切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华脑科疾病与康复杂志(电子版) ›› 2022, Vol. 12 ›› Issue (04) : 210 -216. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-123X.2022.04.004

脑卒中后康复

对侧抑制性rTMS联合运动想象对脑卒中偏瘫患者肢体功能的康复效果
李婷婷1, 梁军军1, 王玉琴1, 刘双洁1, 吕铭新1,()   
  1. 1. 065700 河北廊坊,廊坊市第四人民医院神经内科
  • 收稿日期:2022-02-11 出版日期:2022-08-15
  • 通信作者: 吕铭新
  • 基金资助:
    廊坊市科学技术研究与发展计划(2019013099)

Short-term effects of contralateral inhibitory rTMS combined with motor imagery on limb rehabilitation in patients with hemiplegia after stroke

Tingting Li1, Junjun Liang1, Yuqin Wang1, Shuangjie Liu1, Mingxin Lyu1,()   

  1. 1. Department of Neurology, Fourth People’s Hospital of Langfang City, Langfang 065700, China
  • Received:2022-02-11 Published:2022-08-15
  • Corresponding author: Mingxin Lyu
引用本文:

李婷婷, 梁军军, 王玉琴, 刘双洁, 吕铭新. 对侧抑制性rTMS联合运动想象对脑卒中偏瘫患者肢体功能的康复效果[J/OL]. 中华脑科疾病与康复杂志(电子版), 2022, 12(04): 210-216.

Tingting Li, Junjun Liang, Yuqin Wang, Shuangjie Liu, Mingxin Lyu. Short-term effects of contralateral inhibitory rTMS combined with motor imagery on limb rehabilitation in patients with hemiplegia after stroke[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Brain Diseases and Rehabilitation(Electronic Edition), 2022, 12(04): 210-216.

目的

探讨对侧抑制性重复经颅磁刺激(rTMS)联合运动想象(MI)对脑卒中偏瘫患者肢体功能的康复效果。

方法

选取廊坊市第四人民医院神经内科自2017年1月至2019年10月收治的108例脑卒中偏瘫患者为研究对象,按照随机数字表法将其分为常规组、MI组和联合组,每组36例。常规组接受常规药物治疗及康复治疗,MI组在常规组治疗基础上进行MI训练,联合组在MI组基础上进行对侧抑制性rTMS治疗;3组疗程均为4周。比较3组患者的临床疗效、治疗前后患侧运动诱发电位潜伏期(MEP-CL)、中枢运动传导时间(CMCT)、平衡量表(BBS)评分、起立-行走计时测试(TUGT)时间、修订版跌倒效能量表(MFES)评分、简化Fugl-Meyer评测法(FMA)评分、手部精细动作评估量表(MAS)评分、改良Barthel量表(MBI)评分。

结果

常规组、MI组、联合组治疗4周后总有效率分别为50.0%、77.8%、94.1%,3组患者的临床疗效比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。3组患者的治疗前MEP-CL、CMCT、TUGT时间及BBS、MFES、FMA、手部精细动作MAS、MBI评分比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。治疗4周后,3组患者的MEP-CL、CMCT、TUGT时间缩短,BBS、MFES、FMA、手部精细动作MAS、MBI评分增高(P<0.05);改善程度:联合组>MI组>常规组,差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。

结论

对侧抑制性rTMS联合MI有利于脑卒中偏瘫患者的肢体功能康复,且能明显提高患者的生命质量。

Objective

To explore the short-term effects of contralateral inhibitory repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) combined with motor imagery (MI) on limb rehabilitation in patients with hemiplegia after stroke.

Methods

One hundred and eight patients with hemiplegia after stroke, admitted to Neurology Department of Fourth People’s Hospital of Langfang City from January 2017 to October 2019, were randomly divided into the conventional group, the MI group and the combined group, with 36 patients in each group. The conventional group received conventional drug therapy and rehabilitation therapy. The MI group received MI training on the basis of conventional treatment. The combined group underwent contralateral inhibitory rTMS therapy on the basis of the MI group. The course of treatment in all 3 groups was 4 weeks. The clinical efficacy, latent period of motor evoked potential (MEP-CL) on the affected side, central motor conduction time (CMCT) on the affected side, Berg balance scale (BBS), time up and go test (TUGT), modified falls efficacy scale (MFES), Fugl-Meyer assessment (FMA), motor assessment scale (MAS) of fine hand movement, modified barthel index (MBI) before and after treatment were compared among the 3 groups.

Results

After 4 weeks of treatment, the total effective rates of the conventional group, the MI group, and the combination group were 50.0%, 77.8%, and 94.1%, respectively. The clinical efficacy of the 3 groups was compared with statistically significant differences (P<0.05). There were no statistically significant differences in MEP-CL, CMCT, TUGT time, BBS scores, MFES score, FMA score, fine hand movement MAS score and MBI score before treatment among the 3 groups (P>0.05). After 4 weeks of treatment, MEP-CL, CMCT and TUGT time were shortened, BBS score, MFES score, FMA score, fine hand movement MAS score and MBI score were increased in the 3 groups (P<0.05), the improvement degree: the combined group>the MI group>the conventional group (P<0.05).

Conclusion

The contralateral inhibitory rTMS combined with motor imagination is beneficial to the limb rehabilitation of patients with hemiplegia after stroke, and can significantly improve the quality of life of patients.

表1 3组患者一般资料比较
表2 3组患者的临床疗效比较[例(%)]
表3 3组患者治疗前后MEP-CL和CMCT比较(ms,Mean±SD)
表4 3组患者治疗前后BBS评分、TUGT、MFES评分比较(Mean±SD)
表5 3组患者治疗前后FMA、MAS及MBI评分比较(分,Mean±SD)
[1]
Rastgoo M, Naghdi S, Nakhostin Ansari N, et al. Effects of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation on lower extremity spasticity and motor function in stroke patients[J]. Disabil Rehabil, 2016, 38(19): 1918-1926.
[2]
Lefaucheur JP, Aleman A, Baeken C, et al. Evidence-based guidelines on the therapeutic use of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS): an update (2014-2018)[J]. Clin Neurophysiol, 2020, 131(2): 474-528.
[3]
段强,孙良文,韦春霞,等.作用于小脑的低频rTMS对后循环缺血卒中患者的下肢运动功能及皮层兴奋性的影响[J].中华脑科疾病与康复杂志(电子版), 2020, 10(6): 352-356.
[4]
Chervyakov AV, Poydasheva AG, Lyukmanov RH, et al. Effects of navigated repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation after stroke[J]. J Clin Neurophysiol, 2018, 35(2): 166-172.
[5]
Herrador Colmenero L, Perez Marmol JM, Martí-García C, et al. Effectiveness of mirror therapy, motor imagery, and virtual feedback on phantom limb pain following amputation: a systematic review[J]. Prosthet Orthot Int, 2018, 42(3): 288-298.
[6]
余溯源,刘延锦,郭丽娜,等.远程运动想象疗法训练指导对老年缺血性脑卒中病人恐惧跌倒的影响[J].护理研究, 2020, 34(22): 4063-4067.
[7]
张亚菲,刘旸,张通.运动想象治疗脑卒中患者手部运动功能的功能磁共振研究[J].中国康复, 2020, 35(11): 576-581.
[8]
中华医学会神经病学分会,中华医学会神经病学分会脑血管病学组.中国急性缺血性脑卒中诊治指南2014[J].中华神经科杂志, 2015, 48(4): 246-257.
[9]
中华医学会神经病学分会,中华医学会神经病学分会脑血管病学组.中国脑出血诊治指南(2014)[J].中华神经科杂志, 2015, 48(6): 435-444.
[10]
刘华,周军,杨少峰,等.中文版运动觉-视觉想象问卷在脑卒中患者中的信度[J].中华物理医学与康复杂志, 2017, 39(4): 259-263.
[11]
Méndez-Rebolledo G, Gatica-Rojas V, Torres-Cueco R, et al. Update on the effects of graded motor imagery and mirror therapy on complex regional pain syndrome type 1: a systematic review[J]. J Back Musculoskelet Rehabil, 2017, 30(3): 441-449.
[12]
Wassermann EM. Risk and safety of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation: report and suggested guidelines from the international workshop on the safety of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation, June 5-7, 1996[J]. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol, 1998, 108(1): 1-16.
[13]
韩林,王舒.运动诱发电位在脑血管疾病中的应用研究进展[J].中西医结合心脑血管病杂志, 2016, 14(8): 863-865, 906.
[14]
Kho AY, Liu KP, Chung RC. Meta-analysis on the effect of mental imagery on motorrecovery of the hemiplegic upper extremity function[J]. Aust Occup Ther J, 2014, 61(2): 38-48.
[15]
Askim T, Bernhardt J, Løge AD, et al. Stroke patients do not need to be inactive in the first two-weeks after stroke: results from a stroke unit focused on early rehabilitation[J]. Int J Stroke, 2012, 7(1): 25-31.
[16]
范晨雨,谢鸿宇,吴毅.早期康复训练促进脑卒中神经重塑机制的研究进展[J].中国康复医学杂志, 2020, 35(11): 1377-1380.
[17]
Machado TC, Carregosa AA, Santos MS, et al. Efficacy of motor imagery additional to motor-based therapy in the recovery of motor function of the upper limb in post-stroke individuals: a systematic review[J]. Top Stroke Rehabil, 2019, 26(7): 548-553.
[18]
Hétu S, Grégoire M, Saimpont A, et al. The neural network of motor imagery: an ALE meta-analysis[J]. Neurosci Biobehav Rev, 2013, 37(5): 930-949.
[19]
侯玮佳,朱志中,于洋,等.运动想象疗法联合平衡功能评定与训练对初发脑卒中患者平衡功能及日常生活活动能力的影响[J].中华物理医学与康复杂志, 2018, 40(7): 495-499.
[20]
刘丽,黄菲,尹姣,等.运动想象疗法对脑卒中平衡及日常生活能力的影响[J].中国老年学杂志, 2014, 34(18): 5079-5081.
[21]
车兴旺,程晋成,蒋东生,等.运动想象训练联合经颅直流电刺激对脑卒中偏瘫患者上肢功能的影响[J].海军医学杂志, 2017, 38(4): 303-306.
[22]
刘文权,徐武华,吴婉霞,等.运动想象和肌电生物反馈治疗对卒中患者上肢运动功能的影响[J].中国脑血管病杂志, 2016, 13(4): 174-177.
[23]
Tscherpel C, Grefkes C. Brain stimulation for treating strokerelated motor deficits[J]. Nervenarzt, 2019, 90(10): 1005-1012.
[24]
McIntyre A, Mirkowski M, Thompson S, et al. A systematic review and meta-analysis on the use of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation for spasticity poststroke[J]. PM R, 2018 10(3): 293-302.
[25]
Bella R, Paulus W, Pennisi M. Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation in stroke rehabilitation: review of the current evidence and pitfalls[J]. Ther Adv Neurol Disord, 2019, 12: 1756286419878317.
[26]
Oliveri M, Torriero S, Koch G, et al. The role of transcranial magnetic stimulation in the study of cerebellar cognitive function[J]. Cerebellum, 2007, 6(1): 95-101.
[27]
Guan YZ, Li J, Zhang XW, et al. Effectiveness of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) after acute stroke: a one-year longitudinal randomized trial[J]. CNS Neurosci Ther, 2017, 23(12): 940-946.
[28]
王日旺,彭嘉慧,张志远,等.重复经颅磁刺激改善脑卒中所致肢体功能障碍的临床研究现状[J].大连医科大学学报, 2021, 43(2): 149-154.
[29]
Rastgoo M, Naghdi S, Nakhostin Ansari N, et al. Effects of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation on lower extremity spasticity and motor function in stroke patients[J]. Disabil Rehabil, 2016, 38(19): 1918-1926.
[30]
Chieffo R, De Prezzo S, Houdayer E, et al. Deep repetitivetranscranial magnetic stimulation with H-coil on lower limbmotor function in chronic stroke: a pilot study[J]. Arch Phys Med Rehabil, 2014, 95(6): 1141-1147.
[31]
王虹,袁华,牟翔,等. A型肉毒毒素联合重复经颅磁刺激对脑卒中后下肢痉挛状态的疗效观察[J].中国康复医学杂志, 2016, 31(9): 936-940.
[32]
Dettmers C, Benz M, Liepert J, et al. Motor imagery in stroke patients, or plegic patients with spinal cord or peripheral disease[J]. Acta Neurol Scand, 2012, 126(4): 238-247.
[33]
Oikawa T, Hirano D, Taniguchi T, et al. The effects of tool holding on body schema during motor imagery: a near-infrared spectroscopy study[J]. J Phys Ther Sci, 2017, 29(4): 702-706.
[34]
Kuroda Y, Motohashi N, Ito H, et al. Chronic repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation failed to change dopamine synthesis rate: preliminary L-[β-11C]DOPA positron emission tomography study in patients with depression[J]. Psychiatry Clin Neurosci, 2010, 64(6): 659-662.
[35]
黄华垚,杜厚伟,陈超,等.低频rTMS联合FES治疗对亚急性期缺血性脑卒中患者下肢痉挛及运动功能的康复作用[J].心血管康复医学杂志, 2019, 28(2): 134-138.
[1] 张怡, 王宇洋, 司梦娇, 曹燕, 李欢欢. 脑卒中前白蛋白与肺炎发生风险相关性分析[J/OL]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2024, 17(04): 648-651.
[2] 杨金朔, 吴桥伟, 王春雷, 史怀璋. 脑血管内支架成形术后再狭窄的研究进展[J/OL]. 中华神经创伤外科电子杂志, 2024, 10(03): 174-179.
[3] 江西省神经外科质量控制中心. 江西省心源性脑卒中多学科协作防治专家共识[J/OL]. 中华脑科疾病与康复杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(05): 264-277.
[4] 张洪, 杨琪, 罗静, 唐茜, 邓鸿, 巩文艳, 王丽坤, 刘静, 艾双春. 多靶点神经调控技术对卒中后上肢运动功能障碍患者的脑网络功能连接研究[J/OL]. 中华脑科疾病与康复杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(05): 278-284.
[5] 许方军, 曹晓光, 王修敏, 王婷, 陈冬冬, 余程冬, 张鹤言. 基于闭环理论的动作观察疗法联合躯干控制训练对脑卒中后下肢运动的影响[J/OL]. 中华脑科疾病与康复杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(05): 292-299.
[6] 张雅文, 尹昱, 陈江龙, 杨玉慧, 吕红香, 张琦, 吕佩源. Theta爆发式经颅磁刺激治疗失语症的研究进展[J/OL]. 中华脑科疾病与康复杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(05): 306-311.
[7] 陈冬冬, 余程冬, 曹晓光. 上肢外骨骼机器人在脑卒中康复中的应用与研究进展[J/OL]. 中华脑科疾病与康复杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(05): 312-317.
[8] 吉莉, 苏云楠, 王斌, 沈滔, 刘团结, 毛蕾, 徐玉萍, 张婷, 王博. 急性缺血性脑卒中患者脑白质微结构改变对长期认知功能损伤的预测价值研究[J/OL]. 中华脑科疾病与康复杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(04): 193-200.
[9] 梁明, 魏珍, 祖合热·肉孜, 李金贤. 超声评估脑卒中气管切开患者膈肌功能与肺功能的相关性研究[J/OL]. 中华脑科疾病与康复杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(03): 133-139.
[10] 李璇, 邓岚, 郭微, 邓永梅, 刘杰昕. 标准化皮肤管理流程在防治脑卒中患者失禁相关性皮炎中的应用[J/OL]. 中华脑血管病杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 479-482.
[11] 刘志超, 胡风云, 温春丽. 山西省脑卒中危险因素与地域的相关性分析[J/OL]. 中华脑血管病杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 424-433.
[12] 王丽娜, 吕书霞, 李亚男. 脑卒中偏瘫患者健康焦虑元认知与疾病接受度、恐惧疾病进展的相关性[J/OL]. 中华脑血管病杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 434-440.
[13] 李芳, 戴西望, 王凯, 郭廷昊, 涂江龙. 非瓣膜性心房颤动相关性卒中的治疗研究进展[J/OL]. 中华脑血管病杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(04): 393-397.
[14] 周洪千, 张煜坤, 顾天舒, 胡苏涛, 姜超, 张雪, 张昊, 陶华岳, 刘行, 刘彤, 陈康寅. 既往出血性脑卒中患者行经皮冠脉介入治疗后不良事件的危险因素分析[J/OL]. 中华脑血管病杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(04): 323-329.
[15] 邓越, 白鹏, 洪秋阳, 王桂玲. 颈部七线调衡疗法探析并病例汇报一例[J/OL]. 中华脑血管病杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(04): 345-349.
阅读次数
全文


摘要