1. 1. Department of Neurosurgery, Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital, the Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing University Medical School, Nanjing 210008, China
  • Received:2021-09-15 Published:2021-10-15
  • Corresponding author: Weibang Liang
引用本文:

王晶, 种玉龙, 姜成荣, 陆天宇, 戴宇翔, 梁维邦. 悬吊责任动脉技术治疗面肌痉挛的临床分析[J]. 中华脑科疾病与康复杂志(电子版), 2021, 11(05): 277-281.

Jing Wang, Yulong Chong, Chengrong Jiang, Tianyu Lu, Yuxiang Dai, Weibang Liang. Clinical analysis of the offending vessel suspension technique in microvascular decompression for hemifacial spasm[J]. Chinese Journal of Brain Diseases and Rehabilitation(Electronic Edition), 2021, 11(05): 277-281.

目的

分析采用悬吊责任动脉技术行显微血管减压术(MVD)治疗面肌痉挛的临床疗效。

方法

回顾性分析南京鼓楼医院神经外科自2018年1月至7月采用悬吊责任动脉技术行MVD治疗的82例面肌痉挛患者的临床资料,分析其手术效果及并发症的发生情况。

结果

本组患者术中责任血管为椎动脉联合分支血管压迫19例(椎动脉合并小脑前下动脉15例,椎动脉合并小脑后下动脉3例,椎动脉合并小脑前下动脉、后下动脉1例),非椎动脉的多支血管压迫13例(小脑前下动脉多分支4例,小脑前下动脉联合小脑后下动脉9例),动脉袢冗长、压迫路径长20例(小脑前下动脉),减压支点正好在REZ区或有短小穿支血管30例(小脑前下动脉28例,小脑后下动脉2例),采用悬吊责任动脉法后均彻底减压。术后即刻治愈率为96.3%(79/82),有效率为98.8%(81/82)。随访28~34个月,患者治愈率87.8%(72/82),有效率97.6%(80/82),3例面瘫,3例听力下降。

结论

悬吊责任动脉技术可作为面肌痉挛MVD的一种补充技术,尤其适用于单纯利用垫棉无法充分减压的情况,具有操作简单、安全、可逆的特点,但应注意建立可靠、稳定的神经血管位置关系,保持移位血管血流通畅,避免复发,降低并发症发生率。

Objective

To analyze the clinical effect of the offending vessel suspension technique in microvascular decompression (MVD) in the treatment of facial spasm.

Methods

The clinical data of 82 patients with facial spasm treated by MVD with the offending vessel suspension technique in the Neurosurgery Department of Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital from January to July 2018 were analyzed retrospectively, and the surgical effect and postoperative complications were recorded and analyzed.

Results

The large heavy compressed conflicting vessel was found in 19 cases: 15 cases of vertebral artery associated with anterior inferior cerebellar artery (AICA), 3 cases with posterior inferior cerebellar artery (PICA), 1 case with AICA and PICA. The multiple vessels were found in 13 cases: 9 cases of AICA associated with PICA, 4 cases of the branches of AICA. An elongated loop was found in 20 cases. No decompression fulcrum or perforator with brainstem in 30 cases: 28 cases of AICA, 2 cases of PICA. Using the hanging technique, the permanent and complete transposition of the offending vessel was achieved. The immediate postoperative care rate was 96.3% (79/82) and the effective rate was 98.8% (81/82). The patients were followed up for 28 to 34 months, the care rate was 87.8% (72/82), and the effective rate was 97.6% (80/82), 3 cases of transient facial palsy and 3 cases of hearing loss.

Conclusion

The offending vessel suspension technique can be used as supplementary technique for traditional MVD of facial spasm, especially when the cotton pad alone can not fully decompress. This method is easily applied, reversible and with little damage. It is essential for making stable neurovascular relationship, to avoid recurrence and the complications.

图1 椎动脉合并冗长小脑前下动脉压迫A:Teflon垫片制作成束带状;B:压迫面神经根部的椎动脉(箭头所示),小脑前下动脉(箭头所示),可见小脑前下动脉的支点在面神经根部;C:悬吊小脑前下动脉,并将束带固定在椎动脉和颅脑之间;D:面神经的根部(箭头所示)
图2 冗长小脑后下动脉压迫A:小脑后下动脉局部血管袢(箭头所示),压迫面神经根部,无支点;B:将小脑后下动脉从后组解剖抽出;C:悬吊小脑后下动脉,并将束带固定在副神经(箭头所示)和颅脑之间;D:面神经根部(箭头所示)
[1]
郝杨,于炎冰,王琦, 等. 显微血管减压术治疗面肌痉挛[J]. 中华神经外科杂志, 2017, 33(9): 887-891.
[2]
Liu J, Shen Y, Jiang B, et al. Ameliorating effect of microvascular decompression on patients with coexistence of hemifacial spasm and glossopharyngeal neuralgia: retrospective study[J]. World Neurosurg, 2020, 133: e62-e67.
[3]
Bekar A, Kuytu T, Turkkan A, et al. The efficacy and safety of microvascular decompression for hemifacial spasm: a retrospective analysis of surgical outcomes and complications[J]. Turk Neurosurg, 2020, 30(2): 231-236.
[4]
钱进,施圣晖,许兴, 等. 显微血管减压治疗三叉神经痛和面肌痉挛的临床分析[J]. 临床神经外科杂志, 2018, 15(5): 329-332, 336.
[5]
梁维邦,徐武,陆天宇, 等. 微血管减压术后复发和无效的面肌痉挛患者的再手术治疗[J]. 临床神经外科杂志, 2016, 13(6): 435-438.
[6]
Bishnoi I, Singh D, Bishnoi S, et al. Ring graft technique for microvascular decompression[J]. Neurol India, 2018, 66(6): 1687-1691.
[7]
Huh R, Han IB, Moon JY, et al. Microvascular decompression for hemifacial spasm: analyses of operative complications in 1582 consecutive patients[J]. Surg Neurol, 2008, 69(2): 153-157; discussion 157.
[8]
Kondo A. Microvascular decompression surgery for trigeminal neuralgia[J]. Stereotact Funct Neurosurg, 2001, 77(1-4): 187-189.
[9]
管宏新,朱晋,仲骏, 等. 椎动脉解剖类型与面肌痉挛的相关性研究[J]. 中华神经外科疾病研究杂志, 2010, 9(3): 225-227.
[10]
Mikami T, Minamida Y, Akiyama Y, et al. Microvascular decompression for hemifacial spasm associated with the vertebral artery[J]. Neurosurg Rev, 2013, 36(2): 303-308; discussion 308-309.
[11]
Zhang X, Zhao H, Zhu J, et al. Outcome of biomedical glue sling technique in microvascular decompression for hemifacial spasm involving the vertebral artery[J]. World Neurosurg, 2017, 104: 186-191.
[12]
Masuoka J, Matsushima T, Kawashima M, et al. Stitched sling retraction technique for microvascular decompression: procedures and techniques based on an anatomical viewpoint[J]. Neurosurg Rev, 2011, 34(3): 373-379; discussion 379-380.
[13]
Jiang X, Wu M, Fu X, et al. Microvascular decompression for hemifacial spasm associated with vertebral artery: biomedical glue-coated teflon sling transposition technique[J]. World Neurosurg, 2018, 120: e342-e348.
[14]
Yang D, Tao C, Zhou S, et al. The outcome of sling retraction technique in microvascular decompression for hemifacial spasm[J]. J Craniofac Surg, 2018, 29(8): e764-e767.
[15]
杨德宝,周世军,王安琪, 等. 悬吊技术在面肌痉挛显微血管减压术中的应用[J]. 临床神经外科杂志, 2018, 15(3): 200-203.
[16]
王晶,陆天宇,戴宇翔, 等. 显微血管减压术治疗椎动脉相关面肌痉挛的手术策略及临床疗效分析[J]. 立体定向和功能性神经外科杂志, 2020, 33(1): 28-32.
[17]
于炎冰,张黎,徐晓利, 等. 责任动脉悬吊法在显微血管减压术中的应用[J]. 中华神经外科杂志, 2006, 22(12): 726-728.
[18]
Amagasaki K, Kurita N, Watanabe S, et al. Lower cranial nerve palsy after the infrafloccular approach in microvascular decompression for hemifacial spasm[J]. Surg Neurol Int, 2017, 8: 67.
[1] 王瑶, 肖凤鸣, 吴孟航, 万娟. 下腔静脉右侧入路建立肝脏悬吊系统的腹腔镜右半肝切除术的临床研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2021, 15(01): 61-64.
[2] 丹增阿旺, 王超, 次仁平措, 曾成龙, 杨振华, 罗鑫, 王宇蔚, 张必翔, 张斌豪. 陈氏绕肝悬吊技术在机器人辅助腹腔镜右半肝切除术中的应用(附视频)[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2023, 12(03): 294-299.
[3] 任鸿翔, 张黎, 张瑜廉, 刘学来, 于炎冰. 脑干听觉诱发电位在面肌痉挛显微血管减压术中的应用价值[J]. 中华神经创伤外科电子杂志, 2022, 08(02): 87-91.
[4] 任鸿翔, 张黎, 申宇晓, 任贵玲, 于炎冰. 桥小脑角区肿瘤继发颅神经疾患的临床特点及疗效研究[J]. 中华神经创伤外科电子杂志, 2021, 07(03): 177-181.
[5] 贾戈, 任鸿翔, 张黎, 张瑜廉, 于炎冰. 面肌痉挛显微血管减压术中不同听力保护策略的疗效:一项随机对照研究[J]. 中华神经创伤外科电子杂志, 2021, 07(03): 170-176.
[6] 张永明, 许少年, 赵鹏程, 姜国伟, 张圣帮, 丁俊, 钱峰. 神经电生理监测下显微血管减压术治疗左侧面肌痉挛[J]. 中华神经创伤外科电子杂志, 2021, 07(03): 191-192.
[7] 种玉龙, 徐武, 王晶, 姜成荣, 梁维邦. 头颅CTA检查在微血管减压术前安全性评估中的临床意义[J]. 中华脑科疾病与康复杂志(电子版), 2021, 11(05): 282-284.
[8] 王柏嵊, 张黎, 于炎冰. 面肌痉挛病因学的研究进展[J]. 中华脑科疾病与康复杂志(电子版), 2021, 11(04): 246-248.
[9] 姜成荣, 徐武, 种玉龙, 王晶, 周璐, 梁维邦. 三叉神经痛显微血管减压术中岩静脉的分型及处理策略[J]. 中华脑科疾病与康复杂志(电子版), 2021, 11(04): 200-203.
[10] 任鸿翔. 乙状窦后入路锁孔显微血管减压术治疗面肌痉挛[J]. 中华脑科疾病与康复杂志(电子版), 2021, 11(03): 188-192.
[11] 阿布地热合曼·吐尔孙尼牙孜, 石鑫, 郝玉军, 姜磊, 买买提江·卡斯木, 冯兆海, 裴祎楠. 显微血管减压术治疗舌咽神经痛疗效分析[J]. 中华脑科疾病与康复杂志(电子版), 2021, 11(02): 74-78.
[12] 陈聪, 王昊, 杜垣锋, 王家栋, 江力, 王鼎, 沈永锋, 俞文华. 基于人工神经网络的多数据分析预测三叉神经痛患者MVD术后长期疗效[J]. 中华脑科疾病与康复杂志(电子版), 2021, 11(02): 68-73.
[13] 乔育, 李加龙, 孙帅, 于蓬勃, 马胜利, 张陇平, 王晓峰. 显微血管减压神经移位技术治疗三叉神经痛术中静脉压迫4例报道[J]. 中华脑科疾病与康复杂志(电子版), 2021, 11(01): 61-62.
[14] 李红星, 彭肖肖, 张凯, 刘贻哲, 王瀚, 宗强. 地塞米松鞘内注射与静脉注射在显微血管减压术后无菌性脑膜炎中的疗效比较[J]. 中华脑科疾病与康复杂志(电子版), 2020, 10(05): 276-279.
[15] 薛俊刚, 魏文渊, 赵东升, 邓国华, 党莹, 任碧峰, 别小华. 不同压迫类型的责任血管在面神经显微血管减压术中的临床疗效观察[J]. 中华脑科疾病与康复杂志(电子版), 2020, 10(05): 262-266.
阅读次数
全文


摘要