切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华脑科疾病与康复杂志(电子版) ›› 2021, Vol. 11 ›› Issue (03) : 147 -152. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-123X.2021.03.004

临床研究

前床突脑膜瘤术后并发症的分析与防治
陈立华1, 夏勇1, 魏帆1, 孙恺1, 陈文锦1, 张洪钿1, 徐如祥1,()   
  1. 1. 610072 成都,四川省医学科学院·四川省人民医院神经外科
  • 收稿日期:2021-05-16 出版日期:2021-06-15
  • 通信作者: 徐如祥

Analysis and prevention of postoperative complications of anterior clinoid meningioma

Lihua Chen1, Yong Xia1, Fan Wei1, Kai Sun1, Wenjin Chen1, Hongtian Zhang1, Ruxiang Xu1,()   

  1. 1. Department of Neurosurgery, Sichuan Academy of Medical Sciences and Sichuan Provincial People’s Hospital, Chengdu 610072, China
  • Received:2021-05-16 Published:2021-06-15
  • Corresponding author: Ruxiang Xu
引用本文:

陈立华, 夏勇, 魏帆, 孙恺, 陈文锦, 张洪钿, 徐如祥. 前床突脑膜瘤术后并发症的分析与防治[J]. 中华脑科疾病与康复杂志(电子版), 2021, 11(03): 147-152.

Lihua Chen, Yong Xia, Fan Wei, Kai Sun, Wenjin Chen, Hongtian Zhang, Ruxiang Xu. Analysis and prevention of postoperative complications of anterior clinoid meningioma[J]. Chinese Journal of Brain Diseases and Rehabilitation(Electronic Edition), 2021, 11(03): 147-152.

目的

探讨前床突脑膜瘤(ACM)手术并发症的防治策略。

方法

回顾性分析自1999年7月至2021年6月经笔者治疗的63例ACM患者的临床资料。在Al-Mefty分型标准的基础上将ACM分为4型。根据术前影像学检查,Ⅰ型肿瘤7例(11.1%),Ⅱ型肿瘤39例(61.9%),Ⅲ型肿瘤5例(7.9%),Ⅳ型12例(19.0%)。根据术前肿瘤分型采取相应的措施防治并发症,分析影响术后并发症的主要因素。

结果

术后25例患者出现不同程度的并发症,其中13例较严重。主要并发症有视力恶化5例(7.94%),术后早期动眼神经麻痹3例(4.76%),术后轻偏瘫4例(6.35%),术后颅内感染1例(1.59%)。术后主要并发症总发生率为20.63%(13/63),术后永久性并发症发生率为6.35%(4/63)。无死亡病例。单因素分析结果显示,肿瘤的类型、大小、肿瘤与血管的关系分级和累及海绵窦是术后并发症的影响因素。

结论

ACM的全切除应采取积极谨慎的态度。依据不同类型的肿瘤特点制定详细的手术计划,术中采用合适的手术技巧,是减少手术并发症、改善整体预后的保障。

Objective

To explore the prevention and treatment of surgical complications of anterior clinoid meningioma (ACM).

Methods

The clinical data of 63 patients with ACM treated by Chen Lihua from July 1999 to June 2021 were analyzed retrospectively. On the basis of Al-Mefty classification standard, ACM was divided into 4 types. According to the preoperative imaging examination, there were 7 cases (11.1%) of type Ⅰ tumors, 39 cases (61.9%) of type Ⅱ tumors, 5 cases (7.9%) of type Ⅲ tumors and 12 cases (19.0%) of type Ⅳ tumors. According to the preoperative tumor classification, corresponding measures were taken to prevent and treat complications, and the main factors affecting postoperative complications were analyzed.

Results

Twenty-five patients had different degrees of complications after surgery, iof which 13 were more serious. The main complications were vision deterioration in 5 cases (7.94%), early oculomotor paralysis in 3 cases (4.76%), light hemiparesis in 4 cases (6.35%) and intracranial infection in 1 case (1.59%). The total incidence of major complications after surgery was 20.6% (13/63), and 6.35% (4/63) for permanent complications. There were no deaths. The univariate analysis showed that the type of tumor, the size of the tumor, the grade of the relationship between tumor and vessels, and the involvement of the cavernous sinus were the main factors affecting postoperative complications.

Conclusion

The total resection of ACM should take a positive and cautious attitude. According to the characteristics of different types of ACM, making a detailed surgical plan and using appropriate surgical techniques during the operation are the guarantee of reducing surgical complications and improving the overall prognosis.

表1 前床突脑膜瘤与重要神经血管结构的关系
表2 63例前床突脑膜瘤患者术后并发症统计[例(%)]
表3 63例前床突脑膜瘤患者术后并发症的影响因素分析
[1]
Mansouri A, Klironomos G, Taslimi S, et al. Surgically resected skull base meningiomas demonstrate a divergent postoperative recurrence pattern compared with non-skull base meningiomas[J]. J Neurosurg, 2016, 125(2): 431-440.
[2]
Bassiouni H, Asgari S, Sandalcioglu IE, et al. Anterior clinoidal meningiomas: functional outcome after microsurgical resection in a consecutive series of 106 patients. Clinical article[J]. J Neurosurg, 2009, 111(5): 1078-1090.
[3]
Al-Mefty O. Clinoidal meningiomas[J]. J Neurosurg, 1990, 73(6): 840-849.
[4]
Prosser JD, Vender JR, Alleyne CH, et al. Expanded endoscopic endonasal approaches to skull base meningiomas[J]. J Neurol Surg B Skull Base, 2012, 73(3): 147-156.
[5]
Wong AK, Eddelman DB, Kramer DE, et al. Surgical resection of clinoidal meningiomas without routine use of clinoidectomy[J]. World Neurosurg, 2021, 146: e467-e472.
[6]
Kim JH, Jang WY, Jung TY, et al. Predictive factors for surgical outcome in anterior clinoidal meningiomas: analysis of 59 consecutive surgically treated cases[J]. Medicine (Baltimore), 2017, 96(15): e6594.
[7]
Abdel-Aziz KM, Froelich SC, Dagnew E, et al. Large sphenoid wing meningiomas involving the cavernous sinus: conservative surgical strategies for better functional outcomes[J]. Neurosurgery, 2004, 54(6): 1375-1384.
[8]
Hao S, Tian R, Wu Z, et al. Clinical characteristics and prognosis factors analysis for post-operative ptosis of sphenocavernous meningiomas: a single institution study[J]. Clin Neurol Neurosurg, 2015, 131: 35-41.
[9]
Gozal YM, Alzhrani G, Abou-Al-Shaar H, et al. Outcomes of decompressive surgery for cavernous sinus meningiomas: long-term follow-up in 50 patients[J]. J Neurosurg, 2020, 132(2): 380-387.
[10]
Tomasello F, de Divitiis O, Angileri FF, et al. Large sphenocavernous meningiomas: is there still a role for the intradural approach via the pterional-transsylvian route?[J]. Acta Neurochir (Wien), 2003, 145(4): 273-282.
[11]
Spektor S, Dotan S, Mizrahi CJ. Safety of drilling for clinoidectomy and optic canal unroofing in anterior skull base surgery[J]. Acta Neurochir (Wien), 2013, 155(6): 1017-1024.
[12]
Akyoldaş G, Hergünsel ÖB, Yılmaz M, et al. Gamma knife radiosurgery for anterior clinoid process meningiomas: a series of 61 consecutive patients[J]. World Neurosurg, 2020, 133: e529-e534.
[13]
Xu T, Yan Y, Evins AI, et al. Anterior clinoidal meningiomas: meningeal anatomical considerations and surgical implications[J]. Front Oncol, 2020, 10: 634.
[14]
Behari S, Giri PJ, Shukla D, et al. Surgical strategies for giant medial sphenoid wing meningiomas: a new scoring system for predicting extent of resection[J]. Acta Neurochir (Wien), 2008, 150(9): 865-877.
[15]
Risi P, Uske A, de Tribolet N. Meningiomas involving the anterior clinoid process[J]. Br J Neurosurg, 1994, 8(3): 295-305.
[1] 郑恢超, 王李, 童卫东, 黄彬, 田跃, 赵松, 高羽, 李凡, 刘宝华. 经肛微创手术(TAMIS)与经肛内镜显微手术(TEM)在直肠肿瘤局部切除中的应用优劣分析[J]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2022, 11(03): 254-260.
[2] 陈立华, 夏勇, 黄宏志, 魏帆, 孙恺, 陈文锦, 徐如祥. 前床突磨除和视神经管开放对前床突脑膜瘤疗效的影响[J]. 中华神经创伤外科电子杂志, 2023, 09(03): 142-148.
[3] 李晓东. 翼点锁孔入路夹闭前循环动脉瘤[J]. 中华神经创伤外科电子杂志, 2022, 08(04): 255-256.
[4] 孙印臣, 卢青军, 王洪生, 程月飞, 孟文博. 一侧开颅摘除七个脑池内囊虫一例报道[J]. 中华神经创伤外科电子杂志, 2021, 07(02): 125-126.
[5] 徐佳, 张业韬, 陆小明. 自发性椎管内出血致脊髓损伤24例临床分析[J]. 中华神经创伤外科电子杂志, 2021, 07(01): 46-50.
[6] 陈立华, 夏勇, 魏帆, 孙恺, 黄宏志. 前床突脑膜瘤术后视力的影响因素研究[J]. 中华脑科疾病与康复杂志(电子版), 2022, 12(06): 332-337.
[7] 陈晨, 徐宏, 李政, 韩杨云. 脑室内颅内压监测在重型颅脑损伤患者围术期的应用研究[J]. 中华脑科疾病与康复杂志(电子版), 2022, 12(03): 146-151.
[8] 谢宝树, 何科君, 李西西, 杨李轩, 黄正松, 张弩. 不同岩斜区脑膜瘤手术入路的疗效分析[J]. 中华脑科疾病与康复杂志(电子版), 2022, 12(01): 38-42.
[9] 郑津, 周迎春. 颈髓内中心型神经鞘瘤的诊断与显微手术治疗二例报道并文献复习[J]. 中华脑科疾病与康复杂志(电子版), 2021, 11(06): 375-377.
[10] 陈世超, 王凯, 王作伟, 吴浩. 经外侧腹膜后入路显微手术治疗腰椎椎旁肿瘤[J]. 中华脑科疾病与康复杂志(电子版), 2021, 11(06): 366-369.
[11] 刘开东, 李劲松, 庄宗, 戴嵬, 杭春华. 前床突脑膜瘤早期硬膜外磨除前床突对视神经的保护作用[J]. 中华脑科疾病与康复杂志(电子版), 2021, 11(05): 273-276.
[12] 赵志明, 唐兆伟, 刘运锋, 邓昌武, 张聿民. 小切口经侧裂岛叶入路显微手术治疗基底节区脑出血的临床疗效分析[J]. 中华脑科疾病与康复杂志(电子版), 2021, 11(03): 168-170.
[13] 许佳恒, 林福鑫, 康德智. 脑海绵状血管畸形相关性头痛临床特征及术后疼痛缓解的相关分析[J]. 中华脑科疾病与康复杂志(电子版), 2021, 11(02): 83-91.
[14] 沈书廷, 马飞虎, 龙翔, 牧仁, 王建武, 钱磊, 刘俊鹏, 孟宪东, 张宗林. 高血压性脑出血分型及外科治疗方法选择的探讨[J]. 中华脑科疾病与康复杂志(电子版), 2020, 10(05): 309-315.
[15] 丰育功, 郭品, 张洪亮, 成磊, 朱蒙, 崔振文, 王君涛, 刘学军, 李环廷, 栗世方. 症状性颈动脉狭窄的显微手术方式选择与疗效分析[J]. 中华脑血管病杂志(电子版), 2022, 16(06): 379-384.
阅读次数
全文


摘要