切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华脑科疾病与康复杂志(电子版) ›› 2020, Vol. 10 ›› Issue (06) : 352 -356. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-123X.2020.06.008

所属专题: 文献

临床研究

作用于小脑的低频rTMS对后循环缺血卒中患者的下肢运动功能及皮层兴奋性的影响
段强1, 孙良文1, 韦春霞1, 卢敏1, 余凤立1, 黄杰1, 黄肖群1,()   
  1. 1. 443000 湖北宜昌,宜昌市第一人民医院康复医学科
  • 收稿日期:2020-10-16 出版日期:2020-12-15
  • 通信作者: 黄肖群
  • 基金资助:
    湖北省自然科学基金面上项目(2020CFB756); 湖北省宜昌市科技局科技计划项目(A9-301-21); 三峡大学科学基金青年科学基金项目(KJ2018A006)

Effect of cerebellar low frequency rTMS on lower lamb motor function and cortical excitability in patients with posterior circulation stroke

Qiang Duan1, Liangwen Sun1, Chunxia Wei1, Min Lu1, Fengli Yu1, Jie Huang1, Xiaoqun Huang1,()   

  1. 1. Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, The First People’s Hospital of Yichang, Yichang 443000, China
  • Received:2020-10-16 Published:2020-12-15
  • Corresponding author: Xiaoqun Huang
引用本文:

段强, 孙良文, 韦春霞, 卢敏, 余凤立, 黄杰, 黄肖群. 作用于小脑的低频rTMS对后循环缺血卒中患者的下肢运动功能及皮层兴奋性的影响[J]. 中华脑科疾病与康复杂志(电子版), 2020, 10(06): 352-356.

Qiang Duan, Liangwen Sun, Chunxia Wei, Min Lu, Fengli Yu, Jie Huang, Xiaoqun Huang. Effect of cerebellar low frequency rTMS on lower lamb motor function and cortical excitability in patients with posterior circulation stroke[J]. Chinese Journal of Brain Diseases and Rehabilitation(Electronic Edition), 2020, 10(06): 352-356.

目的

探究作用于小脑的重复经颅磁刺激(rTMS)对后循环缺血性卒中(PCS)患者下肢运动功能的临床疗效和大脑皮层兴奋性变化,并初步探讨其作用机制。

方法

收集宜昌市第一人民医院康复医学科自2019年1月至12月收治的27例PCS患者,按照随机数字表法分为治疗组(13例)与对照组(14例)。2组患者均接受常规物理治疗,治疗组再此基础上给予rTMS治疗,刺激部位为健侧小脑(体表定位为枕骨粗隆旁开3 cm、下移1 cm处),重复频率为1 Hz,80%静息运动阈值(RMT),刺激数为1600个,每天1次,连续4周;对照组的刺激参数与治疗组一样,但仅有声音提示。分别在治疗前、治疗4周后采用Fugl-Meyer运动量表(FMA)、Fugl-Meyer平衡量表(FMBS)和威斯康星步态量表(WGS)对患者进行功能评估,同时检测患者的RMT、皮层运动诱发电位(MEP)波幅的变化,并将运动功能改善与皮层兴奋性的变化进行相关性分析。

结果

治疗4周后,2组患者的FMA、FMBS及WGS评分均有不同程度的提高,RMT降低、MEP波幅增高(P<0.05);与对照组相比,治疗组RMT和MEP波幅的改变更明显(P<0.05)。进一步研究发现,FMBS的改善程度与RMT的变化呈负相关(P<0.05)。

结论

作用于小脑的低频rTMS能有效改善后循环卒中患者的下肢运动功能,其机制可能与其增加了大脑的皮层兴奋性有关。

Objective

To observe the effects of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) on lower extremity motor function and cerebral cortex excitability in patients with posterior circulation stroke(PCS), and to explore its mechanism.

Methods

Twenty-seven stroke patients with PCS, admitted to Rehabilitation Medicine Department of The First People’s Hospital of Yichang from January to December 2019, were randomly divided into treatment group (n=13) and control group (n=14). Patients in both groups received routine physiotherapy, and the patients in the treatment group were treated with rTMS. The stimulation site was the contralateral cerebellum (the body surface was located at the site of 3 cm adjacent to the trochanter of the occipital bone and moved downward to 1 cm), the repetition rate was 80% resting motor threshold (RMT), and the number of stimuli was 1600, once a day for 4 consecutive weeks. The stimulation parameters of the control group were the same as those of the treatment group, but only sound cues. Fugl-Meyer motor scale (FMA), Fugl-Meyer balance scale (FMBS) and Wisconsin gait scale (WGS) walking function were used to evaluate the function of the patients before and 4 weeks after treatment. At the same time, the changes of RMT and cortical motor evoked potential (MEP) amplitude were measured, and the correlation between the improvement of motor function and cortical excitability was analyzed.

Results

After 4 weeks of treatment, the scores of FMA, FMBS and WGS increased, RMT decreased and MEP amplitude increased in the two groups (P<0.05), and the changes of RMT and MEP amplitudes in the treatment group were more obvious than those in the control group (P<0.05). The negative correlation between the improvement of FMBS and the change of RMT (P<0.05).

Conclusion

Low frequency rTMS acting on the cerebellum can effectively improve the balance function of patients with PCS, and its mechanism may be that it increases the cortical excitability of the brain.

表1 2组患者一般资料的比较
表2 2组患者治疗前后功能评估量表对比
表3 FMA、FMBS及WGS评分与RMT、MEP波幅的相关性分析
[1]
Gulli G, Marquardt L, Rothwell PM, et al. Stroke risk after posterior circulation stroke/transient ischemic attack and its relationship to site of vertebrobasilar stenosis: pooled data analysis from prospective studies[J]. Stroke, 2013, 44(3): 598-604.
[2]
刘雪云,胡小伟,蔡秀英,等.后循环缺血早期识别的研究进展[J].临床神经病学杂志, 2018, 31(2): 151-154.
[3]
Kim W, Jung S, Oh M, et al. Effect of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation over the cerebellum on patients with ataxia after posterior circulation stroke: a pilot study[J]. J Rehabil Med, 2014, 46(5): 418-423.
[4]
胡晓辉,杨伟毅,郭睿,等.低频重复经颅磁刺激治疗小脑梗死后平衡障碍的疗效分析[J].中西医结合心脑血管病杂志, 2017, 15(17): 2107-2109.
[5]
中国后循环缺血专家共识组.中国后循环缺血的专家共识[J].中华内科杂志, 2006, 45(9): 786-787.
[6]
Allison R, Shelling L, Dennett R, et al. The effectiveness of various models of primary care-based follow-up after stroke: a systematic review[J]. Prim Health Care Res Dev, 2011, 12(3): 214-222.
[7]
Smith MC, Byblow WD, Barber PA, et al. Proportional recovery from lower limb motor impairment after stroke[J]. Stroke, 2017, 48(5): 1400-1403.
[8]
Luft AR, Forrester L, Macko RF, et al. Brain activation of lower extremity movement in chronically impaired stroke survivors[J]. Neuroimage, 2005, 26(1): 184-194.
[9]
Koch G, Bonni S, Casula EP, et al. Effect of cerebellar stimulation on gait and balance recovery in patients with hemiparetic stroke: a randomized clinical trial[J]. JAMA Neurol, 2019, 76(2): 170-178.
[10]
Casula EP, Pellicciari MC, Ponzo V, et al. Cerebellar theta burst stimulation modulates the neural activity of interconnected parietal and motor areas[J]. Sci Rep, 2016, 6: 36191.
[11]
Machado AG, Cooperrider J, Furmaga HT, et al. Chronic 30-Hz deep cerebellar stimulation coupled with training enhances post-ischemia motor recovery and peri-infarct synaptophysin expression in rodents[J]. Neurosurgery, 2013, 73(2): 344-353; discussion 353.
[12]
Luft AR, Forrester L, Macko RF, et al. Brain activation of lower extremity movement in chronically impaired stroke survivors[J]. Neuroimage, 2005, 26(1): 184-194.
[13]
Spampinato DA, Block HJ, Celnik PA. Cerebellar-M1 connectivity changes associated with motor learning are somatotopic specific[J]. J Neurosci, 2017, 37(9): 2377-2386.
[14]
Bologna M, Di Biasio F, Conte A, et al. Effects of cerebellar continuous theta burst stimulation on resting tremor in parkinson’s disease[J]. Parkinsonism Relat Disord, 2015, 21(9): 1061-1066.
[15]
Brusa L, Ponzo V, Mastropasqua C, et al. Theta burst stimulation modulates cerebellar-cortical connectivity in patients with progressive supranuclear palsy[J]. Brain Stimul, 2014, 7(1): 29-35.
[16]
Di Pino G, Pellegrino G, Assenza G, et al. Modulation of brain plasticity in stroke: a novel model for neurorehabilitation[J]. Nat Rev Neurol, 2014, 10(10): 597-608.
[17]
Minks E, Marecek R, Pavlik T, et al. Is the cerebellum a potential target for stimulation in parkinson’s disease? Results of 1-Hz rTMS on upper limb motor tasks[J]. Cerebellum, 2011, 10(4): 804-811.
[18]
Groiss SJ, Ugawa Y. Cerebellar stimulation in ataxia[J]. Cerebellum, 2012, 11(2): 440-442.
[19]
殷稚飞,程清,秦义婷,等.小脑经颅磁刺激调控脑高级功能的研究进展[J].中华物理医学与康复杂志, 2018, 40(10): 791-794.
[20]
Porcacchia P, Álvarez de Toledo P, Rodríguez-Baena A, et al. Abnormal cerebellar connectivity and plasticity in isolated cervical dystonia[J]. PLoS One, 2019, 14(1): e211367.
[21]
Harrington A, Hammond-Tooke GD. Theta Burst stimulation of the cerebellum modifies the TMS-evoked N100 potential, a marker of GABA inhibition[J]. PLoS One, 2015, 10(11): e141284.
[1] 丁妍, 文华轩, 陈芷萱, 曾晴, 张梦雨, 廖伊梅, 罗丹丹, 秦越, 梁美玲, 邹于, 李胜利. 胎儿小脑皮质发育不良的产前超声诊断[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(03): 255-264.
[2] 丁妍, 文华轩, 张梦雨, 陈思齐, 温昕, 彭桂艳, 曾晴, 罗丹丹, 廖伊梅, 秦越, 梁美玲, 李胜利. 胎儿小脑表面叶裂的产前超声研究[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(01): 14-22.
[3] 易斐, 文华轩, 丁妍, 陈芷萱, 李胜利. 胎儿孤立性小脑出血的产前超声诊断[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2022, 19(11): 1173-1179.
[4] 李强, 臧迪, 任鸿翔. 耳蜗电图与脑干听觉诱发电位的联合监测在桥小脑角胆脂瘤切除术中的应用[J]. 中华神经创伤外科电子杂志, 2023, 09(04): 253-256.
[5] 盛成俊, 沈宇晟, 李彦东, 贺诗茹, 吴徐超, 赵小玉, 曾加, 麦麦提力·米吉提, 更·党木仁加甫, 朱国华. Koos3、4级前庭神经鞘瘤在桥小脑角区的生长方向对面神经功能的影响[J]. 中华神经创伤外科电子杂志, 2023, 09(04): 216-221.
[6] 黄志毅, 赵娟. 重复经颅磁刺激联合分级运动想象训练对脑梗死后偏瘫患者运动功能及神经功能的影响[J]. 中华神经创伤外科电子杂志, 2023, 09(02): 102-107.
[7] 党圆圆, 赵虎林. 机器人辅助小脑齿状核脑深部电刺激植入术[J]. 中华脑科疾病与康复杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(05): 320-320.
[8] 潘升超, 陈燕, 余程冬, 曹晓光. 重复经颅磁刺激技术在颅脑外伤康复中的研究进展[J]. 中华脑科疾病与康复杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(02): 118-123.
[9] 邓艳媚, 龙耀斌, 李鑫, 莫丽华. 经颅磁刺激结合前庭康复训练对ADHD患儿注意力缺陷的影响及临床机制[J]. 中华脑科疾病与康复杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(01): 34-38.
[10] 张建萍, 邓海鹏, 焦黛妍, 赵洁. 高频重复经颅磁刺激联合肌电生物反馈治疗脑卒中后吞咽障碍的临床研究[J]. 中华脑科疾病与康复杂志(电子版), 2022, 12(05): 285-290.
[11] 江伟, 袁良津, 唐向阳, 张斗凤, 王少敏. 高频重复经颅磁刺激规律间歇治疗丘脑梗死后中枢性疼痛的临床研究[J]. 中华脑科疾病与康复杂志(电子版), 2022, 12(05): 269-273.
[12] 潘惠, 王明, 杨忠, 杜向东. 低频重复经颅磁刺激辅助治疗伴不同特征抑郁症的对照研究[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 562-568.
[13] 黄爱茹, 付婧, 余茜. 多模块3D虚拟现实技术联合重复经颅磁刺激治疗卒中后认知功能障碍的效果[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2022, 16(11): 1089-1095.
[14] 祁研, 张岩, 陈雪, 刘颖, 史楠. 探讨高低频交互rTMS对老年脑卒中偏瘫患者肢体功能、吞咽功能及日常生活活动能力的影响[J]. 中华脑血管病杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(04): 359-363.
[15] 庄宗, 祝琦, 那世杰, 刘涛, 凌海平, 张玉华, 曹博强, 杭春华, 张庆荣. 破裂性小脑后下动脉远端动脉瘤的个体化治疗策略[J]. 中华脑血管病杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(03): 200-206.
阅读次数
全文


摘要