切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华脑科疾病与康复杂志(电子版) ›› 2022, Vol. 12 ›› Issue (03) : 137 -141. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-123X.2022.03.003

临床研究

听神经瘤枕下乙状窦后入路显微切除术后面神经功能损伤的危险因素分析
成刚1, 陈旭1, 岳勇1,()   
  1. 1. 621000 绵阳市中心医院神经外科
  • 收稿日期:2022-01-12 出版日期:2022-06-15
  • 通信作者: 岳勇
  • 基金资助:
    四川省科技计划项目(2019TG28)

Risk factors for facial nerve function impairment following microsurgical resection of acoustic neuroma via suboccipital retrosigmoid approach

Gang Cheng1, Xu Chen1, Yong Yue1,()   

  1. 1. Department of Neurosurgery, Mianyang City Central Hospital, Mianyang 621000, China
  • Received:2022-01-12 Published:2022-06-15
  • Corresponding author: Yong Yue
引用本文:

成刚, 陈旭, 岳勇. 听神经瘤枕下乙状窦后入路显微切除术后面神经功能损伤的危险因素分析[J]. 中华脑科疾病与康复杂志(电子版), 2022, 12(03): 137-141.

Gang Cheng, Xu Chen, Yong Yue. Risk factors for facial nerve function impairment following microsurgical resection of acoustic neuroma via suboccipital retrosigmoid approach[J]. Chinese Journal of Brain Diseases and Rehabilitation(Electronic Edition), 2022, 12(03): 137-141.

目的

研究听神经瘤(AN)显微镜外科切除后面神经功能损伤的危险因素。

方法

回顾性分析绵阳市中心医院神经外科自2017年1月至2020年1月行枕下乙状窦后入路显微切除术治疗的140例AN患者的临床资料,随访6个月,采用H-B面神经功能受损量表(HBFGS)评估患者术后6个月的面神经受损程度,并将年龄、性别、肿瘤直径、肿瘤切除范围、手术时间、术中是否行面神经监测、面神经位置、面神经与肿瘤的黏连严重程度等作为分析因素,分析影响患者术后面神经功能受损的独立危险因素。

结果

按照术后6个月面神经HBFGS分级结果将患者分为2组,HBFGS分级Ⅰ~Ⅲ级为轻中度障碍组(78例),Ⅳ~Ⅵ级为重度障碍组(62例)。轻中度障碍组患者的肿瘤最大直径显著小于重度障碍组,手术时间显著短于重度障碍组,差异均具有统计学意义(P<0.05);肿瘤切除程度、术中行面神经监测情况以及面神经与肿瘤的黏连程度与重度障碍组比较,差异均具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。多因素Logistic回归分析结果提示,肿瘤最大直径>3.13 cm、肿瘤部分切除与次全切除、面神经与肿瘤中、重度黏连均是导致术后面神经功能严重障碍的独立危险因素(OR>1,P<0.05),而术中行面神经监测是术后面神经严重障碍的保护因素(OR<1,P<0.05)。

结论

AN瘤体大小、肿瘤切除程度、术中是否行面神经监测以及面神经与肿瘤的黏连程度是影响患者乙状窦后入路显微切除AN术后面神经功能受损程度的独立因素。

Objective

To investigate the risk factors for facial nerve function impairment following microsurgical resection of acoustic neuroma (AN) via suboccipital retrosigmoid approach.

Methods

The clinical data of 140 AN patients receiving microsurgical resection via suboccipital retrosigmoid approach in Neurosurgery Department of Mianyang City Central Hospital from January 2017 to January 2020 were retrospectively analyzed. All patients were followed up for 6 months. The degree of facial nerve damage of patients was assessed using H-B facial nerve grading system (HBFGS). The age, gender, tumor diameter, tumor resection range, operative time, intraoperative facial nerve monitoring, facial nerve location and the adhesion between the facial nerve and tumor capsule and other factors were taken as analysis factors. Logistic regression was used to analyze the independent risk factors affecting postoperative facial nerve function impairment.

Results

The patients were divided into two groups according to the HBFGS scale of facial nerve 6 months after operation. HBFGS grade Ⅰ-Ⅲ was mild-to-moderate disorder group (78 cases), and HBFGS grade Ⅳ-Ⅵ was severe disorder group (62 cases). Univariate analysis showed that mild-to-moderate disorder group had lower maximum tumor diameter and shorter operation time than those of severe disorder group (P<0.05), moreover, tumor resection rang, intraoperative facial nerve monitoring, and the adhesion between the facial nerve and tumor capsule also showed significant difference between two groups (P<0.05). Logistic multivariate regression analysis showed that the maximum tumor diameter>3.13 cm, partial resection and subtotal resection of the tumor and moderate and severe adhesion between the facial nerve and tumor capsule were independent risk factors affecting postoperative facial nerve impairment (OR>1, P<0.05), and intraoperative facial nerve monitoring was a protective factor for severe postoperative facial nerve impairment (OR<1, P<0.05).

Conclusion

The tumor diameter, tumor resection range, intraoperative facial nerve monitoring and the severity of the adhesion between the facial nerve and tumor capsule are independent factors affecting facial nerve function impairment following microsurgical resection of AN via suboccipital retrosigmoid approach.

表1 轻中度障碍组与重度障碍组临床资料比较
图1 肿瘤最大直径受试者工作特征曲线
图2 手术时间受试者工作特征曲线
表2 听神经瘤枕下乙状窦后入路显微切除术后面神经功能损伤相关因素变量名及赋值
表3 影响术后面神经功能的多因素Logistic回归分析
[1]
张丰启,刘庆.听神经瘤显微外科手术治疗与面神经功能保留的研究进展[J].中华神经外科杂志, 2021, 37(2): 210-213.
[2]
吕学明,卢培刚,初晨宇,等.大型听神经瘤显微手术治疗[J].中华脑科疾病与康复杂志(电子版), 2019, 9(1): 36-38.
[3]
张燕君,储伟.影响大中型听神经瘤术后面神经功能的相关因素分析[J].中国医师杂志, 2021, 23(1): 116-119.
[4]
Paolucci T, Cardarola A, Colonnelli P, et al. Give me a kiss! An integrative rehabilitative training program with motor imagery and mirror therapy for recovery of facial palsy[J]. Eur J Phys Rehabil Med, 2020, 56(1): 58-67.
[5]
Gange WS, Kirchner ID, Thompson JA, et al. Ophthalmic complications following acoustic neuroma resection[J]. Oper Neurosurg (Hagerstown), 2018, 14(1): 58-65.
[6]
宁菲,郭菲菲,孔冰冰,等.听神经瘤术后面瘫恢复的相关性分析[J].中华耳科学杂志, 2020, 18(2): 287-290.
[7]
Meier-Gallati V, Scriba H. Objective assessment of the reliability of the house-brackmann and fisch grading of synkinesis[J]. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol, 2017, 274(12): 4217-4223.
[8]
马木提江·木尔提扎,吴昊,麦麦提力·米吉提,等.经乙状窦后入路听神经瘤切术后恶心、呕吐的发生率及危险因素[J].临床神经外科杂志, 2020, 17(1): 100-104.
[9]
洪健,韩璐,陈步东,等.面神经运动诱发电位监测对听神经瘤术后面神经功能的预测作用[J].中华医学杂志, 2020, 100(16): 1245-1248.
[10]
董元训,王雄伟,马金阳,等.显微外科治疗巨大听神经瘤的临床研究及面神经保护[J].中国实用神经疾病杂志, 2015, 18(4): 37-39.
[11]
马明珠,杨立惠,文波,等.枕下乙状窦后入路听神经瘤切除术中聚氨酯凝胶头圈与Mayfield头架摆体位对患者面部压伤影响的效果评估[J].华西医学, 2015, 30(7): 1285-1287.
[12]
贾欢,樊碧云,胡凌翔,等.听神经瘤术中面神经最大阈上刺激的波幅变化与术后早期面神经功能的关系及其影响因素[J].中华耳鼻咽喉头颈外科杂志, 2016, 51(6): 414-418.
[13]
Puanhvuan D, Chumnanvej S, Wongsawat Y. Electrical stimulation-based nerve location prediction for cranial nerve VII localization in acoustic neuroma surgery[J]. Brain Behav, 2018, 8(6): e00981.
[14]
陶晓刚,魏新亭,薛亚轲,等.颅内听神经瘤手术策略与术后面神经功能的影响因素分析[J].中国微侵袭神经外科杂志, 2020, 25(2): 49-52.
[15]
孟哲,韩松,刘宁,等.听神经瘤术后面神经功能预后的影响因素分析[J].中国微侵袭神经外科杂志, 2017, 22(12): 529-532.
[1] 王锋锋, 李虎, 苏孟媛, 苏嘉明, 何祖强, 钟自强. 包皮环切术致尿道损伤的原因分析及修补方法[J]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(04): 394-396.
[2] 叶鉴锋, 王润邦, 张墨. 3D高清腹腔镜保留睾丸动脉的精索静脉高位结扎术的疗效分析[J]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(03): 265-269.
[3] 黄剑华, 钟羽翔, 赵朋朋, 麦源, 韦巍, 林富祥, 金敬苗, 徐战平. 经腹股沟和经腹股沟下途径显微镜精索静脉结扎术的疗效对比[J]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2021, 15(01): 47-50.
[4] 韦振宇, 郑攀攀, 陈前坤, 梁庆丰. 角膜神经分布情况与睑板腺功能障碍患者眼表炎症相关性的临床研究[J]. 中华眼科医学杂志(电子版), 2021, 11(04): 205-210.
[5] 郭协力, 戴伟川, 蔡文华, 方仲宁, 陈英贤, 齐震. 经颈前入路显微镜下椎间盘切除及椎体间植骨融合术[J]. 中华神经创伤外科电子杂志, 2022, 08(06): 379-383.
[6] 周帅, 姜丽娜, 王鲁飞, 刘炜, 郭嘉, 王明鑫, 韩光良. 神经内镜辅助显微镜切除颅咽管瘤的临床研究[J]. 中华神经创伤外科电子杂志, 2021, 07(05): 288-292.
[7] 朱治, 蒋伟超, 陈曦, 陈四方, 宋宁宁, 李玉魁, 肖菲, 谭国伟. 听神经瘤术后面神经功能损伤危险因素分析[J]. 中华神经创伤外科电子杂志, 2020, 06(06): 325-331.
[8] 吴昊, 李云雷, 麦麦提力·米吉提, 买吾兰·艾沙, 陈烈兴, 马木提江·木尔提扎, 巴特·龚高昂, 朱国华. 颅内压监测在治疗非脑疝高血压脑出血中的应用及疗效分析[J]. 中华神经创伤外科电子杂志, 2020, 06(03): 151-155.
[9] 王立忠, 初君盛, 赵立辉, 孙慧渊, 侯青, 丁奇, 闫俊飞, 侯源, 袁武, 王唯. 神经内镜与显微镜手术治疗早期基底节区高血压性脑出血的临床疗效对比[J]. 中华脑科疾病与康复杂志(电子版), 2022, 12(02): 69-73.
[10] 于炎冰. 锁孔手术治疗听神经瘤的策略[J]. 中华脑科疾病与康复杂志(电子版), 2022, 12(02): 126-128.
[11] 钟东. 内听道的个体化处理策略在听神经瘤显微外科手术中的意义[J]. 中华脑科疾病与康复杂志(电子版), 2022, 12(01): 1-8.
[12] 戴伟川, 郭协力, 陈英贤, 齐震, 蔡文华. 经椎旁入路显微镜下微通道腰椎间盘突出切除术[J]. 中华脑科疾病与康复杂志(电子版), 2021, 11(04): 252-256.
[13] 董康, 钟东, 尹浩扬, 蒋宏, 杨瑞, 吴越, 黄志坚, 程崇杰, 夏海坚, 孙晓川. 多学科协作、多技术融合手术治疗颈静脉孔区肿瘤[J]. 中华脑科疾病与康复杂志(电子版), 2020, 10(04): 209-217.
[14] 廖远泉. 输入性卵形疟原虫感染实验诊断技术的研究进展[J]. 中华临床实验室管理电子杂志, 2021, 09(04): 242-247.
[15] 何梦璋, 杨崇艳, 吴雄婷, 黎鹏, 王淼, 胡丽, 徐勇. 重症和非重症新冠肺炎患者的临床特征对比及危险因素分析[J]. 中华临床实验室管理电子杂志, 2021, 09(02): 110-117.
阅读次数
全文


摘要