切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华脑科疾病与康复杂志(电子版) ›› 2025, Vol. 15 ›› Issue (02) : 81 -84. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-123X.2025.02.003

功能神经外科

根治性神经切除术治疗耳颞神经源性顽固性偏头痛的效果分析
杨文强1, 王琦1, 李爱民1, 敖日格勒2, 于炎冰1, 张黎1,()   
  1. 1. 100029 北京,中日友好医院神经外科
    2. 010030 呼和浩特,内蒙古医科大学附属医院神经外科
  • 收稿日期:2025-02-27 出版日期:2025-04-15
  • 通信作者: 张黎
  • 基金资助:
    国家重点研发计划(2022YFC2402500)北京市自然科学基金-昌平创新联合基金项目(L244029)中央高水平医院临床科研业务费资助(2022-NHLHCRF-YS-05)

Efficacy analysis of radical neurectomy in the treatment of intractable auriculotemporal neurogenic migraine

Wenqiang Yang1, Qi Wang1, Aimin Li1, Ri Gele Ao2, Yanbing Yu1, Li Zhang1,()   

  1. 1. Department of Neurosurgery, China-Japan Friendship Hospital, Beijing 100029, China
    2. Department of Neurosurgery,Affiliated Hospital of Inner Mongolia Medical University, Hohhot 010030, China
  • Received:2025-02-27 Published:2025-04-15
  • Corresponding author: Li Zhang
引用本文:

杨文强, 王琦, 李爱民, 敖日格勒, 于炎冰, 张黎. 根治性神经切除术治疗耳颞神经源性顽固性偏头痛的效果分析[J/OL]. 中华脑科疾病与康复杂志(电子版), 2025, 15(02): 81-84.

Wenqiang Yang, Qi Wang, Aimin Li, Ri Gele Ao, Yanbing Yu, Li Zhang. Efficacy analysis of radical neurectomy in the treatment of intractable auriculotemporal neurogenic migraine[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Brain Diseases and Rehabilitation(Electronic Edition), 2025, 15(02): 81-84.

目的

探讨根治性神经切除手术对于耳颞神经源性顽固性偏头痛的疗效。

方法

回顾性分析中日友好医院神经外科自2022年1月至2023年1月行根治性耳颞神经切除术治疗的32例耳颞神经源性顽固性偏头痛患者的临床资料,术后随访2年,比较患者手术前后的疼痛缓解和麻木情况、整体满意度、症状复发及转归情况。

结果

(1)疼痛评分:所有患者术后疼痛数字量表(NRS)评分[0.5(0,2)分]较术前[8(8,9)分]明显降低,差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05);随访2年,NRS评分为0(0,1)分。(2)麻木评分:所有患者术后视觉模拟量表(VAS)评分[6(5,7)分]较术前[0(0,0)分]明显升高,差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05);随访2年,VAS评分为[3(2,3.75)分]。(3)整体满意度:术后手术满意度为34.38%(11/32),术后3个月提升至84.38%(27/32),术后2年的手术满意度为93.75%(30/32)。(4)术后1年复发1例,为神经残端微小神经瘤形成,二次手术切除神经瘤后,症状缓解。

结论

根治性神经切除术是治疗耳颞神经源性顽固性偏头痛的有效方法。

Objective

To investigate the effect of radical nerve resection on intractable auriculotemporal migraine.

Methods

The clinical data of 32 patients with intractable auriculotemporal neurogenic migraine who underwent radical auriculotemporal neuroresection treatment in the Department of Neurosurgery of China-Japan Friendship Hospital from January 2022 to January 2023 were retrospectively analyzed. All patients were followed up for 2 years after surgery. Pre- and postoperative comparisons were made regarding pain relief, numbness status, overall surgical satisfaction, as well as symptom recurrence and outcomes.

Results

(1) Pain score: The numerical rating scale (NRS) score immediately after surgery was 0.5 (0, 2), which was significantly lower than the preoperative NRS score of 8 (8, 9), and the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05); After 2 years of follow-up, the NRS score was 0 (0, 1) points. (2) Numbness score: The visual analogue scale (VAS) score of 6 (5, 7) immediately after surgery was significantly higher than that of 0 (0, 0) before surgery, and the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05); After 2 years of follow-up, the VAS score was 3 (2, 3.75). (3) Overall satisfaction: The postoperative satisfaction rate was 34.38% (11/32), and after 3 months, the surgical satisfaction rate increased to 84.38% (27/32). After 2 years of follow-up, the surgical satisfaction rate was 93.75% (30/32). (4) There was one recurrence 1 year after operation, which was the formation of a small neuroma at the nerve stump. After the second operation, the symptoms were relieved.

Conclusions

Radical neurotomy is an effective method for the treatment of intractable auriculotemporal neurogenic migraine.

表1 32例耳颞神经源性顽固性偏头痛患者术前及随访的临床指标
Tab.1 Clinical indicators of 32 patients with intractable auriculotemporal neurogenic migraine before and after surgery and during follow-up
[1]
中华医学会疼痛学分会头面痛学组, 中国医师协会神经内科医师分会疼痛和感觉障碍专委会. 中国偏头痛防治指南[J]. 中国疼痛医学杂志, 2016, 22(10): 721-727. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-9852.2016.10.001.Head and Face Pain Group of Pain Society of Chinese Medical Association, Special Committee of Pain and Sensory Disorders,Neurologist Branch, Chinese Medical Doctor Association. Treatment guideline of migraine in China[J]. Chinese Journal of Pain Medicine,2016, 22(10): 721-727. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1006 9852.2016.10.001
[2]
Aguilar-Shea AL, Membrilla Md JA, Diaz-de-Teran J. Migraine review for general practice[J]. Aten Primaria, 2022, 54(2):102208. DOI: 10.1016/j.aprim.2021.102208.
[3]
Flynn O, Fullen BM, Blake C. Migraine in university students: a systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. Eur J Pain, 2023, 27(1):14-43. DOI: 10.1002/ejp.2047.
[4]
Guyuron B. The evolution of migraine surgery: two decades of continual research. My current thoughts[J]. Plast Reconstr Surg,2021, 147(6): 1414-1419. DOI: 10.1097/prs.0000000000007979.
[5]
潘海鹏, 王嗣嵩, 张黎. 枕大神经微创减压术治疗枕大神经源性顽固性偏头痛的效果分析[J]. 中华神经医学杂志, 2022, 21(3): 284-287. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn115354-20210812-00501.Pan HP, Wang SS, Zhang L. Therapeutic effect of great occipital nerve decompression on great occipital neurogenic intractable migraine[J]. Chin J Neuromed, 2022, 21(3): 284-287. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn115354-20210812-00501.
[6]
GBD 2016 Headache Collaborators. Global, regional, and national burden of migraine and tension-type headache, 1990-2016: a systematic analysis for the global burden of disease study 2016[J].Lancet Neurol, 2018, 17(11): 954-976. DOI: 10.1016/s1474-4422(18)30322-3.
[7]
Ferrari MD, Goadsby PJ, Burstein R, et al. Migraine[J]. Nat Rev Dis Primers, 2022, 8(1): 2. DOI: 10.1038/s41572-021-00328-4.
[8]
Guyuron B, Varghai A, Michelow BJ, et al. Corrugator supercilii muscle resection and migraine headaches[J]. Plast Reconstr Surg,2000, 106(2): 429-437. DOI: 10.1097/00006534-200008000-00030.
[9]
Totonchi A, Guyuron B, Ansari H. Surgical options for migraine:an overview[J]. Neurol India, 2021, 69(Suppl): S105-S109. DOI:10.4103/0028-3886.315999.
[10]
Gfrerer L, Guyuron B. Surgical treatment of migraine headaches[J]. Acta Neurol Belg, 2017, 117(1): 27-32. DOI: 10.1007/s13760-016-0731-1.
[11]
Guyuron B, Nahabet E, Khansa I, et al. The current means for detection of migraine headache trigger sites[J]. Plast Reconstr Surg, 2015, 136(4): 860-867. DOI: 10.1097/prs.0000000000001572.
[12]
Guyuron B, Harvey D, Reed D. A prospective randomized outcomes comparison of two temple migraine trigger site deactivation techniques[J]. Plast Reconstr Surg, 2015, 136(1): 159-165. DOI:10.1097/prs.0000000000001322.
[13]
张黎. 周围神经减压术与周围神经源性疼痛[J]. 中华神经创伤外科电子杂志, 2023, 9(1): 1-6. DOI: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-9141.2023.01.001.Zhang L. Peripheral neuropathic pain and peripheral nerve decompression[J]. Chin J Neurotrauma Surg (Electronic Edition),2023, 9(1): 1-6. DOI: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-9141.2023.01.001.
[1] 王昭雨, 姜军. 乳腺癌外科治疗理论和技术的发展与挑战[J/OL]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 1-5.
[2] 吉王明, 张涛, 程宇, 周丁华, 吕伟. 加速康复外科理念在胃癌根治性切除术中的应用[J/OL]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2020, 15(06): 434-440.
[3] 马铭秀, 徐锋, 谢铠岭, 郭亚明, 卢潼辉, 戴朝六. 术前碱性磷酸酶-前白蛋白比值对肝细胞癌切除术预后的评估价值[J/OL]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2023, 17(02): 99-103.
[4] 郑泽坤, 刘卓恒, 邹浩, 胡会元, 李妲, 吴巍. 扩大根治性手术切除复发性巨大腹膜后去分化脂肪肉瘤1例[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 588-590.
[5] 郑泽坤, 戴勇, 陈卓, 吴巍. 根治性手术切除罕见的巨大胃肠间质瘤一例[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(02): 235-236.
[6] 卢晓云, 王继伟, 谢铭. 中国腹腔镜右半结肠癌根治淋巴结清扫范围的争议与思考[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2022, 16(05): 487-491.
[7] 邱小原, 林国乐. 直肠癌根治术中保护性肠造口相关问题探讨[J/OL]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2022, 11(05): 420-424.
[8] 汤天津, 于炎冰, 张黎. 周围神经电刺激的临床应用与研究进展[J/OL]. 中华脑科疾病与康复杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(01): 51-55.
[9] 王思达, 周松, 谢春成. 慢性偏头痛的外科治疗体会[J/OL]. 中华脑科疾病与康复杂志(电子版), 2021, 11(01): 38-40.
[10] 任骥, 王嗣嵩, 熊建平, 郑宏伟, 潘海鹏. 偏头痛非药物治疗研究进展[J/OL]. 中华脑科疾病与康复杂志(电子版), 2021, 11(01): 31-34.
[11] 王嗣嵩, 任骥, 熊建平, 郑宏伟, 陈昌平, 孙华东, 陈永军, 张桓, 冯文, 潘海鹏. 肉毒杆菌毒素A型治疗慢性偏头痛的疗效分析(附47例报道)[J/OL]. 中华脑科疾病与康复杂志(电子版), 2021, 11(01): 9-13.
[12] 孙秀艳, 徐庆蕾, 马鹏涛, 胡志元, 郭传真, 祝成红. 腹腔镜胃癌根治术中患者体温变化与压力性损伤及受压部位微环境的相关性分析[J/OL]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(06): 480-484.
[13] 林大卫, 周达新. 卵圆孔未闭研究现状与进展[J/OL]. 中华心脏与心律电子杂志, 2024, 12(02): 65-71.
[14] 张祉昱, 裴月红, 于玲, 王军, 傅瑜. 偏头痛前驱症状临床表型及其病理生理机制探讨[J/OL]. 中华脑血管病杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 64-70.
[15] 于玲, 张祉昱, 张喆, 傅瑜. 偏头痛常见诱因及其在疾病管理中的应用研究进展[J/OL]. 中华脑血管病杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(04): 400-403.
阅读次数
全文


摘要


AI


AI小编
你好!我是《中华医学电子期刊资源库》AI小编,有什么可以帮您的吗?