切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华脑科疾病与康复杂志(电子版) ›› 2021, Vol. 11 ›› Issue (02) : 68 -73. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-123X.2021.02.002

颅神经疾患

基于人工神经网络的多数据分析预测三叉神经痛患者MVD术后长期疗效
陈聪1, 王昊2, 杜垣锋2, 王家栋3, 江力2, 王鼎2, 沈永锋2, 俞文华2,()   
  1. 1. 322000 义乌市中心医院神经外科
    2. 310006 杭州,浙江大学医学院附属杭州市第一人民医院神经外科
    3. 310059 杭州,浙江中医药大学第四临床医学院
  • 收稿日期:2020-12-06 出版日期:2021-04-15
  • 通信作者: 俞文华

Multi-data analysis based on artificial neural network to predict long-term efficacy of trigeminal neuralgia after microvascular decompression

Cong Chen1, Hao Wang2, Yuanfeng Du2, Jiadong Wang3, Li Jiang2, Ding Wang2, Yongfeng Shen2, Wenhua Yu2,()   

  1. 1. Department of Neurosurgery, Yiwu Central Hospital, Yiwu 322000, China
    2. Department of Neurosurgery, Affiliated Hangzhou First People’s Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou 310006, China
    3. Department of Fourth Clinical Medical College, Zhejiang Chinese Medical University, Hangzhou 310059, China
  • Received:2020-12-06 Published:2021-04-15
  • Corresponding author: Wenhua Yu
引用本文:

陈聪, 王昊, 杜垣锋, 王家栋, 江力, 王鼎, 沈永锋, 俞文华. 基于人工神经网络的多数据分析预测三叉神经痛患者MVD术后长期疗效[J]. 中华脑科疾病与康复杂志(电子版), 2021, 11(02): 68-73.

Cong Chen, Hao Wang, Yuanfeng Du, Jiadong Wang, Li Jiang, Ding Wang, Yongfeng Shen, Wenhua Yu. Multi-data analysis based on artificial neural network to predict long-term efficacy of trigeminal neuralgia after microvascular decompression[J]. Chinese Journal of Brain Diseases and Rehabilitation(Electronic Edition), 2021, 11(02): 68-73.

目的

探讨人工神经网络(ANN)模型预测三叉神经痛(TN)患者显微血管减压术(MVD)术后长期临床疗效的价值。

方法

收集自2013年3月至2018年5月于浙江大学医学院附属杭州市第一人民医院神经外科接受MVD手术的1041例TN患者的围术期多数据资料,构建ANN预测模型。比较预测结果与实际随访结果,改变输入层变量,寻找对ANN预测精度影响最大的因素。

结果

ANN模型可以准确预测TN患者MVD术后的长期疗效,准确率为94.2%。血管压迫三叉神经的解剖位置与面部疼痛部位是否符合、MVD术后即刻疼痛缓解情况、责任血管压迫程度、责任血管类型4个因素在ANN预测性能中贡献最大,将其依次删除后模型预测的准确率下降为75.3%、79.8%、86.6%、89.2%。

结论

ANN模型可客观准确地预测TN患者MVD术后的长期临床疗效,并且该模型可以评估临床疗效预测中每个因素的重要性。

Objective

To explore the value of artificial neural network (ANN) model in predicting the long-term clinical efficacy of microvascular decompression (MVD) in patients with trigeminal neuralgia (TN).

Methods

The perioperative data of 1041 TN patients who underwent MVD surgery in Neurosurgery Department of Affiliated Hangzhou First People’s Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine from March 2013 to May 2018 were collected to construct the ANN prediction model. The prediction results are compared with the actual follow-up results to evaluate the performance of the model, then changing the variables of the input layer to find the factors which have the greatest impact on the prediction accuracy of the model.

Results

The ANN model can accurately predict the long-term efficacy of TN patients after MVD with an accuracy rate of 94.2%. These four factors (whether the anatomical location of offending vessels on the trigeminal nerve and the location of facial pain meet, the pain relief in the short term after MVD, the degree of the offending vessels compression, and the type of offending vessels) contribute the most to the prediction performance of ANN. After deleting them in turn, the prediction accuracy of the model dropped to 75.3%, 79.8%, 86.6%, 89.2%.

Conclusion

The ANN model can objectively and accurately predict the long-term clinical efficacy of TN patients after MVD, and the model can evaluate the importance of each factor in the prediction of clinical efficacy.

图1 人工智能网络模型流程图
表1 患者术中特征统计[例(%)]
表2 患者术后特征统计[例(%)]
表3 逐个删除每个因素后的人工神经网络模型预测TN患者MVD术后的长期疗效评估
图2 混淆矩阵显示的测试数据集中正确和错误的预测数量
图3 测试数据集的人工神经网络的操作者工作特征曲线
[1]
Cruccu G, Di Stefano G, Truini A. Trigeminal neuralgia[J]. N Engl J Med, 2020, 383(8): 754-762.
[2]
中华医学会神经外科学分会功能神经外科学组, 中国医师协会神经外科医师分会功能神经外科专家委员会, 北京医学会神经外科学分会, 等. 中国显微血管减压术治疗三叉神经痛和舌咽神经痛专家共识(2015)[J]. 中华神经外科杂志,2015,31(3): 217-220.
[3]
Azimi P, Mohammadi HR, Benzel EC, et al. Artificial neural networks in neurosurgery[J]. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry, 2015, 86(3): 251-256.
[4]
Obermeyer Z, Emanuel EJ. Predicting the future - big data, machine learning, and clinical medicine[J]. N Engl J Med, 2016, 375(13): 1216-1219.
[5]
Headache classification committee of the International Headache Society (IHS) the International classification of headache disorders, 3rd edition[J]. Cephalalgia, 2018, 38(1): 1-211.
[6]
谢旭, 陈芸芝. 基于PSO-RBF神经网络模型反演闽江下游水体悬浮物浓度[J]. 遥感技术与应用, 2018, 33(5): 900-907.
[7]
Ertiaei A, Ataeinezhad Z, Bitaraf M, et al. Application of an artificial neural network model for early outcome prediction of gamma knife radiosurgery in patients with trigeminal neuralgia and determining the relative importance of risk factors[J]. Clin Neurol Neurosurg, 2019, 179: 47-52.
[8]
Kondo A, Date I, Endo S, et al. A proposal for standardized analysis of the results of microvascular decompression for trigeminal neuralgia and hemifacial spasm[J]. Acta Neurochir (Wien), 2012, 154(5): 773-778.
[9]
Wang H, Ying X, Yu WH, et al. Suprafloccular approach via the petrosal fissure and venous corridors for microvascular decompression of the trigeminal nerve: technique notes and clinical outcomes[J]. J Neurosurg, 2018, 129(2): 324-333.
[10]
Kingma DP, Ba J. Adam: a method for stochastic optimization[C]. 5th International Conference on Learning Representations. San Diego: ICLR, 2015.

URL    
[11]
Huang J, Ling CX. Using AUC and accuracy in evaluating learning algorithms [J]. IEEE Trans Knowl Data Eng, 2005, 17(3): 299-310.
[12]
Tyler-Kabara EC, Kassam AB, Horowitz MH, et al. Predictors of outcome in surgically managed patients with typical and atypical trigeminal neuralgia: comparison of results following microvascular decompression[J]. J Neurosurg, 2002, 96(3): 527-531.
[13]
Sarsam Z, Garcia-Fiñana M, Nurmikko TJ, et al. The long-term outcome of microvascular decompression for trigeminal neuralgia[J]. Br J Neurosurg, 2010, 24(1): 18-25.
[14]
杜权, 俞文华, 朱强, 等. 微血管减压术治疗老年原发性三叉神经痛100例临床分析[J]. 浙江医学, 2014, 36(18): 1541-1543, 1576.
[15]
俞文华, 王昊, 江力, 等. 显微血管减压术治疗颅神经疾病5年单中心回顾[J]. 浙江医学, 2019, 41(2): 112-115.
[16]
Parise M, Kubo TT, Doring TM, et al. Cuneus and fusiform cortices thickness is reduced in trigeminal neuralgia[J]. J Headache Pain, 2014, 15(1): 17.
[17]
Sekula RF, Marchan EM, Fletcher LH, et al. Microvascular decompression for trigeminal neuralgia in elderly patients[J]. J Neurosurg, 2008, 108(4): 689-691.
[1] 任鸿翔, 张黎, 张瑜廉, 刘学来, 于炎冰. 脑干听觉诱发电位在面肌痉挛显微血管减压术中的应用价值[J]. 中华神经创伤外科电子杂志, 2022, 08(02): 87-91.
[2] 任鸿翔, 张黎, 申宇晓, 任贵玲, 于炎冰. 桥小脑角区肿瘤继发颅神经疾患的临床特点及疗效研究[J]. 中华神经创伤外科电子杂志, 2021, 07(03): 177-181.
[3] 贾戈, 任鸿翔, 张黎, 张瑜廉, 于炎冰. 面肌痉挛显微血管减压术中不同听力保护策略的疗效:一项随机对照研究[J]. 中华神经创伤外科电子杂志, 2021, 07(03): 170-176.
[4] 刘微丽, 张雨嫣, 孟丽君, 吴徐峰, 袁文杰, 李玉呈, 韦广发, 袁锐. 人工神经网络技术预测颅脑损伤患者的预后效果[J]. 中华重症医学电子杂志, 2021, 07(04): 355-359.
[5] 樊晓彤, 闫峰, 王亚明. 立体定向机器人辅助经皮穿刺半月神经节球囊扩张压迫术[J]. 中华脑科疾病与康复杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(03): 191-192.
[6] 中国医师协会功能神经外科专家委员会, 世界华人神经外科协会功能神经外科专家委员会, 中国研究型医院学会神经外科学专业委员会, 中华医学会神经外科分会功能神经外科学组. 经皮球囊压迫术治疗三叉神经痛中国专家共识[J]. 中华脑科疾病与康复杂志(电子版), 2022, 12(05): 260-268.
[7] 李岩峰, 马逸. 经皮穿刺球囊压迫术治疗三叉神经痛在中国的现状与展望[J]. 中华脑科疾病与康复杂志(电子版), 2022, 12(04): 193-195.
[8] 种玉龙, 徐武, 王晶, 姜成荣, 梁维邦. 头颅CTA检查在微血管减压术前安全性评估中的临床意义[J]. 中华脑科疾病与康复杂志(电子版), 2021, 11(05): 282-284.
[9] 王晶, 种玉龙, 姜成荣, 陆天宇, 戴宇翔, 梁维邦. 悬吊责任动脉技术治疗面肌痉挛的临床分析[J]. 中华脑科疾病与康复杂志(电子版), 2021, 11(05): 277-281.
[10] 王柏嵊, 张黎, 于炎冰. 面肌痉挛病因学的研究进展[J]. 中华脑科疾病与康复杂志(电子版), 2021, 11(04): 246-248.
[11] 姜成荣, 徐武, 种玉龙, 王晶, 周璐, 梁维邦. 三叉神经痛显微血管减压术中岩静脉的分型及处理策略[J]. 中华脑科疾病与康复杂志(电子版), 2021, 11(04): 200-203.
[12] 徐武, 姜成荣, 梁维邦. 卵圆孔形态和外口面积对半月神经节球囊压迫术的影响[J]. 中华脑科疾病与康复杂志(电子版), 2021, 11(04): 196-199.
[13] 蒋亦林, 伍刚, 刘波, 沈洁, 刘如恩. 继发性三叉神经痛诊疗策略[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2022, 16(07): 643-646.
[14] 史鹏飞, 王常伟, 郭亚洲, 刘霄, 李锴, 刘禹, 何兵, 赵余涛, 刘德中. 经皮穿刺球囊压迫与显微血管减压术治疗老年人三叉神经痛的疗效及安全性[J]. 中华脑血管病杂志(电子版), 2022, 16(04): 258-262.
[15] 桑振华, 魏宸铭, 王准, 武剑. 人工智能技术在脑卒中筛查领域的研究进展[J]. 中华脑血管病杂志(电子版), 2022, 16(04): 225-229.
阅读次数
全文


摘要