切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华脑科疾病与康复杂志(电子版) ›› 2022, Vol. 12 ›› Issue (05) : 285 -290. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-123X.2022.05.006

临床研究

高频重复经颅磁刺激联合肌电生物反馈治疗脑卒中后吞咽障碍的临床研究
张建萍1, 邓海鹏1,(), 焦黛妍1, 赵洁1   
  1. 1. 226600 江苏海安,南通大学附属海安医院康复医学科
  • 收稿日期:2022-04-15 出版日期:2022-10-15
  • 通信作者: 邓海鹏
  • 基金资助:
    南通市科技计划项目(MSZ20094)

Clinical study of high frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation combined with muscle electrobiofeedback in the treatment of dysphagia after stroke

Jianping Zhang1, Haipeng Deng1,(), Daiyan Jiao1, Jie Zhao1   

  1. 1. Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Hai'an Hospital Affiliated to Nantong University, Hai'an 226600, China
  • Received:2022-04-15 Published:2022-10-15
  • Corresponding author: Haipeng Deng
引用本文:

张建萍, 邓海鹏, 焦黛妍, 赵洁. 高频重复经颅磁刺激联合肌电生物反馈治疗脑卒中后吞咽障碍的临床研究[J/OL]. 中华脑科疾病与康复杂志(电子版), 2022, 12(05): 285-290.

Jianping Zhang, Haipeng Deng, Daiyan Jiao, Jie Zhao. Clinical study of high frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation combined with muscle electrobiofeedback in the treatment of dysphagia after stroke[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Brain Diseases and Rehabilitation(Electronic Edition), 2022, 12(05): 285-290.

目的

探讨高频重复经颅磁刺激(rTMS)联合肌电生物反馈治疗脑卒中后吞咽障碍的临床疗效。

方法

选取南通大学附属海安医院康复医学科自2018年7月至2021年7月收治的128例脑卒中后吞咽障碍患者,按随机数字表法分为A组、B组、C组、D组,每组32例。A组进行常规吞咽训练,B、C、D组在A组基础上分别进行肌电生物反馈治疗、高频rTMS治疗、高频rTMS联合肌电生物反馈治疗。对比4组患者治疗前后标准吞咽功能评定量表(SSA)评分、舌喉复合体移动度(包括舌骨上移、舌骨前移、甲状软骨上移、甲状软骨前移)、舌骨上肌群肌电活动均方根(RMS)值、吞咽生活质量量表(SWAL-QOL)评分以及临床疗效,并记录患者的不良反应。

结果

治疗后,4组患者的SSA评分均较治疗前下降,且B、C、D组均低于A组,D组均低于B、C组,差异均具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。治疗后,4组患者的舌骨和甲状软骨上移度及前移度、舌骨上肌群RMS值均较治疗前提高,且B、C、D组均高于A组,D组高于B、C组,差异均具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。治疗后,4组患者的SWAL-QOL评分均较治疗前升高(P<0.05),且B、C、D组均高于A组(P<0.05),D组高于B、C组,差异均具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。4组患者的临床疗效分布差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);D组总有效率高于A组,差异具有统计学意义(P<0.01)。4组患者均未出现严重不良反应。

结论

高频rTMS联合肌电生物反馈治疗脑卒中后吞咽障碍能增加患者舌喉部肌肉运动,提高舌喉复合体移动度,改善吞咽障碍,提高患者生活质量,效果显著。

Objective

To investigate the clinical efficacy of high frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) combined with muscle electrobiofeedback in the treatment of dysphagia after stroke.

Methods

One hundred and twenty-eight patients with dysphagia after stroke admitted by Rehabilitation Medicine Department of Hai'an Hospital Affiliated to Nantong University from July 2018 to July 2021 were selected and randomly divided into group A, group B, group C and group D, with 32 cases in each group. Group A received routine swallowing training. Group B, C and D received muscle electrobiofeedback therapy, high frequency rTMS therapy, and high frequency rTMS combined with muscle electrobiofeedback therapy on the basis of group A. The scores of standard swallowing assessment (SSA) scale, and the lingual laryngeal complex mobilities (including hyoid bone upward movement, hyoid bone forward movement, thyroid cartilage upward movement, thyroid cartilage forward movement), root meam square (RMS) of electromyographic activity of suprahyoid muscle group, the scores of swallowing quality of life (SWAL-QOL) and the clinical efficacy of the 4 groups were compared before, after treatment. Adverse reactions of patients were recorded.

Results

After treatment, the SSA scores of the 4 groups were lower than those before treatment (P<0.05). After treatment, the SSA scores of group B, C and D were lower than those of group A (P<0.05), and the SSA score of group D were lower than that of group B and C (P<0.05). After treatment, the degree of upward and forward displacement of hyoid bone and thyroid cartilage and the RMS value of suprahyoid muscle group of the 4 groups were higher than those before treatment (P<0.05). After treatment, the degree of upward and forward displacement of hyoid bone and thyroid cartilage and the RMS value of suprahyoid muscle group in group B, C and D were higher than those in group A (P<0.05), and the degree of upward and forward displacement of hyoid bone and thyroid cartilage and the RMS value of suprahyoid muscle group in group D were higher than those in group B and C (P<0.05). After treatment, the scores of SWAL-QOL in the 4 groups were higher than those before treatment (P<0.05), and the scores of SWAL-QOL in groups B, C and D were higher than those in group A (P<0.05), and the scores of SWAL-QOL in group D were higher than those in groups B and C (P<0.05). There was significant difference in the distribution of clinical efficacy among the 4 groups (P<0.05), and the total effective rate in group D was higher than that in group A (P<0.01). There were no serious adverse reactions in the 4 groups.

Conclusion

High frequency rTMS combined with muscle electrobiofeedback in the treatment of dysphagia after stroke can increase the tongue and throat muscle movement, and improve the mobility of tongue and throat complex, and improve the dysphagia, and improve the quality of life of patients.

表1 4组患者一般资料比较
表2 4组患者治疗前后SSA评分比较(分,Mean±SD)
表3 4组患者治疗前后舌喉复合体移动度比较(mm,Mean±SD)
表4 4组患者治疗前后舌骨上肌群RMS值比较(μV,Mean±SD)
表5 4组患者治疗前后SWAL-QOL评分比较(分,Mean±SD)
表6 4组患者临床疗效比较[例(%)]
[1]
李宇辉,张静,王颖颖,等.多学科协作营养管理模式在急性脑卒中伴吞咽障碍患者中的应用效果评价[J].中华临床营养杂志, 2021, 29(1): 14-21.
[2]
Terré R. Oropharyngeal dysphagia in stroke: diagnostic and therapeutic aspects[J]. Rev Neurol, 2020, 70(12): 444-452.
[3]
Arnold RJ, Bausek N. Effect of respiratory muscle training on dysphagia in stroke patients-a retrospective pilot study[J]. Laryngoscope Investig Otolaryngol, 2020, 5(6): 1050-1055.
[4]
Oh DH, Park JS, Kim HJ, et al. The effect of neuromuscular electrical stimulation with different electrode positions on swallowing in stroke patients with oropharyngeal dysphagia: a randomized trial[J]. J Back Musculoskelet Rehabil, 2020, 33(4): 637-644.
[5]
Alamer A, Melese H, Nigussie F. Effectiveness of neuromuscular electrical stimulation on post-stroke dysphagia: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials[J]. Clin Interv Aging, 2020, 3(15): 1521-1531.
[6]
Wang ZY, Chen JM, Lin ZK, et al. Transcranial direct current stimulation improves the swallowing function in patients with cricopharyngeal muscle dysfunction following a brainstem stroke[J]. Neurol Sci, 2020, 41(3): 569-574.
[7]
Li Y, Feng H, Li J, et al. The effect of transcranial direct current stimulation of pharyngeal motor cortex on swallowing function in patients with chronic dysphagia after stroke: a retrospective cohort study[J]. Medicine (Baltimore), 2020, 99(10): e19121.
[8]
中华医学会神经病学分会脑血管病学组急性缺血性脑卒中诊治指南撰写组.中国急性缺血性脑卒中诊治指南2010[J].中国全科医学, 2011, 14(35): 4013-4017.
[9]
Brodsky MB, Suiter DM, González-Fernández M, et al. Screening accuracy for aspiration using bedside water swallow tests: a systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. Chest, 2016 150(1): 148-163.
[10]
徐邵红,田闪,胡瑞萍,等.脑卒中吞咽障碍康复治疗的客观疗效与主观疗效差异性分析[J].康复学报, 2016, 26(5): 17-20.
[11]
吕铭新.低频电刺激联合高压氧对脑梗死后吞咽障碍的疗效观察[J].神经损伤与功能重建, 2015, 10(6): 514-516.
[12]
李洪艳,朱茜,陈伟,等.多学科管理在脑卒中吞咽障碍患者中的应用[J].中华物理医学与康复杂志, 2021, 43(3): 259-261.
[13]
Im S, Han YJ, Kim SH, et al. Role of bilateral corticobulbar tracts in dysphagia after middle cerebral artery stroke[J]. Eur J Neurol, 2020, 27(11): 2158-2167.
[14]
Hägglund P, Hägg M, Levring Jäghagen E, et al. Oral neuromuscular training in patients with dysphagia after stroke: a prospective, randomized, open-label study with blinded evaluators[J]. BMC Neurol, 2020, 20(1): 405.
[15]
Marchina S, Pisegna JM, Massaro JM, et al. Transcranial direct current stimulation for post-stroke dysphagia: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials[J]. J Neurol, 2021, 268(1): 293-304.
[16]
王曈,孟萍萍,董凌辉,等.双侧大脑半球高频重复经颅磁刺激对脑卒中后吞咽障碍的影响[J].中华物理医学与康复杂志, 2021, 43(4): 306-310.
[17]
Cheng I, Scarlett H, Zhang M, et al. Preconditioning human pharyngeal motor cortex enhances directional metaplasticity induced by repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation[J]. J Physiol, 2020, 598(22): 5213-5230.
[18]
顾怡雯,舒锦.表面肌电生物反馈与神经肌肉电刺激对脑卒中吞咽障碍疗效及生活质量的影响[J].中国康复, 2021, 36(10): 599-603.
[19]
Archer SK, Smith CH, Newham DJ. Surface electromyographic biofeedback and the effortful swallow exercise for stroke-related dysphagia and in healthy ageing[J]. Dysphagia, 2021, 36(2): 281-292.
[20]
Sasegbon A, Niziolek N, Zhang M, et al. The effects of midline cerebellar rTMS on human pharyngeal cortical activity in the intact swallowing motor system[J]. Cerebellum, 2021, 20(1): 101-115.
[21]
Galek KE, Bice EM. The influence of surface electromyography visual and clinician verbal feedback on swallow effort ratio at different bolus volumes in a healthy population[J]. Folia Phoniatr Logop, 2021, 73(6): 449-454.
[1] 张怡, 王宇洋, 司梦娇, 曹燕, 李欢欢. 脑卒中前白蛋白与肺炎发生风险相关性分析[J/OL]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2024, 17(04): 648-651.
[2] 杨金朔, 吴桥伟, 王春雷, 史怀璋. 脑血管内支架成形术后再狭窄的研究进展[J/OL]. 中华神经创伤外科电子杂志, 2024, 10(03): 174-179.
[3] 江西省神经外科质量控制中心. 江西省心源性脑卒中多学科协作防治专家共识[J/OL]. 中华脑科疾病与康复杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(05): 264-277.
[4] 张洪, 杨琪, 罗静, 唐茜, 邓鸿, 巩文艳, 王丽坤, 刘静, 艾双春. 多靶点神经调控技术对卒中后上肢运动功能障碍患者的脑网络功能连接研究[J/OL]. 中华脑科疾病与康复杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(05): 278-284.
[5] 许方军, 曹晓光, 王修敏, 王婷, 陈冬冬, 余程冬, 张鹤言. 基于闭环理论的动作观察疗法联合躯干控制训练对脑卒中后下肢运动的影响[J/OL]. 中华脑科疾病与康复杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(05): 292-299.
[6] 张雅文, 尹昱, 陈江龙, 杨玉慧, 吕红香, 张琦, 吕佩源. Theta爆发式经颅磁刺激治疗失语症的研究进展[J/OL]. 中华脑科疾病与康复杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(05): 306-311.
[7] 陈冬冬, 余程冬, 曹晓光. 上肢外骨骼机器人在脑卒中康复中的应用与研究进展[J/OL]. 中华脑科疾病与康复杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(05): 312-317.
[8] 吉莉, 苏云楠, 王斌, 沈滔, 刘团结, 毛蕾, 徐玉萍, 张婷, 王博. 急性缺血性脑卒中患者脑白质微结构改变对长期认知功能损伤的预测价值研究[J/OL]. 中华脑科疾病与康复杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(04): 193-200.
[9] 刘丹, 郭庆伟, 孙小洁, 樊小农, 刘继华, 冀来喜. "通关利窍"针刺法治疗卒中后吞咽障碍的主穴定位解剖学研究[J/OL]. 中华针灸电子杂志, 2024, 13(03): 102-106.
[10] 李璇, 邓岚, 郭微, 邓永梅, 刘杰昕. 标准化皮肤管理流程在防治脑卒中患者失禁相关性皮炎中的应用[J/OL]. 中华脑血管病杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 479-482.
[11] 刘志超, 胡风云, 温春丽. 山西省脑卒中危险因素与地域的相关性分析[J/OL]. 中华脑血管病杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 424-433.
[12] 王丽娜, 吕书霞, 李亚男. 脑卒中偏瘫患者健康焦虑元认知与疾病接受度、恐惧疾病进展的相关性[J/OL]. 中华脑血管病杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 434-440.
[13] 李芳, 戴西望, 王凯, 郭廷昊, 涂江龙. 非瓣膜性心房颤动相关性卒中的治疗研究进展[J/OL]. 中华脑血管病杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(04): 393-397.
[14] 周洪千, 张煜坤, 顾天舒, 胡苏涛, 姜超, 张雪, 张昊, 陶华岳, 刘行, 刘彤, 陈康寅. 既往出血性脑卒中患者行经皮冠脉介入治疗后不良事件的危险因素分析[J/OL]. 中华脑血管病杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(04): 323-329.
[15] 邓越, 白鹏, 洪秋阳, 王桂玲. 颈部七线调衡疗法探析并病例汇报一例[J/OL]. 中华脑血管病杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(04): 345-349.
阅读次数
全文


摘要