切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华脑科疾病与康复杂志(电子版) ›› 2022, Vol. 12 ›› Issue (03) : 167 -170. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-123X.2022.03.009

短篇论著

多模态监测下颈动脉内膜剥脱术治疗颈内动脉重度狭窄
易竟1, 姚陵1,(), 文江力1, 阙思伟1   
  1. 1. 415003 湖南常德,常德市第一人民医院神经外科
  • 收稿日期:2022-01-03 出版日期:2022-06-15
  • 通信作者: 姚陵
  • 基金资助:
    湖南省临床医疗技术创新引导项目(2018SK50201); 常德市科技局项目(2020S028)

Carotid endarterectomy under multimodal monitoring for severe internal carotid artery stenosis

Jing Yi1, Ling Yao1,(), Jiangli Wen1, Siwei Que1   

  1. 1. Department of Neurosurgery, The First People’s Hospital of Changde City, Changde 415003 China
  • Received:2022-01-03 Published:2022-06-15
  • Corresponding author: Ling Yao
引用本文:

易竟, 姚陵, 文江力, 阙思伟. 多模态监测下颈动脉内膜剥脱术治疗颈内动脉重度狭窄[J]. 中华脑科疾病与康复杂志(电子版), 2022, 12(03): 167-170.

Jing Yi, Ling Yao, Jiangli Wen, Siwei Que. Carotid endarterectomy under multimodal monitoring for severe internal carotid artery stenosis[J]. Chinese Journal of Brain Diseases and Rehabilitation(Electronic Edition), 2022, 12(03): 167-170.

目的

探讨多模态监测下颈动脉内膜剥脱术治疗颈内动脉重度狭窄的临床疗效。

方法

回顾性分析常德市第一人民医院神经外科自2018年1月至2021年9月实施颈动脉内膜斑块剥脱术治疗的15例颈内动脉重度狭窄患者的基本资料、术后并发症和复查情况。

结果

1例患者在预阻断时,多普勒提示血流下降50%,但电生理未提示异常,提高血压,未予以术中转流;3例患者电生理及多普勒同时提示低灌注,予以术中转流后均好转。术后所有患者无明显并发症,术后复查未见再狭窄。

结论

多模态监测下颈动脉内膜剥脱术治疗颈内动脉重度狭窄安全有效。

Objective

To investigate the clinical efficacy of carotid endarterectomy under multimodal monitoring in the treatment of severe internal carotid artery stenosis.

Methods

The basic data, postoperative complications and postoperative reexamination of 15 patients with severe internal carotid artery stenosis treated by carotid intimal plaque stripping in the Neurosurgery Department of The First People’s Hospital of Changde City from January 2018 to September 2021 were analyzed retrospectively.

Results

In one patient during pre-blocking, Doppler showed that the blood flow decreased by 50%, but the electrophysiology did not indicate abnormality, increased blood pressure and did not convert to blood flow. Electrophysiology and Doppler showed hypoperfusion in 3 patients, which improved after intraoperative conversion. All patients had no obvious complications after operation, and there was no restenosis after operation.

Conclusion

Carotid endarterectomy under multimodal monitoring is safe and effective in the treatment of severe internal carotid artery stenosis.

图1 颈内动脉重度狭窄患者手术资料 A:术前头颈部CTA;B:术中切口;C:暴露颈内动脉;D:术后头颈部CTA
[1]
胡爽征,黄声岳,杨科俊.动脉粥样硬化性颈内动脉狭窄的超声诊断意义[J].现代实用医学, 2020, 32(7): 868-870.
[2]
董辉,张晖,蔡磊,等.颈动脉内膜斑块剥脱术治疗体会[J].中国临床神经外科杂志, 2017, 22(8): 587-589.
[3]
Naylor AR, Ricco JB, de Borst GJ, et al. Editor’s choice-management of atherosclerotic carotid and vertebral artery disease: 2017 clinical practice guidelines of the European Society For Vascular Surgery (ESVS)[J]. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg, 2018, 55(1): 3-81.
[4]
Musicant SE, Guzzetta VJ, Terramani TT, et al. Modified eversion carotid endarterectomy (mECEA): analysis of clinical and financial outcomes[J]. Ann Vasc Surg, 2017, 42: 16-24.
[5]
Chang JW, Kim SW, Lee S, et al. Dual monitoring with stump pressure and electroencephalography during carotid endarterectomy[J]. Korean J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg, 2017, 50(2): 94-98.
[6]
Findlay JM, Kesarwani R, Jacka M, et al. Combined stump pressure and oximetry for shunt use during carotid endarterectomy[J]. Can J Neurol Sci, 2017, 44(6): 692-696.
[7]
Kamenskaya OV, Loginova IY, Lomivorotov VV. Brain oxygen supply parameters in the risk assessment of cerebral complications during carotid endarterectomy[J]. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth, 2017, 31(3): 944-949.
[8]
Lam AM, Kianpour D. Monitoring for carotid endarterectomy: more or less?[J]. Anesth Analg, 2015, 120(6): 1186-1188.
[9]
顾大群,张扬,晁迎九,等.脑电图联合局部脑氧饱和度监测脑灌注在颈动脉内膜剥脱术中的应用[J].中华神经医学杂志, 2021, 20(4): 346-349.
[10]
Wang Y, Li L, Wang T, et al. The efficacy of near-infrared spectroscopy monitoring in carotid endarterectomy: a prospective, single-center, observational study[J]. Cell Transplant, 2019, 28(2): 170-175.
[11]
Doig D, Turner EL, Dobson J, et al. Incidence, impact, and predictors of cranial nerve palsy and haematoma following carotid endarterectomy in the international carotid stenting study[J]. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg, 2014, 48(5): 498-504.
[12]
Payne DA, Twigg MW, Hayes PD, et al. Antiplatelet agents and risk factors for bleeding postcarotid endarterectomy[J]. Ann Vasc Surg, 2010, 24(7): 900-907.
[13]
范伟健,李波,瞿小锋,等.复合手术治疗慢性颈内动脉闭塞初步应用及临床效果[J].介入放射学杂志, 2019, 28(2): 147-150.
[14]
Lal BK, Beach KW, Roubin GS, et al. Restenosis after carotid artery stenting and endarterectomy: a secondary analysis of CREST, a randomised controlled trial[J]. Lancet Neurol, 2012, 11(9): 755-763.
[15]
韩帅,李文臣,王海峰,等.基于TCD脑血流频谱评估颅脑损伤患者颅内压的研究进展[J].中华神经创伤外科电子杂志, 2020, 6(1): 53-56.
[1] 李娜, 华扬, 刘蓓蓓, 周瑛华, 张楠, 杨洁, 杜利勇. 颅内动脉侧枝循环对颈动脉内膜剥脱术安全性的预测[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2017, 14(07): 506-511.
[2] 张小艳, 郝晓凤, 谢立科. 眼缺血综合征的研究进展[J]. 中华眼科医学杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(03): 183-187.
[3] 张馨月, 韩帅, 张舒石, 李文臣, 张舒岩. 颅内压监测技术在创伤性颅脑损伤治疗中的应用[J]. 中华神经创伤外科电子杂志, 2023, 09(04): 246-252.
[4] 费舟. 强化多模态监测加重继发性脑损伤的危险因素[J]. 中华神经创伤外科电子杂志, 2021, 07(03): 129-131.
[5] 钱海. 颈动脉内膜剥脱术治疗轻-中度颈动脉狭窄的临床应用[J]. 中华脑科疾病与康复杂志(电子版), 2022, 12(04): 253-255.
[6] 张红伟, 林爱龙, 王志涛, 余志鹄, 郭愿, 刘建新. 剪切波弹性成像技术检测颈动脉斑块不同位置杨氏模量在颈动脉内膜剥脱术前、后一致性的对比研究[J]. 中华脑科疾病与康复杂志(电子版), 2021, 11(06): 349-352.
[7] 陈礼刚. 磁共振技术在三叉神经痛诊治的应用及对胶质瘤治疗的新思考[J]. 中华脑科疾病与康复杂志(电子版), 2019, 09(04): 256-256.
[8] 李锴, 史鹏飞, 郭亚洲, 刘霄, 王常伟, 刘禹, 何兵, 赵余涛, 刘德中. 颈动脉内膜剥脱术与颈动脉支架成形术对脑卒中防治作用的研究进展[J]. 中华脑血管病杂志(电子版), 2021, 15(05): 331-335.
[9] 肖特, 张东, 喻乐宝, 刘珊珊. 颈动脉内膜剥脱术围手术期脑血管事件分析[J]. 中华脑血管病杂志(电子版), 2020, 14(04): 226-229.
阅读次数
全文


摘要